Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Discourse Analysis (Unit 11), Apuntes de Lingüística

Tema "Discourse Analysis" de Linguistica Aplicada (2º)

Tipo: Apuntes

2018/2019

Subido el 23/05/2019

guadalupe29
guadalupe29 🇪🇸

4.5

(2)

6 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
UNIT 11: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
!!
—DISCOURSE: the analysis of discourse is concerned with the study of language in texts and conversations.!
!
—Interpreting discourse: we can cope with texts which appear to break a lot of the rules of the English
language. Yet we can build an interpretation. The following example, provided by Eric Nelson, contains all
kind of errors, yet it can be understood:
!
My town.
My natal was in a small town, very close to Riyadh capital of Saudi Arabia. The distant between
my town and Riyadh 7 miles exactly. The name of this Almasani that means in English Factories. It
takes this name from the peopls carrer. In my childhood I remember the people live. It was very
simple. Most the people was farmer.
!
Rather than simply reject the text as ungrammatical, we try to make sense of it. It’s this effort to interpret
and how we accomplish it that are the key elements investigated in the study of discourse.
!
—Cohesion: cohesion is formed by the ties and connections that exist between texts. For example:
!
My father once brought a Lincoln convertible. He did it by saving every penny he could. That car
would be worth a fortune nowadays. However, he sold it to help pay for my college education.
Sometimes I think Id rather have the convertible.
!
There are connections here in the use of words to maintain reference to the same people and things
throughout: father — he — he — he; my — my — I; Lincoln — it.
Analysis of these cohesive ties within a text gives us some insight into how writers structure what they
want to say. However, by itself, cohesion would not sufficient to enable us to make sense of what we
read.
!
—Coherence: the key to the concept of “coherence” isn’t something that exists in words or structures, but
something that exists in people. It’s people who “make sense” of what they read and hear. For example:
!
MATT: Have you ever seen Titanic?
!
KAT: I hate Leonardo DiCrapio.
!
MATT: Oh, okay then
!
There are no cohesive ties within this fragment of discourse, so how does each of these people manage
to make sense of what the other says? They do use the information contained in the sentences expressed,
but there must be something else involved in the interpretation. Matt asks Kat if she has ever seen
“Titanic” and she answers that she hates Leonardo DiCaprio; since DiCaprio is the main actor of the
movie, Matt understands that she hasn’t seen it.
!
—Speech events: there is enormous variation in what people say and do in different circumstances. For
example, we would have to specify the roles of speaker and hearer and their relatioship (whether they
are friends, strangers, men, women, young, old, of equal status or not, etc).
!
—Communicative competences: it’s a concept that was created by Dell Hymes. According to
him, when we use language we find four different parameters:
!
1. Possibility: this means that it has to be gramatically correct. For example: “Green
ideas sleep furiously”. This sentence is gramatically correct but it doesn’t make any sense.
So this sentence is not possible.
!
1
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Discourse Analysis (Unit 11) y más Apuntes en PDF de Lingüística solo en Docsity!

UNIT 11: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

—DISCOURSE: the analysis of discourse is concerned with the study of language in texts and conversations.

—Interpreting discourse: we can cope with texts which appear to break a lot of the rules of the English language. Yet we can build an interpretation. The following example, provided by Eric Nelson, contains all kind of errors, yet it can be understood:

My town. My natal was in a small town, very close to Riyadh capital of Saudi Arabia. The distant between my town and Riyadh 7 miles exactly. The name of this Almasani that means in English Factories. It takes this name from the peopl’s carrer. In my childhood I remember the people live. It was very simple. Most the people was farmer.

Rather than simply reject the text as ungrammatical, we try to make sense of it. It’s this effort to interpret and how we accomplish it that are the key elements investigated in the study of discourse.

—Cohesion: cohesion is formed by the ties and connections that exist between texts. For example:

My father once brought a Lincoln convertible. He did it by saving every penny he could. That car would be worth a fortune nowadays. However, he sold it to help pay for my college education. Sometimes I think I’d rather have the convertible.

There are connections here in the use of words to maintain reference to the same people and things throughout: father — he — he — he; my — my — I; Lincoln — it. Analysis of these cohesive ties within a text gives us some insight into how writers structure what they want to say. However, by itself, cohesion would not sufficient to enable us to make sense of what we read.

—Coherence: the key to the concept of “coherence” isn’t something that exists in words or structures, but something that exists in people. It’s people who “make sense” of what they read and hear. For example:

MATT: Have you ever seen “Titanic”?

! KAT: I hate Leonardo DiCrapio.

! MATT: Oh, okay then…

There are no cohesive ties within this fragment of discourse, so how does each of these people manage to make sense of what the other says? They do use the information contained in the sentences expressed, but there must be something else involved in the interpretation. Matt asks Kat if she has ever seen “Titanic” and she answers that she hates Leonardo DiCaprio; since DiCaprio is the main actor of the movie, Matt understands that she hasn’t seen it.

—Speech events: there is enormous variation in what people say and do in different circumstances. For example, we would have to specify the roles of speaker and hearer and their relatioship (whether they are friends, strangers, men, women, young, old, of equal status or not, etc).

—Communicative competences : it’s a concept that was created by Dell Hymes. According to him, when we use language we find four different parameters:

1. Possibility: this means that it has to be gramatically correct. For example: “Green ideas sleep furiously”. This sentence is gramatically correct but it doesn’t make any sense. So this sentence is not possible.

2. Feasability: apart from possible, it has to be feasable. For example: “He is older than his mom”. It’s impossible for someone to be older than their own mother, so this sentence is not feasable.

3. Appropiateness: this is about pronouncing something in the correct context and moment.

4. It should be used : we need to put the language into use (communicaton).

—CONVERSATION ANALYSIS: English conversation can be described as an activity in which two or more people take turns at speaking. Typically, only one person speaks at a time and there tends to be an avoidance of silence between speaking turns. If more than one participant tries to talk at the same time, one fo them usually stops. For the most part, participants wait until one speaker indicates that he or she has finished, usually by signaling a completion point which can be indicated in a number of ways: by asking a question, by pausing, etc. Other participants can indicate that they want to take the speaking turn in a number of ways too: they can start to make short sounds, use body shifts os facial expressions to indicate that they have something to say, etc.

—Turn-taking: there are different expectations of conversational style and different strategies of participation in conversation, which may result in slightly different conventions of turn-taking. We all use this strategy to some extent, usually in situations where we have to work out what we are trying to say while actually saying it. It’s preferably to “fill” the pause with a hesitation marker such as er, em, uh, ah…

—THE CO-OPERATIVE PRINCIPLE: the co-operative principle is presented in the following way, together with what are often called the “Gricean maxims”:

1. The Quantity maxim: make your contribution as informative as is required, but not more, or less, than is required.

2. The Quality maxim: do not say that which you believe to be false or for which you lack adequate evidence. 3. The Relation maxim: be relevant.

4. The Manner maxim: be clear, brief and orderly.

—Hedges: hedges can be described as words or phrases used to indicate that we’re not really sure that what we’re saying is sufficiently correct or complete. For example: this book cover is sort of black (these are examples of hedges for the Quantity maxim because we’re giving the information required, but we’re letting know that we’re not 100% sure about it). Other hedges would be as far as I know; I’m not absolutely sure, but…; correct me if I’m worng, but…; etc.

—Implicatures: when we try to analyze how hedges work, we usually talk about speakers implying something that is not said. For example:

RAMIN: Are you coming to the party tonight?

! SIERRA: I’ve got an exam tomorrow

At first sight, Sierra’s statement is not an aswer to Ramin’s question. Yet Ramin will interpret the statement as meaning “no” or “probably not”, because if she has an exam tomorrow then she’ll probably be studying tonight.

—BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE: the background knowledge is the use of some knowledge we already know to understand something that is not clearly implicit in a sentence (the example of Ramin and Sierra is a good example of it. Ramin uses some background knowledge to understand that Sierra won’t go to the party).