Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


comparative, Apuntes de Derecho Comparado

Asignatura: Comparative Introduction to legal systems, Profesor: nuria camps, Carrera: Dret, Universidad: UdL

Tipo: Apuntes

2012/2013

Subido el 07/09/2013

ariiiadnaaa
ariiiadnaaa 🇪🇸

4.5

(6)

9 documentos

1 / 32

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Comparative Criminal Law
Universitat de Lleida 2011
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga comparative y más Apuntes en PDF de Derecho Comparado solo en Docsity!

Comparative Criminal Law

Universitat de Lleida 2011

Comparative Law

  • (^) Diachronic comparison: between different times (history of law)
  • (^) Diatopic comparison: between different spaces (strictly Comparative Law)
  • (^) To compare is a main methode to understand, to analyse, to value and to criticise. The existence of alternative rules suggest that the existing rule is not the only imaginable: alternatives are possible and even can be better.

First approaches

  • (^) A.v. Feuerbach: Essay on Islamic law (1800).
    • Early attempt at legal anthropology
    • Enlightenment spirit
    • Interest in the exotic world of Muslim culture
    • Comparative method as part of his rejection of traditional natural law (deduction of principles of justice from reason alone)
  • (^) Imperialist approach to CCL: Superiority of German substantive CL as a matter of scientific progress

Legal traditions

  • (^) Common law systems: USA, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and former British colonies
  • (^) Civil law systems (continental or roman- Germanic law): it is the most prevalent: rest of EU, Japan and Latin America
  • (^) Islamic systems (muslim justice)
  • (^) Socialist systems: China, Cuba

Common Law / Civil Law

  • (^) Parliamentary Law as the only source of Law
  • (^) Rationalism
  • (^) Rupture with the Ancien Régim (French Revolution)
  • (^) Sophisticated conceptual elaboration
  • (^) Inquisitorial process: judicial power to find the truth - (^) Plurality of sources: Judge-made Law and Statutory Law - (^) Utilitarism - (^) Evolution without rupture - (^) Solving-problems argumentation - (^) Adversarial process: fair competition and due process

Islamic systems

  • (^) The Koran is the first source of Law
  • (^) Theocracies: legal rule and religious rule go together
  • (^) Based on a concept of natural justice: crimes considered acts that offend religion
  • (^) Islamic law ( Sharia, the path to follow ) supplemented by interpretation of Koran, analogical reasoning and consensus of legal scholars
  • (^) Islamic Law is in some countries coexisting with civil law or common law

Continental Criminal Law:

codification

  • (^) Austrian Penal Code 1787
  • (^) French Revolution: Declaration of rights of the man and of the citizen (1789)
  • (^) Revolutionary Penal Code (1791)
  • (^) Austrian Penal Code 1803
  • (^) Penal Code of Napoleon 1810
  • (^) Bavarian Penal Code 1813
  • (^) First Spanish Penal Code 1822

Other European Penal Codes

  • (^) Germany: Penal Code of the Reich 1871. Reform of 1933. Reform of 1962/1975.
  • (^) Italy: Codice Zanardelli 1889 and Codice Rocco 1930.
  • (^) Sweden: PC 1864 / PC 1965 /reform 1988
  • (^) Netherlands: 1811 French PC / PC1881 /

Latin American countries

  • (^) Spanish influence in first codification process (some of them still in force: PC Chile 1857)
  • (^) Modern penal codes, inspired in German and Spanish doctrine and a comittment with international criminal law: Colombia 2000, El Salvador 1996, Argentina 1984
  • (^) North American influence in Procedural law reform towards adversarial system (Chile 2000, Colombia 2002)
  • (^) A federal criminal system: Mexico. Penal Codes of the 32 States and a Federal PC that describes federal crimes.

Fields in CL

  • Substantive criminal law: General part: principles of liability Special part: specific offense definitions
  • (^) Law of sanctions and execution
  • Criminal procedure

Punishment Theory

  • (^) Rationales of punishment: Retribution General deterrence Positive general prevention Special deterrence Rehabilitation Incapacitation Reparation / Restoration

Victims

  • (^) Rediscovery of victims’ needs and victim’s rights
  • (^) In USA assotiated with punitive demands, incapacitation and law and order
  • (^) In other countries: less punitive approach. Victim assistance, restorative justice and victim-offender mediation programs

Principle of Legality

  • (^) US law: PL vaguely associated with the prohibition of ex post facto (not only criminal laws) and vague criminal laws (the latter, derived from the general due process guarantee)
  • (^) Continental CL: Nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege. Judges don’t make law, but merely apply it. Prohibition of analogy
  • (^) A-A CL: Judicial criminal lawmaking not abolished, but faded away. Emerging Statutory law (UK). Sentencing guidelines (USA)
  • (^) Continental CL: Broad place to interpretation of law. Authority of CL science: sophisticated intellectual creation of unelected experts or guarantee of rationality of the decision?

…Legality

  • (^) Procedural dimension: discretionary power of prosecution (A-A CL) v. necessity of prosecution (exception, appropiateness principle). Guidelines: a soft control.
  • (^) Prohibition of retroactivity is a common feature in both legal systems.