Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Inglés gramática "Modals", Apuntes de Inglés

Teoría sobre los modales y algunos ejemplos

Tipo: Apuntes

2019/2020

Subido el 04/06/2020

david-vazquez-garcia
david-vazquez-garcia 🇪🇸

5

(1)

2 documentos

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
MODALS
Before explaining the different uses of modals, there are several aspects to consider.
WHAT’S A MODAL
They are verbs which have special characteristics:
1. They are followed by infinitives without to (except ought to we consider it a modal
for practical purposes, but in English grammars, it is not, it has another name)
I must pay attention
2. They can act as auxiliaries, so they do not need auxiliaries for the negative and
interrogative forms.
I cannot go
Should I stay?
3. They need to be followed by another verb (bare infinitive), they cannot go alone
(except when the verb has been omitted to avoid repetition). Besides, it adds other
meanings to the verb (ability, possibility, prohibition…)
I play tennis
I can play tennis (can adds the meaning of ability to the verb play)
4. They cannot be used for all the tenses, so, when they cannot be used, other modals,
the auxiliary have or other verbs are used (I’ll explain later).
I can play
I could play (in this case, could, which is a modal, can be used)
I will be able to play (we don’t have a modal for the past, so we use the verb be able
to)
It can’t be Mary, the past of this is it can’t have been Mary.
5. Two modals cannot be together.
I will can go I will be able to go
These are the modal verbs: can, could, may, might, will, would, must, should, ought to
Now I will explain them, not one by one, because they have several meanings, but by the
meaning, that is, ability, permission… I will include modals but also the rest of verbs which are
used when these modals cannot be used.
NOTE: those modals followed by HAVE+participle are called PERFECT/PAST MODALS (these
are in the unit.
ABILITY (saber hacer algo)
Present CAN
pf3
pf4
pf5

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Inglés gramática "Modals" y más Apuntes en PDF de Inglés solo en Docsity!

MODALS

Before explaining the different uses of modals, there are several aspects to consider.

WHAT’S A MODAL

They are verbs which have special characteristics:

  1. They are followed by infinitives without to (except ought to  we consider it a modal for practical purposes, but in English grammars, it is not, it has another name) I must pay attention
  2. They can act as auxiliaries, so they do not need auxiliaries for the negative and interrogative forms. I cannot go Should I stay?
  3. They need to be followed by another verb (bare infinitive), they cannot go alone (except when the verb has been omitted to avoid repetition). Besides, it adds other meanings to the verb (ability, possibility, prohibition…) I play tennis I can play tennis ( can adds the meaning of ability to the verb play )
  4. They cannot be used for all the tenses , so, when they cannot be used, other modals, the auxiliary have or other verbs are used (I’ll explain later). I can play I could play (in this case, could, which is a modal, can be used) I will be able to play (we don’t have a modal for the past, so we use the verb be able to) It can’t be Mary , the past of this is it can’t have been Mary.
  5. Two modals cannot be together. I will can go I will be able to go These are the modal verbs: can, could, may, might, will, would, must, should, ought to Now I will explain them, not one by one, because they have several meanings, but by the meaning, that is, ability, permission… I will include modals but also the rest of verbs which are used when these modals cannot be used. NOTE: those modals followed by HAVE+participle are called PERFECT/PAST MODALS (these are in the unit.

ABILITY (saber hacer algo)

Present CAN

Past  COULD All the tenses BE ABLE TO (the verb is be, able is an adjective “capaz”) Be able to can be used for all the tenses, even in present (synonym of can in present), but in general we use CAN in present. For the past we have COULD. The past form of BE ABLE TO has a slight different meaning in the past in affirmative. We use could when we refer to general situations, and was/were able to for a specific situation. I could play the piano when I was 10 (general ability) I was able to escape from the fire (specific, in that situationlogré escapar del fuego) For the negative couldn’t can be used both in general and specific situations. Be able to can be used in all the tenses, infinitives, -ing , mainly when can and could cannot be used. I have been able to drive since I was 18 (sé conducir desde que tenía 18) He was interested in being able to speak Chinese (estaba interesado en saber hablar chino)

PERMISSION

Here the difference between the different modals has to do with the degree of formality. From more informal to more formal we have: can  could  maymight (very polite) (el orden de menos a más formal) To give or refuse permission only can and may are used, even though you use could or might in the question: Yes, you can /may(formal) No,you can’t/ may not(formal) There are other verbs that we can use when talking about permission, mainly for other time referents as the past:

  • Allow or be allowed to, in active or passive. We use the passive structure mainly when we want to express that I have the permission, without mentioning who gives me that permission. My parents allow me to go to the concert. Me dejan ir. Voz activa I’m allowed to go to the concert ( by my parents)  passive
  • Permit (My parents permitted me… I was permitted…)

POSSIBILITY

  • When we talk about a general possibility , can and could can be used: These roses can grow everywhere (las rosas pueden crecer …) In those days everybody could find a job (… todo el mundo podia encontrar un trabajo)

HAVE TOALL TENSES (it’s not a modal, so auxiliaries do, does, did.. are necessary for the negative and interrogative forms) In the present , both verbs can be used with a difference of meaning:

  • We use MUST when the obligation comes from the speaker ( I must do some work; I want to pass my exam).
  • We use HAVE TO to talk about an obligation that comes from “outside” ( In my job I have to work from 9 to 5). In American English HAVE TO is also used for the obligation that comes from the speaker, that’s why it is also common in British English, so when talking both of them are used. In the rest of tenses, only HAVE TO can be used.

PROHIBITION

MUSTN’T is the modal used to prohibit something. CAN’T is also used. You cannot use don’t have to in this situation. You mustn’t / can’t park here.

LACK OF OBLIGATION

However, the negative form of have to DON’T/ DOESN’T HAVE TO cannot be used to ban. It means “it is not necessary, you can do it or not”. The verb NEEDN’T + bare infinitive (similar to a modal) has the same meaning. You mustn’t go = it’s forbidden You needn’t / don’t have to go = you can go or not, it ‘s not necessary for you to go. When talking about the past, we have two forms for needn’t:

  • NEEDN’T HAVE +participle : it wasn’t necessary but you did You needn’t have brought that cake. (= it wasn’t necessary but you brought it)
  • DIDN’T NEED TO + INF = we are simply saying it wasn’t necessary (whether you did it or not) It started raining, I didn’t need to water the plants I needn’t have watered the plants. Just after I finished it started to rain.

ADVICE

When we want to give advice, we use SHOULD/ OUGHT TO (deberías). She ought to study When talking about the past we use SHOULD/OUGHT TO HAVE+participle I should have studied more (debería haber estudiado más)

There is one expression, HAD BETTER +bare infinitive , which is a stronger form: You should go (advice) You had better go (más te vale que vayas)