Primary vs Secondary Memory: Understanding Decay, Interference, and Distinctions, Exams of Psychology

An overview of primary and secondary memory, as well as the concepts of decay and interference. The brown-peterson task, waugh-norman task, and the modal model of memory. It also discusses the differences between absolute identification and memory span, and the concept of chunking. From a psychology class, psy 373, human memory, taught in january 2008.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-s5e
koofers-user-s5e 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 47

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Primary Memory
PSY 373, Human Memory
January 29, 2008
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f

Partial preview of the text

Download Primary vs Secondary Memory: Understanding Decay, Interference, and Distinctions and more Exams Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Primary Memory

PSY 373, Human Memory

January 29, 2008

Housekeeping

  • Brown-Peterson experiment should be completed by Friday.
  • First exam will be Wed, Feb 13.
  • Will try to have a review session Mon, Feb 11.

Overview of today’s material

Primary/secondary memory

  • Miller (1956) and the James/Broadbent model
  • The Brown-Peterson Task.
  • The Waugh-Norman task.

The Modal Model

James’ (1890) Primary memory

“ The objects we feel in this directly intuited past differ from properly recollected objects. An object which is recollected, in the proper sense of the term, is one which has been absent from consciousness altogether, and now revives anew... But an object of primary memory is not thus brought back; it never was lost; its date was never cut off in consciousness from that of the immediately present moment. In fact, it comes to us as belonging to the rearward portion of the present space of time, and not to the genuine past.”

Early work on memory “span”

  • Span of apprehension: number of objects we could reliably count with tachistoscopic presentation
  • Memory span: Number of items we can recite back perfectly without error.
  • Forward and backward memory span are still used as a neuropsychological measure.

Absolute Identification

  • Name a unidimensional stimulus.
  • When the number of stimuli is about 7 ± 2 , this becomes impossible to do perfectly.
  • Doesn’t depend on the range of the stimuli!
  • An example.

The central thesis of Miller (1956)

Do memory span and absolute identification have anything to do with each other? Most authors would say no (e.g. Nosofsky, 1993). Others are not so sure (Brown, Neath, and Chater, in press).

Other contributions of Miller (1956)

  • Introduced notion of “chunk.”
  • Popularized information theory for the study of memory.

Broadbent’s (1958) model

  • S-system: like iconic and echoic memory
  • P-system: conscious awareness
  • secondary memory: long-term storage.
  • S+P are primary, or immediate memory (limited capacity)
  • Rehearsal necessary to maintain information in immediate memory.

Brown-Peterson task, Methods

  • No shocking!
  • Present consonant trigram.
  • Count backwards by threes.
  • Variable delay to recall.

What is the purpose of the distractor?

  • Prevent rehearsal.
  • If Broadbent’s theory is correct, then we should be looking at decay from primary memory.

What does forgetting depend on?

Decay versus interference

We forget over time, but why?

  • Decay postulates that forgetting happens because of time per se
  • Interference means that other information comes in and obscures or displaces older information.
  • Think about our snowman (and those evil squirrels)... or about rust.