Optimal policies with heterogeneous agents, Exercises of Literature

Optimal policies with heterogeneous agents and their impact on infinite dimensional control, infinite dimensional optimization, constrained optimization, and constrained-efficient allocation. It also provides an example of the Aiyagari model with finite lifetimes and its solution using the first-best method. The document concludes with an application of optimal monetary policy with heterogeneous agents. It cites related literature on constrained-efficient problems in discrete-time models, optimal control problems in continuous time, and mean field control.

Typology: Exercises

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/14/2023

shahid_88c
shahid_88c 🇺🇸

4.4

(26)

261 documents

1 / 60

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Optimal policies with heterogeneous agents
Jes´us Fern´andez-Villaverde1and Galo Nu˜no2
October 15, 2021
1University of Pennsylvania
2Banco de Espa˜na
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c

Partial preview of the text

Download Optimal policies with heterogeneous agents and more Exercises Literature in PDF only on Docsity!

Optimal policies with heterogeneous agents

Jes´us Fern´andez-Villaverde^1 and Galo Nu˜no^2 October 15, 2021 (^1) University of Pennsylvania

(^2) Banco de Espa˜na

Prelude: Infinite dimensional

control

Gˆateaux differential

  • Let J (g ) be a functional and let h be arbitrary in L^2 (Φ). If the limit:

δJ (g ; h) = lim α→ 0

J (g + αh) − J (g ) α exists, it is called the Gˆateaux derivative of J at g in the direction h.

  • If the limit exists for each h ∈ L^2 (Φ) , the functional J is said to be Gˆateaux differentiable at g.
  • If the limit exists, it can be expressed as δJ (g ; h) = (^) ddα J (g + αh) |α=0.

Fr´echet differential

  • Let h be arbitrary in L^2 (Φ). If for fixed g ∈ L^2 (Φ) there exists δJ (g ; h) which is linear and continuous with respect to h such that:

lim ‖h‖L (^2) (Φ)→ 0

|J (g + h) − J (g ) − δJ (g ; h)| ‖h‖L (^2) (Φ)

then, J is said to be Fr´echet differentiable at g and δJ (g ; h) is theFr´echet differential of J at g with increment h.

  • If the Fr´echet differential of J exists at g , then the Gˆateaux differential exists at g and they are equal.
  • See Luenberger (1969, p. 173).

Constrained optimization

  • Let H be a mapping from L^2 (Φ) into R.
  • If J has a continuous Fr´echet differential, a necessary condition for J to have a maximum at g under the constraint H(g ) = 0 is that there exists a function λ ∈ L^2 (Φ) such that:

L(g ) = J(g ) + 〈λ, H(g )〉Φ

is stationary in g , i.e., δL (g ; h) = 0.

  • See Luenberger (1969, p. 243).
  • Example

Application 1: Social optima

with heterogeneous agents

How to do it

  • Nu˜no and Moll (2018) analyze optimal control problems with a continuum of heterogeneous agents.
  • Example: constrained-efficient equilibrium in the Aiyagari model with stochastic lifetimes.

Related literature

  • Constrained-efficient problems in discrete-time models with incomplete markets and idiosyncratic risk.
    • D´avila, Hong, Krusell, and R´ıos-Rull (2012).
  • Optimal control problems in continuous time:
    • Lucas and Moll (2014) or Afonso and Lagos (2015).
  • Mean field control:
    • Bensoussan, Frehse, and Yam (2013).

Households

  • Household’s utility: E 0

[∫ ∞

0

e−(ρ+η)t^ c t^1 −χ 1 − χ dt

]

where η is the death arrival (Poisson).

  • Asset dynamics (per capita), assuming insurance sector: dat = (wt zt + (rt +η) at − ct ) dt
  • Borrowing limit: at ≥ 0
  • Idiosyncratic labor productivity: dzt = θ(ˆz − zt )dt + σdBt , zt ∈ [z ¯ , z¯]

The KF equation

∂g ∂t

∂a (s (a, z, wt , rt , c) g )

∂z (θ(ˆz^ −^ z)g^ ) +

∂^2

∂z^2

σ^2 g

−ηg + ηδa 0 ,z 0 ,

where −ηgt (a, z) is the outflow of agents due to death and ηδa 0 ,z 0 = ηδ (a) δ (z − z ¯ ) is the inflow of newborn agents with zero assets and productivity z ¯

Constrained-efficient allocation

  • The planner chooses individual consumption c (·) in order to maximize:

J (g (0, ·)) = max c(·)∈C(t,a,z)

0

e−ρt

∫ ∫ (^) ¯z

¯^ z

u (c) gt (a, z) dadzdt

subject to the law of motion of the aggregate density, to the factor prices and to the market clearing condition.

  • The planner cannot redistribute among agents (she has to respect individual budget constraints).

The Lagrangian

Lce (g , τ, c, j, λ) =

0

e−ρt

u (ct (a, z)) gt (a, z) dadzdt

0

e−ρt

∫ ∫ (^) z¯

¯^ z

jt (a, z)

[

− ∂g ∂t

  • A∗gt (a, z) + ηδa 0 ,z 0

]

dadzdt

0

e−ρt^ λt

[

−kt +

0

∫ (^) ¯z

¯^ z

agt (a, z)dadz

]

dt

First-best allocation

  • The planner is able to fully redistribute among agents.
  • Individual wealth is now given by:

dat = (wt zt + (rt + η) at − ct + τt ) dt,

where τt are transfers across agents.

  • The aggregate amount of transfers is zero: ∫ ∫ (^) z¯

¯^ z

τt (a, z)gt (a, z)dzda = 0

The Lagrangian: First best

Lfb (g , τ, c, j, λ) =

0

e−ρt

u (ct (a, z)) gt (a, z) dadzdt

0

e−ρt

∫ ∫ (^) ¯z

¯^ z

jt (a, z)

[

− ∂g ∂t

  • A∗gt (a, z) + ηδa 0 ,z 0

]

dadzdt

0

e−ρt^ λt

[

−kt +

0

∫ (^) z¯

¯^ z

agt (a, z)dadz

]

dt

0

e−ρt^ ϕt

[∫ ∞

0

∫ (^) ¯z

¯^ z

τt (a, z)gt (a, z)dadz

]

dt