



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A lab experiment aimed at determining the launch speed and angle of a projectile to achieve a prescribed range. Instructions on how to mathematically derive the relationship between range, launch height, initial velocity, and angle, as well as how to measure the range experimentally using a ball launcher. The document also includes exercises to calculate the initial speed, predict landing positions at angles other than zero, and perform uncertainty analysis.
Typology: Lab Reports
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




(version 3/24/06)
Goals
Determining the launch speed of a projectile and its uncertainty by measuring how far it travels horizontally before landing on the floor (called the range) when launched horizontally from a known height.
Being able to predict and measure and compare the range of a projectile when the projectile is fired at an arbitrary angle with respect to the horizontal.
Being able to predict the initial firing angle of the launcher for a prescribed range value. Then compare the range achieved with the desired range value.
Introduction
When objects undergo motion in two (or even three) dimensions rather than in just one, the over-all motion can be analyzed by looking at the motion in any two (or three) mutually perpendicular directions and then putting the motions “back together,” so to speak. In the case of projectiles the horizontal and vertical directions are usually chosen. Why is this choice made? Ignoring the effects of air resistance an object moving vertically near the surface of the Earth experiences a constant acceleration. We know this by experiment. Likewise an object moving horizontally has zero acceleration. Any other choice of perpendicular directions would have different constant values of acceleration in both of the directions. When we write the descriptions of the motion in mathematical terms, the horizontal/vertical choice of directions results in the simplest forms of the equations. Under what conditions can the effects of the air be ignored? One condition is that the speed is not too high, since the effect of the air increases with the speed. If two objects are the same size and shape, the lighter one of the two will experience the larger effect on its motion due to the air. (For example, a ping-pong ball and a steel ball bearing of the same size.) In this lab care has been taken to make these choices so that ignoring air resistance will have a very small effect on the trajectory of the projectile. When conditions are such that air resistance cannot be ignored, the motion is much, much more complicated.
Exercise 1: Mathematical Preliminaries
To accomplish the first two of our stated goals we need first to find a general mathematical relationship showing how the horizontal range of the projectile depends on the height, initial velocity, and the angle of launch. See Fig. 1 on the next page. You need to solve symbolically the appropriate kinematics equations for motion with constant acceleration in the horizontal and vertical directions simultaneously to do this. [Hint: Eliminate the time from the general horizontal and vertical position equations at the instant when the projectile strikes the floor! You can do this by solving one equation for time and substituting that expression in the other equation.] Rather than writing the equations with the angle, θ, explicitly shown, it is suggested that you use the symbols vox and voy where vox = vo cosθ and voy = vo sinθ to simplify the algebraic manipulations. You need to solve for the range,
R, in terms of vox, voy, h, and g. The details of this derivation must be shown in your lab report.
Fig. 1
Picture of Ball Launcher
Fig. 2
Instructions and Precautions for Using the Ball Launcher:
y v 0
θ
h
x R
Exercise 3: Predicting/Measuring the Landing Position at Angles Other Than Zero
Exercise 4: The Real Test
tan θ = v 02 /gR + [( v 02 /gR)^2 - 1 + 2 v 02 h/gR^2 ]1/
where v 0 is the initial launch speed, R is the range, h is the initial launch height, and g is the acceleration of gravity. Show your calculations in your final report. You can earn up to 5 extra credit points by showing the details of the calculation to get this algebraic expression for tan θ. [Hint: Again you should start with the horizontal and vertical position equations.]
Exercise 5: Uncertainty Analysis Check List [Refer to the Uncertainty/Graphical Analysis Supplement at the back of the lab manual]
In Exercise 2 you measured at least three horizontal distance, or range, values for each launcher setting (short, medium, or long range). Since these distances did not all come out exactly the same for a given launch condition, some uncertainty is associated with the measurement. A rather obvious “best” distance value is simply the average, or mean, of the distances, but how do we get a numerical value for the uncertainty associated with it? The sample standard deviation, denoted by σx, is a way to do this for repeated values that we think should really be the same because we did not change any of the conditions. The ball is initially launched at some height above the floor, and this measurement also has some uncertainty determined by the measuring instrument and our measurement technique. Both of these uncertainties contribute to the uncertainty in the initial speed of the ball. Thus we must “propagate” the uncertainty of both these measurements to get the uncertainty in the value of the initial speed. The “maximum-minimum” method is appropriate for PHYS 101, but the “partial derivative” method is appropriate for PHYS 201. Show your calculations clearly in your report.
In Exercise 3 you calculated theoretical values for the range of the projectile assuming that the initial speed, initial height, and the launch angle were known quantities. The measured ranges are “fuzzy” numbers, in other words having uncertainty associated with them as you have previously calculated using the standard deviations. If the calculated range values lie within the “fuzziness” of the experimental values, then you can claim they are the same within the uncertainty of the experiment. If not, then you must conclude that they did not agree, and you may wish to resort to a percent difference as a means of comparison.
In Exercise 4 again compare your given range value with the “fuzzy” experimental range value to determine whether they agree or not. Use a percent difference as a backup.
In Conclusion
Summarize all your results, preferably in a table where the quantities with their uncertainties and comparisons between predicted values and experimental values are clearly displayed. Are you convinced that the theoretical predictions made by separating the horizontal and vertical motions agree with experiment, at least within the calculated uncertainties of the experiment? Your answers need to be based on your experimental results and the calculated uncertainties of the quantities you are comparing. Please don’t make vague statements that are not directly supported by your calculations and measurements.
Before you leave the lab Straighten up your lab station. Make sure that the projectile ball is back in the plastic tray. Report any problems or suggest improvements to your TA.