Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


Jackson solutions - jackson 2 23 homework solution, Provas de Física

Solução do jackson

Tipologia: Provas

2016

Compartilhado em 28/04/2016

iago_lira
iago_lira 🇧🇷

4

(7)

107 documentos

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
Jackson 2.23 Homework Problem Solution
Dr. Christopher S. Baird
University of Massachusetts Lowell
PROBLEM:
A hollow cube has conducting walls defined by six planes x = 0, y = 0, z = 0, and x = a, y = a, z = a.
The walls z = 0 and z = a are held at constant potential V. The other four sides are at zero potential.
(a) Find the potential Φ(x, y, z) at any point inside the cube.
(b) Evaluate the potential at the center of the cube numerically, accurate to three significant figures.
How many terms in the series is it necessary to keep in order to attain this accuracy? Compare your
numerical result with the average value of the potential on the walls. See Problem 2.28.
(c) Find the surface-charge density on the surface z = a.
SOLUTION:
The problem contains no charge, so the electric potential is described everywhere inside the cube by
the Laplace equation:
2=0
This problem has a boundary, the cube, that best matches rectangular coordinates. In rectangular
coordinates, the Laplace equation becomes:
2
x22
y22
z2=0
Using the method of separation of variables, the most general solution to this equation is:
x , y , z = A0B0x A0B0y A0B0z
A0B0x AeiyBeiyAezBe− z
AeixBeix A0B0y AezBe z
,
AeixBeix AeiyBeiy AezBe− z
Apply the boundary condition, Φ(x = 0, y, z) = 0
pf3
pf4
pf5

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe Jackson solutions - jackson 2 23 homework solution e outras Provas em PDF para Física, somente na Docsity!

Jackson 2.23 Homework Problem Solution

Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell PROBLEM: A hollow cube has conducting walls defined by six planes x = 0, y = 0, z = 0, and x = a , y = a , z = a. The walls z = 0 and z = a are held at constant potential V. The other four sides are at zero potential. (a) Find the potential Φ ( x , y , z ) at any point inside the cube. (b) Evaluate the potential at the center of the cube numerically, accurate to three significant figures. How many terms in the series is it necessary to keep in order to attain this accuracy? Compare your numerical result with the average value of the potential on the walls. See Problem 2.28. (c) Find the surface-charge density on the surface z = a. SOLUTION: The problem contains no charge, so the electric potential is described everywhere inside the cube by the Laplace equation: ∇ 2 = 0 This problem has a boundary, the cube, that best matches rectangular coordinates. In rectangular coordinates, the Laplace equation becomes: ∂ 2  ∂ x

2 ^

2  ∂ y

2 ^

2  ∂ z

2 =^0

Using the method of separation of variables, the most general solution to this equation is:   x , y , z = A  0  B  0 x  A  0  B  0 y  A  0  B  0 z  ∑   A  0  B  0 x  Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  ∑   Ae ixBeix  A  0  B  0 y  AezBe − z  ∑  ,   Ae ixBeix  Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  Apply the boundary condition, Φ ( x = 0, y , z ) = 0

0 = A  0  A  0  B  0 y  A  0  B  0 z  ∑   A  0  Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  ∑   A  B   A  0  B  0 y  AezBe − z  ∑  ,   A  B   Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  This must be true for all y and z , so that each term must vanish separately. This forces 0 = 0 and = - . The solution now becomes:   x , y , z = B  0 x  A  0  B  0 y  A  0  B  0 z  ∑   B  0 x  Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  ∑  A  sin  x  A  0  B  0 y  AezBe − z  ∑  ,A  sin  x  Ae iyBeiy  AezBe − z  Similarly, the boundary condition, Φ ( x , y = 0, z ) = 0 leads to 0 = 0 and = - which gives the solution:   x , y , z = B  0 x  B  0 y  A  0  B  0 z  ∑   B  0 xA  sin  y  AezBe − z  ∑  A  sin  x  B  0 y  AezBe − z  ∑  ,A  sin xA  sin  y  AezBe − z  Now apply the boundary condition Φ ( x = a , y , z ) = 0 0 = B  0 a  B  0 y  A  0  B  0 z  ∑   B  0 aA  sin  y  AezBe − z  ∑  A  sin a  B  0 y  AezBe − z  ∑  ,A  sin  aA  sin  y  AezBe − z  The only way this can be true for all y and z is if 0 = 0 and α = n π/ a where n = 0, 1, 2,...   x , y , z =∑ n An sin  nx a   B  0 y  AezBe − z ∑ n ,An sin  nx a ^ A  sin  y  AezBe − z  Similarly, apply the boundary condition Φ ( x , y = a , z ) = 0 to get 0 = 0 and β = m π/ a where n = 0, 1, 2,...   x , y , z =∑ n , m An sin  nx a ^ Am sin  my a   Ae ^ zBe −^ z^ 

An , m =

8 V

n m  2 e −^12  n^2  m^2  ^2 cosh  / 2  (^)  n 2  m 2  Bn , m =

8 V

n m  2 e 1 2  n (^2)  m (^2)   2 cosh  / 2  (^)  n 2  m 2  The final solution is now:   x , y , z = (^) ∑ n ,m odd

sin

nx

a 

sin

my

a ^

8 V

n m

e −^12  n^2  m^2  ^2 ez^ ^ n (^2)  m (^2)   (^2) / a 2  e 1 2 ^ n (^2)  m (^2)   2 ez^  n^ (^2)  m (^2)   (^2) / a 2 cosh / 2  (^)  n 2  m 2

  x , y , z = (^) ∑ n ,m odd

16 V

n m

2 sin

nx

a 

sin

my

a 

cosh  / 2  (^)  n 2  m 2  2 z / a − 1  cosh  / 2  (^)  n 2  m 2

(b) Evaluate the potential at the center of the cube numerically, accurate to three significant figures. How many terms in the series is it necessary to keep in order to attain this accuracy? Compare your numerical result with the average value of the potential on the walls. See Problem 2.28. The potential at the center of the cube is:   a /2, a / 2, a / 2 =

16 V

2 ∑ n ,m odd

n m

sin

n

sin

m

cosh / 2   n 2  m 2

Φ( a /2, a /2, a / 2 )= V [

π

2 sin(

π

sin

π

2 )(^

cosh ((π/ 2 ) √ 2 ) )

2

sin

sin

2 ^

cosh / 2   10  

2

sin

sin

2 ^

cosh / 2   10  

2

sin

sin

2 ^

cosh  / 2  26 

... ]

  a /2, a / 2, a / 2 = V [0.3476−0.0075−0.00750.0002...] Here is solution, to three significant figures, if you only keep the first term, or the first two terms, etc: 1 term  a /2, a /2, a / 2 = V [0.348 ] 2 terms a /2, a /2, a / 2 = V [0.340] 3 terms  a / 2, a / 2, a / 2 = V [0.333] 4 terms a /2, a /2, a / 2 = V [0.333]

We only have to keep the first three terms to have the answer accurate to three significant figures. It is obvious that the solution is converging to:   a / 2, a /2, a / 2 =

V

There are six walls on the cube and two sides have a non-zero potential V , so the average value of the potential on the sides of the cube is Φave on surf =^ 2 V 6 =^ V

  1. This leads to the interesting conclusion that:   a / 2, a /2, a / 2 =ave on surf (c) Find the surface-charge density on the surface z = a. = [

ddn ] n = a We have solved the potential on the inside of the cube, so we can only use that potential to find the surface charge density on the inside of the z = a surface. The normal to the inside surface is in the negative z direction so that: = [

ddz ] z = a = [

d dzn , m odd

16 V

n m  2 sin^  nx a  sin  my a  cosh  / 2  n 2  m 2  2 z / a − 1  cosh / 2  n 2  m 2  ] z = a = [  0 ∑ n ,m odd

16 V

n m  2 sin nx a  sin  my a  sinh  / 2  n 2  m 2  2 z / a − 1  cosh  / 2  n 2  m 2    / a  (^)  n 2  m 2 ] z = a σ= 16 ϵ 0 V π an , m odd √ n 2

  • m 2 n m sin ( n π x a ) sin ( m π y a ) (tanh^ ((π/^2 )^ √ n (^2) + m (^2) ) )