

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Logical Framework analysis (LFA)
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


1. Logical Framework Analysis
Logical Framework Analysis is a management tool for effective planning and implementation of developmental projects. We have to distinguish between Logical Framework Approach (LFA) and Logical Framework Matrix (often called the Logframe). LFA is a process involving stakeholder analysis, problem analysis and strategy selection, tools that can be used for planning, designing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating projects. The Logframe, which documents the product of the LFA process, provides clear, concise and systematic information about a project through a framework; there are various components of a project such as goal, objectives, activities, results and indicators, and the LFA helps in connecting all these components in one framework, presenting the tight relationship between them, leading to the achievement of the expected outcomes.
1.1 Stakeholders Analysis
Stakeholder analysis is the process of identifying the individuals or groups that are likely to affect or be affected by the project, and sorting them according to their impact on the action and the impact the action will have on them.
A stakeholder is any entity with a declared or conceivable interest or stake in the project; Stakeholders can be of any form, size and capacity, they can be individuals, organizations, or unorganized groups.
We identified 5 main stakeholders for our project:
University Students Tutors University Professors Universities Site administrators
University students and tutors are the main target of our project. In fact university students are the users of our platform, looking for information about courses and teachers, downloading material and seeking for help on studying, while Tutors provide to students the assistance that they need in exchange of a little income. University professors and universities are interested in the platform because it can help students to pass exams and obtain higher grades, so indirectly the prestige of University goes up. Site administrators are students or experts who develop the platform.
1.1.1 Description Matrix
The aim of the description matrix is to show in a detailed but schematic way, what are the role and the interests of the stakeholders, what problems they are affected by and their motivation and capacity about the change. The description matrix also shows what the stakeholders want in order to satisfy their interests.
1.1.2 S.W.O.T analysis
S.W.O.T. analysis is the second step of the stakeholders’ analysis. It is a powerful means that allows us to highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each stakeholder respect to the problem we are focusing on. We decided to provide a S.W.O.T. analysis of the two main stakeholders of our project, students and tutors
1.1.3 Spider Diagram
The aim of the spider diagrams is to show in an intuitive and complete way how much each requirement is fluffed by the two main stakeholders, tutors and students. In order to create this kind of diagrams we discussed about the problem with the final purpose of finding a list of satisfying requirements. These are the requirements we found:
Available Material: the quantity and quality of studying material owned by tutors and students that might be uploaded on the platform Knowledge of courses requirements: the quantity and quality of information about courses and teachers held by tutors and students that could be shared on the platform Knowledge of university environment: the quantity and quality of information about the university in general (teachers, erasmus, study rooms, student facilities, etc) held by tutors and students that could be shared on the platform Knowledge of the subject: the specific knowledge held by tutors and students about a certain subject of interest Internet skills: ability of students and tutors to use Internet Financial availability: amount of economic resources held by students and tutors Financial needs: demand of economic resources by students and tutors Multi language skills: capacity of students and teachers to speak more than one language