Memory
Multi Store Model
Sensory Register
Short Tern Memory
Long Term Memory
Duration: 0.5 - 4 seconds
Capacity: Unlimited
Coding: Modality Specific (Echoic, Gustatory, Haptic, Iconic))
Forgetting: Trace Decay
Capacity: 5 - 9 characters
Coding: Acoustic
Duration: 20 seconds
Forgetting: Displacement
Capacity: Unlimited
Coding: Semantic
Duration: Unlimited
Forgetting: Retrieval Failure
Evaluation
Supporting Evidence from Case Studies
Low in Ecological Validity
Supporting Experimental Research
Contradictory Evidence
Case Studies Unscientific
Research
Baddely
Petersen + Petersen
Glanzer + Kunitz
Bahrick
Sperling
Long Term Memory
Episodic
Semantic
Procedural
Declaritive
Personal Life
Hippocampus, Temporal Lobe
Declaritive
General Knowledge
Temporal Lobe
Non Declaritive
Skills
Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, Limbic System
Evaluation
Supporting Case Study
Case Studies Unscientific
Evidence from Brain Scans
Working Memory Model
Central Executive
Limited Capacity
Modality Free
Phonological Loop
Acoustic Coding
Limited Capacity
Visuospatial Sketchpad
Limited Capacity - 3-4 objects
Visual Coding
Episodic Buffer
Limited Capacity - 3-4 chunks
Modality Free
Research
Baddely - Dual Processing
Baddely - Duration of PL
Bunge - Dual Processing
Evaluation
Methodologically flawed
Supporting Case Studies
Supporting Experimental Evidence
Case Studies Unscientific
Practical Applications - ADHD Students
Interference Theory
Retrieval Failure
Retroactive
Proactive
Old memories interfere with new memories
New memories interfere with old memories
Research McGeoch and McDonald
Baddely and Hitch
Kepppel and Underwood
Evaluation
Supported by Evidence
Scientific
Lacks Mundane Realism
Suggestions Incomplete
Meaningful Cues
Context Dependant
State Dependant
Research
Baddely
Goodwin
Tulving and Pearstone
Evaluation
Evidence from Lab Experiments
Real Life Evidence - Jorvik Centre
Supported by Evidence
Lacks Mundane Realism
Impossible to Test Scientifically
Eyewitness Testimony
Misleading Information
Leading Questions
Post-Event Discussion Loftus + Palmer
Gabbert et All
Evaluation Practical Applications - Cognitive Interview
Low Ecological Validity
High Reliability
Contradictory Findings - Yuille and Cutshall
Anxiety
Christianson and Hubinette
Yuille and Cutshall
Evaluation
Lacks Internal Validity
Contradictory Findings from Meta-Analyses
High Ecological Validity and Mundane Realism
Individual Differences
Cognitive Interview
Developed by Geiselman + Fisher
Change Perspective
Report Everything
Change order
Context Reinstatement
Evaluation
Practical Problems
Not all techniques used
Supporting Evidence
Geiselman + Fisher
Fisher et al
