

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Asignatura: Ficcion Contemporanea en Reino Unido, Profesor: Eduardo Valls, Carrera: Estudios Ingleses, Universidad: UCM
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 2
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!


Background information. Period contained between 1990 until 2001
Ideologies : capitalism (conservative and social democracy) vs. communism
Marx Power struggle 1945 1990 2001
1850’s History has been told neo-liberalism
Inspired by: in dialectical closure
Hegel
Darwin
H. Spencer
Schopenhauer
When communism proved to be a failure, all countries turned to capitalism. Capitalism ended the war of ideologies. We don’t talk anymore about individuals, but about consumers. The consumer is a co-modified individual. We don’t talk about individuals against society but about consumers.
In England in 1997, Tony Blair accepted neo-liberalism and he empowered the social services from the states. It has begun the era of technocracy. At the end of the 90’s it begun to take place a “millennium anxiety”. Millennium anxiety can be defined as the fear of the individual that he doesn’t know who he/she is. The reality becomes unpredictable. People fear and wonder which the nature of the humankind is.
Analysis
Joe and Clarissa lack of individuality. They are not individuals but consumers. At the beginning of the book we get to know the name of the wine because they are defined by what they consume. It’s an expensive wine. They are standardized individuals. We get to know the name of the wine before his name because Joe is part of the world of consumption.
At the beginning, Joe and Clarissa have a peaceful life. Joe claims that they live comfortable but with a small scare. It is a social disease which is called paranoia. He claims that the fear is unsubstantiated but still he fears. He also claims that they have a “free and intimate existence”. He has the sensation that intimacy means freedom. It is paradoxical because there is no freedom if there are worried. He defines a limited space. There’s lack of individuality because they could be anyone in the world. They define in comparison to the others.
He calls his life until that point of the accident an “idiocy” 2. The idiocy is to lock himself in his life and ignoring the other possibilities. Life offers lot of other possibilities such as people dying in a bloody way. What they had before was a comfortable, ritualistic life. By doing rituals they feel comfortable. They accept the limits and experience very little. The repetition (^4) Idea of technocracy
of things embodies the entire novel. After the accident, they tell they tell the story to their friends: “Within half an hour we were sitting with our friends Tony and Anna Bruce, eating a Thai takeaway I had ordered and telling our story.” Shock defines you for a second. You’re defined by the shock because you tell it. Now we’re suffering but suffering will disappear.
Then Joe makes a mistake 3. Joe answers Perry’s call but he doesn’t tell Clarissa who he was.
Joe feels scared by the fact that Jed says that he knows how he feels. By knowing what Joe is feeling, Jed has control over Joe. And Joe does the same thing as Jed because he’s assuming. He’s assuming that Clarissa needs protection but does she really need that?
There are three discourses in the novel:
Joe Science
Clarissa Literature (love)
Jed Religion
Clarissa: if we cannot find meanings to things, we cannot feel guilty so we can love each other.
The discourses of religion and science are based on truth.
Jed feels like he’s receiving a message. There is synchronicity: perceiving two phenomena and thinking that they are linked and that they generate significance. A is consequence of B, B is significance of A and B generates significance. In other words, Jed thinks that everything that has happened to him in the past led him to meet Joe.
Joe feels guilty. He feels that Logan “died for nothing”. You feel guilty in order to relate to the world. But are there any limits? If everyone feels guilty for what’s happening in the world where do we put the limits? By being responsible you take control of things. Assigning meanings to things means that you’re taking control of them and Joe has no control of things. He keeps life within the limits. When we cannot relate to the things that are happening in the world we feel guilty.
Whereas Joe tries to explain the situation by scientific terms, Clarissa introduces the notion of love. Joe doesn’t understand how love enters in the equation. Joe and Clarissa are two human beings that need meaning and they are searching for it. The scientific discourse is dominant in our era 4. It is the easiest discourse to disapprove because it always come new observations. Joe is attached to the language of science and this is why he can’t give one single meaning. Joe feels guilty but Clarissa wants to make love. Clarissa wants to go on with life. Things happen, people die.
(^4) Idea of technocracy