



Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Asignatura: Mètodes destudi de la literatura anglesa, Profesor: Jesús Tronch, Carrera: Estudis Anglesos, Universidad: UV
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 5
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!




http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/hopkins_guide_to_literary_theory/free/ archetypal_theory_and_criticism.html
Archetypal Theory and Criticism The Johns Hopkins guide to literary theory and criticism by Michael Groden and Martin Kreiswirth. The Johns Hopkins University Press, London,1994. First online edition 1997.
The term "archetype" (arche, "original"; typos, "form") Northrop Frye introduced new distinctions in literary criticism between myth and archetype. For Frye, as William K. Wimsatt and Cleanth Brooks put it, "archetype, borrowed from Jung, means a primordial image, a part of the collective unconscious, the psychic residue of numberless experiences of the same kind, and thus part of the inherited response-pattern of the race" (709). Archetypal criticism was never linked with any academic tradition and remained organically bound to its roots in depth psychology: the individual and collective psyche, dreams, and the analytic process.
http://www.wsu.edu/~delahoyd/lit.crit.html
Archetypal criticism argues that archetypes determine the form and function of literary works,
that a text's meaning is shaped by cultural and psychological myths. Archetypes are the unknowable basic forms personified or concretized images, symbols, or patterns which may
include motifs such as the quest or the heavenly ascent, recognizable character types such as the trickster or the hero, symbols such as the apple or snake, or images such as crucifixion, all laden
with meaning already when employed in a particular work.
Carl Jung postulated that humankind has a "collective unconscious," a kind of universal psyche,
which is manifested in dreams and myths and which harbours themes and images that we all inherit. Literature, therefore, imitates not the world but rather the "total dream of humankind."
Jung called mythology "the textbook of the archetypes" (qtd. in Walker 17).
Archetypal critics find New Criticism too atomistic in ignoring intertextual elements and in
approaching the text as if it existed in a vacuum. After all, we recognize story patterns and symbolic associations at least from other texts we have read, if not innately; we know how to
form assumptions and expectations from encounters with black hats, springtime settings, evil stepmothers, and so forth. So surely meaning cannot exist solely on the page of a work, nor can
that work be treated as an independent entity.
Archetypal images and story patterns encourage readers to participate ritualistically in basic
beliefs, fears, and anxieties of their age. These archetypal features not only constitute the intelligibility of the text but also tap into a level of desires and anxieties of humankind.
http://www.geocities.com/haverfordenglish/10litcrit.html
Archetypal approach assumes that there is a collection of symbols, images, characters, and motifs (archetypes) that evokes basically the same response in all people. According to the psychologist Carl Jung, mankind possesses a "collective unconscious" that contains these archetypes and that are common to all of humanity. Myth critics identify these archetypal patterns and discuss how they function in the works. They believe that these archetypes are the source of much of literature's power.
Advantages: Provides a universalistic approach to literature and identifies a reason why certain literature may survive the test of time. It works well with works that are highly symbolic.
http://www.fccps.k12.va.us/gm/faculty/english/archcrit.htm
by Ellen K.
Archetypal critics contend that literary greatness depends on themes and images shared with other literature rather than on the author’s originality.
The origins of archetypal criticism are in psychology and myth analysis. It is also called "myth criticism". Jung, stated that there were two parts to the human unconscious, the personal and the archetypal. Personal unconscious is our own repressed or other memories which influence us. The archetypal, or collective unconscious is a theoretical pool of memories that everyone shares, a sort of shared knowledge.
Characters
hero/hero’s journey - the protagonist, the hero’s journey is always his journey from childhood to adulthood, but can also be an actual journey to find something such as his past, usually male examples: Odysseus (Homer), Hercules, Robin Hood, King Arthur death - the antagonist, attempts to thwart the hero’s plans and waylay his journey, greedy, lustful, usually rich, examples: the White Witch, King John, Hades shadow - the evil inside the hero, conflict, temptation, obstacles in journey, this is not represented by a character, but is more of a theme, Jung was not clear mother and father - may be dead, search for parents may be included in the hero’s journey " wise old man " - provides guidance, often has magical powers, examples: Merlin " love interest " - usually female, as the hero is almost always male, sometimes distracts the hero from his journey, provides motivation, eventual happiness together sidekick - self explanatory, provides a foil for the hero, examples: Will Scarlet, Watson
Themes Good vs. Evil, Light vs. Dark
the misfit in society (the hero or the archetype of death) interpretation of dreams the dead returning to life, or simply advising the living (esp. in Greek myths)
Another archetypal critic, Northrop Frye, contends that the origins of the myths are unimportant, that the literary critic needs to go past this and get on with the criticism. Lee, Alvin A. "Archetypal Criticism." Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory. Ed. and comp. Irena R. Makaryk. Toronto: U of Toronto Press,
http://www.library.utoronto.ca/utel/glossary/Archetypal_criticism.html
Glossary of Literary Theory, by Greig E. Henderson and Christopher Brown
B. Archetypal Motifs or Patterns
Jung was also careful to explain that archetypes are not inherited ideas or patterns of thought, but rather that they are predispositions to respond in similar ways to certain stimuli: "In reality they belong to the realm of activities of the instincts and in that sense they represent inherited forms of psychic behavior" (xvi).
In other words, myths are the means by which archetypes, essentially unconscious forms, become manifest and articulate to the conscious mind. Jung indicated further that archetypes reveal themselves in the dreams of individuals, so that we might say that dreams are "personalized myths" and myths are "depersonalized dreams."