

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Encontra documentos específicos para os exames da tua universidade
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
A research study conducted by favier, chanzy, and cavaille at the centre de recherches sur les macromolecules in grenoble, france. The researchers attempted to mimic biocomposites by blending cellulose whiskers from tunicates with synthetic polymer latices. The resulting nanocomposites had unique structural and mechanical properties, which were analyzed through various techniques including electron microscopy and electron diffraction.
Tipologia: Notas de estudo
1 / 3
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!


Macromolecules 1996,28, 6365-6367 6365
Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolkcules Vkgktales, CNRS and Universitk Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
Received April 7, 1995 Revised Manuscript Received June 20, 1995
There are numerous examples where animals or plants synthesize extracellular high-performance skel- etal biocomposites consisting of a matrix reinforced by fibrous biopolymers. lw3 Cellulose is a classical example of these reinforcing elements which occur as whiskerlike microfibrils that are biosynthesized and deposited in a continuous f a ~ h i o n. ~ - ~In many cases, this mode of
almost defect-free, with the consequence of axial physi- cal properties approaching those of perfect crystals. In the present study, we have attempted to mimic biocom- posites by blending cellulose whiskers from the mantles of tunicates with synthetic polymer latices. The films cast from such mixtures had a nanocomposite organiza- tion whose structure and mechanical properties are described in the present paper.
tus, from the Mediterranean, was obtained from a local fish shop. These sea animals had an overall diameter between 5 and 10 cm with a 1 cm thick cellulose tunic. After anesthetizing with chloroform, the animals were gutted and their tunic was cut into small fragments that were deproteinized by three successive bleaching treat-
bleached mantles (the "tunicin") were then disintegrated in water, first with a Waring blender (at a concentration of 5% by weight) and then with 15 passes through a Gaulin laboratory homogenizer operated at 400 bar (at
tunicin suspension was mixed with HzSO4 to reach a
strong stirring. A dispersion of cellulose whiskers resulted. After sonication, the suspension was neutral- ized and washed by dialysis. It did not sediment or flocculate as a consequence of surface sulfate groups created during the sulfuric acid treatment.' When concentrated by evaporation, the suspensions displayed typical liquid crystal characteristics.
from the copolymerization of styrene (35% wlw), butyl
The suspensions were poured into poly(tetrafluor0eth- ylene) molds and allowed to dry slowly for 1 month at room temperature. Homogeneous and bubble-free 2 mm thick films resulted. These films, cut into strips 35 mm long and 6 mm wide, were analyzed with a DMTA Metravib SA Mecanalyseur operating with a forced oscillation pendulum. The experiments were achieved at a fixed frequency of 0.1 Hz and in a temperature
Electron microscopy and electron diffraction analysis on cellulose whiskers was achieved with a Philips EM400T operated at 120 kV. For this, cellulose whisker suspensions were deposited on carbon-coated grids and observed under low-dose conditions, using a 20 pm
0024-9297/95/2228-6365$09.00/
objective aperture that gave bright-field diffraction contrast images. Microdiffraction on individual cel- lulose whiskers was performed by the diffraction method
on the reinforced films were made on ultrathin sections obtained by cryosectioning. These sections were ob- served in bright-field diffraction contrast with a Philips CM200 CRY0 operated at 200 kV and equipped with a 15 pm objective aperture. The images obtained under low-dose conditions revealed (in black) the cellulose crystallites within the clear polymer matrix. An image of the latex particles was made under low-dose condi- tions by depositing drops of latex suspensions on carbon- coated grids. A typical preparation of tunicin crystals is shown in Figure 1A. This sample consists of parallelepiped rods
ters for widths on the order of 10-20 nm. Upon testing by a microelectron diffraction technique (inset), each element gave a spot difiactogram that corresponded to
the ac section) and persisted when the electron probe was scanned along a given rod. As the diffractogram indicated that the cellulose chain axis is along the long
is a low-dose image of the latex particles that were used in this study. Each particle has a diameter of around
within the latex. In this image, recorded under low- dose and diffraction contrast conditions, the cellulose crystals are in black within the clear polymer matrix. This image reveals that the cellulose whiskers are distributed throughout the structure, without segrega- tion or association. When reinforced by a small percentage of tunicin whiskers, the polymer films showed improved mechan- ical properties which were particularly striking when the films were heated above the glass transition of the polymer. This is illustrated in Figure 3, where part A
temperature for various whiskerflatex compositions ranging from 0 to 14% (wlw). The curve corresponding to the pure matrix is typical for a thermoplastic: below
rapidly to 1 MPa during the crossing of the glass- rubber transition temperature. Above this temperature,
with increasing temperature. The films that contained
dramatically reduced: only from 1 to 0.1 GPa for a film
forced films behaved as rubbers as their G value stayed constant over a wide temperature range. This is il- lustrated in Figure 3B that corresponds to a film reinforced by 6% (w/w) whiskers for which G keeps a
which cellulose starts to decompose.
0 1995 American Chemical Society
8566 Communications to the Editor
Figure 1. (A) Electron micrograph of rcdlike cellulose mi- crystals extracted from the mantle of Microcosmus fulcatus. Scale bar: 0.5 pm. Inset: typical electron diffractogram recorded on one microcrystal. oriented with its axis vertically.
that were used for this work. Scale bar: 0.5 pm.
Figure 2. Low-dose images of a cryosection of a nanomm- posite film consisting of 6% (w/w)tunicin whiskers in a latex as in Figure 1B. The image, recorded under difiaction con- trast bright-field conditions, revealed in black the cellulose whiskers. Scale bar: 0.5 pm.
mechanical model developed for short-fiber composite.
for, but one assumes that there is no interaction
of Halpin-Tsai."
10
6 6 A
(Pa)for composites reinforced by weight fractionsof cellulose whiskers from 0 to 14%, as a function of temperature in the
K and for a specimen reinforeed by 6% (w/w) cellulose whiskers. This specimen is compared with a control sample that does not contain any whisker.
K as a function of the volume fraction of cellulose whiskers. Comparison between the experimental (black dots) and cal- culated data with two different mechanical models: a mean- field model (dashed line) and a percolation model (continuous line).
As seen in Figure 4, the mean-field approach is
(1 - 2V + VXJG'&', + (1 - X&G: (1 - X,)G, + aU,- V)G,
soft and rigid phases; X is the volume fraction of