Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Globalization & Value Convergence: A Comparison of Polity & Modernization Theory, Apuntes de Relaciones Internacionales

The theories of global polity and modernization, both of which predict the convergence of values across the world due to globalization. The mechanisms of convergence, the arguments for and against convergence, and the role of development and culture. It also introduces the world values study and inglehart's thesis.

Tipo: Apuntes

2016/2017

Subido el 21/02/2017

derechoeiv
derechoeiv 🇪🇸

4.5

(41)

25 documentos

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Unit 11: Globalization and values
Reading: Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. "Modernization and Postmodernization in 43 Societies."
Chapter 3 in Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton University Press.
1. MECHANISMS OF CONVERGENCE
Two theories have predicted homogenization of values across the world:
(1. Global Polity Theory (Meyer and colleagues). Globalization favors the proliferation of
international organizations and international associations that facilitate the diffusion through
imitation of standardized scripts about how to do things and of those values deemed to be
GOOD for society and progress).
Globalization facilitates the convergence and the diffusion of some ways of organization and
attitudes towards life, across the world. The elimination of barriers facilitates convergence and
diffusion to the extent that in all realms of life, successful ways of organization and attitudes
towards life are imitated across the world. Globalization creates a setting for successful ways of
doing things to be imitated and adopted. Before globalization it was possible to develop isolated
from one another, but nowadays we’re all connected. Globalization makes it possible for
successful values to diffuse around the world. The main process behind this (convergence) is
known as isomorphism (the idea of things becoming more alike).
Some sociologists in the 80s theorized these isomorphic processes and encapsulated in 3 main
types of isomorphism (imitative –fuelled by success, normative –when a particular way of doing
things become a norm and coercive –things become the same because someone impose it). This
idea of isomorphism is very used.
The communication revolution, by facilitating information facilitates imitation. Those values
may diffuse easily.
The transportation revolution: by people travelling more and seeing other places and cultures
may adopt those ideas which they like.
These are the arguments made to predict that as globalization advances, values around the world
converge. There’s another theory that predates globalization theory that also predicts
convergence of values: the modernization theory.
2. ALTERNATIVE CONVERGENCE THESIS: MODERNIZATION THEORY
(2. Modernization Theory (1950s): There is a one-to-one relationship between values and
stages of modernization. All societies are assumed to follow the same path to
modernization until they reach a ceiling. Both the linear progress assumption and that of
the ceiling lead to the prediction of long-term convergence in values).
a. Modernization
It is still highly influential. The main tenet is the idea that as societies modernize, their values
change. Similarly, other authors emphasize that modernization takes place when societies have
certain values. There’s reciprocity in the relationship. Some aspects that helped to gain those
values were industrialization, education, occupational specialization, urbanization.
It is also said that societies follow different stages to modernization. So sooner or later, all
societies modernize and get that set of value priorities.
b. Linear modernization path and ceiling to modernization
pf3
pf4

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Globalization & Value Convergence: A Comparison of Polity & Modernization Theory y más Apuntes en PDF de Relaciones Internacionales solo en Docsity!

Unit 11: Globalization and values

Reading: Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. "Modernization and Postmodernization in 43 Societies." Chapter 3 in Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton University Press.

1. MECHANISMS OF CONVERGENCE

Two theories have predicted homogenization of values across the world: (1. Global Polity Theory (Meyer and colleagues). Globalization favors the proliferation of international organizations and international associations that facilitate the diffusion through imitation of standardized scripts about how to do things and of those values deemed to be GOOD for society and progress).

Globalization facilitates the convergence and the diffusion of some ways of organization and attitudes towards life, across the world. The elimination of barriers facilitates convergence and diffusion to the extent that in all realms of life, successful ways of organization and attitudes towards life are imitated across the world. Globalization creates a setting for successful ways of doing things to be imitated and adopted. Before globalization it was possible to develop isolated from one another, but nowadays we’re all connected. Globalization makes it possible for successful values to diffuse around the world. The main process behind this (convergence) is known as isomorphism (the idea of things becoming more alike). Some sociologists in the 80s theorized these isomorphic processes and encapsulated in 3 main types of isomorphism (imitative –fuelled by success, normative –when a particular way of doing things become a norm and coercive –things become the same because someone impose it). This idea of isomorphism is very used. The communication revolution , by facilitating information facilitates imitation. Those values may diffuse easily. The transportation revolution : by people travelling more and seeing other places and cultures may adopt those ideas which they like.

These are the arguments made to predict that as globalization advances, values around the world converge. There’s another theory that predates globalization theory that also predicts convergence of values: the modernization theory.

2. ALTERNATIVE CONVERGENCE THESIS: MODERNIZATION THEORY

(2. Modernization Theory (1950s): There is a one-to-one relationship between values and stages of modernization. All societies are assumed to follow the same path to modernization until they reach a ceiling. Both the linear progress assumption and that of the ceiling lead to the prediction of long-term convergence in values).

a. Modernization It is still highly influential. The main tenet is the idea that as societies modernize, their values change. Similarly, other authors emphasize that modernization takes place when societies have certain values. There’s reciprocity in the relationship. Some aspects that helped to gain those values were industrialization, education, occupational specialization, urbanization. It is also said that societies follow different stages to modernization. So sooner or later, all societies modernize and get that set of value priorities. b. Linear modernization path and ceiling to modernization

Linea modernization path and ceiling to modernization: there’s a point in which societies cannot become more modern. c. (^) Eventual convergence Because of these two assumptions you can expect that sooner or later what you’re going to have is that all societies are going to converge towards a point, with the same values.

3. WORLD VALUES

  1. Comparative surveys and the study of value convergence: The World Values Study
  2. Value contrasts in 2015: dimensions of variation: Two Axes:
    • A. Traditional vs. Rational-Secular (i.e. Subordination to Group/Religiosity vs. State Orientation
    • (^) B. Survival vs. Well-Being (i.e. Materialism vs. Tolerance/Hedonism/Post-Materialism
    • C. Inglehart’s Thesis

The answer tend to cluster. Once you organize these clusters of values through statistical methods what you get is 2 major value access that summarize, imperfectly but in a general way the set of values more common.

  1. Traditional vs. rational-secular. Indicators: difference between ■ people whose values more or less express the desire to subordinate the individual to society, the priority given to religiosity, versus ■ people who value a society organized and led by a strong state functioning on the basis of technocratic well-founded theoretical ideas of how to conduct things. For them religion does not play a role. Instrumental rationality, expertise coordinated by the state. States can be classified depending on where they situate between these set of values.
  2. Survival vs. well-being. Materialism vs. tolerance/hedonism/post- materialism. It differentiates between: ■ people who thinks that the goods which are more valued are those who contribute to the survival of the group ■ people who thinks that feelings as tolerance maximize the well-being of the group.
  3. Inglehart’s thesis Inglehart contribution was to modify modernization theory: societies move from traditional and religious values to secular and rational values. But there is a point in modernization, where people don’t look for secular values, as they feel secure in their peaceful society. In this point people start to look for other things, like individual self-independence, tolerance, priority to de ecological rights over the economic rights... New levels of aspirations. (3. Inglehart's work allows us to see that two main value axes organize people's values around the world: religious-traditional and secular-rational and survival vs. well-being (self-expression). His view is that societies modernize they move through the first axis. Having reached a high level of modernization, however, their populations start attaching more value to self-expression values than to survival values).

Since modernization theory, development is the key variable. However there are wrong’s assumptions: 1.b.Development is not inevitablegrowing development gap between countries. 1.c. No ceiling to development Inglehart theory is an optimum theory that predicts that all countries are going to develop, to modernize… however, not all countries develops at the same level and time, so they are going to differ in the values. The development of the countries of the top needs the underdevelopment of the countries of above. “The development of advanced economies depends on the poverty of others”

(5. Bonikowski's work on the explanation of value change suggests that modernization, imitative diffusion through International Organizations and Associations, and colonial ties, may one day in a distant future contribute to value convergence).