Optics and Physics Problems: Refraction, Mirrors, Lenses, and Electromagnetism, Exams of Engineering Physics

A collection of physics and optics problems covering topics such as refraction, mirrors, lenses, and electromagnetism. Students are required to attempt all questions within the given time frame and provide reasoning for their answers. Topics include ray diagrams, lens equations, reflection, and electromagnetic waves.

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/12/2013

sasirekha
sasirekha 🇮🇳

4.6

(29)

132 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Attempt all questions, in any order. YOU MUST GIVE YOUR REASONING. 2 hours.
The questions do not carry equal weight (see board)
---sketch to solutions
---Xiaochuan graded Qns 1 2 & 6, & I defer to his comments
(1)<2>!Consider the diagram below (in which the
prism angles are π/2, π/4 & π/4)
If for the rays indicated the refractive index of the
material of the prism is n (& taking air as 1),
through what angle are the rays bent? what is
AB/CD (the ratio of the distances between the
rays)?
---ans = see Xʼs solution
(2)<2>!(i) A ray of light from point P strikes a plane mirror at point Q, and returns through
point R. As we know, reflection occurs at equal angles. Prove (by any method) that this
follows from a requirement that the distance PQR is a minimum.
---see Fermat handout at course site mikebloxham.com/7C, or use Calculus
(ii)<4> !A lens has one face convex, the other flat. Its focal length is F. The lens is
glued (the flat side) to a mirror. An object is placed on the axis of the lens, a distance p
away from the mirror, such that a real image is formed at a distance q from the mirror,
and on the same side as the object p. What is the minimum possible value of p+q?
(Hint: use Newtonʼs alternative to 1/o+1/v=1/f).
---one possible method is to assert (and justify by drawing a ray trace) that an image of
the lens forms, so that the problem is equivalent to the simplest instance of a a convex
lens ... BUT (be careful) with a focal length that you will now have to calculate to be f=F/
2. Then, very easily, newtonʼs form ( o=f+x;i=f+y) xy=fsquared gives a minimum p
+q=4f=2F.
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Optics and Physics Problems: Refraction, Mirrors, Lenses, and Electromagnetism and more Exams Engineering Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Attempt all questions, in any order. YOU MUST GIVE YOUR REASONING. 2 hours. The questions do not carry equal weight (see board) ---sketch to solutions ---Xiaochuan graded Qns 1 2 & 6, & I defer to his comments (1) <2>!Consider the diagram below (in which the prism angles are π/2, π/4 & π/4) If for the rays indicated the refractive index of the material of the prism is n (& taking air as 1), through what angle are the rays bent? what is AB/CD (the ratio of the distances between the rays)? ---ans = see Xʼs solution (2) <2>!(i) A ray of light from point P strikes a plane mirror at point Q, and returns through point R. As we know, reflection occurs at equal angles. Prove (by any method) that this follows from a requirement that the distance PQR is a minimum. ---see Fermat handout at course site mikebloxham.com/7C, or use Calculus (ii)<4>! A lens has one face convex, the other flat. Its focal length is F. The lens is glued (the flat side) to a mirror. An object is placed on the axis of the lens, a distance p away from the mirror, such that a real image is formed at a distance q from the mirror, and on the same side as the object p. What is the minimum possible value of p+q? (Hint: use Newtonʼs alternative to 1/o+1/v=1/f). ---one possible method is to assert (and justify by drawing a ray trace) that an image of the lens forms, so that the problem is equivalent to the simplest instance of a a convex lens ... BUT (be careful) with a focal length that you will now have to calculate to be f=F/

2. Then, very easily, newtonʼs form ( o=f+x;i=f+y) xy=fsquared gives a minimum p +q=4f=2F.

(3) <4>!The radius of curvature of the human cornea is about 8mm (the cornea is a bump at the front of the eye - this is not the radius of the eyeball, which weʼll take to be, for a largish eye, 1.25cm), and the refractive index of the fluid that fills the eye approximately 1.34. Draw and label the angles on a ray diagram, and from the relation between them determine how far behind the retina light from infinity would be focussed, if the eyeʻs lens were not there.

---half the answer is the diagram, showing the small angles I label α, β, γ & θ .. except

in this instance, the object is at infinity, so alpha is 0. The calculations gives focussing at a point that is only 6-7mm behind the retina. you might be curious to work out the diopter of the eye lens (in or out of its aqueous humour). ---see separate solution, that has comments on your alternative methods (4) <4>!I am old, and my eye has almost ceased to accommodate (change in strength). Also, I am far (long) sighted, and without glasses, everything is blurred. I save money on glasses by buying several, of 1-diopter power, and wear as many as I need at a time. To read, I wear three, and find I can read adequately, so long as I hold the book somewhere between a foot and a foot and a half from my eye. I am thinking of getting a GPS unit for my car, but (using one or more glasses) will I be able to see both it and the road? For this very crude calculation, letʼs estimate the GPS unit to be about 2 feet away, and ignore the gaps between eye and glasses. ---see separate solutions, and my tips (advice) about answers ---several ways to do this, but the quickest might be to show that from what I say about reading a book, my eye can only accommodate by about 1 diopter. This calculation, though crude, should, as Shakespeare would say, give me pause (before I buy the GPS unit, I really must go out there and try my glasses out). (5) <4>!Charge is flowing radially & uniformly (isotropically: the same in all directions) from the origin, from source Q, at a steady rate, with

dQ

dt

= C [I should have given you

the sign of C] What is the magnitude and direction of the displacement current

(Maxwellʼs correction to Ampère) at a point r  a distance r from the origin?

(Xiaochuan rightly points out I really mean displacement current density here) ---the whole point of the displacement current is to cancel out the actual current where the divergence of that current is nil. So the answer is: if the current is outward, radially

inward, with a magnitude C / 4 π r^2 It is crucial that you give the direction to be

opposite to that of the current (in this example), as that is what shows you understand what Maxwellʼs correction is all about. I did discuss this example in lecture, a long time ago.