Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Derecho Comparado 01 2013, Exámenes de Derecho Comparado

comparative

Tipo: Exámenes

2012/2013

Subido el 31/12/2012

leidiane-14
leidiane-14 🇪🇸

2 documentos

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Derecho Comparado 01 2013 y más Exámenes en PDF de Derecho Comparado solo en Docsity!

YS/L 91 J0 HOBTINSUOO) AL (P SMUNSU] Ae] URo HS op wpa UOpeIOQp[|O9 UL ME] JeuTuro ut suadxa Aq perezoqejs juatunoop Y KEN LOA MAN JO 9J898 SU JO apos ¡pued 291 (9 30107 UE ÁPUIaImO apo) Je1spad UL (e “SF ¿aPOD [HUA [OPOJA, OU “S9ITIS PAJTEC 941 Y] “OT mogsás Ama 1OJSÁS POXIL Y 5s9201d JeLresIoape ssasoad personismbur ¿SSITINOO AB UOTIVIO) UE pordope Apure sí ssaaoJd [eUpustro JO [9POUL1EHAA 6 Sirunanaoo 94) 103 2105 predtm durop seridin] (p pozoaowz Appeomonoo¡s Ápmouvunad 1nq “59 Sutog sureopx (o vospid mr dos]s os so3Hgo (a 13pI0 MA UL POmuzisop ao e ye ep su) ¿o spotiad parzoods of ureurar or sabirgo (E) “If Un sosuapuos ÁsJununuoo Jo justrarbos Se MaJIMO,, SUL 8 sIStO0p ales (Pp £umaes arerodioo ($ amos (4 SUNGEN SUORRAA (2 se poreuBisap s1 “suopesodioo jo Apuemtuopeld “suonezmueBio JO ÁNIqen Jeumuo SUL “£ duo (Py Desa (S Aquesur (q ¡em Apoods » yo jerag (e 20UAJap SAFBAOUUL, UU SE ponSo[eJeo St so0Uajop FUIMOJTOf 01 JO JONA “9 sesmoxo (p suoneonsal (a Auger ams (43 rare (e :¿soDUaJOp jo Aroorgo Y 101 sí sidoouoo SUjMo][o7 DU JO YOIYAA CS Amaenoorss «(p saaz soe (o suopesgnsaf (q Arquer] axezodioo (e ¿204 Su9ua Bunstxo Á11pIqe [puostad,, a[cioud [ezoual aya o) iondaoxa te sjrosardaz SuOnMnst SUEMo[[oy 21) JO UDIMAL Cp 204931 89u pue “snpop "ear sust (p, 0141 909 70 SOnArmonoo op pue sol srqoe “ex suo (13) oomo8rdou pue snerstyoe tear sua (q, 2ouapradur puz syop tuonoe (e :¿MISISÁS AN] UOUUITLIOO AU] UE SUUTLO O Jd99UOO IU) JO SIHAMISTO 291) AN IR FRA CE -1 sirupe Ánunos e jo moy amerdhg aq uoqas Á]mo q 597. (p -uOnmunsuoo ou Áq parumad st 11 taa ÁTmo 1mq “59 (o 519, Áppesouod “so ¿87 “040n CON (8 ¿SITIOS ANE] UOLITEIOO UY ME[ JPUPIILIO FO 20INOS Y AE] ASEO MIS] “E sasuo JE[IuaS 01 posodui! 0q pIROYS Sar Jeprens (p SI]NSOX JU[TUIS ORO ppnom. Ko1p Je os sana pordiourd 01 Surpsoo0* paptsap aq pmous saseo seputs (3) DUAJO StTeS DL JOJ 2oJ:44 pertoosord aq teo auo om (4, 20U12[JO SUIS ay 20f 9014] payspund oq ueo auo ou (e :ajdrounid sIsto9p axeis 1 o] Burpiogoy *] gp ENIBES ES “HMNVNYNS Z 1S31SMSLSAS TVDAT1 OL NOLLONCOHAN! ALLY VAIMOO 11. The guaranteo that no act may be punished as a crime unless it was not criminal under a law applicable to the actor at the time of the fact is: 4) the due process guarantee 9) de principle of legality c) the prosecution process d) the principle of proportionality 12. The discretional power to decide whether or not to prosecute a crime is more casily recognised by a) German Criminal Law (2) Common law systems +) Southern Europe Criminal Law systems d) National Criminal Law, in comparison with International Criminal Law. 13. Purpose, knowledge, recklessness and negligence are a) Elements ofthe Germanio-based concept of crime b) Modalities of actus revs in the comnon law concept of crime E) States of mind described by the American Model Penal Code (mens rea) 4) Degrees of criminal ability in all criminal justice systems. 14. The pbilosophical justification of punishment that aims to prevent future law breaking by other citizens trough an efficient and effective penal sanction imposed to the wrongdoer is known as a) Retribution b) Special prevention 0) Restoration A) General prevention 15. Crimes whose commission or effects take place in more than one country and require from the State coordinated strategies to prevent and prosecute them aro a) International crimes b) Natural orimes L6)? Transnational crimes d) Conventional crimes 16. Imagine that Josef K., Ministry of Franco, committed war crimes by ordering attacks against civilians in Congo on January 1998. He caa not be prosecuted by tho International Criminal Court. Why? a) Itis mota crime under the jurisdiction of the ICC (9) The act was committed before the entry of the force of the Romo Statute 5, France did not ratified the Romo Statute d) ICC can not prosecule members of democratic Goverments. 17, On the basis of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the European Union adopted binding efícct standards harmonising national criminal systems by way of a) Conventions b) Parliamentary laws e) Recommendations Cd Framework Decisions 18. The European Union adopted Directives alter the entry into force o? the Lisbon Treaty in matters of a) eybercrime and terrorism b) crimes against the economical interests of the European Union (0), trafficking of human beings and sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of 5 cnilaren d) drug trafficking and prostitution. 19. When Criminal Law admils the State”s jurisdiction to prosecute crimes which were committed out of the State's territory although there is no connection with national citizens or interests, that is the so-called a) Broad concept of territory b) Principle of active personality <) Principle of passive personality (é) Universal jurisdiction 20. Anselm von Feuerbach was interested in Comparativo Criminal Law because of (2). his rejection of traditional natural law “B) his will to eliminate the influence of the Enlightenment in German Law 9) tho superiority of the American Law over the Bavarian Law. d) his need to elaborate the first Criminal Code of the Reich, which was based on exotic elements.