Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Brisbane Airport Case Study: Reducing Earth Transportation Costs with Constraints - Prof. , Apuntes de Administración de Empresas

This case study involves the redevelopment of brisbane airport in australia, where 2 million cubic meters of earth need to be moved from five sources to nine destinations. The first phase requires finding the minimum cost schedule for earth transportation, while the second phase considers accessibility constraints for certain destinations that can only be reached after building the perimeter road. Using lingo, formulate and solve the problem in both phases.

Tipo: Apuntes

2013/2014

Subido el 18/01/2014

eolina93
eolina93 🇪🇸

3.9

(369)

200 documentos

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
CASE STUDY: BRISBANE AIRPORT
Brisbane, in Australia, decided to redevelop its international airport. This involved,
basically, moving large amounts of sand from various sources to various destinations.
Normally, how the sand is going to be moved is left to the judgement of the building
company, but Brisbane, in order to guide the competitive tender and judge the
submissions from interested companies, employed consultants to model the situation.
This was justified on the grounds that 2 million cubic meters of earth had to be moved,
and moving earth around represented a large portion of the cost of the redevelopment.
This is a two-phase problem formulation. In the first phase the problem is simplified to
produce a tentative solution. The second phase includes further complexity. You are
required to formulate, and solve with LINGO, the problem in its first phase and in its
second phase.
The sand was available at several locations, but these were grouped into five sources,
which very much matched the work to be done by the construction company: Apron
(AP), Terminal (TM), Airline Area (AA), Maintenance Compound (MC), and Access
Road (AR). Similarly, after grouping, there were nine destinations: Localiser North
(LN), Extension (EX), Low Areas (LA), Roads (R), Car Park (CP), Localiser South
(LS), Fire Station (FS), Oil Industry (OI), and Perimeter Road (PR).
The amount of earth available at each source and required in each destination is given in
the table below. The table also gives the distance between sources and destinations.
Due to difficulties in the terrain, the possibility of sending earth from MC and AR to LS
was not contemplated.
LN EX LA R CP LS FS OI PR Avail’e
AP 22 26 12 10 18 18 11 8.5 20 960
TM 20 28 14 12 20 20 13 10 22 201
AA 16 20 26 20 1.5 28 6 22 18 71
MC 20 22 26 22 6 2 21 18 24
AR 22 26 10 4 16 24 14 21 99
Requ’d 60 217 444 315 50 7 20 90 150 1355
Distances are measured in units of 100 metres, earth volumes are measured in cubic
metres.
In the first part of this case study you are required to find the minimum cost schedule
for taking earth (sand) from the source to the destination. The cost is obtained by
multiplying volume by distance. Notice that this is a “balanced problem”, this means
that the total amount available is equal to the total amount required.
Second part of the problem. The above formulation is very tentative and does not
take into account a very important practical issue: there are destinations that cannot be
accessed from the sources until the perimeter road has been built. The table below
gives the accessibility conditions. I have marked with * the destinations that can only
be accessed in a second stage when the road has been built. You can think of this
problem as a two-step one: first you can move earth around while, at the same time, you
build the perimeter road; second, you move earth to the sites that the perimeter road has
made accessible.
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Brisbane Airport Case Study: Reducing Earth Transportation Costs with Constraints - Prof. y más Apuntes en PDF de Administración de Empresas solo en Docsity!

CASE STUDY: BRISBANE AIRPORT

Brisbane, in Australia, decided to redevelop its international airport. This involved, basically, moving large amounts of sand from various sources to various destinations. Normally, how the sand is going to be moved is left to the judgement of the building company, but Brisbane, in order to guide the competitive tender and judge the submissions from interested companies, employed consultants to model the situation. This was justified on the grounds that 2 million cubic meters of earth had to be moved, and moving earth around represented a large portion of the cost of the redevelopment.

This is a two-phase problem formulation. In the first phase the problem is simplified to produce a tentative solution. The second phase includes further complexity. You are required to formulate, and solve with LINGO, the problem in its first phase and in its second phase.

The sand was available at several locations, but these were grouped into five sources, which very much matched the work to be done by the construction company: Apron (AP), Terminal (TM), Airline Area (AA), Maintenance Compound (MC), and Access Road (AR). Similarly, after grouping, there were nine destinations: Localiser North (LN), Extension (EX), Low Areas (LA), Roads (R), Car Park (CP), Localiser South (LS), Fire Station (FS), Oil Industry (OI), and Perimeter Road (PR).

The amount of earth available at each source and required in each destination is given in the table below. The table also gives the distance between sources and destinations. Due to difficulties in the terrain, the possibility of sending earth from MC and AR to LS was not contemplated.

LN EX LA R CP LS FS OI PR Avail’e AP 22 26 12 10 18 18 11 8.5 20 960 TM 20 28 14 12 20 20 13 10 22 201 AA 16 20 26 20 1.5 28 6 22 18 71 MC 20 22 26 22 6 2 21 18 24 AR 22 26 10 4 16 24 14 21 99 Requ’d 60 217 444 315 50 7 20 90 150 1355

Distances are measured in units of 100 metres, earth volumes are measured in cubic metres.

In the first part of this case study you are required to find the minimum cost schedule for taking earth (sand) from the source to the destination. The cost is obtained by multiplying volume by distance. Notice that this is a “balanced problem”, this means that the total amount available is equal to the total amount required.

Second part of the problem. The above formulation is very tentative and does not take into account a very important practical issue: there are destinations that cannot be accessed from the sources until the perimeter road has been built. The table below gives the accessibility conditions. I have marked with * the destinations that can only be accessed in a second stage when the road has been built. You can think of this problem as a two-step one: first you can move earth around while, at the same time, you build the perimeter road; second, you move earth to the sites that the perimeter road has made accessible.

LN EX LA R CP LS FS OI PR

AP * * * * *

TM * * * * *

AA * * * * * *

MC * * * * NA *

AR * * NA *

Sites that can only be accessed once the perimeter road has been built are signalled by means of the symbol *. The possibility of moving earth from MC and AR to LS continues not to be contemplated.

Formulate the problem taking into account this constraint and compare the solution with the previous one.

Resolution:

  1. Decision variables: How much to send from source i to destination j : X (^) ij
  2. Constraints:

LN EX LA R CP LS FS OI PR Avail’e AP 22 11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

TM 20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

AA 16

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

MC 20

41

42

43

44

45

47

48

49

AR 22

51

42

53

54

55

57

58

59

Requ’d 60 217 444 315 50 7 20 90 150 1355

  • Available constraints: