LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS, Exams of Law

LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS

Typology: Exams

2025/2026

Available from 04/14/2026

Papii4
Papii4 🇺🇸

3.4K documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE
TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS
Premise - ANSWER A fact, proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made
Conclusion - ANSWER A statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons.
Conditional Reasoning - ANSWER A conditional statement is, in its most easily
recognized form, an "if...then..." statement. The following is, for example, a conditional
statement. Conditional statements are also described in terms of sufficient and
necessary conditions.
Sufficient - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a
necessary condition must also occur.
Necessary - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order
for a sufficient condition to occur.
Explain Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER If a sufficient condition occurs, you
automatically know that the necessary condition also occurs. If a necessary condition
occurs, then it is possible that the sufficient condition will occur, but not certain.
Example of Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER Banging my shin on the table is all that is
needed for me to scream in pain (i.e. it is sufficient), so banging my shin is considered
the sufficient condition. I cannot bang my shin on the table without screaming in pain
(screaming necessarily follows the banging of my shin), so screaming in pain is the
necessary condition. You should be fine if you can simply remember that the
antecedent (the phrase following the "if") is the sufficient condition for the consequent
(the phrase following the "then") and the consequent is the necessary condition for the
antecedent.
Contra-positive - ANSWER a conditional statement derived from another by negating
and interchanging antecedent and consequent
Premise Indicators - ANSWER Because
Since
For
For example
For that reason that In that
Given that
As indicated by
Due to
Owing to
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE

TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS

Premise - ANSWER A fact, proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made Conclusion - ANSWER A statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons. Conditional Reasoning - ANSWER A conditional statement is, in its most easily recognized form, an "if...then..." statement. The following is, for example, a conditional statement. Conditional statements are also described in terms of sufficient and necessary conditions. Sufficient - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur. Necessary - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur. Explain Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER If a sufficient condition occurs, you automatically know that the necessary condition also occurs. If a necessary condition occurs, then it is possible that the sufficient condition will occur, but not certain. Example of Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER Banging my shin on the table is all that is needed for me to scream in pain (i.e. it is sufficient), so banging my shin is considered the sufficient condition. I cannot bang my shin on the table without screaming in pain (screaming necessarily follows the banging of my shin), so screaming in pain is the necessary condition. You should be fine if you can simply remember that the antecedent (the phrase following the "if") is the sufficient condition for the consequent (the phrase following the "then") and the consequent is the necessary condition for the antecedent. Contra-positive - ANSWER a conditional statement derived from another by negating and interchanging antecedent and consequent Premise Indicators - ANSWER Because Since For For example For that reason that In that Given that As indicated by Due to Owing to

This can be seen from We know this by Conclusion Indicators - ANSWER Thus Therefore Hence Consequently As a result So Accordingly Clearly Must be that Shows that Conclude that Follows that For this reason Thirteen Logical Reasoning Types - ANSWER 1. Must Be True / Most Supported

  1. Main Point
  2. Point at issue
  3. Assumption
  4. Justify the conclusion
  5. Strengthen / support
  6. Resolve the paradox
  7. Weaken
  8. Method of reasoning
  9. Flaw in the reasoning
  10. Parallel reasoning
  11. Evaluate the argument
  12. Cannot be true Four Family Types - ANSWER 1. Prove
  13. Help
  14. Hurt
  15. Disprove Reasoning Types - Family - Prove - ANSWER a. Must Be True / Most Supported b. Main Point c. Point at issue d. Method of reasoning e. Flaw in the reasoning f. Parallel reasoning Reasoning Types - Family - Help - ANSWER a. Assumption b. Justify the conclusion c. Strengthen / support

Method of reasoning - ANSWER Method of reasoning questions asks you to describe, in abstract terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument. Question stem example: "which of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?" Flaw in the reasoning - ANSWER Flaw in the reasoning questions ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author. Question stem example: "the reasoning in the astronomer's argument is flawed because this argument" Parallel reasoning - ANSWER Parallel Reasoning questions ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus. Question stem example: "which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?" Evaluate the argument - ANSWER With evaluate the argument questions; you must decide which answer choice will allow you to determine the logical validity of the argument. Question stem example: "the answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an evaluation of the argument?" Cannot be true - ANSWER Cannot be true questions ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus. Question stem example: "if the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?" Primary Objectives - ANSWER 1. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements.

  1. If the stimulus contains an argument, identify the conclusion of the argument. If the stimulus contains a fact set, examine each fact.
  2. If the stimulus contains an argument, determine if the argument is strong or weak.
  3. Read closely and know precisely what the author said. Do not generalize!
  4. Carefully read and identify the question stem. Do not assume that certain words are automatically associated with certain question types.
  5. Pre-phrase; after reading the question stem, take a moment to mentally formulate your answer to the question stem.
  6. Always read each of the five answer choices.
  7. Separate the answer choices into Contenders and Losers. After you complete this process, review the Contenders and decide which answer is the correct one.
  8. If all five answer choices appear to be Losers, return to the stimulus and re-evaluate the argument. Sufficient Condition Indicators - ANSWER If When Whenever Every All Any People who

In order to Necessary Conditions Indicators - ANSWER Then Only Only if Must Required Unless Except Until Without Must Be True Questions Incorrect Answers In Must Be True Questions - ANSWER 1. Could be true or likely to be true answers

  1. Exaggerated answers
  2. "new" information answers
  3. The shell game
  4. The opposite answer
  5. The reverse answer Main Point Questions - ANSWER Main Point Questions Cause and Effect Reasoning Causal Indicators - ANSWER Caused by Because of Responsible for Reason for Leads to Induced by Promoted by Determined by Produced by Product of Played a role in Was a factor in Is an effect of How To Attach a Causal Conclusion - Weaken - ANSWER 1. Find an alternate cause for the slated effect
  6. Show that even when the cause occurs, the effect does not occur
  7. Show that although the effect occurs, the cause did not occur
  8. Show that the stated relationship is reversed
  9. Show that a statistical problem exist with the data used to make the causal statement To Strengthen a causal argument, do the opposite of the five task above.

Help - In - ANSWER a. Assumption b. Justify the conclusion c. Strengthen / support d. Resolve the paradox Hurt - In - ANSWER a. Weaken Disprove - ANSWER a. Cannot be true Method of Reasoning - ANSWER Argument Part (AP) questions are a subset of Method of Reasoning questions. In Method-AP questions, the question stem cites a specific portion of the stimulus and then asks you to identify the role the cited portion plays in the structure of the argument. Method of Reasoning questions are simply abstract Must Be True questions: instead of identifying the facts and details of the argument, you must identify the underlying logical organization of the argument. As with any Must Be True question, answer choices can be proven or disproven by directly referring to the content of the stimulus. For example, if an answer choice claims there is a contradiction in the stimulus; search the stimulus to see if a contradiction is present. If not, the answer choice is incorrect. Flaw in the Reasoning - ANSWER Flaw in the Reasoning questions are exactly the same as Method of Reasoning questions with the important exception that the question stem indicates that the reasoning in the stimulus is flawed because the question stem reveals that a flaw is present, you need not make a determination of The stimulus; the question stem makes the determination for you. This information provides you with a tremendous advantage because you can identify the error of reasoning in the stimulus before proceeding to the answer choices. And, if you did not realize there was an error of reasoning in the stimulus, the question stem gives you the opportunity to re-evaluate the argument and find the error of reasoning. To identify the right answer choice, carefully consider the reasoning used in the stimulus. The correct answer will identify the error in the author's reasoning and then describe that error in general. Beware of answers that describe a portion of the stimulus but fail to identify the error in the reasoning. Common Flaws in Reasoning - ANSWER 1. Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept

  1. Source Argument
  2. Circular Reasoning
  3. Mistaken Cause and Effect
  4. Error of Conditional Reasoning
  5. General Lack of Support for the Conclusion
  6. Internal Contradiction
  7. Exceptional Case/Overgeneralization
  8. Errors in the Use of Evidence
  9. Errors of Composition and Division
  10. Survey Errors
  1. Appeal Fallacies Parallel Reasoning Questions - ANSWER Parallel Reasoning questions ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus. Since this requires you to first identify the method of reasoning used by the author, and then identify the method of reasoning present in each answer choice, these questions can be quite time consuming. In Parallel Reasoning questions, the topical matter in the stimulus and the answer choices is irrelevant and same-subject answer choices are generally used to attract the student who fails to focus on the reasoning in the stimulus. The order of presentation of the premises and conclusion in the stimulus is also irrelevant. As long as an answer choice contains the same general parts as the stimulus, they need not be in the same order. The order of presentation does not affect the logical relationship that underlies the pieces. In summary the following element s do not need to be paralleled in a Parallel Reasoning question: o The topic of the stimulus o The order of presentation of the premises and conclusion in the stimulus Parallel Reasoning Elemental Attack - ANSWER 1. Parallel the Reasoning
  2. Parallel the Conclusion
  3. Parallel the premises
  4. Parallel the Validity of the Argument
  5. Parallel the Abstract Structure of the Argument Parallel Flaw Questions - ANSWER Since the February 1992 LSAT, whenever a Parallel Reasoning question contains flawed reasoning, it is stated in the question stem. If there is no mention of flawed reasoning in the question stem, the reasoning in the stimulus is valid (and vice versa). when a Parallel Reasoning stimulus contains flawed reasoning, we identify it as a parallel Flaw question. Like Flaw in the Reasoning questions, Parallel Flaw questions use many of the common forms of erroneous reasoning. The one important thing to remember is that rules for paralleling arguments discussed earlier apply. Equally to Parallel Flaw questions. o Here are two Parallel Flaw question stem examples. They are virtually identical to the previous Parallel Reasoning question stems with the exception that they contain a term indicating that the reasoning in the stimulus is invalid: "The flawed reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to the flawed reasoning in the argument above?" "The questionable pattern of reasoning in the argument is most similar to that in which one of the following?" Resolve the Paradox - ANSWER Resolve the Paradox questions are generally easy to spot because of their distinctive stimuli. Each stimulus presents a paradox or contradiction and the question stem asks you to resolve or explain the paradox. Because most people are very good at recognizing these paradox scenarios, they usually know after reading the stimulus that a Resolve the Paradox question is coming up.