Service of Process - Civil Procedure - Lecture Notes, Study notes of Civil procedure

These are the lecture notes of Civil Procedure. Key important points are: Supplemental Jurisdiction, Cases, Constitution, Controversies, Citizens, Different States, Foreign States, Citizens or Subjects, Pendent Jurisdiction, Common Law Fraud

Typology: Study notes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/27/2013

olala
olala 🇮🇳

4.5

(2)

34 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Civil Procedure
1st theme of class: balancing enforcement of a substantive rule of law against autonomy, against
efficiencyespecially, when should a case be ended before discovery and/or trial?
Service of Process
3rd theme of class: statutory interpretation
Process: pieces of paper; Service of process: the way those papers get delivered.
Service (we are concerned only about service in U.S. and only on individuals and on
corporations or unincorporated associations – ignoring e.g. rules for service on gov’t officials, on
incompetents etc.)
Gives notice to defendant that a lawsuit is pending
Rule 55(a): Default – if the defendant doesn’t answer
o When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed
to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise,
the clerk must enter the party’s default.
Rule 60: Relief from a judgment or order (see slide for complete rule)
What if service is improper? How are the service rules enforced?
o If you default:
Motion to set aside judgment by defendant under Rule 60 (under (b), if
service was improper, you can get rid of default judgment), or
Collateral attack plaintiff can sue on default judgment in a place that has
jurisdiction over money that will allow for enforcement of judgment
(collect the debt) after defendant defaulted as a result of improper service;
new types of defense can be brought up (ex. bankruptcy); defendant
collaterally attacks the judgment on the basis of improper service (attack
in a different proceeding; defendant is saying plaintiff is trying to collect a
debt that doesn’t exist, and the debt does not exist because of issues in
earlier lawsuit); collateral attack concerning service only works if you
defaulted in other judgment
o If you find out about the suit despite the inadequate service:
Pre-answer motion to dismiss for insufficient service: FRCP 12(b)(5)
grounds for dismissal under Federal Rules; sometimes courts allow case to
proceed even if service is improper because defendant did receive motion
(though doesn’t often happen in federal courts)
Defense of insufficient service in the answer
Waiver of service of summons – Rule 4(d)
o Plaintiff sends various papers including waiver to defendant by mail
o If defendant submits waiver
o Defendant gets 60 days to answer instead of 20 (as an incentive)
o If defendant refuses, defendant must pay cost of service (unless D can show good
cause for refusing)
o Sometimes statute of limitations stops at service, not filing
Docsity.com
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Service of Process - Civil Procedure - Lecture Notes and more Study notes Civil procedure in PDF only on Docsity!

Civil Procedure 1 st^ theme of class: balancing enforcement of a substantive rule of law against autonomy, against efficiency – especially, when should a case be ended before discovery and/or trial?

Service of Process

3 rd^ theme of class: statutory interpretation

Process: pieces of paper; Service of process: the way those papers get delivered.

Service (we are concerned only about service in U.S. and only on individuals and on corporations or unincorporated associations – ignoring e.g. rules for service on gov’t officials, on incompetents etc.)

  • Gives notice to defendant that a lawsuit is pending
  • Rule 55(a): Default – if the defendant doesn’t answer o When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.
  • Rule 60: Relief from a judgment or order (see slide for complete rule)
  • What if service is improper? How are the service rules enforced? o If you default:  Motion to set aside judgment by defendant under Rule 60 (under (b), if service was improper, you can get rid of default judgment), or  Collateral attack – plaintiff can sue on default judgment in a place that has jurisdiction over money that will allow for enforcement of judgment (collect the debt) after defendant defaulted as a result of improper service; new types of defense can be brought up (ex. bankruptcy); defendant collaterally attacks the judgment on the basis of improper service (attack in a different proceeding; defendant is saying plaintiff is trying to collect a debt that doesn’t exist, and the debt does not exist because of issues in earlier lawsuit); collateral attack concerning service only works if you defaulted in other judgment o If you find out about the suit despite the inadequate service:  Pre-answer motion to dismiss for insufficient service: FRCP 12(b)(5) – grounds for dismissal under Federal Rules; sometimes courts allow case to proceed even if service is improper because defendant did receive motion (though doesn’t often happen in federal courts)  Defense of insufficient service in the answer
  • Waiver of service of summons – Rule 4(d) o Plaintiff sends various papers including waiver to defendant by mail o If defendant submits waiver o Defendant gets 60 days to answer instead of 20 (as an incentive) o If defendant refuses, defendant must pay cost of service (unless D can show good cause for refusing) o Sometimes statute of limitations stops at service, not filing

o but if the plaintiff relies on waiver of service, the time of service is when the plaintiff files the waiver with the court after receiving it back from the defendant o this becomes an issue for the plaintiff if the statute of limitations is about to run out – defendant can run out the clock o waiver of service rarely used, at least by big firms

Service on Individuals

  • Hypo 1: o insufficient process: Need summons and complaint; o insufficient service: complaint cannot be served by party Rule 4(c)); o Is service OK if Massachusetts and Virginia state law say that a party can serve? o After all, 4(e)(1) says that an individual “may be served in a judicial district of the United States by: (1) following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made” o In fact, Massachusetts and Virginia state laws are don’t allow for service by a party either: Mass. law says sheriff must serve; VA says sheriff or person 18+ and not a party or otherwise interested in the suit can serve). o BUT IF Mass. law allowed a party to serve, Glannon believes service is ok, but Green does not.  Green: Rule 4(c)(2) says who can serve (with no reference to state’s rules of who can serve) and 4(e) says state methods of HOW (not who) one can serve are acceptable. Formalistic/textualist view of Federal Rules. (Theme: statutory interpretation)  Glannon: Mass. can have a narrow method of who may serve because how one can serve is generous. Drafters of federal rules would probably want the state’s “who serves” rule to be used when the state’s “how to serve” rule is being used under 4(e)(1) o Purposive view of Federal Rules. (Theme: statutory interpretation)
  • Hypo 2: Service satisfied. Dwelling place is not important because Rule 4(e)(2)(A): “delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally .” Rule 4(m) allow for 120 days after complaint is filed to serve defendant, so time delay is not an issue with service either.
  • Hypo 3: Does employee of a corporate plaintiff serving the defendant count as a party serving the defendant in violation of Rule 4(c)(2)? “party” is a troublesome term in regards to a corporation being a plaintiff. Employee can be motivated to serve properly or improperly, therefore becoming a conflicted party. Courts have generally found it is ok for employees of a corporate plaintiff to serve; however, when CEO or someone very invested in the case, would be considered service by a party and so improper.
  • Hypo 4: Insufficient o Rule 4(e)(2)(B) says merely “suitable age and discretion,” so daughter’s age is not a problem; however, she does not reside at the summer home, and it is not defendant’s usual dwelling place.