




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
LSAT - LOGICAL REASONING STUDY GUIDE TEST WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS
Typology: Exams
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!





Premise - ANSWER A fact, proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made Conclusion - ANSWER A statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons. Conditional Reasoning - ANSWER A conditional statement is, in its most easily recognized form, an "if...then..." statement. The following is, for example, a conditional statement. Conditional statements are also described in terms of sufficient and necessary conditions. Sufficient - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur. Necessary - ANSWER An event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a sufficient condition to occur. Explain Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER If a sufficient condition occurs, you automatically know that the necessary condition also occurs. If a necessary condition occurs, then it is possible that the sufficient condition will occur, but not certain. Example of Sufficient Necessary - ANSWER Banging my shin on the table is all that is needed for me to scream in pain (i.e. it is sufficient), so banging my shin is considered the sufficient condition. I cannot bang my shin on the table without screaming in pain (screaming necessarily follows the banging of my shin), so screaming in pain is the necessary condition. You should be fine if you can simply remember that the antecedent (the phrase following the "if") is the sufficient condition for the consequent (the phrase following the "then") and the consequent is the necessary condition for the antecedent. Contra-positive - ANSWER a conditional statement derived from another by negating and interchanging antecedent and consequent Premise Indicators - ANSWER Because Since For For example For that reason that In that Given that As indicated by Due to Owing to
This can be seen from We know this by Conclusion Indicators - ANSWER Thus Therefore Hence Consequently As a result So Accordingly Clearly Must be that Shows that Conclude that Follows that For this reason Thirteen Logical Reasoning Types - ANSWER 1. Must Be True / Most Supported
Method of reasoning - ANSWER Method of reasoning questions asks you to describe, in abstract terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument. Question stem example: "which of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?" Flaw in the reasoning - ANSWER Flaw in the reasoning questions ask you to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author. Question stem example: "the reasoning in the astronomer's argument is flawed because this argument" Parallel reasoning - ANSWER Parallel Reasoning questions ask you to identify the answer choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus. Question stem example: "which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?" Evaluate the argument - ANSWER With evaluate the argument questions; you must decide which answer choice will allow you to determine the logical validity of the argument. Question stem example: "the answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an evaluation of the argument?" Cannot be true - ANSWER Cannot be true questions ask you to identify the answer choice that cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in the stimulus. Question stem example: "if the statements above are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?" Primary Objectives - ANSWER 1. Determine whether the stimulus contains an argument or if it is only a set of factual statements.
In order to Necessary Conditions Indicators - ANSWER Then Only Only if Must Required Unless Except Until Without Must Be True Questions Incorrect Answers In Must Be True Questions - ANSWER 1. Could be true or likely to be true answers
Help - In - ANSWER a. Assumption b. Justify the conclusion c. Strengthen / support d. Resolve the paradox Hurt - In - ANSWER a. Weaken Disprove - ANSWER a. Cannot be true Method of Reasoning - ANSWER Argument Part (AP) questions are a subset of Method of Reasoning questions. In Method-AP questions, the question stem cites a specific portion of the stimulus and then asks you to identify the role the cited portion plays in the structure of the argument. Method of Reasoning questions are simply abstract Must Be True questions: instead of identifying the facts and details of the argument, you must identify the underlying logical organization of the argument. As with any Must Be True question, answer choices can be proven or disproven by directly referring to the content of the stimulus. For example, if an answer choice claims there is a contradiction in the stimulus; search the stimulus to see if a contradiction is present. If not, the answer choice is incorrect. Flaw in the Reasoning - ANSWER Flaw in the Reasoning questions are exactly the same as Method of Reasoning questions with the important exception that the question stem indicates that the reasoning in the stimulus is flawed because the question stem reveals that a flaw is present, you need not make a determination of The stimulus; the question stem makes the determination for you. This information provides you with a tremendous advantage because you can identify the error of reasoning in the stimulus before proceeding to the answer choices. And, if you did not realize there was an error of reasoning in the stimulus, the question stem gives you the opportunity to re-evaluate the argument and find the error of reasoning. To identify the right answer choice, carefully consider the reasoning used in the stimulus. The correct answer will identify the error in the author's reasoning and then describe that error in general. Beware of answers that describe a portion of the stimulus but fail to identify the error in the reasoning. Common Flaws in Reasoning - ANSWER 1. Uncertain Use of a Term or Concept