Report on General Education Reforms in Liberal Arts and Sciences, Papers of Cultural History of Europe

The recommendations of the general education task force in the college of liberal arts and sciences at a university, which include reducing general education hours, increasing upper level and major courses, improving quality control of principal courses, and making changes to the b.g.s. Degree. The report also suggests refocusing principal courses on the mission of teaching inquiry principles and allowing literature departments to offer writing-intensive literature courses.

Typology: Papers

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/10/2009

koofers-user-czw
koofers-user-czw 🇺🇸

4

(1)

10 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
General Education Task Force
Final Report
May 2007
BACKGROUND
In 2004-2005, a University-wide task force conducted a review of General Education that left it
to individual colleges/schools to make actual changes. In 2005-2006, CUSA discussed the
findings of the University Task Force, and recommended that the College form its own task force
to make specific recommendations for the College. Dean Joseph Steinmetz formed this task force
in Fall 2006, and it continued work through May 2007. At the recommendation of CUSA and
Dean Steinmetz, the task force considered the following questions, among others:
Should the number of General Education courses required be reduced? If so, how?
Should the B.G.S. degree be abandoned or significantly revised and enhanced?
Could the College combine “skill courses” and “content courses” by incorporating
Writing/Communication/Mathematics emphases across the curriculum?
Should foreign language study be a significant part of both the B.A. and B.G.S. curriculum?
Should units offering Principal Courses be required to demonstrate that such courses include
substantial attention to the assumptions and methods of the discipline, and not merely subject
matter instruction? How would they demonstrate this? To whom?
Should the College emphasize demonstrated competency and achievement, rather than a
particular number of required courses or credit hours? If so, how is competency and
achievement measured?
At its final meeting on May 17, 2007, the Task Force agreed on the following set of
recommendations. Some are quite specific and practical, while others are broad. Some would
require no infusion of funds, while others presume major investments. Overall, the members
believe that it is feasible in the short term to accomplish the following goals:
Reduce General Education requirements by 12 hours.
Increase upper level and major courses by a corresponding figure.
Better address the need for global awareness, especially in the BGS degree.
Shift the emphasis of the BGS back to its original interdisciplinary intent, and away from its
current role as a means of avoiding foreign language.
Refocus the principal courses on the mission of teaching the principals of inquiry.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Reduction of General Education Hours
1. (B.A. only) Reduce the number of principal courses required for the B.A. in each area
(Humanities, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences) to two (reduces Gen Ed hours by 9).
¾ A majority of members also supported returning to the limit of four principle courses
per department, with these to be divided as the department wishes between levels.
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Report on General Education Reforms in Liberal Arts and Sciences and more Papers Cultural History of Europe in PDF only on Docsity!

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences General Education Task Force Final Report May 2007

BACKGROUND In 2004-2005, a University-wide task force conducted a review of General Education that left it to individual colleges/schools to make actual changes. In 2005-2006, CUSA discussed the findings of the University Task Force, and recommended that the College form its own task force to make specific recommendations for the College. Dean Joseph Steinmetz formed this task force in Fall 2006, and it continued work through May 2007. At the recommendation of CUSA and Dean Steinmetz, the task force considered the following questions, among others:

  • Should the number of General Education courses required be reduced? If so, how?
  • Should the B.G.S. degree be abandoned or significantly revised and enhanced?
  • Could the College combine “skill courses” and “content courses” by incorporating Writing/Communication/Mathematics emphases across the curriculum?
  • Should foreign language study be a significant part of both the B.A. and B.G.S. curriculum?
  • Should units offering Principal Courses be required to demonstrate that such courses include substantial attention to the assumptions and methods of the discipline, and not merely subject matter instruction? How would they demonstrate this? To whom?
  • Should the College emphasize demonstrated competency and achievement, rather than a particular number of required courses or credit hours? If so, how is competency and achievement measured?

At its final meeting on May 17, 2007, the Task Force agreed on the following set of recommendations. Some are quite specific and practical, while others are broad. Some would require no infusion of funds, while others presume major investments. Overall, the members believe that it is feasible in the short term to accomplish the following goals:

  • Reduce General Education requirements by 12 hours.
  • Increase upper level and major courses by a corresponding figure.
  • Better address the need for global awareness, especially in the BGS degree.
  • Shift the emphasis of the BGS back to its original interdisciplinary intent, and away from its current role as a means of avoiding foreign language.
  • Refocus the principal courses on the mission of teaching the principals of inquiry.

RECOMMENDATIONS : A. Reduction of General Education Hours

  1. (B.A. only) Reduce the number of principal courses required for the B.A. in each area (Humanities, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences) to two ( reduces Gen Ed hours by 9). ¾ A majority of members also supported returning to the limit of four principle courses per department, with these to be divided as the department wishes between levels.
  1. Reduce the Humanities and Western Civilization requirement from two semesters to one (reduces Gen Ed hours by 3 ).
  2. Increase the required number of junior/senior hours by the same amount that General Education requirements are decreased.

B. Quality Control

  1. In order to ensure that principal courses meet their purpose, the syllabi of principal courses should state clearly how the course addresses at least two of the core skills and how the skills will be practiced in assigned work. CUSA should develop a mechanism (either within CUSA or by a group designated by CUSA) to review principal courses every 3-4 years to ensure that they continue to serve their original purpose.

C. Changes to the B.G.S. Degree:

  1. Require one year of foreign language study for the B.G.S. degree. This requirement could be met either by successfully completing coursework (e.g., two semesters of language) or by testing for competency, or some combination of the two, using the existing procedures, adapted to one-year's competency.
  2. Replace the current "Junior/Senior Concentration" (9 credit hours) with the 12-credit hour "Concentration Area." Three options are proposed: (1) Global Area, (2) Research Methods, or (3) CLAS-approved minor, co-major, or second major.

D. Teaching Basic Skills across the Curriculum

  1. Allow literature departments other than the English Department to offer writing-intensive literature courses to satisfy the third level literature/writing requirement. This would include allowing HWC 205 to count for the literature course as noted in item A.3 above. CUSA should develop standards and a review process to ensure that course quality and training of instructors in the teaching of writing remain at or above current levels.
  2. Make departments more aware that any department can develop a second-level math course (one that requires college algebra as a prerequisite) that integrates mathematics with methods and material particular to the department.