Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


ejercicios conversational analysis (pragmática), Ejercicios de Lingüística

ejercicios del tema de conversational analysis corregidos.

Tipo: Ejercicios

2021/2022

Subido el 12/07/2022

filólogaenapuros
filólogaenapuros 🇪🇸

4.8

(6)

11 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Pragmática y discurso en lengua inglesa Year 2021-2022
Prof. Nuria Calco Cortés
Exercises on Conversation Analysis
Read the following conversations and analyse how turn taking is organised, how the
preferred or dispreffered responses are used and how conversation is damaged and
repaired. Also, analyse the texts from a Discourse Analysis point of view, analysing how
coherence and cohesion are achieved in both texts.
Transcripts extracted from: Redston, C and G. Cunningham (2006). Face 2 Face Intermediate.
Cambridge University Press.
Conversation 1
Context: a group of people are discussing the organisation of a music festival on somebody’s
farmland.
Sarah Clark: ….telling us a bit more about the festival.
Terry Gibson: Please, call me Terry. Well, we’re planning to put on a 3 day festival at Mr
Davidson’s farm on the last weekend in August. We are hoping to have a capacity of 30,000
people and there will be_
Felicity Richards: Sorry, do you mind if I interrupt?
TG: Sure, go ahead
FR: Did you say 30,000 people?
TG: Yes, that’s right.
FR: Well, how do you expect our little village to cope with that many people? It seems to me
that you have not thought about local residents at all.
TG: That’s not true, actually, Felicity.
FR: Mrs Richards.
TG: Sorry, Mrs Richards. We’ve been running festivals for over 10 years and we’ve always had
a very good relationship with local residents. This festival will bring thousands of people to the
area, which will help local businesses and provide jobs for local people.
FR: Well, I’m not sure about that. The people who go to these festivals aren’t the kind of
people we want in our village. It seems to me that the only thing you care about is_
Paul Davidson: Can I say something here?
FR: If I could just finish making this point. The only thing you people care about is making
money. You do not care about local residents at all.
SC: Paul you had something you wanted to say.
PD: Yes, tahnk you. I just wanted to point out that my farm is over 4 miles from Coleford, so
most of the festival-goers won’t pass through the village at all. You’ll never know it’s
happening.
SC: What’s your opinion, Sergeant?
this is a much more formal conversation but we're seeing how the speakers are jumping into each other since they are discussing a problematic topic and they're
getting angry.
There is one moderator: Sarah Clark that is moderating the turns of the speakers, she is organising the turns.
a polite way of interrumping. Here it's obvious that Terry was planning to continue talking.
On the contrary, we can see how this transitions is made in a good way since this sentence is
finished.
In these following three sentences we have an interruption with a correction.
it means that the sentence is unfinished so there
is no transition.
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga ejercicios conversational analysis (pragmática) y más Ejercicios en PDF de Lingüística solo en Docsity!

Prof. Nuria Calco Cortés Exercises on Conversation Analysis Read the following conversations and analyse how turn taking is organised, how the preferred or dispreffered responses are used and how conversation is damaged and repaired. Also, analyse the texts from a Discourse Analysis point of view, analysing how coherence and cohesion are achieved in both texts. Transcripts extracted from: Redston, C and G. Cunningham (2006). Face 2 Face Intermediate. Cambridge University Press. Conversation 1 Context : a group of people are discussing the organisation of a music festival on somebody’s farmland. Sarah Clark: ….telling us a bit more about the festival. Terry Gibson: Please, call me Terry. Well, we’re planning to put on a 3 day festival at Mr Davidson’s farm on the last weekend in August. We are hoping to have a capacity of 30, people and there will be_ Felicity Richards: Sorry, do you mind if I interrupt? TG: Sure, go ahead FR: Did you say 30,000 people? TG: Yes, that’s right. FR: Well, how do you expect our little village to cope with that many people? It seems to me that you have not thought about local residents at all. TG: That’s not true, actually, Felicity. FR: Mrs Richards. TG: Sorry, Mrs Richards. We’ve been running festivals for over 10 years and we’ve always had a very good relationship with local residents. This festival will bring thousands of people to the area, which will help local businesses and provide jobs for local people. FR: Well, I’m not sure about that. The people who go to these festivals aren’t the kind of people we want in our village. It seems to me that the only thing you care about is_ Paul Davidson: Can I say something here? FR: If I could just finish making this point. The only thing you people care about is making money. You do not care about local residents at all. SC: Paul you had something you wanted to say. PD: Yes, tahnk you. I just wanted to point out that my farm is over 4 miles from Coleford, so most of the festival-goers won’t pass through the village at all. You’ll never know it’s happening. SC: What’s your opinion, Sergeant? this is a much more formal conversation but we're seeing how the speakers are jumping into each other since they are discussing a problematic topic and they're getting angry. There is one moderator: Sarah Clark that is moderating the turns of the speakers, she is organising the turns. a polite way of interrumping. Here it's obvious that Terry was planning to continue talking. On the contrary, we can see how this transitions is made in a good way since this sentence is finished. In these following three sentences we have an interruption with a correction. it means that the sentence is unfinished so there is no transition.

Prof. Nuria Calco Cortés Jim Mathews: I’m not sure I agree, actually. Not many people will pass the village, that’s true, but residents will definitely know there’s a festival because of the noise. FR: Yes, absolutely. TG: But the noise won’t be a problem, I promise you. The life music stops_ FR: Won’t be a problem? TG: Can I just finish what I was saying? FR: Yes, of course. TG: The life music will stop at midnight, and after that it will be very quiet, I promise you. PD: Can I make a point here? SC: Yes, of course. PD: Don’t forget there’s a hill between Coleford and the farm, so that will stop a lot of noise. FR: That might be true, but what about all the cars? Surely the traffic will be a big problem? JM: yes, I agree with that. The roads around here aren’t really big enough for that amount of traffic. That’s what worries me most about this idea, to be honest. And there is also the problem of security. We might not have enough police to deal with this festival. SC: What do you think, Mr Gibson? TG: Well, we will be providing our own security staff to check tickets and … Conversation 2 Context : Three friends conversing. Val and Pete arrived at James’ house, the three of them are going out somewhere but James is not quite ready yet. Val: Hi James! James: Hello, Val. Hi Peter, come in. Peter: Hi! V: Ready to go? J: Not quite. Do you want a coffee? I’ve just put the kettle on. V: Yes, sure. You get ready, we’ll make it. J: OK. Oh, there’s a bit of pasta there if you’re hungry. V: Er, no thanks, we’ve just eaten… Well, I’ve found some coffee, but there’s no sugar. P: There‘s some in that jar by the toaster. V: Oh, yes. P: There’s enough milk for two cups, but not enough for three, I don’t think. this conversation is contextualised in the UK. Are there cultural aspects related to the UK? or behaviours? the "kettle". We identify that this is an informal conversation among friends because os some points such as the greeting between friends. Also because of the "ready to go?", it's like they share a common knowledge. Also making a coffe in a house that is not yours -> these are behavioural aspects that means that they share a common knowledge and that it is a formal area. You also hesitate in a formal conversation, as here, and in formal conversations you try not to hesitate. We don't have interruptions netiher, maybe because they are in a friendly conversation among friends, it seems they are respecting their own turns. They're answering each other as if it is a question-answer thing, but there is no questions at all, they are answering each other, as happens at the end of this page. There is no a specific order established of speaking, since the situation leads to a more serious topic, the question of reciclying. we have question-answer adjency pairs. indirect way of asking for pasta, so we're going to find an answer: "er, no thanks...". Val feels an obligation of explaining why she does not want pasta: "er.. no thanks, we've just eaten". here Val is agreeing and she does not need to give an explanation of why she wants coffee. However, there is no real overlapping in this conversation since they're interrupting each other in a very formal way. They're discussing a topic, that's why we find "I agree..." Now she's interrupting in a very unpolite way. we find here a case of self-apointing. the topic of the noise is interrupted here. The conversation about the noise is restorted here: