Module 3 article reflection, Assignments of Biology

Module 3 article reflection questions

Typology: Assignments

2022/2023

Uploaded on 04/20/2023

malakalnaseri
malakalnaseri ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
BIOL 1107 Module 3
Journal Article:๎˜
Reich et al.๎˜‹ 2004.๎˜‹ Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its
response to CO2 and N.๎˜‹๎˜‹PNAS.๎˜‹101(27):10101โ€“ 110106.๎˜‹
๎˜‹
The purpose of this discussion is to evaluate how the authors set up an experiment to test their idea that
species diversity and functional group richness may influence biomass accumulation, thus changes in biodiversity
may change carbon and nitrogen sequestration.๎˜‹ Pay careful attention to which variables the authors keep the same
for all the experiments and which variable(s) they manipulate to test their idea.๎˜‹ Look at the authors' results and
decide what๎˜‹you๎˜‹think the answer is to their question.๎˜‹
Discussion Questions๎˜
Introduction ๎˜‹
1. What is a functional group? How does that differ from species richness?
Functional group is the specific identity, species richness is the number of functional groups in the
community
2. Why are the authors looking at differences in functional groups and species richness for plant biomass
accumulation?
To identify the effects S and F can have on a community diversity and hoe those effect each other with other
communities
3. What rationale did the authors give for conducting this experiment?
To have a better understanding of how S and F alter diversity
4. What is the authors' research question?๎˜‹
What are the effects of S n standardized F on diversity and how do they effect each other?
5.What hypotheses are the authors testing?๎˜‹
Biomass increase with CO2 and N increase
6.What specific predictions do the authors make๎˜‹from their hypotheses?๎˜‹
As CO2 and N levels increase independently, the biomass increases
Materials and Methods ๎˜‹
7. The authors had three different experiments. Compare and contrast the experimental design for the three
experiments.
Each experiment has different plots but the same species are tested
8. What dependent variable(s) did they measure?๎˜‹How did they measure it/them? Why did they measure so
many different components? Why was this important?
CO2 and N
9. What independent variable(s) did they manipulate?๎˜‹How did they do this? Did their approach seem
appropriate?
S and F
10. What four functional groups did the authors select? How do these functional groups differ from one
another? (Hint: think about this at many different scales)
There was 4 C4 gasses (Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua gracilis, Schizachyrium scoparium, and
Sorghastrum nutans) , 4 C3 gasses (Agropyron repens, Bromus inermis, Koeleria cristata, and Poa
pratensis), four N-fixing legumes (Amorpha canescens, Lespedeza capitata, Lupinus perennis, and
Petalostemum villosum) and four non-N-fixing herbaceous species (Achillea millefolium, Anemone
cylindrica, Asclepias tuberosa, and Solidago rigida). All being presented in each experiment at different
amounts.
Results: ๎˜‹ Figure 1. ๎˜‹
11. What do the bars show in the three graphs?๎˜‹ What do the error bars represent?๎˜‹Why does Figure 1B not
have error bars?
They show the effects N and CO2 change has on biomass, the bars indicate any other factrs that might lead
to the deviation
12. What is the difference between parts A, B, and C?๎˜‹
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Module 3 article reflection and more Assignments Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

BIOL 1107 Module 3

Journal Article:

Reich et al. 2004. Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO 2 and N. PNAS. 101(27):10101โ€“ 110106. The purpose of this discussion is to evaluate how the authors set up an experiment to test their idea that species diversity and functional group richness may influence biomass accumulation, thus changes in biodiversity may change carbon and nitrogen sequestration. Pay careful attention to which variables the authors keep the same for all the experiments and which variable(s) they manipulate to test their idea. Look at the authors' results and decide what you think the answer is to their question.

Discussion Questions

Introduction

  1. What is a functional group? How does that differ from species richness? Functional group is the specific identity, species richness is the number of functional groups in the community
  2. Why are the authors looking at differences in functional groups and species richness for plant biomass accumulation? To identify the effects S and F can have on a community diversity and hoe those effect each other with other communities
  3. What rationale did the authors give for conducting this experiment? To have a better understanding of how S and F alter diversity
  4. What is the authors' research question? What are the effects of S n standardized F on diversity and how do they effect each other? 5.What hypotheses are the authors testing? Biomass increase with CO2 and N increase 6.What specific predictions do the authors make from their hypotheses? As CO2 and N levels increase independently, the biomass increases Materials and Methods
  5. The authors had three different experiments. Compare and contrast the experimental design for the three experiments. Each experiment has different plots but the same species are tested
  6. What dependent variable(s) did they measure? How did they measure it/them? Why did they measure so many different components? Why was this important? CO2 and N
  7. What independent variable(s) did they manipulate? How did they do this? Did their approach seem appropriate? S and F
  8. What four functional groups did the authors select? How do these functional groups differ from one another? (Hint: think about this at many different scales) There was 4 C4 gasses (Andropogon gerardii, Bouteloua gracilis, Schizachyrium scoparium, and Sorghastrum nutans) , 4 C3 gasses (Agropyron repens, Bromus inermis, Koeleria cristata, and Poa pratensis), four N-fixing legumes (Amorpha canescens, Lespedeza capitata, Lupinus perennis, and Petalostemum villosum) and four non-N-fixing herbaceous species (Achillea millefolium, Anemone cylindrica, Asclepias tuberosa, and Solidago rigida). All being presented in each experiment at different amounts. Results: Figure 1.
  9. What do the bars show in the three graphs? What do the error bars represent? Why does Figure 1B not have error bars? They show the effects N and CO2 change has on biomass, the bars indicate any other factrs that might lead to the deviation
  10. What is the difference between parts A, B, and C?

BIOL 1107 Module 3 Part A displays various permutations of CO2 and N in which they are present, along with their cumulative biomass. Part B illustrates the alterations in the overall biomass as a result of the distinct combinations of CO2 and N. Finally, Part C presents the same variation in biomass while taking into account the entire population of species as a reference.

  1. Does elevated CO 2 and N production change plant biomass? How does this vary with number of species while standardizing for number of functional groups? The increase in CO2 levels and nitrogen production leads to significant changes in plant biomass, but the extent of this variation is dependent on the number of species present as well as the number of functional groups. The effects of elevated CO2 and enriched nitrogen are observed separately, but when these two parameters are combined, a greater impact on biomass is noticed. Results: Figure 2.
  2. What do the bars show in the three graphs? What do the error bars represent? Why does only Figure 2A have error bars? these three charts demonstrate the influence of functional groups on biomass. The error bars indicate the approximate margin of error for each measurement. However, no error bars appear on 2A because it shows changes in the total biomass.
  3. What is the difference between parts A, B, and C? Part A displays the variations in the responses of functional groups to distinct levels of CO2 and N. Part B illustrates the changes in overall biomass among different functional groups. Finally, Part C demonstrates the changes in fine root biomass across functional groups.
  4. Considering the number of functional groups, how does elevated CO 2 and N production change plant biomass while the number of species remains the same? Significant changes can be observed across each functional group when exposed to independent and combined CO2 and N treatments. Nevertheless, the most notable changes occur in functional group 4. Inference
  5. Which is more important to increase of plant biomass- species or functional richness? How do elevated CO 2 and N contribute to these results?

Functional richness is more important to the increase of biomass. the elevated levels of CO2 and N

shows more prominent effects on plant biomass.

  1. Given the trend for continually increased atmospheric CO 2 levels over the last century, if you were restoring a small area of terrestrial vegetation, how would you approach the restoration effort, in terms of the number of species and functional groups?

In order to restore a small area of vegetation the more diverse species set and functional groups

are more important to visualize the effects of the different changes of CO2 and N