english Script for practical research, Essays (high school) of English

it is an english script for final defense of practical research. it can be use in different aspect. it can be use in dufferent ssubjects. and it is a script of practical researcjh jailihica jajbcobcobaio ikahphihwihaw iwhidhiahfh ouiwhdhgwqhfqhc fedhugyfrg vb gffn bfffn yfyvy ivfui vhvyv vyhv yv y g uiv ig gg g h yh y yt ttyyt gyy y y y y y t t t t ty y u uiui i i y h hh h yh gh tg yt yu uy r y6f g ig f fuhisv b wggfggg v hvbghtyghhf bb gy h h gg g g gh h hg g g g gg h j j u 65w5g yh yh ih iho iho io guo ug gu ugi iy fu i ugigu gouiugo ouig iogi o ioougi g io iog ogi og gioh uigo guio oui io gio guo gou ogi goui ogi oigh go go gogo guoigo iog gio go igo ouig uogi ugi guio ugoi goi igo igo gio gio goi goiuugo guo guio uogi hio ghio guoi ugo guo ugo gu guiug ug ov uugo ouig gio oi g gio igo igogio giog g goiu `oidi i hihoihihsihihsihi h hihiihpsdihpshpioiph pjoi opjp ihpfehpwhpi h h whepiohh pewh hp ph hpwh pwehp we hphip ph whipow hpioph whp h hpiohihpiowehew hh

Typology: Essays (high school)

2022/2023

Uploaded on 08/24/2023

lerry-christine
lerry-christine 🇵🇭

1 document

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
RESEARCH PROPOSAL DEFENSE
SCRIPT
1: Lerry Christine Nicolas
2: Richard Buenaventura
3: Enrico Calzado
4: Vinz Danyael Ignacio
5: Jayxen Lloyd Monteza
6: Vinze Alfred Ramon
7: Noela Tan
SHOW SLIDE 1
LERRY: Good day panelists and co-researchers, we are the group 1 of *10 – St. matthew *. I
am Lerry Christine Nicolas together with my team, .
RICHARD: I am Richard Buenaventura
ENRICO: I am Enrico Calzado
DANYAEL: I am Vinz Danyael Ignacio
JAYXEN: I am Jayxen Lloyd Monteza
VINZE: I am Vinze Alfred Ramod
NOELA: and I am Noela Tan
We are here to present our research study entitled, Recognizing the Factors to be considered
by Students in Choosing a Senior High School strand under the supervision of *Ms. Maria Dhel
V. Clarion*, our research adviser.
SHOW SLIDE 2 BRIEFLY (AROUND 3 SECONDS ONLY)
SHOW SLIDE 3
LERRY: The K– 12 Program has been found to be an appropriate period for learning under
basic education in our country and in foreign Asian or Non– Asian countries, and its distinction
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download english Script for practical research and more Essays (high school) English in PDF only on Docsity!

RESEARCH PROPOSAL DEFENSE

SCRIPT

1: Lerry Christine Nicolas 2: Richard Buenaventura 3: Enrico Calzado 4: Vinz Danyael Ignacio 5: Jayxen Lloyd Monteza 6: Vinze Alfred Ramon 7: Noela Tan SHOW SLIDE 1 LERRY: Good day panelists and co-researchers, we are the group 1 of *10 – St. matthew *. I am Lerry Christine Nicolas together with my team,. RICHARD: I am Richard Buenaventura ENRICO: I am Enrico Calzado DANYAEL: I am Vinz Danyael Ignacio JAYXEN: I am Jayxen Lloyd Monteza VINZE: I am Vinze Alfred Ramod NOELA: and I am Noela Tan We are here to present our research study entitled, Recognizing the Factors to be considered by Students in Choosing a Senior High School strand under the supervision of Ms. Maria Dhel V. Clarion, our research adviser. SHOW SLIDE 2 BRIEFLY (AROUND 3 SECONDS ONLY) SHOW SLIDE 3 LERRY: The K– 12 Program has been found to be an appropriate period for learning under basic education in our country and in foreign Asian or Non– Asian countries, and its distinction

requirement of professionals and non– professionals has been found to be an acceptable period in our country and in foreign Asian or Non– Asian countries. pause briefly In the Philippines, The K– 12 Program officially started in the year of 2011– 2012. The first batch graduated on March of year 2018. pause briefly Making a choice entail, making a transparent choice between two or more options. It is one amongst the foremost important aspects of life and work because of its tight relationship successfully and effectiveness. Academics, Technical– Vocational and Livelihood (TVL), sports, and humanities and style are among the four areas with-in which SHS students might specialize. the educational track is split into four strands: Accounting, Business, and Management (ABM), Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS), and General Academic. RICHARD: Choosing a strand is one in all the foremost life altering decisions someone can make and determining the acceptable strand for incoming Senior High School students could be a difficult process. It can be an earthly task that needs a choice, or a tricky situation with several challenges that necessitates a choice. Making a decision indicates that there are options to consider, and in this situation, we want to not only identify as many of those options as possible, but also select the one that best meets our goals, objectives, wants, values, and so on. pause briefly Choosing the simplest strand while also taking under consideration of one's future career may be a difficult decision for each student. Many of the students are certain about the courses they require to acquire, while others are not. A career is de-fined as an overall pattern of one's behaviors throughout the course of one's life. Because it describes who someone is, it can even be utilized to see their personality ENRICO: There are several factors that will influence students' and parents' decisions and are often a decent source of insight for personal educational activity institutions to supply quality services that may meet the community's needs, expectations, and demands. However, with almost identical curricular offerings, diversification is difficult. Knowledge, cultural identity, finance, globalization, interests, personality, role model, self– concept, social support, and socialization are all factors that impact a student's profession choice.

Lastly, what are the possible recommendations /solutions that can be utilized to minimize the impact that may affect the decision– making of the respondents in choosing SHS strand. This is to aid the incoming Senior High School students in selecting their strand. SHOW SLIDE 7 BRIEFLY (AROUND 3 SECONDS ONLY) SHOW SLIDE 9 DANYAEL: Next is the assumptions of the study. The researchers assumed the following hypothesis for this study;  Firstly, the respondents that are going to be selected are all anticipated to provide their honest and complete personal information.  Next, there are circumstances that can be a great assistance to the respondents who are struggling to choose their strand.  Another is, things that can affect respondent are quite usual and common, such as challenges and pressure associated with stress, relaxation, and planning as well.  Another one is, it cannot be prevented that some of the respondents are facing factors that influences their decision, especially when they encountered peer pressure and practicality.  Lastly, the result of the study can be used to lessen the effects that may possibly have an impact on making choices of the respondents in selecting SHS strand. SHOW SLIDE 10 BRIEFLY (AROUND 3 SECONDS ONLY) SHOW SLIDE 11 JAYXEN: For the scope and delimitation, this study focuses on all students who have undergone the K to 12 curriculum and their decisions on pursuing career or courses related to their chosen strand. This study also focuses on finding what are the influencing factors that affect their ability to choose their own strand. Furthermore, this research also aims on taking the advice of the graduates of K to 12 to the incoming Senior High students.

SHOW SLIDE 12

VINZE: For the paradigm of the study, we have the input, process, and output. For the input we have the profile of the respondents, the variables affecting SHS strand selection and lastly, the challenges encountered by the respondents in choosing SHS strand For the process we have the distribution of survey via online platform and compilation and analyzation of the responses. Lastly for the output of the research, to find out the factors that affect the decision making of the respondents SHOW SLIDE 13 BRIEFLY (AROUND 3 SECONDS ONLY) SHOW SLIDE 14 VINZE: Choosing the correct SHS strand has a significant impact on each student's daily life. With the support of other SHS students and past SHS students, this study addresses the possibility to emphasize the factors that students should consider while choosing a SHS strand. The goal is to assist students who are still undecided about their future plans. This research will be extremely beneficial to individuals who are having difficulty deciding on the best and most favored strand. pause briefly This study's guide or instruments are the linked literature and studies, both local and foreign materials. The researchers gathered the following data to help them aid with their study. SHOW SLIDE 15 NOELA: Moving on, the next would be the research methodology. This section explains the methodology used in collecting data qualitatively. More information is given on the sampling, interview, population, method, and observation of data are collected. SHOW SLIDE 16

RICHARD: The researchers created the study instrument based on their readings and relevant

literature, research papers on a specific topic, and internet access to obtain more information about the subject. At the same time, the researchers used questionnaires/surveys among the respondents to obtain more accurate data. The researchers employed the following instruments to gather basic data in order to respond to the challenges raised in the first chapter. SHOW SLIDE 18 ENRICO: The survey is a research instrument comprising if series of questions used by researchers for the compelling strategies of gathering data from respondents. It is composed of five parts: The first part of the questionnaire includes the profile of the respondents in terms of age, sex, SHS strand and their dream profession. The second part of the questionnaire enumerates the things that help the respondents to choose their preferred strand. The third part discussed how the respondents handle the challenges and pressure in terms of stress, relaxation, and planning. SHOW SLIDE 19 RICHARD: The fourth part contains possible challenges that the respondents encountered in choosing SHS strand and how do the factors connect to the students in terms of peer pressure and practicality. Lastly, the fifth part focused on what are the possible recommendations/ solutions that can be utilized to minimize the impact that may affect the decision making of the respondents in choosing SHS strand. SHOW SLIDE 20 DANYAEL: Moving on to the following section, which is the instrument's construction. The researchers looked at a variety of linked literature and studies, both domestic and international. The researchers used all of these to design throughout the construction of the instrument items.

The consultant had been given the primary documents to comment on and make recommendations on. pause A few items were regarded important to the study, while others had been discarded. After considering the consultant's suggestions, the experts presented the amended form for early feedback and recommendations. The final drafts were developed and prepared for validation after the revision. JAYXEN: The final draft of the instrument was evaluated again for validation purposes to see whether there were any areas that were difficult to grasp or respond. The purpose was to determine if there were any remaining difficult-to-understand questions in the questionnaire. The instrument was then replicated for distribution and a copy was kept by the researchers. Following that is the administration and retrieval of the questions; the researchers personally oversaw the survey's distribution to develop affinity and fully explain the survey's substance and proper completion to the respondents. The instrument was completely recovered, and the researchers calmly reviewed their responses to each item for investigation and interpretation. SHOW SLIDE 21 VINZE: For the statistical treatment of data, the information gathered was thoroughly examined, counted, and analyzed. The comes about gotten from the tabulation were statistically treated using ranking, frequency, rate and mean. Frequency and percentage were used to determine the frequencies of the students’ response using the formula P = F over N times 100. Where P is the percentage of distribution, F is the number of frequencies of response and N is the total number of respondents. SHOW SLIDE 22 NOELA: For the statistics analysis, the information accumulated were counted; the computations and presentations of information were encouraged through the use of tables of percentage distribution. The weighted cruel values of the zone of inquiry were moreover computed. For computing percentage distribution P = F over N times 100 as mentioned in the previous slide. Meanwhile, for computing over all weighted mean X = F over N where F is the total number of responses and n is the total number of respondents.

SHOW SLIDE 27:

DANYAEL: The frequency and percentage of respondents' desired jobs are depicted in Figure

  1. Thirty (30) of the fifty respondents reported that their preferred employment was not included in the provided possibilities. Engineer ranks second in popularity, with a frequency of nine (9) and a percentage of 18%. Doctor is the third level, with five (5) total and 10%. Finally, Lawyers, Architects, and Teachers each received two respondents and 4% of the vote. (4%) SHOW SLIDE 28: JAYXEN : These are the primary criteria that influence students' decisions regarding their current strands. This process was included to ensure that the chosen topic was relevant. The selected selections reflect the individual's preferred values. The most influential factor/person in assisting respondents in choosing their strand is their self- principle, which rates top with 46%. Following the other two factors, with a proportion of 24%, family was the third element that influenced respondents' strand choice, with a rate of 16%. The fourth factor/person that influences responders' strand selection is their practicality (6 percent ). Friends and the Internet come in last place with a combined percentage of 4%. SHOW SLIDE 29: VINZE : Managing stressful events can help you develop essential abilities. This is critical because challenges are one of the most important criteria for choosing a career. The frequency, proportion, and order of responses to the stress, relaxation, and planning problems are shown in Table 6. 94 percent of respondents with a frequency of 47 preferred to deal with difficulties and pressure through alone time. 8% of respondents preferred to cope with difficulties and pressure by socializing. Finally, no one chooses to alleviate stress through family time.

SHOW SLIDE 30:

NOELA : Decision-making is the process of determining the optimal course of action from a set of alternatives. It is a critical step in the planning process. The success is contingent upon the choices you make in your career and personal lives. As a result, the investigators incorporated this component as if it had a holistic effect on the individual. Respondents discuss how and why peer pressure influences their decisions in this table. Three- nineths (39) percent of respondents replied no, stating that there is no easy strand and that choosing what kids actually want will have no impact on their daily lives. Some of them are fearful of taking risks, and one of the reasons they are fearful of choosing their strand is that their buddies lead them astray. SHOW SLIDE 31: NOELA: Respondents shared when and why practical informs their decisions in this table. This is the innumerable quality of being effective, useful, or appropriate for a specific purpose or context. One in every twenty-eight (28) persons replied yes because they want to assist their family as quickly as possible and are considering their financial situation. 22 percent of respondents replied no, stating that they simply think and do what they actually enjoy, and their families respect and support their decisions. SHOW SLIDE 32: LERRY: All throughout the study, the investigators suggested the following intervention to the respondents: First is to allow no pressure to influence their decision-making. Next, choose the strand that corresponds to their life goals. Then begin by determining your favorite field and specialty. Meanwhile, allow some of the relatives to assist them in making their selection and keep in mind to have the schedule feasible.

  1. Self-principle is one factor that influences responders' choice of strand. SHOW SLIDE 38: NOELA:
  2. Spending time alone also aides responders in coping with difficulties and strain.
  3. The STEM Strand had the majority of respondents, with 34 pupils and a proportion of 68 percent. LERRY:
  4. The vast majority of respondents aspire to be engineers.
  5. The majority of respondents believe that pragmatism plays a role in decision making.
  6. The majority of responders reported feeling no pressure. SHOW SLIDE 39: LERRY: They are, nonetheless, equally significant. The conclusion and recommendation sections of the thesis are critical. Recommendation is the final section of our thesis. It makes an appeal to individuals or organizations to resolve or assist in resolving the issues uncovered during the investigation. Throughout the trial, the investigators recommended to the responders the following intervention. The following recommendations are made in light of the facts received and findings drawn:
  7. Avoid allowing pressure to influence your decision-making.
  8. Select the strand that corresponds to their life goals.
  9. Determine your preferred subject of study and specialty.
  10. Allow their family to assist them in making their selection.
  11. Make it a priority to plan it as soon as feasible.
  1. Concentrate on determining what people truly desire.
  2. Investigate, diversify, and enquire.
  3. Develop a habit of getting enough sleep and maintaining mental clarity. LERRY: That concludes our presentation. Once again, we are the group 1 of 10-St. matthew. Thank you pause As researchers, we are willing to accept corrections or criticisms from the panel. Our group will now accommodate questions, comments, queries from the panelists.