Many Body Physics 6, Lecture Notes - Physics, Study notes of Quantum Physics

Many Body Physics 6, Lecture Notes - Physics - Prof. J E Moore.pdf, Quantum State of Matter, Many body Physics, Lecture Notes, Physics, Prof. J E Moore, University of California, USA

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 11/07/2011

strawberry3
strawberry3 🇺🇸

4.6

(39)

387 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 216: Special topics in many-body physics, Spring 2003:
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/˜ jemoore/phys216.html
Lecture VI
We continue using the assumption that while the interparticle interactions in a Fermi liquid
may be strong, we consider only small perturbations of the quasiparticle occupancies from the
equilibrium distribution. This is somewhat justified because the “most probable” configuration, as
shown last time, still is given by the Fermi-Dirac distribution of quasiparticles, even though the
quasiparticles are no longer free. The assumption that we could keep only the leading term in the
quasiparticle interaction gives
δαβ (p) = Zfαγ,βδ (p,p0)δn(p0)γ δ dp0.(1)
Recall that δαβ (p) was defined as the change in the effective energy of quasiparticles of momentum
pinduced by a given nonequilibrium distribution of the other quasiparticles:
δE
V=Zαβ(p)δnβα . (2)
The total value of ˆis now
ˆ(p)F=vF(ppF) + tr 0Zˆ
f(p,p0)δˆn(p0).(3)
In practice we will only be interested in small deviations near the Fermi surface, so the interaction
ˆ
fwill only need to be evaluated when both momenta lie on the Fermi surface. We will assume
spherical symmetry of the Fermi surface, so ˆ
fdepends only on the angle θbetween pand p0.
The final simplifying assumption we will make is that the spin part of the interaction is rota-
tionally symmetric in spin space, so that the Pauli matrices can only appear as a scalar product.
Then we can finally write pFm
π2¯
h3ˆ
f(p,p0) = F(θ) + σ·σ0G(θ).(4)
Here Fand Gare two dimensionless scalar functions of the angle θbetween pand p0. The units
work since ˆ
fmultipled by a density gives an energy; the term on the left side is the density of
quasi-particle states per energy on the Fermi surface
ν(F) = 2·4πpF2
(2π¯
h)3
dp
d |pF=pF2
π2¯
h3vF
=pFm
π2¯
h3.(5)
Now we will show how the effective mass mcan be written in terms of F, using Galilean
invariance: this is the first of many examples of how experimental quantities can be related to
Fand G. (We also need to make use of our assumption that the total number of quasiparticles
is equal to the total number of original particles, so that the Fermi surface is unchanged.) The
number flux of quasiparticles is
tr Zˆn∂
pdτ. (6)
1
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Many Body Physics 6, Lecture Notes - Physics and more Study notes Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Physics 216: Special topics in many-body physics, Spring 2003:

http://socrates.berkeley.edu/˜ jemoore/phys216.html

Lecture VI

We continue using the assumption that while the interparticle interactions in a Fermi liquid may be strong, we consider only small perturbations of the quasiparticle occupancies from the equilibrium distribution. This is somewhat justified because the “most probable” configuration, as shown last time, still is given by the Fermi-Dirac distribution of quasiparticles, even though the quasiparticles are no longer free. The assumption that we could keep only the leading term in the quasiparticle interaction gives

δαβ (p) =

∫ fαγ,βδ(p, p′)δn(p′)γδ dp′. (1)

Recall that δαβ (p) was defined as the change in the effective energy of quasiparticles of momentum p induced by a given nonequilibrium distribution of the other quasiparticles:

δE V

∫ αβ (p)δnβαdτ. (2)

The total value of ˆ is now

ˆ(p) − F = vF (p − pF ) + tr ′

∫ f^ ˆ (p, p′)δˆn(p′). (3)

In practice we will only be interested in small deviations near the Fermi surface, so the interaction fˆ will only need to be evaluated when both momenta lie on the Fermi surface. We will assume spherical symmetry of the Fermi surface, so fˆ depends only on the angle θ between p and p′.

The final simplifying assumption we will make is that the spin part of the interaction is rota- tionally symmetric in spin space, so that the Pauli matrices can only appear as a scalar product. Then we can finally write pF m∗ π^2 ¯h^3

fˆ (p, p′) = F (θ) + σ · σ′G(θ). (4)

Here F and G are two dimensionless scalar functions of the angle θ between p and p′. The units work since fˆ multipled by a density gives an energy; the term on the left side is the density of quasi-particle states per energy on the Fermi surface

ν(F ) = 2 · 4 πpF 2 (2π¯h)^3

dp d

|pF = pF 2 π^2 h¯^3 vF

pF m∗ π^2 ¯h^3

Now we will show how the effective mass m∗^ can be written in terms of F , using Galilean invariance: this is the first of many examples of how experimental quantities can be related to F and G. (We also need to make use of our assumption that the total number of quasiparticles is equal to the total number of original particles, so that the Fermi surface is unchanged.) The number flux of quasiparticles is

tr

∫ ˆn

∂p dτ. (6)

Since the number of particles moving is the same as the number of quasiparticles, the physical mass flux should be the above, multiplied by the bare mass m:

tr

∫ pn dτˆ = tr

∫ m

∂p n dτ.ˆ (7)

Now we assume that all the tensors are diagonal and vary both sides of the above equation. There are two terms on the right, and we integrate the second by parts and switch variables:

∫ pδn dτ = m

∫ ∂ ∂p

δn dτ + m

∫ ∂f (p, p′) ∂p

n δn′^ dτ dτ ′

= m

∂p

δn dτ − m

∫ f (p, p′) ∂n′ ∂p′^

δn dτ dτ ′. (8)

This implies, since δn is so far arbitrary, that

p m

∂p

∫ f (p, p′) ∂n′ ∂p′^

dτ ′. (9)

At zero temperature, the derivative of n′^ is proportional to a delta-function:

∂n′ p′^

p′ p′^

δ(p′^ − pF ). (10)

Now we substitute in the earlier equation

ˆ(p) − F = vF (p − pF ) + tr ′

∫ f^ ˆ (p, p′)δˆn(p′). (11)

and get, again assuming that the momentum is at the Fermi surface and using cos θ = ˆp · ˆp′,

pF ˆp m

= vF ˆp − pF 2 (2π¯h)^3

∫ f (θ) cos(θ)dΩ. (12)

Here the integral is over the Fermi surface and Ω is the element of solid angle. Dividing through by ˆppF and using the definition of m∗, we obtain

1 m

m∗^

pF (2π¯h)^3

∫ f (θ) cos(θ)dΩ (13)

which becomes finally m∗ m = 1 + 〈F (θ) cos(θ)〉. (14)

This suggests that it is useful to parametrize F and G in terms of Legendre polynomials:

F (θ) =

l

(2l + 1)FlPl(cos θ), G(θ) =

l

(2l + 1)GlPl(cos θ). (15)

There is a stability requirement that follows from the assumption that stationary perturbations of the Fermi surface not lower the energy. This can be simply expressed as

Fl + 1 > 0 , Gl + 1 > 0 , (16)