









Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
The legitimization of television as a cultural form and the evolution of broadcasting from the 1960s to the internet era. the historical context, representations of television, and different perspectives and theories. It also touches upon the sociological approach to mass communication research and the impact of television on society.
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 15
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!










of production. This commodification of culture is the commodification of human consciousness. → They argue that the culture industry has taken over reality as the prism through which people experience reality, thus completely shaping and conditioning their experience of life. “Amusement has become an extension of labor under late capitalism”. → Seemingly all films and TV shows we watch are different, but in fact they follow the same recycled formulas as in other types of consumer goods. Like consumer goods, it feels like "there is something for everyone" here but in fact it's all variations of the same thing. → The culture industry has the specific function of providing ideological legitimation of the existing capitalist societies and of integrating individuals into the framework of its social formation.
Main ideas/Limitations Contributions to TV studies Continuities Sociological Approach (Mass Media Research) This approach was more concerned about “the effects'' than the content itself. Very quantitative and with a (mostly) linear perspective of the power of media on the masses It helped legitimising academic research and interest in mass media like TV. And it also viewed TV as a pivotal social agent. Still many studies about “the effects” of television in society in terms of violence, sexism, consumerism… (This is NOT Television Studies) Critical Approach (the Frankfurt School) They viewed mass media as something uniform. They also believe that TV serves the needs of dominant corporate interests, plays a major role in ideological reproduction, and in enculturating individuals into the dominant system of needs. Which may be true but is also a narrowed view of the medium. Qualitative and interdisciplinary methodologies. They’ve helped to draw attention at the ideological aspects of media (as well as technological, social, historical…) Many more contemporary (postmodern) scholars have followed this epistemological perspective.
Television aims to reach a large audience. A sense of collectivity. It articulates social debates: it makes you confront your beliefs. → TV’s ideological work is conceived as a “ process rather than product, on discussion rather than indoctrination, on contradiction and confusion rather than coherence ” Legitimation processes are the result of historical changes, economic factors and power relations where notions such as “taste” and “quality” come to the fore. We can now conclude that television is for the masses, therefore it’s a non elitistic medium and it is collective rather than individual. Everyone has access to it, everyone can enjoy it and understand it. But even with all this process taking place through history, in the legitimating we still find anti-tv tendencies.
→ Debates and complaints: Too pornographic, erotic → Huge amount of viewers (more than the game) → Demographics (both republicans and democrats) ○Trump had 2 commercials. Michael Bloomberg 1 ● Contradiction: antifeminists and racists ○ Male gaze ○ TV shows after superbowl have a much greater audience than usually ● Grey’s Anatomy the most benefited one ● Commercial - George’s Dream (male gaze again) ○ Pole dance → attracting certain gazes but using it for visibilize social causes The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills: rich bitch realness The Real Housewives: a reality soap series (Desperate Housewives) Broadcast in Bravo: from “quality television” to The Queer Eye TRHOOC (of Orange County) Premiered in 2006. 10 american installments and 14 international installments. Ratings of TRHOBH: Between 1.5 and 2.5 viewers per episode What was happening when the franchise kicked off (2012)? → Huge economic crisis, people losing jobs… What do you think about it in cultural, representation and ideology terms? → Gloria Steinem y noseqn Gay, feministas opinando sobre la serie Who is watching? → “Affluencers” as the model audience for Bravo ○ Group of people who have money, who are educated and ● A very gay show (with not many gay characters) ○ Camp, femininity, catfights ○ Andy Cohen - executive producer → Ways of watching ○ Between identification/emotional attachment/desire AND critical distance/humour ○ Aspirational: their job is to be rich women (performing to be one of them too) ● Self-commodification and beauty standards ● Consumerism (and hard work) ○ Sexism ○ “The bravo wink”: campy irony. From the title to the editing ● They aren’t real housewives. Making fun of them... ○ Self-conscious performances: self-branding: the real job is to be a good reality persona ○ Populist tendencies ○ Is it an aspirational portrayal of a happy and perfect life?
boxes Bundles guide Broadcast Era (1990s - 2000s) Technology Cultural form Infrastructure Devices Service Frames Content Viewing Add on Broadcasting +Cable + Satellite + Digital TV set Remote control + VCRs + Set up boxes + Personal video recorders Mass channels + Niche Channels + Bundles + Pay-per-vie w Linear Schedule + Electronic programme guide + Interfaces Programmes
Online TV: closed sites/spaces that limit users contributions and are designed primarily to facilitate viewing. Online TV as internet-connected services Fluidity, rapid development of new devices, services and infrastructures Online TV providers control the frames, such as metadata and interfaces. When they publish their content on YouTube, they lose control. TV controls also the content within their service, enabling them to provide highly regulated user experience, build a brand… Their YouTube channels operate as far more open sites that facilitate marketing and promotion because the content can be more easily found and shared. CASE STUDIES: Individualization of tv If I watch The Graham Norton Show on your Youtube using my phone, am I watching TV? “ Since 2010 the internet has begun to provide viewing experiences that are largely indistinguishable from those offered by television, while simultaneously transforming how television delivers delivers audiovisual content to viewers ” Redefining television; does it matter to know if something is (or isn’t) television? Is television dying and we are about to enter a post-TV period? → to us yes Convergence and fragmentation. But what was the biggest change brought by the internet that seems to make definitions of TV so problematic? The more content, the more specific and individualised experience (fragmentation). With broadcast TV people would still watch TV in the same place (kitchen, living room). Most people would watch the same shows. Transformations in technology → biggest change: TV is competing with other video services Quibi (quick bite) Short videos (<10mins). Even the films would be divided. Big fail. Founded in 2018. Jeffrey Katzenberg & Meg Whitman Big investment (1.75 billions of dollars). Disney, Universal, Sony, Viacom, MGM, BBC… January 2020: presentation.
○ We should not isolate individuals and their work from their surroundings. “ [There is] a set of social institutions, or field , that selects from the variations produced by individuals those that are worth preserving; a stable cultural domain that will preserve and transmit the selected new ideas of forms to the following generations; and finally the individual , who brings about some change in the domain, a change that the field will consider to be creative .” Domain → Culture → Taste, trends, traditions Field → Society → Mandate, management, money Individual → Personal background → Talent, training. track record. CASE STUDY: Autorship TV (Christmas special + Reese Witherspoon + Pose) You have to create a Christmas special: how would you do it? First, who is it for? Netflix or public tv? If it's for public television, who is in government? Also, what events took place that year? Examples: La última cena del 88 (TVE. 1988) Felipe Gonzalez in government with a huge majority and the socialist party. Capitalizing off la movida madrileña , counter moving against francoism. Spanish camp tradition → Almodovar. This became an example on what not to do on christmas specials.