Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Television Studies: Legitimizing TV and the Evolution of Broadcasting, Apuntes de Historia de la Radio y la Televisión

The legitimization of television as a cultural form and the evolution of broadcasting from the 1960s to the internet era. the historical context, representations of television, and different perspectives and theories. It also touches upon the sociological approach to mass communication research and the impact of television on society.

Tipo: Apuntes

2020/2021

Subido el 20/06/2021

daniela-diaz-qpy
daniela-diaz-qpy 🇪🇸

4 documentos

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
WEEK ONE: INTRODUCTION TO TELEVISION STUDIES
- Television is a medium that’s in constant transformation, a lot of conversations in our
world revolve around it.
- The alleged “death of tv” is false, because people are still selling and buying tv sets.
- The new oversaturation of media makes the tv watching experience radically
different from what it was 20 years ago: the MASH finale was watched by 128
million, whereas The Big Bang Theory only 18,5 million people tuned in. This is a sign
of the medium’s maturation and vitality
- Television wasn’t legitimized as something worthy of studying until the 90s, when it
developed its own canon and intellectual touchstones. The reason it took so long was
because it was dismissed as a mass media form, and it was related to domesticity.
- Also in order to study television we would need to stop and rewatch, which was not
possible until reruns and vcr.
- Television studies are sustained by the analysis of programmes, audiences, context
and industries.
TELEVISION STUDIES
- Programmes:
Critical analysis: The general disdain towards television, delayed the critic's arrival
to the 1970s, and instead the only analysis done was textual. Once it arrived it was
difficult to develop it because of the ephemeral nature of television in its beginning.
Formal analysis: Centered on the aesthetic and narrative. This used to be
exclusive to literature and film. In television the audience creates the text, that
creates the meaning.
Semiotic/semiological analysis: Semiotics study how meaning is created. Changes
in language create changes in reality. News programmes try to create a sense of
trustworthiness by seeming transparent, neutral, object, etc. Suits and sobriety give
us a sense of authority
- These signifiers can be used and twisted to create new meaning. These
examples use the associations we have in order and change their meaning.
The environments are similar but they are used to bring comedy not
trustworthiness. Ex: SNL’s weekend update, Drew’s news
Aesthetics and ideology: Dominant ideology (culture and power) Not just high
culture, but in every cultural product. Why should we only analyze Shakespeare
when culture is so much broader than that? The “value” is (inter)subjective:
consensus and the canon.
-Ex: The handmaid’s tale appeals to our collective idea of what nuns look like
in western culture which translates this idea of submissive and docile god
given women.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Television Studies: Legitimizing TV and the Evolution of Broadcasting y más Apuntes en PDF de Historia de la Radio y la Televisión solo en Docsity!

WEEK ONE: INTRODUCTION TO TELEVISION STUDIES

  • Television is a medium that’s in constant transformation, a lot of conversations in our world revolve around it.
  • The alleged “death of tv” is false, because people are still selling and buying tv sets.
  • The new oversaturation of media makes the tv watching experience radically different from what it was 20 years ago: the MASH finale was watched by 128 million, whereas The Big Bang Theory only 18,5 million people tuned in. This is a sign of the medium’s maturation and vitality
  • Television wasn’t legitimized as something worthy of studying until the 90s, when it developed its own canon and intellectual touchstones. The reason it took so long was because it was dismissed as a mass media form, and it was related to domesticity.
  • Also in order to study television we would need to stop and rewatch, which was not possible until reruns and vcr.
  • Television studies are sustained by the analysis of programmes, audiences, context and industries. TELEVISION STUDIES
  • Programmes: → Critical analysis: The general disdain towards television, delayed the critic's arrival to the 1970s, and instead the only analysis done was textual. Once it arrived it was difficult to develop it because of the ephemeral nature of television in its beginning. → Formal analysis: Centered on the aesthetic and narrative. This used to be exclusive to literature and film. In television the audience creates the text, that creates the meaning. → Semiotic/semiological analysis: Semiotics study how meaning is created. Changes in language create changes in reality. News programmes try to create a sense of trustworthiness by seeming transparent, neutral, object, etc. Suits and sobriety give us a sense of authority
  • These signifiers can be used and twisted to create new meaning. These examples use the associations we have in order and change their meaning. The environments are similar but they are used to bring comedy not trustworthiness. Ex: SNL’s weekend update, Drew’s news → Aesthetics and ideology: Dominant ideology (culture and power) Not just high culture, but in every cultural product. Why should we only analyze Shakespeare when culture is so much broader than that? The “value” is (inter)subjective: consensus and the canon.
  • Ex: The handmaid’s tale appeals to our collective idea of what nuns look like in western culture which translates this idea of submissive and docile god given women.
  • Genres → They have things in common based on textual things. They have certain elements, called conventions, that are repeated and that we can recognize. Ex: Successful auditions in talent shows.
  • Context → How programmes are placed alongside others within the same slot or network. - Television had to be studied as a flow, not as an individual text. Because those who make television don’t want you to watch just one. - This may be correct but this changes throughout countries. It's still important to acknowledge that programmes are not placed along but it can’t be the center of the analysis. → Instead, the study approach could be through intertextuality. Television overflows the media, therefore we can’t study television alone, we have to study all the other forms of media (transmedia) - Paratext: entryway (posters that make you watch the show) and media res (you can learn more about the show and its characters through other ways, not just the show). → THE PROGRAMME ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE SHOW. CASE STUDY: THE GOOP LAB with Gwyneth Paltrow Our aim is to understand: How does it legitimize pseudoscience? Encouraged by a large distrust of medicine, economic crisis and general mistreatment of minorities fuels this. We google our symptoms instead of going to the doctor. Celebrities and influencers preach about alternative healing methods and different lifestyles. Deeply influenced by post hippism. Gwyneth Paltrow is different from the usual celebrity gurus because it's not only due to her image, she has created a brand based on dangerous pseudoscience. She also knows how to appeal to women and women only. Why would Netflix produce it? Because controversy makes money. They’ve also done it before since they have other pseudoscientific documentaries. New factual television: It's not Gwyneth Paltrow talking, it's a mix between documentary and reality. In order to make it look like science they do two things: talk about them as if they're new, or science hasn’t been able to explain this or that. They speak as if they were talking about science to gain legitimacy. The way they ask the questions conditions how we perceive it, and since they both believe it. “Case studies” and the guinea pigs from the goop team. Ordinary people, results based therapies and self improvement narratives that ignore the process and just care about how they get you there. The show is capitalising off feminism. She’s trying to gain money from women’s insecurities.

of production. This commodification of culture is the commodification of human consciousness. → They argue that the culture industry has taken over reality as the prism through which people experience reality, thus completely shaping and conditioning their experience of life. “Amusement has become an extension of labor under late capitalism”. → Seemingly all films and TV shows we watch are different, but in fact they follow the same recycled formulas as in other types of consumer goods. Like consumer goods, it feels like "there is something for everyone" here but in fact it's all variations of the same thing. → The culture industry has the specific function of providing ideological legitimation of the existing capitalist societies and of integrating individuals into the framework of its social formation.

  • Sociological approach: Mass communication research, the beginning of the study in the mass media in the US was very influential in the study of television. It inspired ideas of Behaviourism, how people behave to a certain stimulus. It is quite focused on the ideas of effect, in our case the effect of television on a group of people. You want to study this effect in relation to people’s behavior and if it changes them.
  • TV was and still is perceived as Moral degradation / Deceiving and fake /Persuasive and manipulative (propagandistic) / Threatening and horrifying / Narcotizing and alienating / At odds with high culture, art or traditional literacy skills CASE STUDY: Fifteen Million Merits , Black Mirror. What is Black Mirror? An anthology that debates media, technology and society looking to the future, present. Very related to the culture industry: enlightenment and mass deception*. Charlie Brooker and co have not made any new arguments against tv. “Any trace of spontaneity from the public in official broadcasting is controlled and absorbed by talent scouts, studio competitions and official programs of every kind selected by professionals” → The talent show from the episode. “By subordinating in the same way and to the same end all areas of intellectual creation, by occupying men’s sense from the time they leave the factory in the evening to the time they clock in again in the next morning with matter that bears the impress of the labor process they themselves have to sustain throughout the day, this subsumption mockingly satisfies the concept of a unified culture which the philosophers of personality contrasted with mass culture” → The relationship between work and consumerism of entertainment. It becomes part of labor itself, in the case of this episode, quite literally. WEEK THREE: LEGITIMIZING TV (II)
  • The two schools of thought that have influenced television studies the most:

Main ideas/Limitations Contributions to TV studies Continuities Sociological Approach (Mass Media Research) This approach was more concerned about “the effects'' than the content itself. Very quantitative and with a (mostly) linear perspective of the power of media on the masses It helped legitimising academic research and interest in mass media like TV. And it also viewed TV as a pivotal social agent. Still many studies about “the effects” of television in society in terms of violence, sexism, consumerism… (This is NOT Television Studies) Critical Approach (the Frankfurt School) They viewed mass media as something uniform. They also believe that TV serves the needs of dominant corporate interests, plays a major role in ideological reproduction, and in enculturating individuals into the dominant system of needs. Which may be true but is also a narrowed view of the medium. Qualitative and interdisciplinary methodologies. They’ve helped to draw attention at the ideological aspects of media (as well as technological, social, historical…) Many more contemporary (postmodern) scholars have followed this epistemological perspective.

  • A climate of social changes brought new perspectives in the studies of texts → Reconceptualization of mass culture: trying to break away from dichotomies of low and high culture. Opened new ways for television criticism and analysis but was still too centred on the text.
  • University of Birmingham - 1964 - Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies - Richard Hoggart → Cultural studies started realizing the importance of the working classes. The shift from academia’s focus on culture to mass culture. → The defense of the importance of everyday life and working class place in culture. (Neomarxists). → Culture and the creation of meaning is not restricted to the ruling class. → Rejector of the media manipulation perspective. → Exploring the varying roles of media texts (and other cultural products) within society. Refusing the idea that mass media unproblematically transfer ideas from producer to consumer.

Television aims to reach a large audience. A sense of collectivity. It articulates social debates: it makes you confront your beliefs. → TV’s ideological work is conceived as a “ process rather than product, on discussion rather than indoctrination, on contradiction and confusion rather than coherence ” Legitimation processes are the result of historical changes, economic factors and power relations where notions such as “taste” and “quality” come to the fore. We can now conclude that television is for the masses, therefore it’s a non elitistic medium and it is collective rather than individual. Everyone has access to it, everyone can enjoy it and understand it. But even with all this process taking place through history, in the legitimating we still find anti-tv tendencies.

  1. Before television: the case of radio. Consumers and the delegitimation.
  2. 50s TV: The Golden Age. Ideas of taste and exclusion processes.
  3. 70s TV: The (industrial) importance of demographics. A new “quality” paradigm that hides the economic logic. → Taste was related to demographics
  4. More niche content and technological changes: the ‘cult’ status. → Using cults to discuss why some productions were deeper/better than others
  5. It's not TV. It’s HBO ”. Cultural capital. A new standard of programmes. → They sold themselves as something better than tv (even if it was tv) CASE STUDY: Real Housewives of Beverly Hills The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills → No awards but running for several years Trash TV Not considered a good cultural show → yet people with money watched it Something to have fun with, not intelectual. Low culture Charlie’s Angels “ Jiggle TV ” (or T&A TV) → Their bodies were bouncing, tits and ass... Social debates: the cultural forum → Lo veía mucha gente y de varios perfiles diferentes Remarkable contradictions: feminism and femininity → What a woman should look like → They were hyper feminine (patriarchal pressure)→ to please men. → It wasn’t a purposely feminist show, but it showed strong women being feminine… alternative image of what women should look like Remaking Charlie’s Angels (further reading) ○ Destiny’s Child - Independent Women or Drew Barrymore creating women superheros? Halftime shows (superbowl) Evolution from Janet Jackson’s boob Why Shakira and Jennifer López? → Miami. → Latino identity → Feminism

→ Debates and complaints: Too pornographic, erotic → Huge amount of viewers (more than the game) → Demographics (both republicans and democrats) ○Trump had 2 commercials. Michael Bloomberg 1 ● Contradiction: antifeminists and racists ○ Male gaze ○ TV shows after superbowl have a much greater audience than usually ● Grey’s Anatomy the most benefited one ● Commercial - George’s Dream (male gaze again) ○ Pole dance → attracting certain gazes but using it for visibilize social causes The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills: rich bitch realness The Real Housewives: a reality soap series (Desperate Housewives) Broadcast in Bravo: from “quality television” to The Queer Eye TRHOOC (of Orange County) Premiered in 2006. 10 american installments and 14 international installments. Ratings of TRHOBH: Between 1.5 and 2.5 viewers per episode What was happening when the franchise kicked off (2012)? → Huge economic crisis, people losing jobs… What do you think about it in cultural, representation and ideology terms? → Gloria Steinem y noseqn Gay, feministas opinando sobre la serie Who is watching? → “Affluencers” as the model audience for Bravo ○ Group of people who have money, who are educated and ● A very gay show (with not many gay characters) ○ Camp, femininity, catfights ○ Andy Cohen - executive producer → Ways of watching ○ Between identification/emotional attachment/desire AND critical distance/humour ○ Aspirational: their job is to be rich women (performing to be one of them too) ● Self-commodification and beauty standards ● Consumerism (and hard work) ○ Sexism ○ “The bravo wink”: campy irony. From the title to the editing ● They aren’t real housewives. Making fun of them... ○ Self-conscious performances: self-branding: the real job is to be a good reality persona ○ Populist tendencies ○ Is it an aspirational portrayal of a happy and perfect life?

boxes Bundles guide Broadcast Era (1990s - 2000s) Technology Cultural form Infrastructure Devices Service Frames Content Viewing Add on Broadcasting +Cable + Satellite + Digital TV set Remote control + VCRs + Set up boxes + Personal video recorders Mass channels + Niche Channels + Bundles + Pay-per-vie w Linear Schedule + Electronic programme guide + Interfaces Programmes

  • Adds + Transmedia
  • Linear TV: The one that's broadcasted to you, either by cable or satellite, where the programming is given to you. * Non linear TV: You choose what to watch and in which order within your reach. DEFINING ONLINE TV: In the text Johnson states: Online TV as service Service at the center of the definition in this book. It is through the service that we experience television in the internet era. Online TV services can be distinguished from other forms of internet-connected video services because they share 3 core characteristics with earliest forms of broadcast, cable/satellite and digital television: they construct viewing experiences, they provide access to editorially selected content and they are closed. Online TV as viewing services Even though many services offer access to online videos, they are not constructed primarily around the experience of watching. In social media the aim is communicative and in news websites the aim is to accompany the written news. Online TV as editorial services TV (earlier and online): Active sourcing of content for television services. Editorially selected Other video services: passive sourcing (users uploads) Online TV as closed services Social media: open sites, depend on users

Online TV: closed sites/spaces that limit users contributions and are designed primarily to facilitate viewing. Online TV as internet-connected services Fluidity, rapid development of new devices, services and infrastructures Online TV providers control the frames, such as metadata and interfaces. When they publish their content on YouTube, they lose control. TV controls also the content within their service, enabling them to provide highly regulated user experience, build a brand… Their YouTube channels operate as far more open sites that facilitate marketing and promotion because the content can be more easily found and shared. CASE STUDIES: Individualization of tv If I watch The Graham Norton Show on your Youtube using my phone, am I watching TV? “ Since 2010 the internet has begun to provide viewing experiences that are largely indistinguishable from those offered by television, while simultaneously transforming how television delivers delivers audiovisual content to viewers ” Redefining television; does it matter to know if something is (or isn’t) television? Is television dying and we are about to enter a post-TV period? → to us yes Convergence and fragmentation. But what was the biggest change brought by the internet that seems to make definitions of TV so problematic? The more content, the more specific and individualised experience (fragmentation). With broadcast TV people would still watch TV in the same place (kitchen, living room). Most people would watch the same shows. Transformations in technology → biggest change: TV is competing with other video services Quibi (quick bite) Short videos (<10mins). Even the films would be divided. Big fail. Founded in 2018. Jeffrey Katzenberg & Meg Whitman Big investment (1.75 billions of dollars). Disney, Universal, Sony, Viacom, MGM, BBC… January 2020: presentation.

  • Video - as if technology was always evolving towards something Contents, showrunners and stars Super Bowl 2020: commercial without success Why did Quibi fail? → Pandemic. Content for those moments when you look at the phone (way to work, uni…) and then those moments didn’t exist. They wanted to make it young → who’s gonna pay for it? Competing for attention The showrunners were using their projects that wouldn’t be accepted by other platforms. Interactive shows Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt Open narratives that became more and more popular thanks to technology. Convergence and fragmentation → even more individualized.
  1. Writer mimics (more than creates)
  2. Back to the table (revising/rewriting), to the showrunner (revising/rewriting), and often the studio/network (checking and making some changes)
  3. Writer usually gets credited (the one charged to write that episode)
  • SHOWRUNNERS : The key TV authorship roles:
  1. The creator - could be one of the authors of the show (might change later)
  2. The (head) writer - in charge of the writer’s room
  3. The director - sometimes the creator directs something to control more about it.
  4. The (executive) producer - usually also the writer
  5. The showrunner*: writer-producer
  • The auteur : David Chase ( The Sopranos ) or Steven Brocho ( NYPD Blue ). Their personal touch on the show
  • The craftsman : Stephen J. Cannell ( 21 Jump Street ) or Chuck Lorre ( The Big Bang Theory ) = Industrial product
  • En España Pedro Masó EX: I LOVE LUCY: What is the book chapter about? Jess Oppenheimer; he registered the idea of the show → Why was he so controversial? Because of the conflict: even if he was working as a showrunner, this status between being producer and writer was not understood. *** THE SHOWRUNNER** :
  • Authorship as a product of television cultures, more than an originating force
  • Reframing authorship from a process of creation to a discursive practice (Foucalut, 1969)
  • Authorial branding
  • Helps viewers (and fans) have expectations and interpret the shows. → Alex Pina’s deal with netflix: an image of the show. → If we like the Simpsons we might like Futurama. → Ryan Murphy
  • TV and creative processes. → Creating a TV show can be a huge economic risk. Cultural industries have tried different methods to foresee if something will be a success or failure (recently big data, algorithms…) → The creative process is a constant interplay between several elements → Original thought and creativity does not happen in a vacuum → Creative process. The 4 Ps model: ○ Person, Product, Process and Press (reception and context of reception: criticism and whole surrounding)

○ We should not isolate individuals and their work from their surroundings. “ [There is] a set of social institutions, or field , that selects from the variations produced by individuals those that are worth preserving; a stable cultural domain that will preserve and transmit the selected new ideas of forms to the following generations; and finally the individual , who brings about some change in the domain, a change that the field will consider to be creative .” Domain → Culture → Taste, trends, traditions Field → Society → Mandate, management, money Individual → Personal background → Talent, training. track record. CASE STUDY: Autorship TV (Christmas special + Reese Witherspoon + Pose) You have to create a Christmas special: how would you do it? First, who is it for? Netflix or public tv? If it's for public television, who is in government? Also, what events took place that year? Examples: La última cena del 88 (TVE. 1988) Felipe Gonzalez in government with a huge majority and the socialist party. Capitalizing off la movida madrileña , counter moving against francoism. Spanish camp tradition → Almodovar. This became an example on what not to do on christmas specials.

  • TVE in the 80s ○ Javier Gurruchaga and Viaje con nosotros ○ Pilar Miró and the 2 conditions ○ A team for the show and creative traditions ○ A different Christmas special Authorship as agency. REESE WITHERSPOON : In the 2000s she wasn’t a tv person, she was known for her films, especially Legally Blonde. Despite her attempts at being an outspoken fighter for women’s rights, her agency was limited by her stardom and prettiness. After failing to find roles that satisfied her, she created her own production company in order to tell more female centered stories (Pacific Standard). Produced Gone Girl, Wild, Hot Pursuit, Big Little Lies. After this she created a transmedia brand called Hello Sunshine (podcast, audiovisual content for social media, films, TV shows, filmmaking camps for young girls…) RYAN MURPHY : At the beginning of his career, he wasn’t allowed to make it as gay as he wanted. Popular, Niptuck, Pretty/Handsome. He want a golden globe, but being gay or wanting to tell gay stories was not around yet. Then Glee came, originally it wasn’t a queer representation show, it wasn’t even Ryan Murphy created. But he jumped into the project and made it gay. Kurt was one of the most important characters in the show, and then the