Assignment 2 - Managing a Successful Computing Project - Pass, Assignments of Computer Science

Download Assignment 2 - Managing a Successful Computing Project - Pass and more Assignments Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Huynh Minh Huy | GCD

GCD1001 | UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH

Assignment 2

MANAGING A SUCCESSFUL COMPUTING PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 2 FRONT SHEET Qualification BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Computing Unit number and title Unit 19 : Managing a Successful Computing Project Submission date 26 /02/2023 Date Received 1st submission Re-submission Date Date Received 2nd submission Student Name Huynh Minh Huy Student ID GCD Class GCD1001 Assessor name Ly Quynh Tran Student declaration I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice. Student’s signature (^) Huy Grading grid P5 P6 P7 M3 M4 D

Acknowledgement

First of all, I would like to thanks the curators of the University of Greenwich, who make these courses available to students. I would like to thanks all the authors and researchers who have researched about this data. In addition, I would like to thanks teacher Ly Quynh Tran for her very good and professional lectures and tutorials. Finally, I would like to thanks the teachers and responsible staff of our university for providing a good learning environment.

Table of Contents

• Chapter 1: Introduction.
• Chapter 2: Research Analysis. (P5)
  • I. Analyze and Evaluate Data.
  • II. Evaluate which tools have selected.
• Chapter 3: Recommendations. (P6)..............................................................................................................
  • I. Summary about proposed system.
  • II. List of features for proposed system.
  • III. Advantages and disadvantages of proposed system..................................................................................
  • IV. Recommendations to address challenges and issues for the proposed system.
• Chapter 4: Reflections. (P7).............................................................................................................................
  • I. Fill out the log book form.
  • II. Evaluation of the research result.
  • III. Some of my own learning from the project.
  • IV. Things I need to explore more.
• Conclusion.
• References

Chapter 1: Introduction. In Assignment 1, I carried out planning and research for the development of an e-waste recycling tool. So, in Assignment 2, I will present and discuss the results obtained from the work done in Assignment

1. This report will focus on specific categories to clearly present the outcomes of the research.  Logbooks, lessons learned, project outcomes, and an assessment of the project process.  Examine the usage of approved research tools and processes for correctness and authenticity.  The project management approach and practices are being evaluated. In Assignment 1, I stated the project's major goal and aims for developing an e-waste recycling solution. In this report, I will concentrate on the tasks involved in reaching the goal and goals. The outcomes will be reported depending on progress toward the stated goals and objectives.  Main aim of the project: The main aim of a project on E-waste recycling tools is to properly manage and dispose of electronic waste in an environmentally responsible manner, in order to reduce the negative impact of electronic devices on the environment and to promote sustainability. This can involve developing and implementing new tools and processes to help with the collection, transportation, and processing of electronic waste, as well as promoting awareness of the importance of responsible e-waste management. The ultimate goal is to minimize the environmental impact of electronic devices and reduce the amount of waste generated from these devices over time.  List of Objectives to achieve the aim (Note Objectives should be SMART):  Develop an efficient and effective E-waste recycling tool that can be easily integrated into existing waste management systems.  Increase the amount of electronic waste recycled by 50% within the next two years through the implementation of the E-waste recycling tool.  Reduce the environmental impact of electronic waste by properly disposing of hazardous materials through the E-waste recycling tool.  Ensure that the E-waste recycling tool meets all relevant regulations and industry standards.  Increase public awareness of the importance of proper e-waste disposal and encourage greater participation in e-waste recycling through the implementation of the E-waste recycling tool.

Chapter 2: Research Analysis. (P5) I. Analyze and Evaluate Data. As a project manager, my objective was to gain a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and benefits associated with recycling electronic devices, including the implementation of e-waste recycling tools in our daily lives, the difficulties and challenges involved in the process, and the demands that team members face in meeting the requirements for e-waste recycling tools. Furthermore, the purpose was to determine the possible advantages of e-waste recycling techniques when they were implemented in human life. In order to do this, I did both qualitative and quantitative research in Assignment 1 by giving surveys to users through a Google Form-based survey. The poll sought to ascertain satisfaction and unhappiness with the use of e-waste recycling instruments in society. The results of the survey are presented below. Figure 1 : Data of Gender. Look the pie chart for the gender, it is interesting to see that the majority of respondents in the survey for the E-waste recycling tool were male, with a proportion of 58.3% while the percentage for female were 41.7%. Although, the difference in percentage between male and female users of the e-waste recycling tool is significant, it is important to remember that both genders play a crucial role in promoting sustainable waste management practices. Encouraging diversity and inclusivity in environmental initiatives can lead to a more holistic

Figure 3 : Data of are they a student. Look at the pie chart, we can see that the majority of the respondents are students, accounting for 65.5% of the total survey population, while the remaining 34.5% are non-students. The data suggests that the e-waste recycling tool is an appealing concept for students who may be more aware of environmental issues and have a greater sense of responsibility towards the planet. This data may provide useful information for developers of the e-waste recycling tool to tailor their marketing and outreach efforts towards this specific target audience. Frequency Percent Gender Male 35 58. Female 25 41. Total (^60) 100. Age 18 - 25 26 43. 25 - 30 19 31.

30 (^15) 25. Total (^60) 100. Student or not Student (^39) 65. Non - Student (^21) 35. Total (^60) 100. Table 1 : Demographic.

To summarize the demographic, I created this table that shows the frequency and proportion of each element. The data presented in the table shows the demographic breakdown of the participants in the study. The sample consists of 60 individuals, with 35 participants identifying as male (58.3%) and 25 identifying as female (41.7%). In terms of age, the majority of participants (43.3%) fall in the 18-25 age range, with 31.7% of participants falling in the 25- 30 age range and 25.0% of participants being over 30 years old. Regarding student status, 65.0% of participants are students, while the remaining 35.0% are not students. These findings provide insight into the makeup of the study sample and may have implications for the interpretation of the study's results. Figure 4 : Data of are they using the tool. Look at the pie chart, we can see that the extent to which the e-waste recycling tool has been used or not shows a promising result with 66.7% of participants indicating that they have used the tool. This suggests that the tool is being adopted and gaining some traction among users, which is a positive sign for the effectiveness of the tool. The 33.3% of participants who have not used the tool could be due to a variety of reasons, such as not having access to the tool or not having any electronic waste to recycle. Nonetheless, this data indicates that the tool has some level of usage and has the potential to be used even more widely in the future.

Figure 6 : Data of how willing are they to pay a fee for e-waste recycling services. The bar chart measuring the willingness to pay for e-waste recycling services shows a diverse range of responses. It is encouraging to see that over one-third of the participants (36.7%) are strongly willing to pay for these services, indicating a growing recognition of the importance of responsible e-waste disposal. The combined total of those who are somewhat or strongly willing to pay is 58.4%, which is a positive sign for the future of e-waste recycling. However, the 23.3% of respondents who are either not at all or only slightly willing to pay for these services shows that there is still work to be done in raising awareness about the negative impact of improper e-waste disposal on the environment and human health.

Figure 7 : Data of how helpful are the features of the app. The bar chart indicating the helpfulness of the features of the e-waste recycling app provides useful insights. The results show that a significant number of participants rated the app's features as extremely helpful, with 45% of voters selecting the highest scale of 5. The app's features rated less helpful with a smaller number of voters, with only 16.7% voting for scale 1 indicating the least helpful. This graph demonstrates that a majority of participants found the app's features useful and that the app has been developed with a user's perspective in mind, which is an excellent indicator of an effective e-waste recycling tool.

Figure 9 : Data of do they believe that e-waste recycling tools are effective in reducing environmental impact. The measurement chart measuring participants' beliefs about the effectiveness of e-waste recycling tools shows that 46.7% of respondents believe that these tools are very effective in reducing environmental impact. This is a positive response that suggests that people are aware of the benefits of e-waste recycling and are actively engaged in using such tools. However, it is important to note that 31.7% of participants do not believe that these tools are effective at all. This suggests that more education and awareness campaigns are needed to inform people about the benefits of e-waste recycling and the environmental impact of electronic waste. Finally, 21.7% of participants are unsure, indicating that more information and resources should be made available to help people make informed decisions about e-waste recycling.

Figure 10 : Some of answer for the question: "What suggestions would you have for improving the e-waste recycling process?". Here are some of the suggestion from the participant who took part in the survey. It's encouraging to see that participants are willing to make suggestions for improving the e-waste recycling process. The fact that they are actively engaged in this issue shows that they are concerned about the impact of e-waste on the environment. Some common suggestions include develop more advanced and efficient e-waste processing technologies, make e-waste recycling more accessible for low-income communities, and educate people on how to properly dispose of batteries and other hazardous e-waste materials. It's important to consider these suggestions and work towards implementing them to create a more sustainable future for our planet.

Figure 12 : Some of answer for the question: "What do you like most about the tool?". Based on the participants’ feedback, the E-waste recycling tool has received both positive and negative comments. Many participants appreciated the convenience of the tool, particularly its ease of use, accessibility, and ability to provide information about the proper disposal of e- waste. Some participants also praised the tool's ability to raise awareness about the importance of e-waste recycling and its potential positive impact on the environment. However, there were also negative comments about the tool, such as the limited number of items that can be recycled and the tool's effectiveness in reaching a wider audience. Despite the drawbacks, the overall positive feedback suggests that the tool is a step in the right direction towards promoting e-waste recycling and raising awareness about the issue.

Figure 13 : Some of answer for the question: "What challenges have you encountered when trying to recycle e-waste?". According to the participants’ comments, it seems that one of the major challenges faced when trying to recycle e-waste is the lack of awareness and knowledge on how to recycle properly. Delegates also mentioned the difficulty in finding e-waste recycling facilities, especially in rural areas, and also mentioned the difficulty in finding places to put the e-waste recycling tool. Additionally, some participants reported challenges related to recycling and shipping costs, making it a less viable option. It is clear that there are still some significant challenges in the e-waste recycling process and it is important to address them to encourage and enable more people to participate in e-waste recycling.