



Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Teoría sobre los modales y algunos ejemplos
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 5
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!




Before explaining the different uses of modals, there are several aspects to consider.
They are verbs which have special characteristics:
Present CAN
Past COULD All the tenses BE ABLE TO (the verb is be, able is an adjective “capaz”) Be able to can be used for all the tenses, even in present (synonym of can in present), but in general we use CAN in present. For the past we have COULD. The past form of BE ABLE TO has a slight different meaning in the past in affirmative. We use could when we refer to general situations, and was/were able to for a specific situation. I could play the piano when I was 10 (general ability) I was able to escape from the fire (specific, in that situationlogré escapar del fuego) For the negative couldn’t can be used both in general and specific situations. Be able to can be used in all the tenses, infinitives, -ing , mainly when can and could cannot be used. I have been able to drive since I was 18 (sé conducir desde que tenía 18) He was interested in being able to speak Chinese (estaba interesado en saber hablar chino)
Here the difference between the different modals has to do with the degree of formality. From more informal to more formal we have: can could maymight (very polite) (el orden de menos a más formal) To give or refuse permission only can and may are used, even though you use could or might in the question: Yes, you can /may(formal) No,you can’t/ may not(formal) There are other verbs that we can use when talking about permission, mainly for other time referents as the past:
HAVE TO ALL TENSES (it’s not a modal, so auxiliaries do, does, did.. are necessary for the negative and interrogative forms) In the present , both verbs can be used with a difference of meaning:
MUSTN’T is the modal used to prohibit something. CAN’T is also used. You cannot use don’t have to in this situation. You mustn’t / can’t park here.
However, the negative form of have to DON’T/ DOESN’T HAVE TO cannot be used to ban. It means “it is not necessary, you can do it or not”. The verb NEEDN’T + bare infinitive (similar to a modal) has the same meaning. You mustn’t go = it’s forbidden You needn’t / don’t have to go = you can go or not, it ‘s not necessary for you to go. When talking about the past, we have two forms for needn’t:
When we want to give advice, we use SHOULD/ OUGHT TO (deberías). She ought to study When talking about the past we use SHOULD/OUGHT TO HAVE+participle I should have studied more (debería haber estudiado más)
There is one expression, HAD BETTER +bare infinitive , which is a stronger form: You should go (advice) You had better go (más te vale que vayas)