Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Relevance theory activity, Apuntes de Idioma Inglés

Asignatura: Pragmatica de la Lengua Inglesa, Profesor: Bárbara Eizaga, Carrera: Filología Inglesa, Universidad: UCA

Tipo: Apuntes

2014/2015

Subido el 29/07/2015

rgrtg
rgrtg 🇪🇸

4.2

(189)

38 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
RELEVANCE THEORY ACTIVITIES
1. List the assumptions that will constitute the initial, immediately
accessible context in which the hearer will process the second
utterance of the following exchange:
A and B, two friends living in Cadiz, are talking:
A: Why don’t we go to the Seville Fair on Thursday?
eB: This will have to go into the garage tomorrow morning and I
don’t feel like spending hours in Santa Justa to get back here.
Explain how the hearer will have to extend that initial context to be
able to interpret B’s remark. (You can supply any assumptions you
consider appropriate to provide a good explanation)
Possible assumption for the initial context is that two
friends that want to do something new and they are
calculating possibilities. They have never been in Seville
Fair.
Explicitly, “B” said to A” that “this” refers to a car, a car
that probably does not belong to him as “b” declares “will
have to go into the garage tomorrow”, the car possibly
belong to his parents, and then he does not want to wait
hours in Santa Justa Station to return to home.
Implicitly, ”B” means that his parents will not let him the
car to go to Seville and he is lazy enough to wait a train
there.
2. Consider clause (a) of optimal relevance and analyze the
following utterance said by one stranger to another on a train to
Manchester:
a. Trains are very comfortable nowadays.
First stranger is in a train to Manchester.
A second stranger is in a train to Manchester too.
So, both strangers are in a train to Manchester.
The utterance ‘Trains are very comfortable nowadays’ is
relevant to the hearer because the speaker males a
reference to the same vehicle of transport they are
using. The utterance agrees with the context,
independently whether the utterance is true or false.
3. Explain why the hearer is restricted to choosing the minimal
acceptable context and contextual eects. Base your argument
on clause (b) of the denition of optimal relevance. Use the
following example to develop your argument:
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Relevance theory activity y más Apuntes en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity!

RELEVANCE THEORY ACTIVITIES

  1. List the assumptions that will constitute the initial, immediately accessible context in which the hearer will process the second utterance of the following exchange:

A and B, two friends living in Cadiz, are talking: A: Why don’t we go to the Seville Fair on Thursday? eB: This will have to go into the garage tomorrow morning and I don’t feel like spending hours in Santa Justa to get back here.

Explain how the hearer will have to extend that initial context to be able to interpret B’s remark. (You can supply any assumptions you consider appropriate to provide a good explanation)

Possible assumption for the initial context is that two friends that want to do something new and they are calculating possibilities. They have never been in Seville Fair. Explicitly, “B” said to “A” that “this” refers to a car, a car that probably does not belong to him as “b” declares “will have to go into the garage tomorrow”, the car possibly belong to his parents, and then he does not want to wait hours in Santa Justa Station to return to home. Implicitly, ”B” means that his parents will not let him the car to go to Seville and he is lazy enough to wait a train there.

  1. Consider clause (a) of optimal relevance and analyze the following utterance said by one stranger to another on a train to Manchester:

a. Trains are very comfortable nowadays.

  • First stranger is in a train to Manchester.
  • A second stranger is in a train to Manchester too.
  • So, both strangers are in a train to Manchester.
  • The utterance ‘Trains are very comfortable nowadays’ is relevant to the hearer because the speaker males a reference to the same vehicle of transport they are using. The utterance agrees with the context, independently whether the utterance is true or false.
  1. Explain why the hearer is restricted to choosing the minimal acceptable context and contextual effects. Base your argument on clause (b) of the definition of optimal relevance. Use the following example to develop your argument:

Ann: Does Gladys have a good memory? Bob: Gladys is just like an elephant.

  • It is known that elephant are animals with a great memory more developed than other species. This assumption is accepted by the scienti fi c world and has the society’s support. So, when Bob uses the utterance “Gladys is just like an elephant” he obviously is asserting Ann’s question, “Gladys has a good memory”. Bob has opted to ask Ann with a very speci fi c assumption because, he perfectly knows that Ann has been grew in the same society and culture as him, thus, both characters share this minimal context, it is not necessary to extend more the context.
  1. RT has treated Grice’s generalized conversational implicatures and some particularized conversational implicatures as part of the explicature. Describe how examples (a-b) would be treated within a Gricean approach, explain why RT might consider these meanings as part of the explicature (“+>” means “conversationally implicates”):

a. My boss treats me like dirt. +>My boss treats me as though I have no value. b. You should see my dog when she catches a Frisbee; she’s a regular kangaroo. +>My dog is good at jumping.

  • According to Gricean approach; utterance “a” would be described as particularized conversational implicature as the utterance hides a second meaning, and utterance “b” would be described as generalized conversational implicature as the utterance is triggered by inde fi nite article “a Frisbee”.
  • According to Relevance Theory approach considers these meanings as part of the explicatures because both meanings can be communicated and when they communicate that means they are explicatures of an utterance.
  1. What would be the explicature(s) of the following examples? a. Stop him! b. Have a bath! c. Give this decision some thought! What kind of enrichments does the hearer have to make to derive the full proposition(s) expressed?

a)