Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Assessing Asthma Patients: Symptom Control, Risk Factors, and Effective Treatment, Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones de Clínica Medica

Guidelines for assessing asthma patients, focusing on symptom control and future risk. It covers topics such as identifying asthma symptoms, confirming diagnoses, assessing symptom control, and optimizing treatment. The document emphasizes the importance of regular controller treatment, including inhaled corticosteroids, for achieving good asthma control and minimizing the risk of exacerbations.

Tipo: Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones

2015/2016

Subido el 01/05/2016

sara_leal
sara_leal 🇲🇽

4.7

(38)

9 documentos

1 / 29

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
POCKET GUIDE FOR
ASTHMA MANAGEMENT
AND PREVENTION
A Pocket Guide for Health Professionals
Updated 2016
(for Adults and Children Older than 5 Years)
BASED ON THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA
MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
© Global Initiative for Asthma
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Assessing Asthma Patients: Symptom Control, Risk Factors, and Effective Treatment y más Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones en PDF de Clínica Medica solo en Docsity!

POCKET GUIDE FOR

ASTHMA MANAGEMENT

AND PREVENTION

A Pocket Guide for Health Professionals

Updated 2016

(for Adults and Children Older than 5 Years)

BASED ON THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION

© Global Initiative for Asthma

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

GLOBAL INITIATIVE

FOR ASTHMA

POCKET GUIDE FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

Updated 2016

GINA Board of Directors Chair: J Mark FitzGerald, MD GINA Science Committee Chair: Helen Reddel, MBBS PhD GINA Dissemination and Implementation Committee Chair: Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD GINA Assembly The GINA Assembly includes members from 45 countries, listed on the GINA website www.ginasthma.org. GINA Program Suzanne Hurd, PhD (to Dec 2015); Rebecca Decker, BS, MSJ

Names of members of the GINA Committees are listed on page 28.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

PREFACE

Asthma affects an estimated 300 million individuals worldwide. It is a serious global health problem affecting all age groups, with increasing prevalence in many developing countries, rising treatment costs, and a rising burden for patients and the community. Asthma still imposes an unacceptable burden on health care systems, and on society through loss of productivity in the workplace and, especially for pediatric asthma, disruption to the family. Health care providers managing asthma face different issues around the world, depending on the local context, the health system, and access to resources. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was established to increase awareness about asthma among health professionals, public health authorities and the community, and to improve prevention and management through a coordinated worldwide effort. GINA prepares scientific reports on asthma, encourages dissemination and implementation of the recommendations, and promotes international collaboration on asthma research. The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention was extensively revised in 2014 to provide a comprehensive and integrated approach to asthma management that can be adapted for local conditions and for individual patients. It focuses not only on the existing strong evidence base, but also on clarity of language and on providing tools for feasible implementation in clinical practice. The report has been updated each year since then. The GINA 2016 report and other GINA publications listed on page 28 can be obtained from www.ginasthma.org.

The reader acknowledges that this Pocket Guide is a brief summary of the GINA 2016 report for primary health care providers. It does NOT contain all of the information required for managing asthma, for example, about safety of treatments, and it should be used in conjunction with the full GINA 2016 report and with the health professional’s own clinical judgment. GINA cannot be held liable or responsible for healthcare administered with the use of this document, including any use which is not in accordance with applicable local

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCEor national regulations or guidelines.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT ASTHMA?

Asthma is a common and potentially serious chronic disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients, their families and the community. It causes respiratory symptoms, limitation of activity, and flare-ups (attacks) that sometimes require urgent health care and may be fatal. Fortunately…asthma can be effectively treated , and most patients can achieve good control of their asthma. When asthma is under good control, patients can:  Avoid troublesome symptoms during day and night  Need little or no reliever medication  Have productive, physically active lives  Have normal or near normal lung function  Avoid serious asthma flare-ups (exacerbations, or attacks) What is asthma? Asthma causes symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough that vary over time in their occurrence, frequency and intensity. These symptoms are associated with variable expiratory airflow, i.e. difficulty breathing air out of the lungs due to bronchoconstriction (airway narrowing), airway wall thickening, and increased mucus. Some variation in airflow can also occur in people without asthma, but it is greater in asthma. Factors that may trigger or worsen asthma symptoms include viral infections, domestic or occupational allergens (e.g. house dust mite, pollens, cockroach), tobacco smoke, exercise and stress. These responses are more likely when asthma is uncontrolled. Some drugs can induce or trigger asthma, e.g. beta-blockers, and (in some patients), aspirin or other NSAIDs. Asthma flare-ups (also called exacerbations or attacks) may occur even in people taking asthma treatment. When asthma is uncontrolled, or in some high-risk patients, these episodes are more frequent and more severe, and may be fatal. A stepwise approach to treatment , customized to the individual patient, takes into account the effectiveness of available medications, their safety, and their cost to the payer or patient. Regular controller treatment , particularly with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)- containing medications, markedly reduces the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and the risk of having a flare-up. Asthma is a common condition, affecting all levels of society. Olympic athletes, famous leaders and celebrities, and ordinary people live successful and active lives with asthma.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

CRITERIA FOR MAKING THE DIAGNOSIS OF ASTHMA

Box 2. Features used in making the diagnosis of asthma

1. A history of variable respiratory symptoms Typical symptoms are wheeze, shortness of breath, chest tightness, cough - People with asthma generally have more than one of these symptoms - The symptoms occur variably over time and vary in intensity - The symptoms often occur or are worse at night or on waking - Symptoms are often triggered by exercise, laughter, allergens or cold air - Symptoms often occur with or worsen with viral infections 2. Evidence of variable expiratory airflow limitation - At least once during the diagnostic process when FEV 1 is low, document that the FEV 1 /FVC ratio is reduced. The FEV 1 /FVC ratio is normally more than 0.75–0.80 in adults, and more than 0.90 in children. - Document that variation in lung function is greater than in healthy people. For example: o FEV 1 increases by more than 12% and 200mL (in children, >12% of the predicted value) after inhaling a bronchodilator. This is called ‘bronchodilator reversibility’. o Average daily diurnal PEF variability* is >10% (in children, >13%) o FEV 1 increases by more than 12% and 200mL from baseline (in children, by >12% of the predicted value) after 4 weeks of anti- inflammatory treatment (outside respiratory infections) - The greater the variation, or the more times excess variation is seen, the more confident you can be of the diagnosis - Testing may need to be repeated during symptoms, in the early morning, or after withholding bronchodilator medications. - Bronchodilator reversibility may be absent during severe exacerbations or viral infections. If bronchodilator reversibility is not present when it is first tested, the next step depends on the clinical urgency and availability of other tests. - For other tests to assist in diagnosis, including bronchial challenge tests, see Chapter 1 of the GINA 2016 report. *Calculated from twice daily readings (best of 3 each time), as (the day’s highest PEF minus the day’s lowest PEF) divided by the mean of the day’s highest and lowest PEF, and averaged over 1-2 weeks. If using PEF at home or in the office, use the same PEF meter each time.

Physical examination in people with asthma is often normal, but the most frequent finding is wheezing on auscultation, especially on forced expiration.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

DIAGNOSING ASTHMA IN SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Patients with cough as the only respiratory symptom This may be due to chronic upper airway cough syndrome (‘post-nasal drip’), chronic sinusitis, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), vocal cord dysfunction, or eosinophilic bronchitis, or cough variant asthma. Cough variant asthma is characterized by cough and airway hyperresponsiveness, and documenting variability in lung function is essential to make this diagnosis. However, lack of variability at the time of testing does not exclude asthma. For other diagnostic tests, see Box 2, and Chapter 1 of the GINA 2016 report, or refer the patient for specialist opinion. Occupational asthma and work-aggravated asthma Every patient with adult-onset asthma should be asked about occupational exposures, and whether their asthma is better when they are away from work. It is important to confirm the diagnosis objectively (which often needs specialist referral) and to eliminate exposure as soon as possible. Pregnant women Ask all pregnant women and those planning pregnancy about asthma, and advise them about the importance of asthma treatment for the health of both mother and baby. The elderly Asthma may be under-diagnosed in the elderly, due to poor perception, an assumption that dyspnea is normal in old age, lack of fitness, or reduced activity. Asthma may also be over-diagnosed in the elderly through confusion with shortness of breath due to left ventricular failure or ischemic heart disease. If there is a history of smoking or biomass fuel exposure, COPD or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) should be considered (see Chapter 5 of the GINA 2016 report). Smokers and ex-smokers Asthma and COPD may co-exist or overlap (asthma-COPD overlap syndrome, ACOS), particularly in smokers and the elderly. The history and pattern of symptoms and past records can help to distinguish asthma with fixed airflow limitation from COPD. Uncertainty in diagnosis should prompt early referral, as ACOS has worse outcomes than asthma or COPD alone. Confirming an asthma diagnosis in patients taking controller treatment : For many patients (25–35%) with a diagnosis of asthma in primary care, the diagnosis cannot be confirmed. If the basis of the diagnosis has not already been documented, confirmation with objective testing should be sought.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

HOW TO ASSESS ASTHMA CONTROL

Asthma control means the extent to which the effects of asthma can be seen in the patient, or have been reduced or removed by treatment. Asthma control has two domains: symptom control (previously called ‘current clinical control’) and risk factors for future poor outcomes. Poor symptom control is a burden to patients and a risk factor for flare-ups. Risk factors are factors that increase the patient’s future risk of having exacerbations (flare-ups), loss of lung function, or medication side-effects. Box 4. Assessment of symptom control and future risk A. Level of asthma symptom control

In the past 4 weeks, has the patient had : (^) controlledWell controlled^ Partly^ Uncontrolled Daytime symptoms more than twice/week? Yes No None of these

of these

of these

Any night waking due to asthma? Yes No Reliever needed* more than twice/week? Yes No Any activity limitation due to asthma? Yes No B. Risk factors for poor asthma outcomes Assess risk factors at diagnosis and periodically, particularly for patients experiencing exacerbations. Measure FEV 1 at start of treatment, after 3–6 months of controller treatment to record personal best lung function, then periodically for ongoing risk assessment. Potentially modifiable independent risk factors for exacerbations include:

  • Uncontrolled asthma symptoms (as above)
  • ICS not prescribed; poor ICS adherence; incorrect inhaler technique
  • High SABA use (with increased mortality if >1x200-dose canister/month)
  • Low FEV 1 , especially if <60% predicted
  • Major psychological or socioeconomic problems
  • Exposures: smoking; allergen exposure if sensitized
  • Comorbidities: obesity; rhinosinusitis; confirmed food allergy
  • Sputum or blood eosinophilia
  • Pregnancy Other major independent risk factors for flare-ups (exacerbations) include:
  • Ever being intubated or in intensive care for asthma
  • Having 1 or more severe exacerbations in the last 12 months. Risk factors for developing fixed airflow limitation include lack of ICS treatment; exposure to tobacco smoke, noxious chemicals or occupational exposures; low FEV 1 ; chronic mucus hypersecretion; and sputum or blood eosinophilia Risk factors for medication side-effects include:
  • Systemic : frequent OCS; long-term, high dose and/or potent ICS; also taking P450 inhibitors
  • Local : high-dose or potent ICS; poor inhaler technique

Having one or more of these risk factors increases the risk of exacerbations even if symptoms are well controlled.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

What is the role of lung function in monitoring asthma? Once asthma has been diagnosed, lung function is most useful as an indicator of future risk. It should be recorded at diagnosis, 3–6 months after starting treatment, and periodically thereafter. Patients who have either few or many symptoms relative to their lung function need more investigation. How is asthma severity assessed? Asthma severity can be assessed retrospectively from the level of treatment (p14) required to control symptoms and exacerbations. Mild asthma is asthma that can be controlled with Step 1 or 2 treatment. Severe asthma is asthma that requires Step 4 or 5 treatment, to maintain symptom control. It may appear similar to asthma that is uncontrolled due to lack of treatment.

HOW TO INVESTIGATE UNCONTROLLED ASTHMA

Most patients can achieve good asthma control with regular controller treatment, but some patients do not, and further investigation is needed. Box 5. How to investigate uncontrolled asthma in primary care

This flow-chart shows the most common problems first, but the steps can be carried out in a different order, depending on resources and clinical context.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

CONTROL-BASED ASTHMA MANAGEMENT

Asthma treatment is adjusted in a continuous cycle to assess , adjust treatment and review response. The main components of this cycle are shown in Box 6.

Box 6. The control-based asthma management cycle

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

INITIAL CONTROLLER TREATMENT

For the best outcomes, regular daily controller treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after the diagnosis of asthma is made, because:

  • Early treatment with low dose ICS leads to better lung function than if symptoms have been present for more than 2–4 years
  • Patients not taking ICS who experience a severe exacerbation have lower long-term lung function than those who have started ICS
  • In occupational asthma, early removal from exposure and early treatment increase the probability of recovery Regular low dose ICS is recommended for patients with any of the following:
  • Asthma symptoms more than twice a month
  • Waking due to asthma more than once a month
  • Any asthma symptoms plus any risk factor(s) for exacerbations (e.g. needing OCS for asthma within the last 12 months; low FEV 1 ; ever in intensive care unit for asthma) Consider starting at a higher step (e.g. medium/high dose ICS, or ICS/LABA) if the patient has troublesome asthma symptoms on most days; or is waking from asthma once or more a week, especially if there are any risk factors for exacerbations. If the initial asthma presentation is with severely uncontrolled asthma, or with an acute exacerbation, give a short course of OCS and start regular controller treatment (e.g. high dose ICS, or medium dose ICS/LABA). Low, medium and high dose categories for different ICS medications are shown in Box 8 (p 14 ). Before starting initial controller treatment
  • Record evidence for the diagnosis of asthma, if possible
  • Document symptom control and risk factors
  • Assess lung function, when possible
  • Train the patient to use the inhaler correctly, and check their technique
  • Schedule a follow-up visit After starting initial controller treatment
  • Review response after 2–3 months, or according to clinical urgency
  • See Box 7 for ongoing treatment and other key management issues
  • Consider step down when asthma has been well-controlled for 3 months COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

STEPWISE APPROACH FOR ADJUSTING TREATMENT

Once asthma treatment has been started, ongoing decisions are based on a cycle to assess, adjust treatment and review response. The preferred treatments at each step are summarized below and in Box 7 (p14); for details, see full GINA 2016 report. See Box 8 (p 14 ) for ICS dose categories. STEP 1 : As-needed SABA with no controller (this is indicated only if symptoms are rare, there is no night waking due to asthma, no exacerbations in the last year, and normal FEV 1 ). Other options : regular low dose ICS for patients with exacerbation risks. STEP 2: Regular low dose ICS plus as-needed SABA Other options : LTRA are less effective than ICS; ICS/LABA leads to faster improvement in symptoms and FEV 1 than ICS alone but is more expensive and the exacerbation rate is similar. For purely seasonal allergic asthma, start ICS immediately and cease 4 weeks after end of exposure. STEP 3: Low dose ICS/LABA either as maintenance treatment plus as- needed SABA, or as ICS/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy For patients with ≥1 exacerbation in the last year, low dose BDP/formoterol or BUD/formoterol maintenance and reliever strategy is more effective than maintenance ICS/LABA with as-needed SABA. Other options : Medium dose ICS Children (6–11 years) : Medium dose ICS. Other options: low dose ICS/LABA STEP 4: Low dose ICS/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy, or medium dose ICS/LABA as maintenance plus as-needed SABA Other options : Add-on tiotropium by mist inhaler for patients ≥12 years with a history of exacerbations; high dose ICS/LABA, but more side-effects and little extra benefit; extra controller, e.g. LTRA or slow-release theophylline (adults) Children (6–11 years): Refer for expert assessment and advice. STEP 5: Refer for expert investigation and add-on treatment Add-on treatments include tiotropium by mist inhaler for patients with a history of exacerbations (age ≥12 years), omalizumab (anti-IgE) for severe allergic asthma, and mepolizumab (anti-IL5) for severe eosinophilic asthma (age ≥12 years). Sputum-guided treatment, if available, improves outcomes. Other options : Some patients may benefit from low dose OCS but long-term

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCEsystemic side-effects occur.

REVIEWING RESPONSE AND ADJUSTING TREATMENT

How often should patients with asthma be reviewed? Patients should preferably be seen 1–3 months after starting treatment and every 3–12 months after that, except in pregnancy when they should be reviewed every 4–6 weeks. After an exacerbation, a review visit within 1 week should be scheduled. The frequency of review depends on the patient’s initial level of control, their response to previous treatment, and their ability and willingness to engage in self-management with an action plan. Stepping up asthma treatment Asthma is a variable condition, and periodic adjustment of controller treatment by the clinician and/or patient may be needed.

  • Sustained step-up (for at least 2–3 months) : if symptoms and/or exacerbations persist despite 2–3 months of controller treatment, assess the following common issues before considering a step-up o Incorrect inhaler technique o Poor adherence o Modifiable risk factors, e.g. smoking o Are symptoms due to comorbid conditions, e.g. allergic rhinitis
  • Short-term step-up (for 1–2 weeks) by clinician or by patient with written asthma action plan (p22), e.g. during viral infection or allergen exposure
  • Day-to-day adjustment by patient for patients prescribed low dose beclometasone/formoterol or budesonide/formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy. Stepping down treatment when asthma is well-controlled

Consider stepping down treatment once good asthma control has been achieved and maintained for 3 months, to find the lowest treatment that controls both symptoms and exacerbations, and minimizes side-effects.

  • Choose an appropriate time for step-down (no respiratory infection, patient not travelling, not pregnant)
  • Document baseline status (symptom control and lung function), provide a written asthma action plan, monitor closely, and book a follow-up visit
  • Step down through available formulations to reduce the ICS dose by 25–50% at 2–3 month intervals (see full GINA report for details of how to step down different controller treatments)
  • Do not completely withdraw ICS (in adults or adolescents) unless it is COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCEneeded temporarily to confirm the diagnosis of asthma

TREATING MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS

Exacerbation risk can be minimized by optimizing asthma medications, and by identifying and treating modifiable risk factors. Some examples of risk modifiers with consistent high quality evidence are:

  • Guided self-management : self-monitoring of symptoms and/or PEF, a written asthma action plan (p22), and regular medical review
  • Use of a regimen that minimizes exacerbations : prescribe an ICS- containing controller. For patients with 1 or more exacerbations in the last year, consider a low dose ICS/formoterol maintenance and reliever regimen
  • Avoidance of exposure to tobacco smoke
  • Confirmed food allergy : appropriate food avoidance; ensure availability of injectable epinephrine for anaphylaxis
  • For patients with severe asthma : refer to a specialist center, if available, for consideration of add-on medications and/or sputum-guided treatment.

NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL STRATEGIES AND INTERVENTIONS

In addition to medications, other therapies and strategies may be considered where relevant, to assist in symptom control and risk reduction. Some examples with consistent high quality evidence are:

  • Smoking cessation advice : at every visit, strongly encourage smokers to quit. Provide access to counselling and resources. Advise parents and carers to exclude smoking in rooms/cars used by children with asthma
  • Physical activity : encourage people with asthma to engage in regular physical activity because of its general health benefits. Provide advice about management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
  • Occupational asthma : ask all patients with adult-onset asthma about their work history. Identify and remove occupational sensitizers as soon as possible. Refer patients for expert advice, if available.
  • NSAIDs including aspirin : always ask about asthma before prescribing. Although allergens may contribute to asthma symptoms in sensitized patients, allergen avoidance is not recommended as a general strategy for asthma. These strategies are often complex and expensive, and there are no validated methods for identifying those who are likely to benefit. Some common triggers for asthma symptoms (e.g. exercise, laughter) should not be avoided, and others (e.g. viral respiratory infections, stress) are difficult to avoid and should be managed when they occur.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE

TREATMENT IN SPECIAL POPULATIONS OR CONTEXTS

Pregnancy : asthma control often changes during pregnancy. For baby and mother, the advantages of actively treating asthma markedly outweigh any potential risks of usual controller and reliever medications. Down-titration has a low priority in pregnancy. Exacerbations should be treated aggressively. Rhinitis and sinusitis often coexist with asthma. Chronic rhinosinusitis is associated with more severe asthma. For some patients with allergic rhinitis, treatment with intranasal corticosteroids improves asthma control. Obesity : to avoid over- or under-treatment, it is important to document the diagnosis of asthma in the obese. Asthma is more difficult to control in obesity. Weight reduction should be included in the treatment plan for obese patients with asthma; even 5–10% weight loss can improve asthma control. The elderly : comorbidities and their treatment should be considered and may complicate asthma management. Factors such as arthritis, eyesight, inspiratory flow, and complexity of treatment regimens should be considered when choosing medications and inhaler devices. Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is commonly seen in asthma. Symptomatic reflux should be treated for its general health benefits, but there is no benefit from treating asymptomatic reflux in asthma. Anxiety and depression : these are commonly seen in people with asthma, and are associated with worse symptoms and quality of life. Patients should be assisted to distinguish between symptoms of anxiety and of asthma. Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD): a history of exacerbation following ingestion of aspirin or other NSAIDs is highly suggestive. Patients often have severe asthma and nasal polyposis. Confirmation of the diagnosis of AERD requires challenge in a specialized center with cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilities, but avoidance of NSAIDs may be recommended on the basis of a clear history. ICS are the mainstay of treatment, but OCS may be required. Desensitization under specialist care is sometimes effective. Food allergy and anaphylaxis : food allergy is rarely a trigger for asthma symptoms. It must be assessed with specialist testing. Confirmed food allergy is a risk factor for asthma-related death. Good asthma control is essential; patients should also have an anaphylaxis plan and be trained in appropriate avoidance strategies and use of injectable epinephrine. Surgery : whenever possible, good asthma control should be achieved pre- operatively. Ensure that controller therapy is maintained throughout the peri- operative period. Patients on long-term high dose ICS, or having more than 2 weeks’ OCS in the past 6 months, should receive intra-operative hydrocortisone to reduce the risk of adrenal crisis.

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL- DO NOT ALTER OR REPRODUCE