NURS 6003 Module 3 Assignment; Research Analysis, Assignments of Nursing

Download NURS 6003 Module 3 Assignment; Research Analysis and more Assignments Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!

Module 3 | Assignment

lOMoARcPSD|

Research Analysis

Academic and Professional Success

Plan Part 3

NURS 6003

Walden University

Research Analysis

I have identified one topic of interest for further study. I have researched and identified one peer- reviewed research article focused on this topic and have analyzed this article. The results of these efforts are shared below. Step 1: Research Analysis Topic of Interest: Can dialysis modalities and dialyzer kind cause intradialytic hypotension? Research Article: Patel, S., Raimann, J. G., & Kotanko, P. (2017). The impact of dialysis modality and membrane characteristics on intradialytic hypotension. Seminars in dialysis , 30 (6), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi. Professional Practice Use: This research is useful for the dialysis healthcare professional practice in ways as follow:

1. It offers additional knowledge and learning of how dialysis modalities and dialyzer membranes can result in intradialytic hypotension.
2. Its findings can help in formulating dialysis plans and prescriptions.
3. It can aid in identifying risks, manage, and prevent intradialytic hypotensive episodes.

provided answers to the question of interest. explained. Introduction (^) • This section was able to provide the history of procedures and materials utilization related to the key elements of the study.

• The purpose was implied before conduction of the study as mentioned. - Significance was limitedly expounded. - There was lack of acknowledgement for drawbacks with the interventions and observations and reasoning for bias. Methods & Materials Used
• The research was able to display integrity and credibility through using related literatures findings which were peer-reviewed and previously published.
• The study methodology was appropriate but limited in a sense that data gathered were dependent from the source articles, meaning, variables produced were uncontrolled by the authors of this research. Results • This section was organized, and analysis of findings was outstanding.
• The authors’ choice for presenting this section, that
• Sampling was restricted due to the retrospective design method of the research.

is, using tables and categorizing data, was brilliant in that it made its readability and comprehension at ease.

• Consistency and coherence are noted from the results. - Potential diminished value of data was foreseen due to recycling of findings. Discussion (^) • The authors acknowledged application methods used from source studies of this research.
• The authors honestly discussed the potential and existing biases of the research (Partiality from being a retrospective study and selection issues of resources).
• This section was accordingly constructed. (Arguments presented according to variables and subsequent explanation of - Noticeably, research had an absence of null findings which were necessary to consolidate the facets of discussion.

present and gathering of findings came from sources and not directly from experimentation.

• (Outcome) The word “impact” denoted the results of this study. It was vague and broad to measure, but applicable. Study Type (Design)
• This research used a Correlational Retrospective type of investigative model.
• The sample population was not stated but obviously indicated (Dialysis Patients who were participants from the source studies where data of this research were gathered). Sampling was not necessary since data were derived from retrospective studies of similar nature. Selection Issues
• As mentioned from the analysis of strengths and limitations, the researchers were not able to control the choosing of subjects.
• Selection bias was revealed as well by the authors when they did the research. The selection method was not disclosed. Outcome Factors and Measurement s
• All relevant results were assessed. It directly showed consistency in providing answers for the research question.
• The Independent variables applied were the dialysis modalities, i.e., Hemodialysis (HD), Hemofiltration (HF), Hemodiafiltration (HDF), membranes, i.e., Polysulfone, Polyacrylonitrile, and Cuprophan, and dialysate bath, i.e.,

Acetate and Bicarbonate.

• The dependent variable was obviously the intradialytic hypotension rates (IDH). Data Analyses and Interpretation
• It was prominent that researchers made thorough assessment of the statistical significance of each group data from the article sources they utilized for this study.
• Data were consistent with the findings when analysis and methodology were applied.
• It was cited that there was a decrease of confounding factors among the data used from the source studies because of the methodology done on those previous studies. Statistical Method and Results
• The P-value formula was used to analyze the findings. Interpretations from this equation had been long valid and reliable for most studies. Clinical Significance
• The appraiser of this research conducted statistical analysis on the data gathered like how the researchers did it.
• Upon summarizing and simplifying the results of the statistical equation of each group of gathered data and analyses, several occurrences denoted that IDH rates were lower compared to HD; Dialyzer membranes did not affect IDH rates, and; Acetate Dialysate Bath had increased incidence of IDH rates compared to Bicarbonate bath.
• These findings from this appraiser were consistent with the

Lastly, this critical appraisal of this clinical research is solely the objective analysis opinion

Step 2: Summary of Analysis

This writer’s perspective about critical appraisal improved because of the creation of this paper. The learning resources helped a lot in configuring the elements of this research analysis. Furthermore, this writer saw the importance of peer-reviews and article evaluations on consolidating and empowering an academic writing. The approach that this writer utilized for the structure of the appraisal is from the methodology format recommended within the article “Critical Appraisal of Clinical Research” (Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S., 2017). It enlisted the categories with subsequent explanations and things to consider for writing the appraisal. When it comes to summarizing points, strengths, significance and relevance of this study, this writer borrowed the method impressed in the article “Simplifying Synthesis” (Shellenbarger, 2016). The strategies this writer discovered on effective search for peer-reviewed research are as follows: (1) Collection of online database websites which Walden University already have; (2) Type in keywords for the topic of interest; (3) Evaluate the overview of the article with the criteria to be a peer-reviewed article, and; (4) Subscribe on the article or create or register to have an account for the website for easy access. The ultimate resource weblink that this writer learned was PubMed. It is a government

funded online library for biomedical sciences. As for the writer’s opinion, this is the best choice to look for related literatures, articles, and research to any scientific practice related to nursing. It is highly recommendable due to its adherence to validation from peer reviews before publishing. PubMed contains more than 35 million references for biomedical writing from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites. In conclusion, this writer views that these research analysis, study synthesis, peer- reviewed article search, and online database libraries are useful avenues for a scholarly practitioner to excellence and success in academic writing.

References

Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/

Patel, S., Raimann, J. G., & Kotanko, P. (2017). The impact of dialysis modality and membrane characteristics on intradialytic hypotension. Seminars in dialysis , 30(6), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12636Links to an external site. Pubmed (n.d.). National Library of Medicine [Webpage]. PubMed (nih.gov) Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor , 26(3). http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/ Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=