Primary and Secondary Memory: Echoic Memory and the Brown-Peterson Task, Exams of Psychology

A portion of a university lecture note from a psychology class on human memory. The topic covers primary and secondary memory, with a focus on echoic memory and the brown-peterson task. Discussions on the james/broadbent model, the brown-peterson experiment, and the distinction between decay and interference in memory. It also touches upon the concept of retroactive and proactive interference.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-vfo
koofers-user-vfo 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 48

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Echoic Memory and Primary
Memory
PSY 373, Human Memory
September 12, 2007
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30

Partial preview of the text

Download Primary and Secondary Memory: Echoic Memory and the Brown-Peterson Task and more Exams Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Echoic Memory and Primary

Memory

PSY 373, Human Memory

September 12, 2007

Housekeeping

  • Should have completed Brown-Peterson Experiment already.
  • Experiment report due one week from today (September 19).
  • First exam will be October 1.
  • Will try to have a review session Sept. 26.

Overview of today’s material

  • Primary/secondary memory
    1. Miller (1956) and the James/Broadbent model
    2. The Brown-Peterson Task.
    3. The Waugh-Norman task.
  • What’s in an experiment report?

The Modal Model

James’ (1890) Primary memory

“ The objects we feel in this directly intuited past differ from properly recollected objects. An object which is recollected, in the proper sense of the term, is one which has been absent from consciousness altogether, and now revives anew... But an object of primary memory is not thus brought back; it never was lost; its date was never cut off in consciousness from that of the immediately present moment. In fact, it comes to us as belonging to the rearward portion of the present space of time, and not to the genuine past.”

Early work on memory “span”

  • Span of apprehension: number of objects we could reliably count with tachistoscopic presentation
  • Memory span: Number of items we can recite back perfectly without error.
  • Forward and backward memory span are still used as a neuropsychological measure.

Absolute Identification

  • Name a unidimensional stimulus.
  • When the number of stimuli is about 7 ± 2 , this becomes impossible to do perfectly.
  • Doesn’t depend on the range of the stimuli!
  • An example.

The central thesis of Miller (1956)

Do memory span and absolute identification have anything to do with each other? Most authors would say no (e.g. Nosofsky, 1993). Others are not so sure (Brown, Neath, and Chater, in press).

Other contributions of Miller (1956)

  • Introduced notion of “chunk.”
  • Popularized information theory for the study of memory.

Broadbent’s (1958) model

  • S-system: like iconic and echoic memory
  • P-system: conscious awareness
  • secondary memory: long-term storage.
  • S+P are primary, or immediate memory (limited capacity)
  • Rehearsal necessary to maintain information in immediate memory.

Brown-Peterson task, Methods

  • No shocking!
  • Present consonant trigram.
  • Count backwards by threes.
  • Variable delay to recall.

What is the purpose of the distractor?

  • Prevent rehearsal.
  • If Broadbent’s theory is correct, then we should be looking at decay from primary memory.

What does forgetting depend on?

Decay versus interference

We forget over time, but why?

  • Decay postulates that forgetting happens because of time per se
  • Interference means that other information comes in and obscures or displaces older information.
  • Think about our snowman (and those evil squirrels)... or about rust.