professional ethics in computer science engineering, Study notes of Professional Communication

STUDIES ABOUT PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

Typology: Study notes

2020/2021

Uploaded on 02/01/2021

fz-sheik
fz-sheik 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ASSIGNMENT-I
PROFESSIONAL ETHCS
Ethical theories available for "Right of Action"
Three basic approaches to ethical behaviour are:
I . Utilitarian Approach:
This approach proposes that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences.
People should therefore behave in such a way that will produce the greatest benefit to society
with the least harm or the lowest cost. This approach suffers from the difficulty in
recognizing all the benefits and the costs of any particular decision.
Research reveals that only the stakeholders having the most power (ability to affect the
company), legitimacy (legal or moral claim on company resources), and urgency (demand for
immediate attention) are given priority by CEOs. It is therefore likely that only the most
obvious stakeholders will be considered while others are ignored.
II . Individual Rights Approach:
This approach proposes that human beings have certain fundamental rights that should be
respects in all decisions. A particular decision or behaviour should be avoided if it interferes
with the rights of others.
The U.S. Constitution includes a Bill of Rights that may or may not be accepted throughout
the world. This approach can also encourage selfish behaviour when a person defines a
personal need or want as a “right”
III. Justice Approach:
The justice approach proposes that decision makers be equitable, fair and impartial in the
distribution of costs and benefits to individuals and groups. It follows the principles of
distributive justice and fairness. This approach can also include redistributive justice and
compensatory justice.
Cavanagh proposes that we can solve ethical problems by asking the following 3
questions regarding an act or decision:
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download professional ethics in computer science engineering and more Study notes Professional Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

ASSIGNMENT-I

PROFESSIONAL ETHCS

Ethical theories available for "Right of Action"

Three basic approaches to ethical behaviour are: I. Utilitarian Approach: This approach proposes that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences. People should therefore behave in such a way that will produce the greatest benefit to society with the least harm or the lowest cost. This approach suffers from the difficulty in recognizing all the benefits and the costs of any particular decision. Research reveals that only the stakeholders having the most power (ability to affect the company), legitimacy (legal or moral claim on company resources), and urgency (demand for immediate attention) are given priority by CEOs. It is therefore likely that only the most obvious stakeholders will be considered while others are ignored. II. Individual Rights Approach: This approach proposes that human beings have certain fundamental rights that should be respects in all decisions. A particular decision or behaviour should be avoided if it interferes with the rights of others. The U.S. Constitution includes a Bill of Rights that may or may not be accepted throughout the world. This approach can also encourage selfish behaviour when a person defines a personal need or want as a “right” III. Justice Approach: The justice approach proposes that decision makers be equitable, fair and impartial in the distribution of costs and benefits to individuals and groups. It follows the principles of distributive justice and fairness. This approach can also include redistributive justice and compensatory justice. Cavanagh proposes that we can solve ethical problems by asking the following 3 questions regarding an act or decision:

  1. Utility- Does it optimize the satisfaction of all stakeholders?
  2. Rights- Does it respect the rights of the individuals involved?
  3. Justice- Is it consistent with the canons of justice? Another approach to resolving ethical dilemmas is by applying Kant’s categorical imperatives to guide our actions: (1) A person’s action is ethical only if that person is will for the same action to be taken by everyone who is in a similar situation. This is same as the Golden Rule. You should treat others, as you would like them to treat you. (2) A person should never treat another human being simply as a means but always as an end. This means that an action is morally wrong for a person if that person uses others merely as a means for advancing his or her own interests. To be moral, the act should not restrict another people’s actions so that they are left disadvantaged in some way. Ethics – Factors Affecting Individual Ethics Individual ethics are determined by the following factors:
  4. Family Influences – Individuals, as children, develop ethical standards if other family members engage in ethical behavior.
  5. Peer Group Influences – The children, when they grow up, are influenced by the behavior of their friends and peer group. High or low standard of ethical behavior is likely to be followed in the same manner by the members of the peer group.
  6. Life Experience – The way an individual’s behavior is dealt with in real life situations also affects his ethics. If his behavior (right or wrong) is reprimanded by his elders, he tends to avoid repeating it in future thinking that it is unethical and vice-versa. A person who speaks harshly, if, never objected to by his parents or elders, will form a habit of speaking in that manner and will feel nothing unethical about it.
  7. Personal Values – Ethical standards change according to the priority accorded to different behaviours being pursued by an individual. A person who believes in the material world will have different ethical standards than the one who prioritizes religious or social norms.

It may also want to do the same for those companies with which it does business. For example, Reebok International has developed a set of human rights production standards for the manufacturers that supply the company with its athletic shoes on a contract basis. Ethics – Religion and Ethical Behaviour Religion is very difficult to define. The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary defines it as – the belief in the existence of a god or gods, and the activities that are connected with the worship of them. Religion is important to ethics because our actions are, in many cases, governed by religious doctrines or ‘divine commands’ as they may sometimes be called. The underlying and most important aspect of religious beliefs is, or should be, that all religions fundamentally and inherently speak or proclaim ethical conduct in the same way. There is probably no religion that has doctrines conflicting with the fundamental ethical principles that we have outlined. Once we have understood this aspect of religion, it will be simple to follow our faith and still be ethical in all our actions. One should avoid giving too much weightage or credence to external symbolisms or rituals associated with a religion or faith. For an individual, these rituals may have personal value and he/she should practise them as he/she deems fit. From an ethical point of view, such symbolism and practices can have their place, but it is more important to understand the unifying and exalted principles associated with religious beliefs. Only such an understanding will help us appreciate other religions and the associated practices. Understanding our religion in its true perspective is important in formulating our ethical standards and resolving ethical conflicts. Influence of Religion: Religion has great influence, to a large extent positive, in shaping our ethical behaviour. Almost all religions have influenced the ethical thinking and standards followed by individuals and societies for the past many centuries. Most religions support the five cardinal ethical principles. Many social codes of conduct have a religious sanction given by the preachers of the faith. Following a religion helps us in forming moral standards and benchmarks.

Another aspect of religious faith is the psychological impact it has on our moral conduct. Religious beliefs in most cases should guide us towards morally right actions. One aspect may be the reprisal or punishment that may be meted out in case one’s actions are not according to religious doctrines. Another aspect is the self-realization of an individual about the right moral stand to be taken in accordance with his/her religious beliefs. It must also be understood that most religions set high moral or ethical standards of life. Thus, if one follows his/her religion and lives according to the dictates of that faith, he/she will be considered highly moral in his/her actions. It is, however, necessary to understand the basic tenets of the religion and not be governed by the trivialities of rituals and external symbolisms. There were times in human history when religion, through its doctrines and dictates, played the most important role in guiding people’s lives. For instance, in medieval times, the church had a great influence on the governance of countries as well as the personal lives of people. Religious heads were more powerful in shaping people’s behaviour than political or social heads. Political heads or rulers looked up to the religious heads for guidance in taking decisions. Today, religious heads do not have that kind of influence, but still do have considerable influence on our lives. Having said that religion has a positive influence on our morality, we should also recognize that many religious practices do not always set high moral or acceptable standards. Some religious practices accord lower status to women and are biased against their rights. For example, in India, sati is a practice of a woman ending her life on the same pyre when her husband dies and is cremated. The practice has been going on for years, but has now stopped. Why the husband was not asked to commit sati when the wife died is beyond comprehension or present social thinking. Thus, not all religious practices are acceptable in today’s context. In conclusion, one can say that the influence of religion in shaping our moral lives has predominantly been positive.

CODE OF ETHICS

A code of ethics is a guide of principles designed to help professionals conduct

business honestly and with integrity. A code of ethics document may outline the

mission and values of the business or organization, how professionals are

supposed to approach problems, the ethical principles based on the

organization's core values, and the standards to which the professional is held.

A code of ethics also referred to as an "ethical code," may encompass areas such

as business ethics, a code of professional practice and an employee code of

conduct.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • A code of ethics sets out an organization's ethical guidelines and best

practices to follow for honesty, integrity, and professionalism.

  • For members of an organization, violating the code of ethics can result in

sanction including termination.

  • In some industries, including banking and finance, specific laws govern

business conduct. In others, a code of ethics may be voluntarily adopted.

Code of Ethics

Understanding a Code of Ethics

Business ethics refers to how ethical principles guide a business's operations.

Common issues that fall under the umbrella of business ethics include

employer-employee relations, discrimination, environmental issues, bribery

and insider trading, and social responsibility. While many laws exist to set basic

ethical standards within the business community, it is largely dependent upon a

business's leadership to develop a code of ethics.

Both businesses and trade organizations typically have some sort of code of

ethics that their employees or members are supposed to follow. Breaking the

code of ethics can result in termination or dismissal from the organization. A

code of ethics is important because it clearly lays out the rules for behavior and

provides the groundwork for a preemptive warning.

Regardless of size, businesses count on their management staff to set a standard

of ethical conduct for other employees to follow. When administrators adhere to

the code of ethics, it sends a message that universal compliance is expected of

every employee.

While a code of ethics is often not required, many firms and organizations

choose to adopt one.

Compliance-Based Code of Ethics

For all businesses, laws regulate issues such as hiring and safety standards.

Compliance-based codes of ethics not only set guidelines for conduct but also

determine penalties for violations.

In some industries, including banking, specific laws govern business conduct.

These industries formulate compliance-based codes of ethics to enforce laws

and regulations. Employees usually undergo formal training to learn the rules of

conduct. Because noncompliance can create legal issues for the company as a

whole, individual workers within a firm may face penalties for failing to follow

guidelines.

To ensure that the aims and principles of the code of ethics are followed, some

companies appoint a compliance officer. This individual is tasked with keeping

up to date on changes in regulation codes and monitoring employee conduct to

encourage conformity.

This type of code of ethics is based on clear-cut rules and well-defined

consequences rather than individual monitoring of personal behavior. Despite

strict adherence to the law, some compliance-based codes of conduct do not

thus promote a climate of moral responsibility within the company.

Value-Based Code of Ethics

A value-based code of ethics addresses a company's core value system. It may

outline standards of responsible conduct as they relate to the larger public good

and the environment. Value-based ethical codes may require a greater degree of

self-regulation than compliance-based codes.

Some codes of conduct contain language that addresses both compliance and

values. For example, a grocery store chain might create a code of conduct that

espouses the company's commitment to health and safety regulations above

financial gain. That grocery chain might also include a statement about refusing

to contract with suppliers that feed hormones to livestock or raise animals in

inhumane living conditions.

Code of Ethics Among Professionals

Financial advisers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or a

state regulator are bound by a code of ethics known as fiduciary duty. This is a

legal requirement and also a code of loyalty that requires them to act in the best

interest of their clients.