Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Exposition: Milgram's experiment, Ejercicios de Inglés

Exposition about this interesting experiment.

Tipo: Ejercicios

2020/2021

Subido el 22/11/2024

miiryy
miiryy 🇪🇸

5

(1)

8 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Oral exposition
One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by
Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. He conducted an
experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and
personal conscience.
Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those
accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense
often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from
their superiours.
The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf
Eichmann in Jerusalem.
Milgram selected participants for his experiment by newspaper
advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning
at Yale University.5
The procedure was that the participant was paired with another
person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’
and who would be the ‘teacher.’5 The draw was fixed so that the
participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of
Milgram’s confederates (pretending to be a real participant). The
learner (a confederate called Mr. Wallace) was taken into a room
and had electrodes attached to his arms, and the teacher and
researcher went into a room next door that contained an electric
shock generator and a row of switches marked from 15 volts (Slight
Shock) to 375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock) to 450 volts (XXX).
The “learner” (Mr. Wallace) was strapped to a chair with electrodes.
After he has learned a list of word pairs given him to learn, the
"teacher" tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to
recall its partner/pair from a list of four possible choices.
The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the
learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time.
The learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose), and for each
of these, the teacher gave him an electric shock. When the teacher
refused to administer a shock, the experimenter was to give a
series of orders/prods to ensure they continued.
65% (two-thirds) of participants (i.e., teachers) continued to the
highest level of 450 volts. All the participants continued to 300
volts.
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Exposition: Milgram's experiment y más Ejercicios en PDF de Inglés solo en Docsity!

Oral exposition

One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiours. The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram selected participants for his experiment by newspaper advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University. The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher.’ The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s confederates (pretending to be a real participant). The learner (a confederate called Mr. Wallace) was taken into a room and had electrodes attached to his arms, and the teacher and researcher went into a room next door that contained an electric shock generator and a row of switches marked from 15 volts (Slight Shock) to 375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock) to 450 volts (XXX). The “learner” (Mr. Wallace) was strapped to a chair with electrodes. After he has learned a list of word pairs given him to learn, the "teacher" tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to recall its partner/pair from a list of four possible choices. The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time. The learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose), and for each of these, the teacher gave him an electric shock. When the teacher refused to administer a shock, the experimenter was to give a series of orders/prods to ensure they continued. 65% (two-thirds) of participants (i.e., teachers) continued to the highest level of 450 volts. All the participants continued to 300 volts.

Milgram did more than one experiment – he carried out 18 variations of his study. All he did was alter the situation (IV) to see how this affected obedience (DV). Conclusion: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognize their authority as morally right and/or legally based. This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations, for example in the family, school, and workplace. Milgrams' Agency Theory: Milgram (1974) explained the behavior of his participants by suggesting that people have two states of behavior when they are in a social situation:

  • The autonomous state – people direct their own actions, and they take responsibility for the results of those actions.
  • The agentic state – people allow others to direct their actions and then pass off the responsibility for the consequences to the person giving the orders. In other words, they act as agents for another person’s will. Milgram suggested that two things must be in place for a person to enter the agentic state:
  1. The person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate.
  2. The person being ordered about is able to believe that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens. Agency theory says that people will obey an authority when they believe that the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. This is supported by some aspects of Milgram’s evidence. For example, when participants were reminded that they had responsibility for their own actions, almost none of them were prepared to obey. In contrast, many participants who were refusing to go on did so if the experimenter said that he would take responsibility. Variations: