Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


event predication semantics, Apuntes de Idioma Inglés

Asignatura: Semantica de la Lengua Inglesa, Profesor: Ninguno Ninguno, Carrera: Estudios Franceses, Universidad: US

Tipo: Apuntes

2014/2015

Subido el 02/09/2015

elenaperez5891
elenaperez5891 🇪🇸

3.7

(3)

4 documentos

1 / 21

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga event predication semantics y más Apuntes en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity!

Preliminaries - Truth values -Susan writes -Susan is a writer - Individuals Therefore our model has : n E a » Properties » Relations » Susan ¡s tall » Susan is against Bill =TALL(s) »AGAINST(s,b) » Susan isa dancer » Susan dances »DANCER(s) »DANCE(s,e) = Susan kissed Fred »KISS (sf, e) + E [| KISS(x,y,e)) ' To bereadas: the triple belongs in the set [KISS], ¡.e. the set of triples such that the first entitiy ¡s the individual who kisses, the second one is the individual kissed and thethird is a kissing event. 1 € [| EATIxel Be E felFAST(e) + Toberead as: the couple belongs in the set [EAT] (¡.e. the set of couples such that the first entitiy is the individual who eats and the second one is an eating event) and e, belongs in the set [FAST] of fast events. : cn | An important parallelism Predicates of individuals Player: x[PLAYER (x)] short: x[SHORT(x)] tall: x[TALL(x)] m tes of events econ») eat: EATING(x,y,e) healthy: HEALTHY(e) unhealthy: UNHEALTHY(e) bles Micaton over event val Just as we quantify over individuals in LF formulas like We can now quantifier over events in LF formuals like [Some x: STUDENT (x)] INTELLIGENT (x) [Some e] EAT (pete,e) £l FAST(e) L Some students is intelligent L Sometimes Pete eats fast [Most x: TOURIST (x)] IN (x paris) [Most e] READ(pete,shakespeare,e) L Most tourists are in Paris L Pete mostly reads Shakespeare [All e] EAT (Phil,e) 8: AT (e,lioni's) L Phil always eats at Lioni's Predicting entailment | p8q>p q | Án ambiguous sentence Interpretation 1: There was no brutal attack on the mailman by Shelby Ly [Some e: ATTACK(shelby, the mailman,e)] BRUTAL (e) Interpretation 2: Shelby attacked the mailman but he didn't do so brutally Ly [Some e: ATTACK(shelby,the mailman,e)] >BRUTAL(e) L Susan greeted each student [Every x: STUDENTO)] [e ] GREET(susan,x,e) Capturing (at least some varieties of) subordination: the case of bare infinitive clauses subordinated to perception verbs Some examples If the logical form of E a Lauri saw Richard kiss Meg 4 Paul heard Mary shut the shades E Meg saw the wind blow the clouds away Susan saw the thief move behind the curtain [3 e:SEE(laurix,e)] [3 e KISS(rich,meg,e)] T [3e 3e*SEE(laurie”, s 81 KISS(rich,meg,e)] [soma sya ts Laa sos an sent) as [3 €e:SEE(lauri,richard,e)] Lauri saw Richard L F pues saw the wind blow the clouds away -» > -— Meg saw the wind Ususan saw the thief move behind the curtain - does note -— Susan saw the thief ea) Assignment | Translate the following English sentences to LF formulas (if the sentence is ambiguous provide the two relevant LFs) - Susan welcomed Brad warmly yesterday - Johnny mostly drinks tea Susan didn't see Meg at the party Meg never drinks Meg always drinks two liquors Susan heard John leave Sandy kissed Pete twice passionately John gave a book to each child