Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Reading 2, Apuntes de Idioma Inglés

Asignatura: Lingüística Aplicada a la Lengua Inglesa, Profesor: Begoña Núñez Perucha, Carrera: Estudios Ingleses, Universidad: UCM

Tipo: Apuntes

2011/2012

Subido el 26/10/2012

auszubildender
auszubildender 🇪🇸

4

(293)

84 documentos

1 / 17

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
7 l{ow do thev do it?
t'hildr:en are born into a world ir-rll oinoises and souuds of all sorts
(r'rrrsic, caL engines, slaurming doors, whistling, coughiug, cryittg,
cr.rr rverszrlion, and so on). Somehow, they have to take the part that is
specch, [rreak it down into its snraller parls (words, prefixes, sulfrxes,
r:lt: ), de(ermine what they rnean, and figure out how to reassemble
llrc:rn in new ways.
l)oing tl-ris involves mastering a system oi sounds, words, slruc-
Irrrc and meaning whose intricacy typically deleats even the mosl
Ilill ccl adu lt lealners. Yet children get the job done beiore they learn
lo lje lheir shoes. How do they do itZ
'['lrcrc's still no real solntiou to this puzzle, although bits and
lriccr-:s ol lhe answer are starting to emerge, And as this happens, it's
br:r'ouring clear tbat certain widely held ideas about how language
Ic;r1-11i11g works arc probably dead-ends.
'l'lre job oI Ll.ris chapter is to try to sort out the differe nce between
l l r c: icleas l"h at r.uake scnse and those th at don' t We' ll star t by lool<in g
irl lhtr popultrr idca ttrat children learn language by imitating tl-reir
ptrrc r-t tl;.
l. Why it's lrot imitation
r\sli lhe averirge person how a child lean-rs language and you'll
prohably be told "by imitating adults," On the face o[it, that makes
rr lol ol sense . The adults in a child's Ii[e speak a particular language,
irrtl ilrc cl-rilcl euds r,rp speaking Lhatlanguage too.
Irnitat.ion oI sorne sorl probably rs involvecl in cerlain aspects
ol larguage acqr-risilion. Take worc'ls, for example. There's only one
t,r,ir\r lor children to lcarn that the word ior "cat" is cat or that the
urrrr rl lcrr' "light" islight.Tliey have to notice what adultssay andthen
1r y 111 ,1,, lhe same tlring themselves - in other words, they have to
i r rr i l rr l c r,rrha t tbey lrear. i lt is certainly no accideut that huutans, the
ortly spccie" with language, have a capacity for vocal imitation that
I6,l
Ilott t[o tlrcy do iL? 16 5
far exceeds anything in nronkeys and apes - coutrar)/ to popular
misconceplion.2
But the itnitatiott explattatiott \\ron't tal(e us ver)I far. That's
because there are maiol paI ts of langtragc that catinol, be inritated
Sentences are tlre nost obrrious exarnple.
Unlil<e rvords, which ale uremorized aL-rd stored in the brain, sen-
teuces are created as the need arises. YoLr've probably uevcr seelt a
single one of tl-rc sentences in tlte preceding trvo paragraphs belorc
iri-youl li[e, and you'll probably uever see an)/ oI thern again. yet
you understood tl-ren.r, and yon conld have produced thenr yourself
it you'd been writing this book.
Apart from greetings atrd other [ormulaic cxpressions, many of
the senlences we utter and hear e\rery day are uovel in this rvay
They simply don't involve the sort of rertrernbering and repentins
associated witlr imitation.
Two facts abolrt langLrage acquisition confilnt tliaI inrita-
tion is r.rot tlte explanation fol hortr children learn to produce
sen tences,
Firs t, children a relt'L verJr Bood at in it ating sente nces co n taiui n g
unfamiliar rvords and structnres. Thel' tl,pically repeat only 11,In1
they can already salr il they've ah'ead1, learned delinite articles,
they'll repeat a definite article, If lhel''ve alreadJ' learne d plr-rlalend-
i n gs, they' ll repea t a plura l end in g If t hey'r'e alleady lc.rrned t he verl:
i.re, thcy'll repeat it. 0therwise, they'll imitate The tlogs nrelntngry as
Dog hturgry.lndeed, it is precisely for this reasoll that experirlentcrs
cornmonly use iLnitatjon tests as a rvay of assessing clrilclren's lan-
guage deve)opment l
SecoL-td, perhaps becarise they linow they're Dot very good at it,
childrer-r don't even try to imitate sentences velJr olten, The prooI of
lhis is straightiorward - sillply lake a typical crouversa[ion betlnreen
a motlrer and her cltild and calculate horv uranl'oithc child's utter,
ances are intitations
The loliorving corrversatior-r tool< place rvhen Adam was t\vo years
and eiglit uronths old. (The symbol # r'nalks a pause.)You cau counl
a sentence as an irniLation if it inclLrdes the sanre "content" words
(nouns, verbs, and adjectives) used in the same order as in tlte utte r-
ance just produced by an adult.
-
z
't
-l
(t
o
?
fr"l
\JN
stD At
!/
-
At
-mA2
gUJ
^
b.J
9l
A
I
-I
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Reading 2 y más Apuntes en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity!

7 l{ow do thev do it?

t'hildr:en are born into a world ir-rll oinoises and souuds of all sorts

(r'rrrsic, caL engines, slaurming doors, whistling, coughiug, cryittg,

cr.rr rverszrlion, and so on). Somehow, they have to take the part that is

specch, [rreak it down into its snraller parls (words, prefixes, sulfrxes,

r:lt: ), de(ermine what they rnean, and figure out how to reassemble

llrc:rn in new ways.

l)oing tl-ris involves mastering a system oi sounds, words, slruc-

Irrrc and meaning whose intricacy typically deleats even the mosl

Ilill ccl^ adu^ lt^ lealners.^ Yet^ children^ get^ the^ job^ done beiore they learn

lo lje lheir shoes. How do they do itZ

'['lrcrc's still no real solntiou to this puzzle, although bits and

lriccr-:s ol lhe answer^ are^ starting to emerge, And as this happens, it's

br:r'ouring clear tbat certain widely held ideas about how language

Ic;r1-11i11g works arc probably dead-ends.

'l'lre job oI Ll.ris chapter is to try to sort out the differe nce between

l l r c: icleas l"h (^) at r.uake scnse and those th at don' t We' ll star t (^) by lool<in g

irl lhtr popultrr idca ttrat children learn language by imitating tl-reir

ptrrc (^) r-t tl;.

l. Why it's lrot imitation

r\sli lhe averirge person how a child lean-rs language and you'll

prohably be told "by imitating adults," On the face o[it, that makes

rr lol ol sense. The adults in a child's Ii[e speak a particular language,

irrtl ilrc cl-rilcl euds r,rp speaking Lhatlanguage too.

Irnitat.ion oI sorne sorl probably rs involvecl in cerlain aspects

ol larguage acqr-risilion. Take worc'ls, for example. There's only one

t,r,ir\r lor children to lcarn that the word ior "cat" is cat or that the

urrrr rl lcrr' "light"^ islight.Tliey have to notice what adultssay andthen

1r y^111 ,1,, lhe same tlring themselves (^) - in other words, they have to

i r rr i l rr l c r,rrha t tbey lrear. i^ lt is certainly no accideut that huutans, the

ortly spccie" with language, have a capacity for vocal imitation that

I6,l

Ilott t[o tlrcy do iL? 16 5

far exceeds anything in^ nronkeys^ and^ apes^ - coutrar)/ to^ popular misconceplion.

But the itnitatiott explattatiott^ \ron't^ tal(e^ us ver)I far.^ That's

because there are maiol^ paI ts of^ langtragc^ that^ catinol,^ be^ inritated

Sentences are^ tlre^ nost^ obrrious^ exarnple.

Unlil<e rvords, which ale uremorized aL-rd stored in the brain, sen-

teuces are created as^ the^ need arises. YoLr've probably uevcr^ seelt^ a

single one of tl-rc sentences in tlte preceding^ trvo paragraphs belorc

iri-youl li[e, and you'll probably uever see an)/ oI thern again. yet

you understood tl-ren.r, and yon conld have produced thenr yourself

it you'd^ been writing this book.

Apart from greetings atrd other [ormulaic cxpressions, many of

the senlences we utter and hear e\rery day are uovel in this rvay

They simply don't involve the sort of rertrernbering and repentins

associated witlr imitation.

Two facts abolrt langLrage (^) acquisition confilnt tliaI inrita- tion is r.rot (^) tlte explanation fol hortr children learn to produce sen tences,

Firs t, children a relt'L verJr Bood at in it ating sente nces co n taiui n g

unfamiliar rvords and structnres. Thel' tl,pically repeat only 11,In

they can already salr (^) il they've ah'ead1, learned delinite articles,

they'll repeat a definite article, If lhel''ve alreadJ' learne d plr-rlalend-

i n gs, they' ll repea t a plura l end in g If t hey'r'e alleady lc.rrned t he verl:

i.re, thcy'll repeat it. 0therwise, they'll imitate The tlogs nrelntngry as

Dog hturgry.lndeed, it is precisely for this reasoll that experirlentcrs

cornmonly use iLnitatjon tests as a rvay of assessing clrilclren's lan-

guage (^) deve)opment l

SecoL-td, perhaps^ becarise they linow they're Dot very good at it,

childrer-r don't even try to imitate sentences velJr olten, The prooI of

lhis is straightiorward - sillply lake a typical crouversa[ion betlnreen

a motlrer and her cltild and calculate horv uranl'oithc child's utter,

ances are intitations

The loliorving corrversatior-r tool< place rvhen Adam was t\vo years

and eiglit uronths old. (The symbol # r'nalks a pause.)You cau counl

a sentence as an irniLation if it inclLrdes the sanre "content"^ words

(nouns, verbs, and adjectives) used in the same order as in tlte utte r-

ance just^ produced by an adult.

z

't -l

(t

o ?

fr"l

\JN

stD

At !/

  • At

gUJ^ -mA^2

^b.J

9l

AI

-I

Ijorr (^) h d r.rrin g (^) y rrherc (^) I (^) s \otzrs (^) s

ol content lvords as a precedir-tg Lttterance b1, his nrother. In fact, it

auyone seellrs to be illritating, it's r\dam's rnother-on [our occasior-is

(lines 5, 9, 13, and t 5) she repeats wltat r{E has

iust saidl

Hou'rlo theY do^ it?^167

children \rarJ/ a^ gfeat^ cleal^ in^ terms^ of^ precisely^ how much^ they

iruitate their paients'speech.^ One^ study^ oIthe^ speech of^ six^

children

rvho n'ere^ jttst^ beginning^ to^ produce tnulti-rn'ord scntences found

that the proportion^ of^ imitated utterances ovcr^ several^ tapiug^ ses-

siotrsrangedli.onraround5percerrtirrorrecl-rildtoarounc'|40pel.

cent iu auother.{

If anything, this study^ probably^ overestirnaled the extent^ of^

imi-

tation in chilJren's speech.^ That's^ because^ the^ researchers^ counted

an LrtteraDce^ as^ an^ imitation^ even i[^ it was^ missing^ a^ lot^ o[^

the words

that r.uere in^ the corresponding adult^ sentence.^ Here's an exantple

liom the speech ol tn'enty-one-month-old^ Peter'^ with^ "irnitations"

in bold[ace.

Pertn: OPen. OPen. OPen

Aout-t: Did^ you^ open^ the^ tape recorder?

PETER: OPcn^ it.

Aourr: Did yott^ open^ the^ tape recorder? Prt'e n:^ T:rPe^ recortlcr

It's probably uD[air^ to^ relcr^ to^ Pel-er's^ "opetr^ il-"^ as^ au^ ir-r.ritation;^ iL's

most likclJr just thc atls^ /er^ to^ lhe^ aclult's^ qr-restion'

ln stttn, although children^ do sornetimes repeat^ what^ they^ have

just hearcl (as clo adutts), inlitation does^ uot^ scem to be^ a^ very large

part olthe picLure, especially wheu^ it^ comes^ to^ liguring^ otrt how^ sen-

tences worl<.^ The^ lce],^ l-o^ uude^ rsLanding how^ children learn language

cleally lies elsen'ltere.

  1. Why it's not teaching

If childrer.r clon't leanr^ language^ b)'in.ritation'^ then how^ do^ they

do it? Cor.rld it be Lha t^ paren^ ts^ somehow teach^ tl-reir^ childrer.r^ to^ speak

b1'explaining things to^ them or^ by^ coL'recting^ therl^ when^ they malte

a rnistahe? That loo is^ unliliely.

Once we go^ beyond [he ntost^ sttperficial things,^ l.here's^ lro[^ much

that tl're average person^ (or^ even^ the^ above-average^ person) can

saJ/ aboLll- hor,r' lauguagc rvorks.^ That's^ because^ lllost^ of^ what^ we

hnow about language is suBcoNsclous: we^ know^ it,^ but^ we^ don't

knor,r' that^ we^ litlow^ it^ - ar-rd^ wc're thereforc^ not^ able to^ explain it to a nyone else.

l,66 Hov, Cltiltlrert Lenrtt Lnrryuage

  1. lvfother:
  2. Aclarn: J Mother: +. Aclant:
  3. N{other: (r. (^) Adanr:
  4. l\Iorher:
  5. Adam: '). \rfother':
  6. Adanr: i 1. l,lother: I2. r\danr: I 3. I{other: 14 Adanr: 1 5. Nlother:
  7. Ivfother:
  8. Adam: 1 8. Ada rn: I 9. Irlother: rO. (^) Adam: 2 i. lvlothcr: 22 Adaur: 23 N{other: 2+ Adarr: 2). Adaur:
  9. (^) Adanr:
  10. (^) Adanr: 2 8. Aclam: (^29) Adarn:
  11. (^) Adarn: 3l Ad:rm: I l. Adarn: I (^) J ldarl:

Do 1'6o trno*' rvhat this is

What this is # car.

No # that's not a car.

Pir-t. PinT Yeah#IVlon-rnry#pin. \Arhat kind (^) ofpen? Car. Car? Yeah. What kind olcar? Red car. Red car? Yellow (^) car. Yellon' car?

What do you do \t'ith it

Iinaudible] r,r'atch. Where horses go 'Vl-rer:e n,hat go? \Vhere horsesr IJorse?

florse # go yes lVlomrny

Did he go to the corral Did he?

There he is # Ir,Ionruty.

Corral corral. Baby (^) horses, Horses. Baby horses. Readi'rne go: Read1, 11-19. Go down dere.

Go dort'n right side.

It l'all.

I don't read no^ bool(s.

A Lrutter. Have tvr,o cracker. I,lan up tbere. tJp n'all. Papa buy sonre, Faster faster as nle' !\rell. n'hat you^ go^ do? Cromer has he glasses^ on.

'Ihat's r,r'h1' J. comed.

It doiug clancittg.

Ihat napliins.

\'her-c's tbe^ pencils?

\'here is them?

Wl'rat I (^) do to it? Cold it.

1, 0 Horl ClilIdrurLcnrttLtttrguage

Sonrr lecasts^ by^ Et,c's tttL)tlru tvhrrl^ EI'e rvas^1 8 to^27 ntonths^ oltlro

Et,e's ttttera ttce^ Her ll-Iother's^ recast

Hou, do thcy do it? 77 |

What (^) elsei Shoelace. Shoelace. \Vhat else? Pant. Socli. Dat socks. Socl<. What else? Face. What (^) else? Cromer face. Cronrer's [ace.) Ursula's face. Adarn lace. What else? lvfommy face. Mornmy has a^ socli on.

No # I l:aven't socks on.

Crorner has a socli on. Ursula has a boot on. Ursula has boots on. Have shoei on. Eyes. Eyes? IIow many eyesT Four. Fonr (^) eyes. I{ow rnany ears? Four. Four ears. Horv (^) many nose?

Yes # how rnany noses?

Fonr. Four. Flow many rnou[hs?

Ii4outh # Cath1,# pop go n'easel.

It I.ELL?

I know you're not going to read axv boolis.

\bu r,i'ant soME butter?

Horv rnany cRAcKERs?

Trrpng's A nlan up there.

ON rue^ rvall,^ yeah.

Papa BoucHT some lor^ us. F,qst as me?

\Vhat arn I co^*lrr do?

Oh, he does bave s ts glasses^ ou.

Yes, f. c.trrr yesterda1', yesterday

alternoon.

Ir's dancing,^ yes.

Yeah, t'H sv' u t napkins. Where'n e the pencils? Tu gv're^ at^ honre.

\rhat oro you^ do to it?

I loror,r' tt's coLp.

I 1. Ii,lother:

  1. Adam: I L N'lother: I+. trlother:
  2. Adarn:
  3. Adam:
  4. Adarn:
  5. Adarn: I 9. IVIother:
  6. Adam: 2I. Adam:
  7. Adanr:
  8. Mother: 2+. Adam:
  9. Adam:
  10. Mother:

2 /. Adam:

  1. (^) Adam:
    1. (^) Mother:
    2. Adanr: 3 I. Adam:
    3. Ivlother: 3 3. Adarn:
    4. Adanr; 3 5. lVlother: 3 6. lvlother:
  2. Adanr:
  3. Mother:
    1. Mother:
  4. Adar:r: 4I. Ivlother:
    1. Adan:
    2. Motlrer: 44 Adant:
  5. (^) lvlother: +6. Mother: +7. Adaur:

In order to^ get^ a sense^ o[^ hon'recasts fit into an^ actual^ conver-

satiotl, ttrlie a looli at the follon'ing speech sample involving thirty-

one-uronth-old Adam and his lnother. I'r'e used boldlaced type for

the parts ol'the mother's recasts that might provide a model that

t\dam cor.rkl Llse to e/aluate his incornplete or incorrect utterances.

tTlrc'# sl'nrbol rnzrrks a paLlse.)

.\rlzrrn: I^ got^ ;r^ pant^ or-t. \lother: \bu'r'e got rvhat on Arlanr: Shoes^ on^ # pant on too # sltirt on too, 'lother: Slroes on # pauts^ on # shilt on? Aclam: Yeah. [othe'r: \'hat^ elsei Adanr: Shoelace. Adaru: Pant. Adar-n: Sl-roes. Adaur: Shoelace.

As you can see,.Adarl's mother adds a missing verb (line 2), a missing

plural (^) suffix (lines (^) 4, 32, 43), and a nissing possessive marker

(line 23).

t.

L

l.

().

7 7 2 LIon, Cliklrar^ Learrt^ Latryunglc

Ilorv sct-iotts ore^ pnretts^ nbout^ recastittg?

Although recasts^ LooK^ llelp[ul' lrothers^ dou't^ prorride^ therl^ all

that consistently. (Fathers^ and^ eveu^ older siblings provide^ recasts

too, but perhaps^ not^ as^ li-equently^ as^ mothers^ do,l^

I ) hr one study o[^ forty tlothers^ of children^ aged^ trvo^ to^ five,^ it

r,t,as fonDcl that only trrothers of^ the^ trvo year olds^ actually^ recast

childreu's "bad"^ r.rtterances^ significantly^ more^ ol'ten^ than^ their

"goocl" sentences. And, as the^ lollor,t'ing table shou's,^ even^ they pro-

videcl recasts only about^ a^ quarterof^ the time^ (26.3^ percent, to^ be

exact).

Ilcc a s t ra t c s lb r n7 o Ll^ rc^ r^ s ol-^ tttt'^ o^ -^ g^ c^ a^ r^ - o^ I^ d^ c^ h^ il^ Ll^ r^ e^ t^ rI

2

"bail" sentences "good" sentences

Horv rlo tl'rcy do (^) it? 17 3

adding the missing tlrc or a. (Adam was tn'enty-eight months old at

the time.)

Adam: Book.

Adam: Read booli.

lvlother: Alright, you (^) read bool<.

This type of thing is surprisingly couluorl. One stucly reports that

mothers mayrepeat as rnany as one third oIthcirchilclren's incorrcct

utteranccs without nlakil'lg any changes.ll

Do rtcnsts hcllt?

In light of this, it's perhaps r-rot surprisirrg that recasts are not a

rnagical elixir. They don't alrt,aj,s Itave a cliscernible eft'ect, at least

r-rot a reliable one.

In line 23 of or-rr speeclr sanrple, for instance, Adam's rnother

provides a recast that nrodels the possessive marke r -'s, which Adam

ther.r inclLrdes in his ncxt uttelance (line 2 4 ) but drops in the lollow-

ing one (line^2 5).

'ld ol^ tinres^ repeatecl irr rvhole or in part

ul, of tines not repeated

8 6.

\/ith numbers lilie these, it woulcl be pretty hard for trvo-year-

olds to REL\ on their mother's recasts to learu language, In [act,

it nright even be^ misleading. Not only do^ tnothers^ leave^ the^ vast

majorit_v ol' their childre n's bad sentences alone (73.7^ percent in

Lhis saurple), thel' sometirnes partially repeat ancl change perfectly

gootl trtterances (1 3.7 percent).

Yor-r can see both ol'these things happening in the speech sarnple

rlr' jrrst lookcd at. On the one hand, Adam's urother mahes tlo attenpt

tr) rectlst a nunrber of his itrcorrect utterances (^) - dnt socks in line (^1 )

zrncl -lrlrrrrr/ircr in line 2 5, for exarnple,

On the other hand, she recasts trvo utterances that were fine to

begiu rvith (^) - Adarn's/brrr (^) in lines 37 and 40 is perfectly oliay as it

stirnds. There is no need to add a noun like el1es or enrs aiter the

llunrer?rl in English (although^ some Ianguages do require tbis).

fo complictrte nlatters still fr-rrther, there are even tirnes rvhen

rnothers repeat their child's ir.nperfect utterances, as if they approved

oithcur. \bu can see an exanrple of this in the[ollorvingconversation,

in rn,hiclr Adam's mother repeats his incomplete read book without

The (^) effectirreness oIrecasts (^) is d'bio's ir other (^) cases as well. (^) Ta]<e

definite and indefinite articles (the and a), lor example. young chil_

dren olten drop these lvords, and parents sometirnes respond with

a recast ttrat includes the missing elcment.

CFrrr-o: Clownlalldou'n.

P,lReNr: Yes, the clown fell down.

But does this rnal<e a differencel

One study locused on this qr.restion by examining [he relationship

bet*reen (^) article trse (^) a'd recasts (^) i' the speech ol'threc chilcir-.,r. ra The

researchers lbu*d that the childre''s parents provided

recasts lor

nissing articles abo't 3 5 percent oI tr.re tirne. However, this seemed

to have no irnmediate eftect. The chirdre'clicrn'I sudde.ry start using

articles iLr response to their pareDt,s recasts.

Adam: Crornel (^) [acc.

Ivlother: Cromer's[ace?

Adam: (^) Ursula's face. Adarn; r\dam (^) face.

I7 6 Hotv Clilldrur Leurrt Liutgtutge

special vvay. Called rnotlrcresc, this type ol speech is characterized

b1'5161,1', carelul articr,rlatior-r zrnd the use of basic rrocabular], itenrs,

short sentences,^ and sornen'hat^ exaggerated intonation.

Sonrc (^) ltroperties of tnotlrcrese2o Pronunciation:

. (^) SIorn,er speech rt,ith longer palrses betu'een utterances aud after conteltt r,'ords . (^) Higher overall pitch; greatel pitch range . (^) Exaggerated intol)ation and stress . (^) Fewer n,ords per rninute

\trcabr.rlaly and meaning:

. (^) ,lore rc'stricted vocabulaly . (^) I'hree times as nruch parapluasing . (^) IIore reference to the here and non,

Scn tences:

. (^) Fert'er Lrroken or (^) lun-on selltences . (^) Shorter. less (^) contplex rr tterances (approx 50 percent (^) ar-e sin gle rvords or slrort (^) statemcnts) . (^) Nlore rvell-lbrmed (^) and intelligible sentences . (^) \lorc'cortrrnancls (^) aud tluestiorrs (approx. (^) 6O per.ccnt of total) . (^) \lorc rcpetitiolts

Fathcrs and siblings adjust their speech too, b5, thg r,r,a5,, but not as

nrnch as mothers do.ll

lt's (^) easSr to see horv the (^) sorts o[ adjust'rents (^) associated (^) witrr

.rothercse could be helpful to children. Slor^/, careful articulation

rnalies speech easier to perceirre and to brealt down into snra.ller

parts. Restricted vocabulary, short sentences, and a focus on the

here and no\'should make speech easier to compreheltd. And the

ruse ol-re pe^ titiorrs gives childreu a second chaDce to understand n,hat

hars been said. Plus, it's knortr.r (^) that children are (^) attracted by motl.rerese _ lbur-'ro.l-h-olds (^) rt'ill tnrn rheir (^) heads nrore li-equently (^) toward

Hov,do tlrcy ilo^ it? 177

speech n'ith the intonation ol'rrotherese that'r to speech with^ tnore

aclLrlt-like intonation.l2 (As far as I linow, the maguetic power of

fatherese has not yet^ been investigated.)

Does tnotlrcrese lrclp?

Perhaps. As just^ noted, rnany of the features of^ motherese^ seem

designed to enhance the cornprehensiblity of the mother's speech (^) -

which n-ral<es sense, since most mothers want to coMMUNIcATE

with their children. Being exposed to highly cornprehensible speech

iu Lhe early stages of language acqr,risition can't hurt.

Horryever. that doesn't mean that lnotherese is Npcessanv lor

language acqr.risition to^ occur'. In^ fact,^ we lcnow^ that it^ cnr.rnol^ be

necessary. That's because there are communities and cultules in

vr'hich rrrotherese is r.rsed little if at all.2r

For example, in the coulse of hel extensive research in the

A[ro-r\merican rvorlting-class town o[ Tracl<ton during the ] 9 70s,

Shirle_v Brice Fleath noticed that ach.rlts there don't sirnplily their

speech at all n,hen adclressing children. They clon't use sin.rple words

or baby tallt, and they don't speak any slower t-han usual.

In fact, Heath reports, adults in Tracliton don't even see babies or

young children as suitable partners [or regular conversation. Except

[oL'war-nings, teasing, and orders, she says, "adults rarely address

speech specilically to very young children."25 YetTrackLon ctrildren

learn language.

This flies in tl-re face o[ standard (mis)conceptions about chil-

dreu aud language, I know. Errery societ)'has its myths, and one o[

ours is that children ueed special help learniug language. Steven

Piuker has attenpted to put this in perspective (^) by noting a bit of folklore (^) lron another culture.26 The ll(ung Sang of Aliica's

Kalahari Desert, he reports, believe that children must be taught

to sit, stand, and walli. O[ course, the !l(ung Sang are wrong about

tl'ral (^) - childreu sit, stand, and walk (^) on their own when they're [ead'. And rvc're n,rong about language (^) - children learn to (^) spcak with-

ouI any special help too. Annie lvlae, a'l'rackton resident, explains

it this n'ay when askecl horv she expected her grandson to learn to

talk:

I 78 Horv Cltildretr Lcartr Larryrutge

He's got to learn to^ l<nor,v^ about this^ r.,'orld;^ there's no one^ r,r,ho^ can tell hirl.. 1{/hite lbllts hear their kids say sonrething, they sav it bacl( to rhenr. thel' asl< then'r^ again^ and agairr^ about things,^ lil<e^ they're^ supposed

ttr be born l<nott'iug.^ \bu^ think^ I can tell^ Teegie^ Ilrer grandson]^ all^ tlrat

he's gcrt^ to knorv to get^ along? He's^ just^ got to^ be^ l<een,^ keep^ his^ e1'es

operl.^.^ .'I'here's uo^ Llse^ t-Ile^ telling hinr, "Learn^ this,^ leam^ tIrat.^ \ilhat's

this? \rhat's^ that?"

\-lnt rcnlly nmtters

Does this mean that children can learn languagc no rratter what

their circumstances?^ Not^ quite. There's^ at^ least^ one external con-

dition that nrust be rnet before language can be acquir:ed.^ Cltildrur

ne e d to lrear setttcttccs tlnt lhey^ cnn wttlcrstnrd urit/lollt^ kttott,hry^ a lot

nltotil tlrc kuryuagc they're trl1ing to lcarn.2E

\bu can see n'hy this is so ilyou thiulc about the follorvir.rg simple

question: could you learu a lauguage just^ by listening to it on the

radior

The ansrt'er-, o[coLrrse, is^ no,^ I[vou had a really great^ lnelnor),,

l,ou nright^ be^ able^ to^ memorize certain chunks^ ol'speech.^ especially il'

J'oLr heard^ thern^ ofLen^ enough.^ Br-rt_you'd^ neverkltovv^ rvhat^ anythiltg

nre?rnt. Yolt n'oulclu't liuon'n'hether the chlrnk 1'ou rlemorized vr,t-rs

ar rlord or a scntence, or u'hether subjects cortre belore rrerbs or alter

tbenr. Yor-r rtouldn't kuow hon'to nralie nouns plural, or hort'to put

vertrs in the past tense.

Ihe lt'hole thiug would be pointless and hopeless, and you'd prob-

ablv give^ Llp prettJ'^ Quiclcll'. And so n'ould a child. In lact, it's been

reported that hcarir-rg children gror,r,ing^ up in honres r,r'ith non-

sltc-trliing cleal'parents^ cannot learn language li'om radio or even

televisiou.l

But nolv irnagine a dilferent scenario. Let's say that after lis-

tening to y6)p. mother and others around you lor a [er.v rlonths,

)'oLt',e nranaged to^ learn^ a^ couple^ oldozen common words (^) - mostly

nalles lclr tlrings that I'ou olien looli at. touch, or plal'n'ith. (Recall

thal nrtlst ol a child's lirst n'ords are in iact (^) nonrls ol just (^) this

t]'pe.)

Asstrrle one of those rt'olds is doggic aid that on a particular day

voLl are loolting out the rtindort n'ith vour- mother nrhen a dog runs

Hortt, tlo tlrcy do iL? 17 9

by. Your mother^ says,^ "Lool(.^ The^ doggie^ is^ rttutriug."^ Yotr miss the

little rvord in^ li-ont^ ol'doggie^ ar.rd^ thc little n'ord^ irr^ liont^ of^ nntilrtg'

neither of r.r'hich is stressed autl treither^ ol^ n4lich cttrries^ a^ collcrete

rneaning. But^ 1'611 catch^ the^ fanrilial^ rt'ord tloggic. And^ ]'ott catch the

tvord rttttttittg (or^ at least [he rtitt part),^ and^ ]'oLl match it^ to^ what^ the

dog is doing.

In thatinstant, yott've rnade two il'nportant steps lbrward^ -you've

learned a verb (nrn) and you've^ seen^ that^ it colues^ alter^ its subject^ in

English. l\nd all this happened because you lllere^ able^ to^ figure^ out

the meaning ol'your mother's scntence just^ by loolcing aI^ what^ was

happer.ring around J/ou. You^ didn't^ have to^ know^ the^ entire lauguage

already to understand rryhat she said.

Now, o[cottrse, not all^ the several rnillion^ scutences^ a^ child hears

during the first three ycars^ olher lifel0 are^ going^ to^ be as^ tratrspar-ent

as this one (^) - a child nright overhear lrer urother .say 'A cut it-r^ the

tax on ilividend earuings nrakes bad econor)lic sense," lor exatnple.

Senteuces lihe that are sinrply going to zip by without doing any

han-n or an1'good.

But quite a large portion ol'speech to children ts abor-rt whaI they

can see or hear, rvhat they r,r'ant to linott, abont. and what^ they have

just experienced or are about to experience.II [t's this tl,pe ol'speecIr

that provides childr:en rvith the raw rnaterinl thcy need to learn a

langnage. (Parcnts talie note!)

This r,,,orhs^ in Tracliton too, by tl-re way. Even though adtrlts there

address speech to childreu relatively infrequently, they are olten

r,r'ith children and they do speal< in front of them l"o others.12 So

loug as at least son-re ol those sentences are about the here and now

ar.rd thercfore are comprehensible to children. the key condition for

languagc acquisition is in place. (Do^ young Trackton children pay

attentiou to those sorts of seutencesT Evidently they do, since Heath

reports that they frequently repeat them.)

But regardless o[ whether it's Seattle or Tracl<tor.r, we still have

to ask "Then^ what7" You could procluce easy-to-understand sen-

tences in front o[ a cat lor all niue ol'its lirres, and it still wouldn'L

learn English. Obviouslli thcre's nrore [o language leanting than

just hearing certain types oI sentences in certain l"ypes of contexts.

That sonrething cannot be observed so directli', though, because it's

inside thc child's lrcad.

l.\2 Floru C/riLL-crr^ Lcarrt^ Larryuagc

geltes.lr'It's teurpting to think that a particnlar gene l'night be

responsible lor a^ particr-rlar^ part^ o[ langr-rage^ (lilie^ the ability to add

inflectiou al c'ucliugs),I7 bLr t genes^ nsuall]r don't r,r'orli that rvaJ,. Their

el'l'ect is t1,pical11, ntuclt more inclirect.

It's liliel-r' that^ FOXP2^ r,r'orlis^ indirectly^ too^ - it does^ sornething

that resnlts in sonrething that leacls to a lar.rguage disorder. And sr,ue

enough, there is evidence that merrbers o[ the I(E [amily rvith tl-re

del'ective gene harte problems that extend vye Il beJ'ond inflectional

enclings and even^ Lrel'ond^ Ianguage.

),lot onlf is their speech ahnost unintelligible dr-re to articnlator-y

protrlenrs. thev arre uuable to in]itate lacial movemeuts suclr as open-

ing the uronth and sLickir-rg ou t the tongue. In addition, their IQs are

on average l8 or 19 points lon'er than those (^) o[unaflected famill'

menbers.I

  1. The search fbr tlre acquisition device

Eve u alter geneticists icleutill'the particr.rlar genes that sl-rape tl.re

brtrin's abilitl' to lc'arn and (^) nse langnage, a question r,r'ill remain (^) -

the qr-restion ol hort language is acquired.

That's becalrse ansrvering this qr-restion invoh'es ruore than iden-

till.ing genes, It invoh,es {igr.rriug out exactlJ, n'hat the brain ol an

in[ant l)ot:s r.r.lten it is exposed to speech and how that results in a

lirlli' lluent child three vears later.

Unlbrtltnate l)r, (^) the brail is uot easJr (^) to stlldj' directlir In Iact, (^) a lot

ol rvhat u'e linon' abour its role in language comes fr-om stud1,i11g

rrira t h appeus rvhen it is cla uraged as the result of a strolieor a vr,oLr ucl.

.'\ncl irlmost all ol'the rest comes frorn experiments done rvitl-r healthl,

irdLrlts (^) - using electrocles, brain (^) scans, and other techniques that

clon't rerluire s'rger-_'. ,Vhen it col-lles to figuring out lvl-rat it is about

childlen's braius that nraltes them so good ert le arning language, r,r,e

hin'e to adopt a difl'ereut strateglr

'l'hLrt stratcg),is ro

thinli o[thc braiu as (^) iIit tl,er-e al..b]ac-lt_bQ1.:i

I'hirt s a tcnn t[rilt sciL-r]tists solt'rcl-ilues r-rse ro clescr-rbe i1.!_ei,i-ce

n'hose conteLrts carurot

!e {!gec!]y^ o_bs.9511ed.^ The^ part^ o[^ the^ black

uoi ttrat (^) is concer-recl'r'vittiiir-rgur1ge (^) leainiirg is (^) so'retir..es callecl

the !l_t!lisition dcuicc.

I-low do thty tlo it? 183

\4/e have a prettrr good ide a of what gets l'ed into it (^) - as we saw

a short r.r'hile ago, the nrost essential ingrerlient seenrs to be just

hearing people talk about understanclable Lhings. Le t's jLrsl"^ call this

"e-xperience. (^) "

\re also hai'e a ppettl, good idea ol'r,rrhat the black box churns

oLrt- the^ kuovrrledge needed to^ use^ a^ langr,rage.^ Liuguists olten call

tlris linor'r,ledge a Unn:lntar. You probabll,^ think of a^ grammar^ as

sornething that's lrrritten in a booli, but linguists use it to Inean

''krrorvledge oIa larrguage." '' '

Il'this is right, tlien the language learuing process coures^ dowu

to sonrething like this.

exPelrence -------)

The brain

the ilcqutst troI devlcc

gramnrar

The job^ ol'lar.rguage acquisition reseArchers is to figr-rre out pr:ecisely

rurhat's ir.r the little blacli box labeled "acqr-risition clevice" that tnrns

erperiencc into knon,ledge.

To sorue extent, of course, the acquisition clevice is an abstraction.

It's not literally a box in the brain. In fact, it's likely tbat it"s parts

are splead out in diflerent regious of the brain, just as books about

language can be lbund iu dil'l'erent parts ol'a library.

For novv, the key to thinliing abor.rt the acquisitiou device is to

lbcr.ts or-r what those parts are and how tlrel' yy6.L. And here there

are t\t'o verJ'dillerent v'ews.

I,'ierr,# (^) l: 1-1rc ucqtisitiott rleuicc (^) is (^) f rrst (^) for luquqlc

.-\ccorcling to one vieu'. the acqiiisition dcvicc has a ve[y specinc

langr.rage-orier.rtecl (^) design that luakes it good (^) lbr jr-rst (^) orle thing (^) -

lalrgLra ge acquisition.

In fact, according to some versions o[ this view, like those put for-

t'r'ard b)' Noanr CI'romsklt the acqu isitior-r device iucludes er pre-made

I 84 Horv ClfiIdrett Leanr^ Langungle

(i.c. inborn) grautrar.3g^ This^ is^ generally^ called Universnl Gtatrttttnr'

becanse it^ consists^ of^ the sorts^ of^ grammatical^ categories aud

priu-

ciples that^ a[e^ colllmoll^ to^ all^ languages'

Being born rvith^ sr-tch^ a^ systeln woulcl^ give^ children a^ huge

heacl start r,t'ben^ it^ colnes to latlguage^ leartliug'^ Talie^ categories'

lbr instauce.

The diflerence betrveen^ nouns^ and verbs^ is^ one^ of^ the^ tl'lost^ funda-

mental ancl^ importaut^ coutrasts^ in all^ o[^ language' But discovering

this ancl flguring or.rt^ n'hich^ rvords belong^ in rl'hich^ category^ is^ more

cl-rallenging thau^ 5rou uright^ think'

Tlr. (^) iro[I.,' comes^ do*,'^ to^ k'owi.g^ l'hat^ to^ look^ for.^ Take the

lbllorving sel)tellce, lbr example'

That dog is Inisbehaving.

Doll is^ a^ DouD^ ancl^ uisbelnve is a^ ve|b,^ but^ hor'r'^ is^ a^ child^ supposed

to ligr.rre tltat ottti

Ther.' ale^ tlau)'^ clilferences^ betn'eett the^ tt't'o^ rT'ords'^ Do,^ begins

rrith the

.,d" sound, it refers to an anirnal, it coDsists ofjust oue s1'l[6-

ble. it occurs next^ to^ the^ "locator''^ r,t'ord^ thnt,^ it^ appeat's^ in^ the^ second

positiou in the seuteuce' aud^ so^ on.^ If^ you^ didn't^ know^ ar-rything

about language. hor,r'^ rvould^ you^ hnow rvhich^ o[ these^ properties^ are

inlportalrt for categorizing rt'ords^ and^ vr'hich are not?

\tl'rzrt nould^ prevent^ you from^ settitlg^ up a^ systerlr^ of^ word

classes in^ n'lrich all the^ rvords^ beginning^ n'ith^ the^ "d"^ sound^ go

together (^) - tlttg, do.^ thill,^ darqle,^ aud^ so ou?^ Or rvhat rvould^ prevent

1'crr,r irorrr^ putting the^ n'ords^ dog,^ alreatly,^ at, and^ see^ iu^ the^ satne

class sirnpll' becaltse thev can all occur in^ the^ second^ position^ in^ a

scDtetlce?

'f he uoc bit nre.

I..\l-r(E.\Dr arte.

Look --rl tlre girafl'e.

I st't the elephant.

In otl'rer ll'ords. tt'ltJ'rt'or.rld a^ chilcl eveu^ think^ of groupir.rg words

into noun and velb classesr And^ eveu^ if^ she^ did, hort'rvould^ she

hnon' n4rich^ r,vords^ are^ nouns and^ which^ ones are^ verbs?

l'he ansr.r'er that linguists lavoring Unlversal Gratrmar^ ilave

conle Lrp n'ith is that the acqr-tisition device tells children what^ to do

Hot, tlo tltc1l do it? 785

and rthat to look for. [n particular, it tells ther.n that alllangnages are

going to have particular categories (nouDs aud verbs, for exanrple)

aLrd it gives [hem sone clLre s that l.re lp thenr ligure out rt'trich r,vords

belor-rg to^ rvhlch^ categorlr+o

Chrcs to cntcgorics

V/hat might these clr.res looh like? Oue possibility is that they

involve inlblmation abouI the type oInreaning most olten associater]

r'r'ith particular^ nrorcl classes. For example, the acqr-risition der,ice

might "tell"^ children that rvords relerring (o^ concrcte thiugs nrust

be uonLrs. So langr-rage learners r'r'ould [<nolv right arvay that words

lilie dog, I71ry, /rorrse, and trzc belong to that n,ord class.

This might jr-rst^ be enough to get stalted. Once clrildren knevtt

ru,hat some norrns loolted lilie, thel'could start noticiLrg other thir.rgs

on their own (^) - lihe the lact that items in the noun class (^) can occur

ru'ith locator r,r,ords lilie this and thnt, that the1,66,r take the plural

ending, that the5, can be used as subjects ancl clir-ect objects, that

thel' 3;s usnalll' stresscd, and s<l on.

Nouns lvith locator rvortls:

Nouns rtith the plural cndiug:

Nonns ur^ed as sub.ject or direct obj ect:

Thirt tlog loolis tired.

'fhis horrsc is onrs.

Cats r.nake (^) nte sr)ceze. I likc'coolcics. Dogs clr:rse cats.

A rlan pairrted our Irousc.

Inlbrmation oithis sort can then be used to deal with words like

irlcn arrd atLitLule , which carnor. be classifiecl on the basis of their

tneaning. (The1'^ 6ys ltoLlns, br.rt thel' dou't r-el'er.to concrete things.)

Sooner o. later a child r,r'ill hear these words usecl with this or LInt,

or ivith a plnral, or in a snb.iect position. Il she's learned thnt these

arc thc sigLrs (^) ol nounhoocl, (^) it'll be easy to rccognize (^) ous thatclo''t

refer to concrete things.

Il all ol this is o' tl.re (^) right rL'acli, the. the proccdr-rre (^) lbr icler- tilf int ,ro.clr belonging (^) to the nolrn class vvould go something

lilie this. (Sinrilar. procedr-rres exist for- ver.bs, adiectives, and other

categories.)

,l,\l I^ /t'lr'^ (^ /liltlt,'rr,l.t,ir'/l^ I-rlrlr/llrlr,/t'

liDt_rrr.s tzr baltiillil. sil].)iln(l^ a^ nL.tv^ obiL'ct {a rr,lrisl<.^ ltrr examplc') and

is then askecl "Shoil, urc the^ [erlclle"^ $,ill point^ ttl tlte^ tletv^ object.]r

llLrt is [rrtual l]xclr.rsivitl'^ just^ lbr^ t()rds aDd their: trreanitlgsi

pc,rhaps not, Paul B.!g.!_l sr.rggc'sts^ tlrat it's realll,.jtlst^ all^ exillnple^ ol'

a *cr!;ge'ertrl sortbl^ ietrso,rlilg tltut^ goc's^ sollrethi'g^ lil<e^ this:l^

r

  1. I^ ltnor'r'^ tllat^ a^ bauana^ is^ called^ barmtn'

2.,IItl.respcaliernreal]ttore[ertotlrebatratltt,slrett'ottIdlrar,e

aslicd tle to shot'tr her^ the^ bauatra'

  1. But^ she^ didn't:^ she^ tlsed^ the stlange^ word/brrllc' +.Scrslrenltlstitltel.rdtorelertosorrrellrirrgo[lrertl)aDtlle btttt ittr a. ). .-\ pllrr.rsiblc-^ carrtlidate^ is^ the^ r'r'hisli' (t. (^) Fcttrlld Inust reler to tl-rc' r'r'hisk.

This t1,pe^ ol^ reasoning^ is^ Dot^ ir-rst usecl^ lbr^ tvorcls atlcl^ nleattillgs:^ it's

rrscrl lbr^ itrlirrtnatiotr^ irt^ gctrertrl

(lil (^) Disenrlr-ucli ancl Lor:i (^) -\larkson corrcir.rctr'rl irn cxpcrimetrt^ in

n-hich thrc'c-],ear -okls^ rtere^ shor.r,u^ trvo^ ob^ jects^ trtld givett^ sOtne^ uovcl

inlbrmatiotr itbollt^ onc ol^ tl'reur^ - lil<e^ "il'It'sister^ gave^ this^ I'o^ ure"' \'l.rerr thel^ aslted^ "Can^ JroLl show lne the olle^ that^ dogs^ lilie^ to plat'

$-ithi" thev tendcd to^ choose^ thc^ second obiect.^ Thc rcasotritlg^ het'r'

seetls pitritIlc'l.r+

I liuo$'that tlre fir:st object cattte l|ott't the spe^ aker's^ sister"

Il'rlrc'spealier- l)reaut to rcfel to IItat ob.iect, she r,vould^ hare

a:^licd nrc'to shorv her tlre oue that l-rer sister^ gave her.

P,trt .:-he clidn't: she aslicd lbr the object that dogs^ lilic^ to^ plai'

\'itl1.

So she n-rr,rst intend to rel'er^ to^ sourethitrg tlther thatr^ thc

lilsl. object.

A plarrsible'^ canclirlate is tl.re second object.

'f he se'coucl object must be the ore that dogs likes to plav

rvil-h.

llloorn claitns tlrttt tr,trrd Ir'ill'ning stratcgies in gctrc-ral^ tvorli^ Ihis

rra-'- n oDc ol the|n is used ju st lbr learn irr g^ thc n'rctrrtirt g^ r-rl^ rvords.^ i;

lltrrl,ri,r Iltlt tlt, itl ll

.Strrr i.sr ir'r rl lavt irt 11

Another exaurple ol'a mor-e genet-al [o6[ 11-r.,t is part ol'the actlui-

sitron detice (^) involues "statistical^ lear-nirrg" (^) - tl'the lelative plobabilit1'ol (^) tut or nrorc thirrgs (^) liirpl

  • ,ll-rvesarv inilirijiiEFZ, (^) .{ seTieTot d;tin; (^) lerer

Jusczl'li and^ his colleagucs^ strggest^ that^ inlzrnts n'ho are not 1rs1 p51.

to speali have nonethele"^s figured out that vrords hzrve lxrrLicular

pbonetic proper[ies.

(lne ol'tbese is stress

  • lltosl^ tl4/o-s)rllable^ nor-rns^ in^ English^ have

tlre "strong-weal(" stress pattern heard in r.,rby and DoLtor.Another

int'olves the t_t'pe ol' corrsonant courtrinatiorrs that <lr:cur. at r,rrord

boundirries (^) - the'scquence "ng-t,"^ lbr instaucc, (^) is conrr-nor-r betvveen

rvords (as^ irr rvr-orrg lirrc), but not insi(le \fl)rds.

Similar abilities have been observcd for gramnrar. As noted ir-r

chaptcr J. litr cxantplc, eightecn-ruonth-olds prel'er to li.stcn to pas-

sagcs colttaiuing (^) is (^) * l7,rb-itt1t patterns (^) rathcr than rrrrr (^) * I'crb_irrr.

pilttcrns. 'l'heir^ orvn speech still consists lzrrgclv ol'one-n'ord utter:.-

anccs, bnt somehorr'Lhey have alreacltr obscn,etl a tenclency lbr is

and l/zlD-irry lo occur l,ogether in adult slteech.

'l'hese are all rc''rarl<able accourplislrr-.euts arrd ro do'bt i'rpor-

tattt lbr learni.g a la'grage, si'cc it urattcrs a grcar. tleal lr,her-c

ru'orcl bonndaries are and rt'hich itcurs occr-rr Logel-hcr. Btrt thcre is

luo rcason to thinli tlrat the ability to Dore statis^tical c:orrelatior.rs ol'

this sort is restlicted to langLragc learning. [{2p1r tlllpgs ar-e lcarnccl

th.lt r'l'a-'- the relatio'ship betrveer clogs

''cl

barlii.g, cl,ucrs a.d

rain, doctor vis^its and neerlles, and so on.

Str rvhit (^) l uit,u, is cot-r.r,t.ti -]

l()l) Hor:',^ C/rilrh'rrr^ Lctrtr^ Latryrurllc

S.!r-U-Llttlt.clS. u'hilc' the^ exatnplcs^ itl^ lavtlr^ <tl'at t'ttorc'^ gellerttl itcqtli-

sition clevie^ e^ involve^ \'()rds^ iut(l^ theil^ ntc'anings.

So n h-r' don't thc^ ttrt)^ catnps^ jtrst^ go^ "lread to^ heacl"^ orl^ the^ saurc

phcttt-tt-ttcuot't-stt)Isvllt'rctccatcgoriesatrdstrttctutcs?Theaustt'er

is that thcl'can't^ a3,rcc^ ou^ rt'bat^ sJ'ntactic categories atrd^ strtlcttrrcs

ale like in the first place.^ Ancl rt,ithout that^ agleemelt[, it's not^ pos-

sible to have a debate aboLrt how tl.rc1, n1-s acqltiretl.

'il'hedispr-rteoverthenal.ureol'tl'leacquisitiontleviceisreal11'part

ol'zr urnch^ deeper^ disagrectncut^ ovcr tlte tratttre^ trilaLrguagc^ itself.

()rr tltc' one lt zrutl, t hc're trre litr gtrisls tlho see la rlgtlagc as a higbll'

conrplex lirlnralsl,sterl that is bcst rlcscribecl b-t'abstlact t'ttlcs that

h irve n o co u llterparts in ol her arezrs ol'cognitiott. (1'hc recluire men t

tl)at scntel)ccs har.'e :r biuarl' branchilrg syntactic stt'ttctttre is ont'

e xzrurplc'ot srrc[r a "^ rr-r le. "^ ) No t surprisingll', thc're is er st rong tcuclc'uc1'

Ior these rc'scarchers lo larror thc vierv that the acquisiLion device is

tlcsignctl spccilicallr' lbr lan gr"rage.

On thc rrther herncl, thelc arc nran_r'lingLrists u'ho lhinli that lan-

guirgc lrirs to lrc undc,r-stoorl in Lcrnrs ol its comnrunical.it'c lLuction.

Accolcling to thesc. rc'sealchc'rs, stratcgics that Iacilitatc conlnu-

rricirtiou (^) - not trbstrzrct lbrnral (^) rnles (^) - detcmtine hon, ltrng[rage

r.r'orlis. lJccausr. cor-nnrunicatiolt iltvol\rcs nralt), dillelent t5,pes ol'

corrsicleralions (nc\'r,crsns old inlbnnation, poitrt ol vierr', thc'stir-

tLrs ol spc:rlicr and acldlcsscc,, tlre sitr.raLittn), this perspectivc tcnils

to LrL, zrssot iitted r,r'itlr a bias Iorvald ir ntultipr,rr-posc' acqr.ri.sition

rlcvicc'.

'l'hc'clisirglc'enteltt ovL't'the ltirtLlle ol langr-ragc has bcen going or-r

lirr cvcn lorrqc'r Ihan tLrc dispLrtc ttver thc'natLlre ol thc acqnisition

rlcticc'. ['nlbrtunarc.ll', it is not liltel-t'ttt be (^) settled auy tillrc soon.

Ilorvcvc'r, thc,re arc still a lot of things t,/e can lcarn in the nteantiutc

irbouI h.rr' langrragc'acquisition (^) rvorhs. (^) one o['thenr (^) - and the linal

-Lopic lbr this (^) boolt (^) - involve s tlrc learning process (^) itscl[.

6, Learrring to learu

licguld lcss ol h orv nr u ch is b u ilr into I hr'trccluisitiou dcvicc, rhcrr's

still a lot ubout language that htrs to bc'learneil, Errcn il the acqui-

sition delicc tr.lls childlen thirt rvortls r-e lerriug [o coltcr-ctc objects

.rrc lroLlr-rs in n'ltattvcr langr.rzrgc tlie1,'1-s learning, they're ou tllcir

L|ttv'tlo thcy (^) do it? 19 j

on,rr r,vhen it cotnes to tigr.rr-irrg t_rut r,vhirt thc plural lbrrn ol,it lloLrn

Ioolis lilic.

sott* tlrirrlls thtt clillLlrrtr ltu'tritrlt lircris/r rrrrr.rt lilyrrt our /irr-llrcrrrs.r'ts

. 'l'he (^) plLrlal (^) is Lrsuall_y lrrrnted bl,adtlirrg -.r (|ooL./Dcroks), buI therc are sonrc (^) cxccptiot)s (rrrcrr, (^) chilrlft,rr./i.s/r. arrtl (^) so lbrth).

" 'l'he^ past^ tensc'is^ usullll, ftrrntetl [r],rrtlrlirrg -crl (rvrrlk/u,rrlkt,rl). but

Uie[c al-e a ltrt ol csceptions {r?1,t, {ltc. .slcpl, hsl, r[id./i,/1. .srru,, antl so

orr l. ";\ r'crb^ co'rbi'es^ r,r,itli its suLr;cct (^) trrrtl direct olrjcct (^) irr thc.r<ler s-Lrlriect-verb-tlifect (^) obiecl. (,1'ltt (^) cnt lruttk lLc rrriift. (^) ). " r^ 'ou' co.rbirrcs ^,ith^ il.

'tljective

tr'd .rr article (^) i. the ordcr article-adjectivc-lloLr (^) n 1a bl11 trttk).

" QtrestioDs^ arc^ fOrnted^ [r]' ,,.r,r,,,,.,* zr liqht vcrb to thc liont crl.the

SclltcDce (Crrrr (^) ttorr stnr/.)).

Iiviclentllq thcn, the actlrrisilicln clcvice has to be powcL-ful

cnolrgh

ard llcxi ble erou grr to .lror,v crrirdre' to'rastcr-

a h. ge n t,nrber-ol

l.cts (^) abolr t

'r,hate'c'r

la.gu age thcy l.r a irpe' t. be lear'ir_rg. ,l.hcre,s^ ir

tu'cll-*'orvn (^) lea (^) r'irg proced * L'e th (^) a t ca ritre rp.

Ir's olicr si'rply catcd

11ttrcnilizntiott, because (^) it involrres dr':rnring (^) a (^) ic.erarc.'crusi.'

specilic ri.o'r

cases.

Crrrr51,1'1'n1ira, (^) rJ-ti (^) I tdtes

Cc.'e.aliz:rtio' is a

'eri, 'sc,lirl

a.cl .el-, cot..utot_l'lace lcar.irrg

str-iltcg_'. (^) \bu r-rsc (^) it rt'hcu (^) voLl-sec thrce or lbur

shcep ancl thcn

conclude that rrll slreep trre vvooll-v anrl cat grass.

And you^ r-rse il.

tt'hc. -'.u co.clrLdc []rat

'on

.r'c alrergic to clhocol'te ir you break

r.rut irr hivcs lbr the tlrird titne iu eL r:ou, right alicr

ctrLrne it.

I 9f llorl L/riJrft'rr l-tldrn LilntilnLJ(

I dicln't co[recI nr_r'danghter. because I r,r'anted to see [ron'all ol'

this n'as^ going^ L<i^ tnrtr^ out.^ So.^ I^ nrtrcle a noLe^ ol^ the^ crror^ aucl^ started

listening lor otlrer cxanrplc'-s. I hcard a cor,rplc niore, but al'ter a l'cu'

rrcc.lis m_r' clar.rghter lr-rst stopped tallting alrout "trlo^ rvhiles," and

rtc,nt bacli to saving, just^ "a rt'hile."

Sonrc.hou', slre urust^ httve r:ealizecl tha^ t no one else^ nras^ ever con r-rt-

ing u,lriles.+7 Eviclentl],, childrcn are able to notice that there ale

ccrt-zrin things^ that^ othcr^ pcople^ rlotr't^ sa1'.

Doittlt r1oodl

Lct's thinli aboLlt another exarnple. \;hen nrJ'ilaugirter rvas lbr-rr

1'ears old.^ sbe^ startecl using^ tl-re^ rtorrl^ goorlly^ r,r.here^ atlnlts^ rvonld sal'

r lcll.

\ c har.' Lo dr.r this goodlll

l)itlrr't I tlrlrt thisgo,xlh,,

She rlid this cltrite svstL'ulaticall_'. zrnd it is prettl,eas_v to sc'c rt'hat

cur,tsccl tlris crror. She noticecl the iollorr.ir-rg qLrite gcner:al patterr.l

involving ucljectivc.s {rvorcls that exprcss proper-ties o[ things) and

adverLrs (^ rvolcls thtr t descri be properties ol' actions).

, \rljcctivcs .'\dtc rbs

(lLrict (il (lr-lirt nraDl clirietll, lc.ert quietl_y)

Slo\V (^) Iir sh)\' t ar) (^) sk-rrvl1' (go (^) slorr'11' (^) ) ltirppv ta happl girlt (^) happrily l1:lar, happill,) rlLrick ta tluicli (^) rlogl qLricltll'(rtru quiclill,)

;\s -r'ou c:lll sc,c-. therc's a stl-ong tc'nclencl,in English lbr adverbs

ttr lre l.rurctl lr-onr arljc'cti'es b_v adcling the -1y cnding. lvl_r,dar,rghter

ob'ior,rslv .oticed this (language letrrncls are srrpposEl) to r.rotrcc

glcneral tctlclencir's). She then rrsc'd the generalizatioD proceclnre tO

i'()nclrr(lc tlrar il therc is an trcljcctiveu()r)rl, thcrr. slror.rlcl bc aLr adterlr

goolly.l'har. lvas !r'[ong. but it n'ers r]ot ar) Lulreasonable thing to clo.

'I hc qucstion is horv to get bacli on trztck.

I-lorv rlo^ tltey^ dtt^ it?^195

Once agnin. I did nothing to corrcct her^ t.uistztke.^ Aucl^ strrc

encrr,rgh, alir'r a l'crv tuonths she stoppetl .str-vit'tg^ gorrrlly^ arlcl^ started

sal,ing rvtl/. I-lcr brtrlics {the "lle^ Cotrscrt'zttivc"^ Lar'r')^ lrad^ ltrilecl,^ [rut

lbrtLr uatcl-t' hcr^ acrlLr^ isition^ dcvicc had^ a^ bacli-tl^ p.^ Scrttlchot't', slte^ urit.s

irble to notice that no orte clse erter said^ gooll11.

One thing that might havc'helped her is a^ learnitlg^ strtlteg)'^ callecl

thc "-P^ ri rl! i^ pte^ qt _Clolltjtl t^ "-'ll

'llrc (^) l'ritn'iph: ry' Cottltrtst li|cr'1 ttt0 lon)ts coltlt'ilst itt tlteittrittg.

'\ihat this principle basicalll,sttys is thttt uo tu'o t'r'tlrcls shottld have

cl rtq-t-ltt-j-l-rg.Salrre__- ur_,-_.-l^ e^ er^ u^ i^ u^ g..

Snre, thele are^ rn'orcls^ Ihat^ tnean^ .{Lrtos't'^ the sante^ thir-rg^ -s/irtr,

t/rirr. and skirrrry, lbr examplc (^) - br-rt therc's^ alttrztJ,s^ at^ least^ a sLlbtlc

difl'crcncc. 1Thal"'s 14,[1r 14rs talli arbouL thin hair tttrcl tr slitn rttaistlitte,

and not the rerrerse.) Having [hese sorts o[ ccltttrasts utalies sense,

since it r'r,oLrld be Lrr-rcconorlric:rl lbr a langr-rage to httve urorcls t,r,ith

eract11' the samc' l'nc-aning ancl nse.

In the case ol'gocrrlly, thc' Principle ol'C--outrasl, protrab15' lii(-lisd

itr n,hen ury danehter heard nre say things lihe "You did that reall5r

r'r'ell" or "Did things go \'ell Loday?" ln thcsc senlences, the u,orcl

rut'll liacl exactly the nlc'aning tl.rat sl.re u'onld have expresserl usir.rg

4o()d/I/. The^ Principlc^ ol'ConLrast r,yould havc. tokl l-rer "Jrou^ can'I

Itave (^) trvo rrords (^) rvith cxtrcLly [[re same meaning; one o[ thcrl has t(J go."

,Vhich one is hept and n'hich oue gets tossed ou t? The acquisition

device seeurs in general^ to rc.arlizc tlr at aclult spealie rs otthe la n gu age

[<nor.r' best. ,VheLr there is a conflict bg11rygs11 a lorm that others nse

aucl a lbrrn tl-rat the child l-ras utade Llp on her own, the former one

n,ins out. Gracluerlly, goorliy gets rcplaced by nu,1l, crrturl gets pushed

ont b1, a1s, and the langr-rage ol'the:rdult bec,or-r-rc"^ the lar-rgr-rzrgc ol'

the child.

Ilenrenrber. Ll'rough, thirt it talies a lot oI exposLrres kl lhe adult

lbrrr (^) belbrc the translbrntittion is complete (^) - sevcral (^) hnndred aecording to one estiurate (scc^ chapter 2, scction i). What if this

doesu't happen, perhaps because the r,rrord is rarell, used? Then the

child's ttver-regularized lbrm mal' snn'ive, and the Iangr,rage begins

I

196 Hott' Clilldrcrr Laortt^ Lungunge

to change. That's^ vyhl'^ rt,e^ saJ'[/tt'ivcrlrather than^ t/lrurre^ (the^ original

past tense ol't/r'iuc) iu coutemporary English.Le

Rccnst.s n.qnitt

The l?rinciple ol'Contrast may^ be^ most^ efl'ective and nltrst^ t-tselirl

r,r,hen there are recasts (^) - [hosc partial^ rc'petitious^ ol'children's^ r-rtter-

ances that^ rte^ cliscussed^ a^ little^ ezrrlier^ in^ this^ chapter:.^ That's^ because

r-ecasts givc the chikl an opporl-unity to heaI colrpetil-tg itenrs in close

prorinrit1' to each otlter: she szrl'5 "The doggie n,rrn o it all" and right

an'tr-r' hcars hc'r^ mother^ respoud^ r,r'ith the^ recast "Oh,^ he^ ars^ it^ all,

did he?" It rnnst be l'airl5' ei155, 1o notice that entcd is inli'inging on the

territorl'ofatc, here,^ since^ both^ are^ being^ nsed to^ express^ [he^ saure

nlea ll ilr g.

Ihis violates thc' Principle of Cor.rtlast, and it's probabl-v^ at^ this

point tlrat the chilcl starls to have dor-rbts about crrlrd. Undcr con-

tinuecl l'ronrbardment from nlr, the immature lbrm begiDs to r,rrither

a rt cl evett ttt a I lJ' d istrppeal-s c omplete l-1'.

  1. A firral worcl

So. r,r-hc,re does all of this leave rrs2 At the ver], least. r,r'ith a col-

lcction ol abiliries thzrt rnalre it possible to learn language.

1b begir-r, there's a ve[_\r earl5/ abilit], to distipgr_rish speech soupds

lroru othc'r t-t'pes o[ sonrds ard frorn each other. A'cl there's the

abilitl', rlhich starts to emerge aronnd the age o[ tu,eh,e months,

to procluce those saLre speech (^) son.ds i' an i'teiligible rran'er.

striugiltg thenr Logether to lbnl vrrords (^) and sentences.

l:or r'ords, there is first otall the ability to pick the br.rilcli'g blocl<s

of langr-rage or-rt of the speech stre anl. As rrre'rre seen, the lVlatchins

-Strateg5' ancl the^ Spotlight Strateg5, seem to be inrplicated here irl

[Iotr do tlty do iL?^ ]^97

For meaning, theL'e's the amazitrg abilitt, to "^ fast utap" (^) - to^ learu

the meaning oIzr vvorcl on tlre basis o{^ a^ single^ exposLll-e^ to its^ Llse.

This in tur:u inrplicates varioLts other abilities.'l'here r,t,ottld^ Lre^ tro

lirst nrapping il'childreLr didrt't^ sce^ thc^ rt'orld^ thc^ ^ ra5'^ adr-rlts clo,^ il'

the1, cou ld n't ligure ou t tt'ha t^ thc^ spealicr: is^ paj'ing^ ilttentiott^ ttl^ as^ he

spealis, and itthel, cor-rldn'1, ttse lingr-ristic clues to inte r^ (tbr^ illstatlce)

that a zav mnsI be a thing btrt that Zav lias to be ir persott.

For sentences, there's tlre^ abilit5' to note^ patterns o[^ particular

tvpes (su^ b.iect-verb-objecl- coustructious, passives,^ negartivcs,^ rela-

tive clanses), to see [row thel' n1(] br"rilt, and to figr-rre out wl-rat^ thcy

are nsed [or. And tying it all together is the ability to leam (^) - to^ lbmr^ geueral-

izations thaI harre a good^ chance ol being right tl.rc^ first^ tin.re ancl^ tr.l

rlal<e corrections when there's tr mistake.

lVIan5't[1iqus in^ life^ yield^ up^ theil^ tnJ/steries^ and^ lose^ their lascinti-

tion alter a little bit of examination and analJ'sis. Langr-ragc^ is^ not^ lilie

that. Although it has been probed^ ancl aLralyzed and studied fol over

tr,r'o thousand )rears, \tre still r-rndersttrnd relatively little about how it

rvorlis. TI-re myster)' is compounded by the [act that every year, tens

o[ r'nillioLrs o[ children aronr.rd the ',t'orld qr-rickly^ and etlbrtlessly go

about the job of langr-rage learuing, creating tl-re pttzzle that vve'tre

been considering in this (^) booli: hor,r, do the1, le 11>

For nor,v at least, thcre's no conrplete ansrver to this^ qr-restion.^ But

this is pe rhaps crne ol'those qr-restions that is as enio1/able to poircler

as it is to answer-. And, unlike rnanl' olthe puzzles Lhat scientists lilte

to inrrestigate, this one hits verJ, close to horne.

.a