



Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Review Resumen Class enemy INTRODUCTION PLOT CHARACTERS STRUCTURE, STYLE AND LANGUAGE STAGE PROPS CRITICAL EVALUATION BIBLIOGRAPHY Nota final; 9
Tipo: Resúmenes
1 / 5
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!




| English Theatre |
In this review, I am going to talk about “Class enemy”, a play written by Nigel Williams in 1978, and first performed at the Theatre Upstairs, the 9th March 1978, and on the 4th^ April at the Royal Court Theatre, London. PLOT The play is about six students, so savage and rude that teachers are not willing to teach them. They destroy the classroom and argue about what to do, finally Iron has the idea of giving short lessons by themselves. Nipper starts talking about his drunk father, and then Sweetheart talks about sex. Iron argues about the way they are giving those lessons, because they are not lessons, just speeches. Then Rack gives his “lesson”, although his friends ask him to do talk about sex and gardening, he just talks about gardening and winderboxes as a craft which converts into a plant. Suddenly, master arrives calling Cameron (Snatch) to leave, and announces that he does not know if a teacher will come. The boys are angry with the system. Nipper talks about black people and says what they do to go from Africa to any country until Sweetheart sees a teacher going to their class. In act two, no teacher finally goes to the class, and students argue about teachers, and social workers. Snatch arrives again, and they receive him as if they were militaries. Snatch gives a lesson about winders and narrates also the first time someone called him “nigger”, when he finishes everybody congratulates him. Iron and Sky-light start arguing and hitting themselves, after this Sky-light tries to give her lesson about cooking a British dish, Bread and butter pudding, although Iron is always interrupting and bothering her. Iron and Sky-light fight again until Sky-light is beaten on the
the boss of the class and is always arguing, interrupting and destroying everything; in fact, he hits Sky-light.
However, I think that the content is good; Williams shows us another society far from the manners of “The Importance of Being Earnest” or “Mrs Warren Profession”. Nigel Williams shows us young people with different and difficult lives trying to pass time until a teacher arrives, this last fact remembers me of “Waiting for Godot” a play by Becket. Both show people waiting for something to happen but never happens, and in both plays characters spend their time talking about life and giving speeches, a way of seeing how characters are and what they think about different topics: as in this play sex, black people or defence. Moreover, we can see their behaviour while waiting and listening to each other’s lessons. As an example, we can see that Iron is self-centred and egocentric, while Racks tries to help the rest. In addition, that although Sky-light is being bullied, in such a way, by Iron at the end of the play he tries to calm him down. To sum up, that it is not directly said how they behave we can know it by their actions and speeches. Finally, I consider that by the content is a good play, but by the language is very difficult to understand, so that maybe it is just recommended to people with a high level of English. I would have liked to see it on scene, because I think it would be more understandable and visual. BIBLIOGRAPHY Williams, Nigel. Class Enemy. Methuen Modern, 1978.