


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
MATH 3339, Spring 2025, Final Review
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



b. Reject H 0 at
c. two-sided t test vs. one-sided t test.
p-value)
a. np=2, too small b. since np and n(1-p) must each be at least 10, we will need 500 parts to sample c. Fail to reject H 0 at
Fail to reject the null hypothesis. (this is a two sided proportions test, the test statistic is 0.3333 which does not fall in the rejection region for 1% significance)
Reject H 0 at
(two sample z test since we have population sd) test statistic is z=-7.28 => Reject the null and conclude there is a difference in the means.
-0.
1537
matched pairs t-test. Reject the null hypothesis
a. success/fail, same prob for success, independent trials b. dbinom(4,6,.9)=0. c. pbinom(2,6,.9)=0. d. 1-pbinom(4,6,.9)=0.885735 (remember, this is discrete data)
for , based on p-value given for data, reject the null at 5%
98
b. b = 1.158 t *^ = 1.860 SE (^) b =.
This means that I am 90% confident the true slope of the LSRL of math and verbal scores on the SAT will lie in this interval. OR: I am 90% confident that for every 1 point increase in math SAT score, the average increase in verbal SAT score will be between .846 and 1.467. c.
Conclusion: Based on 5% significance level, I will reject the null hypothesis which states that there is no linear relationship between math and verbal scores on the SAT.
b. On average, for each 1 point increase in the problem solving sub score, the was an increase of 4.0162 points in the total score. c. R 2 indicates that 62% of the variation in total scores can be explained by the LSRL of total scores on problem solving sub score. d.
e. All assumptions check.
Based on 5% significance level I will reject the null hypothesis which states that there is no linear relationship between problem solving sub scores and total scores on the exam.