philosophy fallacy and biases, Lecture notes of Philosophy

this lecture notes cover the different type of fallacy and biases with explanation and examples

Typology: Lecture notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 11/03/2023

joiemmy-gayudan
joiemmy-gayudan 🇵🇭

8 documents

1 / 28

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Introduction to Philosophy
Doing Philosophy: Fallacies
NECESSARY CONDITION
Q is true only if P is true
SUFFICIENT CONDITION
If R is true, then S is true
VALID ARGUMENT
If premises are true, conclusion is true
SOUND ARGUMENT
A valid argument with true premises
Reviewing last session:
STRUCTURE OF AN ARGUMENT
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c

Partial preview of the text

Download philosophy fallacy and biases and more Lecture notes Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

NECESSARY CONDITION

Q is true only if P is true

SUFFICIENT CONDITION

If R is true, then S is true

VALID ARGUMENT

If premises are true, conclusion is true

SOUND ARGUMENT

A valid argument with true premises

Reviewing last session:

STRUCTURE OF AN ARGUMENT

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

fal·la·cy a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument. in logic: a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Formal fallacy Informal fallacy

1.If P , then Q. 2.P. 3.Therefore, Q.

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

1.If P , then Q. 2.not P. 3.Therefore, not Q.

Formal fallacy:

Denying the antecedent

Valid

Invalid

P is sufficient for Q

but P is not necessary for Q

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Informal fallacies

Poisoning the well – presenting adverse information about a target person with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says. Appeal to motive – dismissing an idea by questioning the motives of its proposer. Tone policing – focusing on emotion behind a message rather than the message itself as a discrediting tactic.

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Subtypes of the ad hominem fallacy

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: Peter is a genius Premise 2: Peter says X Conclusion: X is right

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: You have said X Premise 2: X is not true Promise 3: People who say untrue things are liars Conclusion: You are a liar Response: No! You are a liar!

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: Peter says X Premise 2: X is wrong Conclusion: Peter is wrong

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: You can’t proof that not-X Premise 2: Things that you cannot proof are not true Conclusion: not-X is not true Premise 1: not-X is not true Premise 2: Either X is true or not-X is true Conclusion: X is true

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

1.If P , then Q. 2.Q. 3.Therefore, P.

That’s a fallacy (affirming the consequent),

but that doesn’t mean that “not P”

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: All feathers are light Premise 2: What is light cannot be dark Conclusion: No feather is dark Refusing to give up personal freedom to help fight terrorism is un- American Giving up personal freedom to help fight terrorism is un-American

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Premise 1: I am aware of X happening Premise 2: I am unaware of Y happening Conclusion: X is more likely than Y

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

Doing Philosophy: Fallacies

  1. Erica: "How do you know that the bible is divinely inspired?" Pedro: "Because is says right in the third chapter of II Timothy that 'all scripture is given by divine inspiration of God.'"
  2. Celibacy is an unnatural and unhealthy practice, since it is neither natural nor healthy to exclude sexual activity from one's life.
  3. Thoughts are not part of the physical world, since thoughts are in their nature non-physical.
  4. Happiness is the highest good for a human being, since all other values are inferior to it.
  5. Of course smoking causes cancer. The smoke from cigarettes is a carcinogen.