Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


corporate tax, Apuntes de Administración de Empresas

Asignatura: tax, Profesor: , Carrera: Business Administration and Management, Universidad: URJC

Tipo: Apuntes

2014/2015

Subido el 14/01/2015

evz
evz 🇪🇸

3.6

(5)

1 documento

1 / 35

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
1
CORPORATE TAXATION
CLASS PRESENTATIONS
Unit 1. Basic Concepts. The Principles of Taxation.
Unit 2. Personal Income Tax.
Unit 3. Corporate Income Tax
Unit 4. Value Added Tax
Unit 5. Tax Harmonization in the EU
Carlos Garcimartín
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga corporate tax y más Apuntes en PDF de Administración de Empresas solo en Docsity!

CORPORATE TAXATION

CLASS PRESENTATIONS

Unit 1. Basic Concepts. The Principles of Taxation.

Unit 2. Personal Income Tax.

Unit 3. Corporate Income Tax

Unit 4. Value Added Tax

Unit 5. Tax Harmonization in the EU

Carlos Garcimartín

BASIC CONCEPTS: THE PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION

  1. Efficiency: The concept of deadweight loss
    • Lump-sum tax
    • Deadweight loss

2 2

DWL = ab bc = ε p pre − tPpre − tXt

  • By increasing prices and reducing quantities bought and sold, taxes impose losses on consumers and producers alike. The sum of these costs almost always exceeds the revenue that the taxes raise—and the extent to which they do so is the deadweight loss
  • Optimal Taxation Rules emerge:
    • Elasticities
    • The Ramsey Rule

2.2 The concept of progressivity

  • A tax is progressive if the effective tax rate increases as the tax base grows.
  • Examples: Flat tax, VAT
  • The Kakwani index to measure progressivity: K= GT - GY

2.3. The concept of redistribution

  • A tax is redistributive if the pre-tax income distribution is less egalitarian than the post-tax distribution.
  • The Reynolds-Smolenski index to measure the redistributive capacity of taxes: RS= GY - GY-T
  • The link between progressivity and redistribution

K t

t RS

= 1

  1. Simplicity; for both, the taxpayers and the tax administration
  2. Flexibility

PERSONAL INCOME TAXATION

  • Tax Imposed directly on personal income
  • Basic PIT scheme: Taxpayer  Income  Tax Base  Tax Base Reductions  Tax Rate  Tax Deductions  Tax Liability

Taxpayers

  • Should the PIT discriminate across taxpayers? single vs. married; active population vs. retired people; etc.
  • Residence definition: more than 183 days
  • Residents vs. Non-residents

Tax Base

  • Schedular vs. Global
    • Schedular: separate taxes are imposed on different categories of income.
    • Global: single tax is imposed on all income, whatever its nature.
  • Types of income subject to the tax: earned income (pensions?), savings income (interests, dividends, capital gains, sole proprietors?)
  • Tax base reductions vs. tax liability deductions
  • Dual taxes

Main characteristics of dual schemes:

  1. labour income is taxed at progressive rates;
  2. capital income is taxed at a flat rate; and
  3. the capital income rate equals the lowest rate on labour income and the CIT rate

Pros:

  • Higher revenue and progressivity compared to weak integral schemes
  • Possible increase in taxation on capital income
  • Lower administration and compliance costs
  • Possible decrease in tax avoidance and increase in savings

Cons:

  • Potential arbitrage between capital and labour income
  • Possible negative social perception of the lower rates on capital income

PIT TRENDS IN THE EU

Big differences across MS. Broadly speaking, new MS show lower tax/GDP ratios

PIT Revenue (% GDP). 2007/

Source: Eurostat

Decrease in rates (until the crisis), enlargement of the tax base, and reduction in the number of tax brackets

Top personal income tax rate. EU average

Source: Eurostat

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Flat taxes in the new MS and dualisation in the old MS

PIT in EU Countries Country PIT Type Austria Comprehensive and progressive with some dualisation Belgium Different categories of income subject to different rates. 25% withholding tax rate for most interest income Bulgaria Flat tax Cyprus Progressive rate structure. Capital income is mostly exempt Czech. Rep Flat tax Denmark Comprehensive and progressive Estonia Flat tax Finland Dual system France Comprehensive and progressive, but some types of capital income is taxed at flat rates Germany Semi-dual system UK Comprehensive and progressive, but some types of capital income is taxed at flat rates Greece Different rate structures are applied to different types of income Hungary Flat tax Ireland Semi-dual system Italy Semi-dual system Latvia Flat tax Lithuania Flat tax Luxembourg Comprehensive and progressive with some dualisation Malta Comprehensive and progressive with some dualisation The Netherlands Semi-dual system Poland Semi-dual system Portugal Comprehensive and progressive Romania Flat Tax Slovakia Flat Tax Slovenia Semi-dual system Spain Semi-dual system Sweden Dual System

COORPORATE INCOME TAXATION

  • Tax Imposed directly on corporate net income.
    • Why tax companies?
    • Borrowing vs. retained profits
    • Integration between the CIT and the PIT
  • Basic CIT scheme: Taxpayer  Profits  Tax Base  Tax Rate  Tax Deductions  Tax Liability

From profits to the tax base

  • Revenue and expenses included in the tax base
  • Costs and expenses:
    • Depreciation costs
    • Provisions
    • Value rules: transfer-pricing, under-capitalisation
    • Fines
    • Etc.
  • Tax base compensation over time?

Tax rate Progressive?

Tax deductions and benefits Cost and rationale

CIT TRENDS IN THE EU

Differences across MS are lower than those in PIT. The exceptions are Luxembourg, Malta, and Cyprus (due to certain “peculiarities”). No particular difference is observed between new and old MS

CIT Revenue (% GDP). 2007/

Source: Eurostat

Rates largely differ across MS: in general, lower rates are found in the new MS. Strong divergence across MS is observed in the first half of the 2000’s, mostly due to intensified tax cuts in the new MS after EU accession

Statutory CIT rate. EU Countries

Source: Eurostat

Statutory CIT rate. EU average

Source: Eurostat

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

VALUE-ADDED TAX

Main characteristics of the VAT

  • VAT is a form of indirect tax collected at various stages of production-distribution chains, but it is paid in the end by consumers.
  • VAT has an invoice-based credit nature: a taxable business can claim for the refund of the input VAT only if the claim is supported by purchase invoices
  • Firms at any stage of the production-distribution chain charge their customers the VAT on their sales, and then claim for the VAT paid on their purchases
  • Many countries have introduced the VAT to replace turnover tax or some type of single-stage sales tax

Main pros of the VAT:

  • absence of cascading effect;
  • information provider;
  • international trade neutrality (origin vs. destination principle)

Taxes on final consumption would also show some of these advantages, but drawing the distinction between wholesale and retail sales is difficult in practice

Main cons:

  • Regressivity;
  • high compliance costs;
  • fraud and evasion.

Uniform vs. differentiated VAT rates

  • Effects on progressivity
  • Costs (revenue costs, compliances and administrative costs, etc.)
  • Fraud
  • Lobbying

Shares of tax base subject to different rates

Source: TAXUD (2011): “A retrospective evaluation of elements of the EU VAT system”

VAT TRENDS IN THE EU

VAT revenue across MS is more homogenous than that of PIT and CIT. However, the contribution of VAT to total revenue tends to be higher in new MS

VAT Revenue (% GDP). 2007/

Source: Eurostat

Increase in rates, especially strong since the beginning of crisis; modifications of the product lists subject to reduced rates

Standard VAT rate. EU average

Source: own elaboration based on Eurostat

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Although deep differences exist across MS, there is a clear trend towards convergence (conversely to CIT and PIT rates)

Standard VAT rate. EU Countries

Source: Eurostat

Standard VAT rate. Coefficient of variation

Source: own elaboration based on Eurostat

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013