

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A collection of physics and optics problems covering topics such as refraction, mirrors, lenses, and electromagnetism. Students are required to attempt all questions within the given time frame and provide reasoning for their answers. Topics include ray diagrams, lens equations, reflection, and electromagnetic waves.
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Attempt all questions, in any order. YOU MUST GIVE YOUR REASONING. 2 hours. The questions do not carry equal weight (see board) ---sketch to solutions ---Xiaochuan graded Qns 1 2 & 6, & I defer to his comments (1) <2>!Consider the diagram below (in which the prism angles are π/2, π/4 & π/4) If for the rays indicated the refractive index of the material of the prism is n (& taking air as 1), through what angle are the rays bent? what is AB/CD (the ratio of the distances between the rays)? ---ans = see Xʼs solution (2) <2>!(i) A ray of light from point P strikes a plane mirror at point Q, and returns through point R. As we know, reflection occurs at equal angles. Prove (by any method) that this follows from a requirement that the distance PQR is a minimum. ---see Fermat handout at course site mikebloxham.com/7C, or use Calculus (ii)<4>! A lens has one face convex, the other flat. Its focal length is F. The lens is glued (the flat side) to a mirror. An object is placed on the axis of the lens, a distance p away from the mirror, such that a real image is formed at a distance q from the mirror, and on the same side as the object p. What is the minimum possible value of p+q? (Hint: use Newtonʼs alternative to 1/o+1/v=1/f). ---one possible method is to assert (and justify by drawing a ray trace) that an image of the lens forms, so that the problem is equivalent to the simplest instance of a a convex lens ... BUT (be careful) with a focal length that you will now have to calculate to be f=F/
2. Then, very easily, newtonʼs form ( o=f+x;i=f+y) xy=fsquared gives a minimum p +q=4f=2F.
(3) <4>!The radius of curvature of the human cornea is about 8mm (the cornea is a bump at the front of the eye - this is not the radius of the eyeball, which weʼll take to be, for a largish eye, 1.25cm), and the refractive index of the fluid that fills the eye approximately 1.34. Draw and label the angles on a ray diagram, and from the relation between them determine how far behind the retina light from infinity would be focussed, if the eyeʻs lens were not there.
in this instance, the object is at infinity, so alpha is 0. The calculations gives focussing at a point that is only 6-7mm behind the retina. you might be curious to work out the diopter of the eye lens (in or out of its aqueous humour). ---see separate solution, that has comments on your alternative methods (4) <4>!I am old, and my eye has almost ceased to accommodate (change in strength). Also, I am far (long) sighted, and without glasses, everything is blurred. I save money on glasses by buying several, of 1-diopter power, and wear as many as I need at a time. To read, I wear three, and find I can read adequately, so long as I hold the book somewhere between a foot and a foot and a half from my eye. I am thinking of getting a GPS unit for my car, but (using one or more glasses) will I be able to see both it and the road? For this very crude calculation, letʼs estimate the GPS unit to be about 2 feet away, and ignore the gaps between eye and glasses. ---see separate solutions, and my tips (advice) about answers ---several ways to do this, but the quickest might be to show that from what I say about reading a book, my eye can only accommodate by about 1 diopter. This calculation, though crude, should, as Shakespeare would say, give me pause (before I buy the GPS unit, I really must go out there and try my glasses out). (5) <4>!Charge is flowing radially & uniformly (isotropically: the same in all directions) from the origin, from source Q, at a steady rate, with
the sign of C] What is the magnitude and direction of the displacement current
(Xiaochuan rightly points out I really mean displacement current density here) ---the whole point of the displacement current is to cancel out the actual current where the divergence of that current is nil. So the answer is: if the current is outward, radially
opposite to that of the current (in this example), as that is what shows you understand what Maxwellʼs correction is all about. I did discuss this example in lecture, a long time ago.