Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Perception and Knowledge: The Importance and Limitations of Sight, Ejercicios de Matemáticas aplicadas a las Ciencias Sociales II

The role of sight in gaining knowledge and the limitations of relying solely on our senses. The author discusses various examples and philosophical perspectives on the importance of sight, colorblindness, and the influence of our brain on perception. The text also touches upon the idea that everyone sees the world differently due to individual experiences and beliefs.

Tipo: Ejercicios

2019/2020

Subido el 27/03/2020

raul-ortiz-2
raul-ortiz-2 🇵🇪

1 documento

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
#1 TOK DIARY:
“Sight is the most important sense for gaining knowledge”
In my opinion sight, indeed, is the most important sense for gaining knowledge, as it is
essential to identify various objects and to see the behaviours of humans and animals. For
example, without sight, I would not be able to identify the plants, but with the sight, I would
definitely know what it is. Last year, I was playing with my friends a game in which you had
to guess what the object was from touching it, the difficult part here was that you were
blindfolded, with a shirt so you had no idea of what you were touching. During the game, I
recognised certain things, such as a water bottle, a book and a pencil. And this was all
because I have seen them previously in my life, touching something, so thanks to sight I had
the knowledge to remember the shape of the previously mentioned objects.
However, we have now the knowledge about colourblindness, so we nowadays can not trust
our senses, as we have the example of people that are not able to see them. We think that
not be able to see the colours we “normally” see is wrong. But what would happen if we are
the ones who see the colours in the wrong way, and the colour blind people see colours the
right way? There is no way to determinate what we know compared to other people’s
knowledge. For example, a banana could be yellow for me, but other people could be
orange. We can’t trust our sight.
#2 TOK DIARY:
“Everyone should be an empiricist”
In my opinion, not everyone should be an empiricist. Not everyone should be an empiricist
because you can’t always trust your senses, for example, when you have a cold you
obviously have the nose blocked, so how do you know for sure how something smells if you
are actually smelling nothing? The answer you give is not other than your own perception of
how something smells like. Another example to prove our senses can be wrong is when
people say that they believe in God. We do not see God, we can not touch God, so how do
we know if he is even real? Some modern philosophers say, “any reference to things that
transcend the senses is cognitively meaningless since there is no evidence on which such
ideas can be either affirmed or denied” (Klocker, v-vi).
On the other hand, some people might agree that everyone should be an empiricist. Some
points they would talk about could be colours. How would you know what the colour blue
looks like if you were born blind? The only way to have the idea of blue is to experience it
with your senses, using the sight in this case.
#3 TOK DIARY:
“Visual illusions mean that we shouldn’t trust what we see”
In my opinion, I agree with the statement above, because I have recently seen a video about
an experiment and I found interesting how our brain prioritizes the information that comes
from our eyes, rather than information that our ears provide. This is because most of us are
used to trust or sight more than any other sense. This experiment the man did was related to
the “McGurk Effect”. This illusion makes what we see override what we hear, so the mouth
movements we see as we look at the face influences what we believe we are hearing. But
what if we closed our eyes? We hear the sound as it is with our eyes open. We actually see
how mouth movements influence what we are hearing. The most remarkable thing of this
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Perception and Knowledge: The Importance and Limitations of Sight y más Ejercicios en PDF de Matemáticas aplicadas a las Ciencias Sociales II solo en Docsity!

#1 TOK DIARY:

“Sight is the most important sense for gaining knowledge”

In my opinion sight, indeed, is the most important sense for gaining knowledge, as it is essential to identify various objects and to see the behaviours of humans and animals. For example, without sight, I would not be able to identify the plants, but with the sight, I would definitely know what it is. Last year, I was playing with my friends a game in which you had to guess what the object was from touching it, the difficult part here was that you were blindfolded, with a shirt so you had no idea of what you were touching. During the game, I recognised certain things, such as a water bottle, a book and a pencil. And this was all because I have seen them previously in my life, touching something, so thanks to sight I had the knowledge to remember the shape of the previously mentioned objects. However, we have now the knowledge about colourblindness, so we nowadays can not trust our senses, as we have the example of people that are not able to see them. We think that not be able to see the colours we “normally” see is wrong. But what would happen if we are the ones who see the colours in the wrong way, and the colour blind people see colours the right way? There is no way to determinate what we know compared to other people’s knowledge. For example, a banana could be yellow for me, but other people could be orange. We can’t trust our sight.

#2 TOK DIARY:

“Everyone should be an empiricist”

In my opinion, not everyone should be an empiricist. Not everyone should be an empiricist because you can’t always trust your senses, for example, when you have a cold you obviously have the nose blocked, so how do you know for sure how something smells if you are actually smelling nothing? The answer you give is not other than your own perception of how something smells like. Another example to prove our senses can be wrong is when people say that they believe in God. We do not see God, we can not touch God, so how do we know if he is even real? Some modern philosophers say, “any reference to things that transcend the senses is cognitively meaningless since there is no evidence on which such ideas can be either affirmed or denied” (Klocker, v-vi). On the other hand, some people might agree that everyone should be an empiricist. Some points they would talk about could be colours. How would you know what the colour blue looks like if you were born blind? The only way to have the idea of blue is to experience it with your senses, using the sight in this case.

#3 TOK DIARY:

“Visual illusions mean that we shouldn’t trust what we see”

In my opinion, I agree with the statement above, because I have recently seen a video about an experiment and I found interesting how our brain prioritizes the information that comes from our eyes, rather than information that our ears provide. This is because most of us are used to trust or sight more than any other sense. This experiment the man did was related to the “McGurk Effect”. This illusion makes what we see override what we hear, so the mouth movements we see as we look at the face influences what we believe we are hearing. But what if we closed our eyes? We hear the sound as it is with our eyes open. We actually see how mouth movements influence what we are hearing. The most remarkable thing of this

illusion is that, even though we know everything that is involved, we still hear what our eyes believe we should be hearing. This optical illusions really amaze me, because it actually shows that our brain is the one inferring the exterior information, and is the one in charge to process it into what we belief is happening. However, it may be argued that we are now where we are because of sight. And that we always knew it had its limitations, but we always relayed on it. We have always develop ourselves since ancient times using our sight and out thoughts. How did Galileo manage to change the structure of the galaxy? It is easy, he saw it!

#4 TOK DIARY:

“Everyone sees the world differently”

In my opinion, I do believe that everyone sees the world in a different way. This is because everyone has its own life background, in other words, everybody has lived in a distinct way, so its context defines what the person believes to see and what it believe it is. For example, I love to listen to motivational music while exercising. A friend of mine finds them completely unnecessary! I later realized that I liked this type of music because it resonates with my inner world. In other words, I believe I am playing my final game, and I have to die at the pitch in order to win. People see the world based on their identities and as a result one person can find a certain thing interesting while the other person can find it boring. Another example why everyone sees the world differently is their beliefs, the belief system a person has governs the way he or she sees reality. If ,for example, you believe that all people are mean then you will interpret their actions in a way that proves this fact true. Beliefs come from past experiences and that's why the environment the person grows in determines the way he sees the world. However, people may argue that all this perspectives come from the the same information. People may say that all our perspectives, all our points of view are no other that ramifications of the same information provided through this years. This explains why many people agree in various points of view.