Discussion Board Assignment Intructions, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Cognitive Sociology

The assignment is a discussion board prompt.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2023/2024

Uploaded on 02/29/2024

jennifer-earles
jennifer-earles 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Premise:
When the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police
set off a wave of racial unrest across the country in
2020, corporate America and universities responded
swiftly with renewed and public commitments to
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
Major companies created new DEI positions or
expandedteams dedicated to(DEI and the phrase
became a buzzword across the social landscape. Many
corporate leaders(pledged to hire more people of
color,(removed branding perceived to
beracist,(and(invested in historically Black colleges.
At the time, the efforts were largely met with public
support,(amid a so-called “racial reckoning” that laid
bare a slew of systemic inequities in American society,
including theworkplace.
Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity
Four years later, however, a firestorm of debate about DEI
efforts has taken over the public sphere.
DEI advocates frame their trainings and initiates as
those that will teach employees and students how to
unlearn stereotypes against certain groups, respect
each other’s differences, and hire or admit people of
color without overlooking them because of personal
bias.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Discussion Board Assignment Intructions and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Cognitive Sociology in PDF only on Docsity!

Premise: When the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police set off a wave of racial unrest across the country in 2020, corporate America and universities responded swiftly with renewed and public commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Major companies created new DEI positions or expanded teams dedicated to DEI and the phrase became a buzzword across the social landscape. Many corporate leaders pledged to hire more people of color, removed branding perceived to be racist, and invested in historically Black colleges. At the time, the efforts were largely met with public support, amid a so-called “racial reckoning” that laid bare a slew of systemic inequities in American society, including the workplace. Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity Four years later, however, a firestorm of debate about DEI efforts has taken over the public sphere. DEI advocates frame their trainings and initiates as those that will teach employees and students how to unlearn stereotypes against certain groups, respect each other’s differences, and hire or admit people of color without overlooking them because of personal bias.

Criticism of DEI initiatives, on the other hand, comes from both sides of the political aisle – with some voices on the left blasting these efforts as corporate window dressing that focuses more on publicity than enacting real change for people of color in the workplace. Others on the right, meanwhile, have taken aim at these efforts, which they say unfairly disadvantage white workers. Those on the right also argue that the most qualified person should be hired for a job or admitted into a university, regardless of race. While there is a cohort of Americans, on both right and left, who want to eradicate illegal discrimination and remedy the effects of centuries of American injustice, they also have grave concerns about the way in which some DEI efforts are undermining American constitutional values, especially on college campuses – particularly when it comes to freedom of speech, due process, and equal protection of the law. Professors and professionals, in particular, are concerned that the DEI concept of a safe space, whereby those with distasteful or offensive views are prevented from speaking at a university, is fundamentally at odds with the rigorous exchange and debate central to the idea of the academy itself. Keep in mind that this conception of safe space refers to ideas and speech rather than physical safety. Indeed, compared to other environments like workplaces, DEI critics argue that students and academics should (in

Hypothetically, should the following speakers be allowed to speak on campus? 1)This speaker argues that the Second Amendment should be repealed so that guns can be confiscated. 2)This speaker argues that abortion should be completely illegal in all circumstances in every U.S. state. Why or why not? Note: You should address whether or not BOTH speakers should or should not be allowed to speak on campus, giving reasons for both your answers. You may use DEI as a premise to support your argument, but this is not required.