Network Design and Implementation: A Practical Guide with Test Results, Assignments of Network Design

use DHCP to configure the network

Typology: Assignments

2020/2021

Uploaded on 09/02/2021

UnderLine07
UnderLine07 🇻🇳

4.7

(66)

16 documents

1 / 39

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1 | P a g e
ASSIGNMENT 2 FRONT SHEET
Qualification
BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Computing
Unit number and title
Unit 2: Networking Infrastructure
Submission date
19/8/2020
Date Received 1st submission
Re-submission Date
Date Received 2nd submission
Student Name
Student ID
Class
Assessor name
Student declaration
I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that
making a false declaration is a form of malpractice.
Student’s signature
Grading grid
P5
P6
P7
P8
M3
M4
D2
D3
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27

Partial preview of the text

Download Network Design and Implementation: A Practical Guide with Test Results and more Assignments Network Design in PDF only on Docsity!

ASSIGNMENT 2 FRONT SHEET

Qualification BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Computing Unit number and title Unit 2: Networking Infrastructure Submission date 19/8/20 20 Date Received 1st submission Re-submission Date Date Received 2nd submission Student Name Student ID Class Assessor name Student declaration I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice. Student’s signature Grading grid

P 5 P 6 P 7 P 8 M 3 M 4 D 2 D 3

 Summative Feedback:  Resubmission Feedback:

Grade: Assessor Signature: Date: Lecturer Signature:

After completing the first project. CEO Nguyen was very satisfied with my project and continued to give me the second task. In this 2nd project I was asked to analyze the specification as outlined in the first project. So I need to design and perfect my system and show the details that have been used in the system. I hope this second project of mine will meet the requirements of CEO Nguyen so that I can be trusted and entrusted with more projects in the future.

1. Provide a logical/physical design of the networked system with

clear explanation and addressing table (P5):

1.1. The difference between logical and physical network design

a. What is a logical design?

- A logical network is one that appears to the user as a single, separate entity although it

might in fact be either an entity created from multiple networks or just a part of a large network, it’s defined by it’s IP addressing sheme.

  • Logical design is how data connections work through the computer network and how devices interact. And the graphic includes nodes such as servers, routers and switching as shown in a physical network design. A logical network design concentratesmon how to design out your facility and company, admins can design numerous network logic diagrams, including maps for WAN, LAN, AWS, Cisco and other applications. These deagrams are exceedingly comprehensive or offer an overview of high standards.
  • There are the main characteristics of logical design: o VLAN selection o Logical plant floor layout o Typical configurations based upon standards o Access and distribution layer switch types, models and ports o IP Address scheme and subnetting

Figure 2 : Physical design

c. Compare between logical and physical network design

  • Familiar point: the two important domains in networking are the physical and logical topology. These two layouts are important in networking, the connectivity between two computers can be made easier using either of these two domains. Physical network topography is based on the physical hardware used for the connection.
  • Different point:

Advantages Disadvantages Logical design o Troubleshooting : if service is between two IP addressed, a logical network diagram can be utilized to exclude a firewall problem quickly. o Firewalls : you can verify that your firewall rules remain accurate with logical network diagrams. o Capacity planning : although physical network charts are important to the planning of capacity, logical charts also aid. They enable you to map network expansion or change and understand what the impact will be. o Sharing network information : you can use a logical network diagram if you need to share information on the network, but you want to disguise physical information on the network. o Eliminate redundancies : logical network diagrams will clearly help you determine what isn’t redundant. o If any node goes down the whole network is failed in the ring topology because the connection is the break. o The new device cannot be added or removed from the network. Physical design o Compliance : can be critical for proving compliance with key regulations, such as PCI, that may require specific, secure architecture. o Network maintenance and management : admins can run device inventory, get a visual overview of their environment, see how their infrastructure operates under various loads. o Solving : when problems occur, admins need fast insight into what is causing the bottleneck. o Needs monitoring software. o Equipment costs are high. Table 1 : Compare between logical and physical network design

o Performance limitations : are network dependability, traffic performance, and computer speeds for host/client.

c. Assessing user requirements

Tobe loved and trusted by users, response times, throughput, and reliability are key components of application usability: o Response time is the time to complete or transmit the reply between a command or keystroke entered and the host system. Interactive internet services such as automated teller and point-of-sale machines include applications in which rapid reaction time is deemed vital. o Apart from end-to-end connections, applications with large-volumn traffic have a greater impact on the networking throughput. Normally, low response time requirements apply to high-performance applications, when reaction-time sensitive traffic is low, it can usually be programmed. o Reliability is always crucial, there are legitimate demands on certain applications that surpass conventional needs. Some examples are emergency/ police/military operations that suggest a high hardware and topological redundancy need. In establishing the relative relevance of reliability for your network, determining the cost of any outage is vital. 1.3. System design

a. Partner requirements

o People: 200 students, 15 teachers, 12 marketing and administration staff, 5 higher managers including the adcademic heads and the programme managers, and 3 computer network. o Resource: 50 student lab computers, 35 staff computer, and 3 printers. o Building: 3 floors, all computers and printers are on the ground floor apart from the IT labs- one lab located on the first floor and another located on the second floor.

b. Logical design of network based on the specific requirements

Figure 3 : Logical network design

o Ground floor: there are 5 room include network admin room, admin & marketing room,

teacher room, printing room and manager room. Figure 4 : Ground floor

Network-Admin room: in this room will include 3-PC network: 2 desktop and 1 laptop.

Figure 7 : Teacher room design

Printing room: in this room only includes 3 printers

o WAP for all users in ground floor and use IP address is: 192.168. 10 .1/ o VLAN for 3 printer is: 192.168. 10 .6 9 - 72/ Figure 8 : Printing room design

Manager room: in this room includes 12 PC for academic heads and 1 printer

o WAP for all users in ground floor and use IP address is: 192.168. 10 .1/ o VLAN for 12 Academic heads and 1 printer is: academic heads (12 PC) 192.168. 10 .59-62/24, printer 192.168. 10 .63/

Figure 9 : Manager room design

  • 1 st^ Floor: One the 1st^ floor only have LAN-floor room that used as a student’s room

o In this room includes 25 PC for students and 1 switch

o WAP for all user in 1st^ floor and uses IP address: 192.168.20.1/

o VLAN of 25 student’s PC is: student (25 PC) 192.168.20.54-59/

Figure 10 : 1 st^ floor design

  • 2 nd^ Floor: On the 2nd^ floor have LAN-floor room that used as a student’s room

o In this room includes 25 PC for students, 1 switch and 1 server.

o WAP for all user in 2nd^ floor and uses IP address: 192.168.20.1/

o VLAN of 25 student’s PC and 1 server: student (25 PC) 192.168.20.53-55/24, server

Device Interface IP Address Subnet Mark Default

Gateway

Router G0/0. 20 192.168. 20 .1 255.255.255.0 N/A

S0/1.1 10.10.1.2 255.255.255.0 N/A

G0/0. 10 192.168. 10 .1 255.255.255.0 N/A

S0/1.1 10.10.1.1 255.255.255. 0 N/A

Central- SW VLAN 192.168. 10 .1 255.255.255.0 N/A

Floor1- SW VLAN 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 N/A

Floor2- SW VLAN 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0 N/A

PC Network

admin(1-3)

NIC 192.168. 10.

PC Admin(1-12)

& Marketing(1-

NIC 192.168. 10.

PC teacher(1-

NIC 192.168. 10.

PC academic

heads(1- 12)

NIC 192.168. 10 .59 255.255.255.0 192.168. 10.

Printer0 NIC 192.168. 10 .63 255.255.255.0 192.168. 10.

Printer1 NIC 192.168. 10 .69 255.255.255.0 192.168. 10.

Printer2 NIC 192.168. 10 .72 255.255.255.0 192.168. 10.

DNS server NIC 192.168. 10 .200 255.255.255.0 192.168. 10.

PC student floor

NIC 192.168.20.

PC student floor

NIC 192.168.20.

Table 2 : The IP address

2. Evaluate the design to meet the requirements (P6)

2.1. Test plan

o In ground floor, floor 1 or 2 can ping to rooms of other floors and ping each other. And from computers in diferrent rooms can ping these servers. o The 1st^ and 2 nd floors include student computer labs, from the machines in these 2 rooms can access dns, dhcp etc. Can also ping each other. o All room can use the wireless network. o The system is installed correctly and the network can be used. To improve safety for network system, it should have support the installation of a firewall system.

2.2. Evaluate my network design

Advantages Disadvantages

o Easy to understand and maintain with simple and effective design. The layout is clearly dividef into 3 floors. o All floor are installed wireless network. o Rooms are pingable to each other with low latency. o Network system has 2 server, one for ground floor and one for 2nd^ floor. o Complete security for routers. o Incomplete firewall and security system. o Still missing many servers o Because system is simple, so it’s easy to have a lack of network bandwidth when all rooms are operating at maximum capacity. Table 3 : Evaluate my network design

2.3. Advice and solutions

o Use more than 1 router and 1 switch in floors 1 and 2. o The addition of switches on the 1st^ and 2nd^ floor can also provide additional ports to use wireless, it’s help students can alse use the Internet for learning. o Should be upgrade security system and firewall as soon as possible.

Router(dhcp-config)#dns-server 192.168.10. Router(dhcp-config)#exit Router(config)#exit Router#exit wr Building configuration... [OK] Router#%DHCPD- 4 - PING_CONFLICT: DHCP address conflict: server pinged 192.168.1 0.

PC:

Figure 14 : Marketing PC 0

    1. Provide a logical/physical design of network and explain (P5):…………………………………………………………………………
    • 1.1 The difference between logical and physical network design…………………………………….………………….….…
    • 1.2 Discuss and explain user requirements for general network design……………………………………….……….…..
    • 1.3 System design………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….
    1. Evaluate the design (P6):…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…...
    • 2.1Test plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…
    • 2.2 Evaluate my network design………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
    • 2.3 Advice and solutions…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……
    1. Implement a network system (P7):…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……
    • 3.1 Ground floor setting: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………
    • 3.2 1 st floor & 2nd floor setting:……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    • 3.3 Diagram:…..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    1. Test results (P8):……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………
  • Figure 1: Logical design
  • Figure 2: Physical design................................................................................................................................................
  • Figure 3: Logical network design
  • Figure 4: Ground floor
  • Figure 5: Network admin room design
  • Figure 6: Admin & marketing room
  • Figure 7: Teacher room design
  • Figure 8: Printing room design
  • Figure 9: Manager room design
  • Figure 10: 1st floor design
  • Figure 11: 2nd floor design
  • Figure 12: Physical design............................................................................................................................................
  • Figure 13: 1st floor
  • Figure 14: Marketing PC0
  • Figure 15: Marketing PC
  • Figure 16: Administration staff PC...............................................................................................................................
  • Figure 17: Teacher PC1
  • Figure 18: Academic heads PC1
  • Figure 19: Server0........................................................................................................................................................
  • Figure 20: Network PC0
  • Figure 21: Printer
  • Figure 22: Floor 2 design
  • Figure 23: Floor 1 design
  • Figure 24: Student PC26
  • Figure 25: Student PC50
  • Figure 26: Student PC50
  • Figure 27: Student PC1
  • Figure 28: Student PC25
  • Figure 29: Server2........................................................................................................................................................
  • Figure 30: Diagram of network....................................................................................................................................
  • Figure 31: Ping results
  • Figure 32: Ping results
  • Table 1: Compare between logical and physical network design.……………………………………………………………………….…..
  • Table 2: The IP address………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
  • Table 3: Evaluate my network design.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
  • Figure 15 : Marketing PC