Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


presentación diapos, Apuntes de Psicología

Asignatura: Personalidad y diferencias individuales, Profesor: Estrella Durà, Carrera: Psicologia, Universidad: UV

Tipo: Apuntes

2013/2014

Subido el 25/04/2014

laau207
laau207 🇪🇸

4.1

(29)

17 documentos

1 / 27

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
OPTIMISM, COPING
AND HEALTH
Assessment and implications of
generalized outcomes expectancies
Michael F. Scheier
Carnegie-Mellon University
Charles S. Carver
University of Miami
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (3) 219-247
Copyright © 1985, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga presentación diapos y más Apuntes en PDF de Psicología solo en Docsity!

OPTIMISM, COPING

AND HEALTH

Assessment and implications of

generalized outcomes expectancies

Michael F. Scheier Carnegie-Mellon University Charles S. Carver University of Miami HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (3) 219- Copyright © 1985, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, In c

MAIN ASPECTS

  • (^) A scale which measure dispositional optimism
  • (^) Trans-situational consistency
  • (^) Outcome variables: morale, life satisfaction, and psychological well-being  effects and transient states
  • (^) Optimism determine our actions and our health

General model of behavioural self- regulation

  • (^) Goal-directed behaviour is guided by a hierarchy of closed-loop negative feedback systems.
  • (^) Discrepancy between present behaviour and the goal or standard.
  • (^) Assessment process yields an outcome expectancy.

Differences Other studies ● Laboratory ● One specific domain of behaviour Our study ● Natural behaviours ● More than a single task-specific expectancy ● Generalized outcome expectancies ● Dispositional optimism ● We need a new scale

Study 1: The life orientation test (LOT) ► Steps to construct the optimism scale:  (^) 1.The first step was to generate a pool of items.  (^) 2.Then was to generate an equal number of positively worded and negatively worded statements.  (^) 3.Finally did not imply any specific basis for the expectancy.

  • (^) Initially, 16 items administrates to a group. Later factor analysis was performance. Two major factors emerged from this analysis: -The first was comprised of items worded in a negative direction. -The second worded in a positive direction.  (^) But this version needed a revision for several reasons.(some of the items were rewritten) ► (^) Final version: The scale became more uniforms in its focus. It was administrate to independent samples.

Final Psychometric Properties ► SCALE FORMAT AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION  Final version was composed by : Eight items + four filler items that were included in order to disguise the purpose of the test.  8items: *Four are keyed in the positive direction. *Four are keyed in the negative direction.  The respondents had to answer according to the grade of agreement with the question: ● 4=strongly agree ● 3=agree ● 2=neutral ● 1=disagree ● 0=strongly disagree

Norms

  • (^) To provide norms for men and women , means and standard deviations were compute separately.
  • (^) Norms for age ,class and occupational group ingare clearly needed if the scale is to be used on a wider basis.
CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION
  • (^) Objective: establish convergent and discriminant validity for the LOT
  • (^) Gave the LOT to undergraduates
  • (^) With different scales

Questions about the finding

in Table 4

  • (^) As we don`t have hard and
fast rules that determine the
redundancy of each test, its
independency becomes
unwarranted when other
measures are available.

Two analyses

Expectancies: hoped

that the LOT would

be relatively

independent of:

  • (^) Social desirability
  • (^) Private and public

self-conscious.

  • (^) As can be seen in

Table 4:

  • LOT is relatively

independent of both

private and public

self-conscious.

STUDY 3

  • Examining the role played by optimism and
dispositional with impediments encountered in the
course of goal-directed activities.
  • (^) It is tested in 3 ways
By measuring persistence
By measuring actual performance
By measuring the strength and type of the
affective actions

METHOD… 79 undergraduated men

  • (^) Subjects 62 undergraduated women
  • (^) Procedure:  (^) Each subject complete a set of questionnaires - 4 weeks prior to the end of semester - on the subject´s final day of classes  (^) Divided in groups of 11 to 38 people.

RESULTS

  • (^) Relationship between chronic optimism and symptoms at the same point.
  • (^) ACROSS THE TIME Optimism was a prospective predictor of reports of physical well- being Physical well-being DID NOT seem to lead to a sense of optimism over time.
  • (^) Conclusion: the more optimistic you are, the less bothered you feel by the development of physical symptoms.