Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Discourse analysis capitolo 1, Dispense di Lingua Inglese

Riassunto del primo capitolo del libro Discourse analysis

Tipologia: Dispense

2022/2023

Caricato il 12/11/2023

madalina-sandu
madalina-sandu 🇮🇹

17 documenti

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
A1. WHAT IS DISCOURSE ANALYSIS?
It’s the scientific study of language.
DA focuses on how people use language in real life to do things like joke
and argue and persuade and flirt, and to show what kind of people they
are.
Discourse analysis study the ways sentences and utterances go together
to make texts and interactions and how those texts and interactions fit
into our social world.
DA is based on four assumptions: (assunti)
1. Language is ambiguous. What things means is never absolutely clear. All
communication involves interpreting what other people mean and what
they are trying to do.
2. Language is always “in the world” (context).
3. The way we use language is inseparable from who we are and the
different social groups to which we belong.
4. Language is never used by itself (never isolated = can’t focus on a single
text/sentence). It is always combined with other things such as our tone
of voice, facial expressions, and gestures when we speak, and the fonts,
layout and graphics we use in written texts. What language means and
what we can do with it is often a matter of how it is combined with these
other things.
THE AMBIGUITY OF LANGUAGE
Nearly all communication contains some elements of meaning that are not
expressed directly by the words that are spoken or written. (you want to borrow
a pen but you ask instead ‘do you have a pen?’ – in order to understand this
question as a request, the other person needs to undertake a process of
‘figuring out’ what you meant, a process which in this case may be largely
unconscious and automatic, but which is, all the same, a process of
interpretation.
-People don’t always say what they mean, and people don’t always mean
what they say.
-Language is an imperfect tool for the precise expression of many things
we think and feel. (Sometimes language is not enough)
-We mean to communicate more than just one thing.
LANGUAGE IN THE WORLD
One of the most important ways we understand what people mean when
they communicate is by referring to the social context within which they
are speaking or writing. The meaning of an utterance can change
dramatically depending on who is saying it, when and where it is said,
and to whom it is said.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Discourse analysis capitolo 1 e più Dispense in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

A1. WHAT IS DISCOURSE ANALYSIS?

 It’s the scientific study of language.  DA focuses on how people use language in real life to do things like joke and argue and persuade and flirt, and to show what kind of people they are.  Discourse analysis study the ways sentences and utterances go together to make texts and interactions and how those texts and interactions fit into our social world. DA is based on four assumptions: (assunti)

  1. Language is ambiguous. What things means is never absolutely clear. All communication involves interpreting what other people mean and what they are trying to do.
  2. Language is always “in the world” (context).
  3. The way we use language is inseparable from who we are and the different social groups to which we belong.
  4. Language is never used by itself (never isolated = can’t focus on a single text/sentence). It is always combined with other things such as our tone of voice, facial expressions, and gestures when we speak, and the fonts, layout and graphics we use in written texts. What language means and what we can do with it is often a matter of how it is combined with these other things. THE AMBIGUITY OF LANGUAGE Nearly all communication contains some elements of meaning that are not expressed directly by the words that are spoken or written. (you want to borrow a pen but you ask instead ‘do you have a pen?’ – in order to understand this question as a request, the other person needs to undertake a process of ‘figuring out’ what you meant, a process which in this case may be largely unconscious and automatic, but which is, all the same, a process of interpretation.
  • People don’t always say what they mean, and people don’t always mean what they say.
  • Language is an imperfect tool for the precise expression of many things we think and feel. (Sometimes language is not enough)
  • We mean to communicate more than just one thing. LANGUAGE IN THE WORLD  One of the most important ways we understand what people mean when they communicate is by referring to the social context within which they are speaking or writing. The meaning of an utterance can change dramatically depending on who is saying it, when and where it is said, and to whom it is said.

When we speak of discourse, we are always speaking of language that is in some way situated. Language is always situated in at least four ways:

  1. Within the material world and where we encounter it (shop, textbook, website) will contribute to the way we interpret it.
  2. Within relationships (in order to understand what people mean is by referring to who they are, how well we know them and whether or not they have some kind of power over us).
  3. In history (in relation to what happened before and what we expect to happen afterwards). In relation to other language (utterances and texts always respond to or refer to other utterances and texts: everything that we say or write is situated in a kind of network of discourse) LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL IDENTITY People are also situated by discourse, they enact identities (demonstrate who they are and what their relationships is to other people) through discourse. Identities are multiple and fluid (they change according to situations) TEXT: whatever conveys a meaning as a whole, units of meaning. It is not limited to the written language, it uses visual and verbal elements, which integrate to make a unique meaning. There is a principle of integration in a multimodal text. …. Raymond Carver Language and other modes  Language is combined with other communicative modes that contribute to the meaning making process. (like fashion, gestures, and the handling of various kinds of objects) Consider: body movements, face expressions, dress code… Partially because of its roots in linguistics, discourse analysts used to focus almost exclusively on written or spoken language. Now, people are increasingly realizing not just that we communicate in a lot of ways that do not involve language, but that in order to understand what people mean when they use language, we need to pay attention to the way it is combined with these other communicative modes. The 5 modes of communication:
  1. Linguistic
  2. Visual
  3. Aural (ears) --- Oral (mouth)
  4. Gestural

A formal approach of discourse analysis focuses on how different elements of texts are put together to form unified wholes. We usually look for two kinds of things:

  1. COHESION – linguistic features (words and grammar) that help to link different parts of the text together.
  2. COHERENCE – the overall pattern of a text that conform to our expectations about how different kinds of texts ought to be structured. LANGUAGE IN USE The second aspect of discourse that discourse analysts focus on is how people actually use language to get things done in specific contexts. It is often very difficult to understand what a piece of language means without referring to the social context in which it is being used and what the person who is using it is trying to do.  M.A.K. Halliday (Systemic Functional Grammar) focused less on the forms language takes and more on the social functions accomplished by language and the work of Austin and Grice who laid the foundation for what we call pragmatics (the study of how people do things with language). Language has three linguistic metafunctions:
    1. Ideational
    2. Interpersonal (concerned with the relation we create through language)
    3. Textual (how you create texts) Another important figure is H.G. Widdowson, who approached the whole problem of language use from the perspective of language learning, nothing that learning a foreign language requires more than just learning how to make grammatical sentences; it also involves being able to use the language to accomplish things in the world. There are several ways to study language in use.
    1. One way is to consider discourse itself as a kind of action, and to explore how, when we say things or write things, we are actually doing things like apologizing, promising, threatening or making requests.
    2. Another way to consider language in use is to explore the role of discourse make certain kinds of actions or activities either easier or more difficult to perform.
    3. Finally, we might consider how people use discourse strategically to try to communicate their interpretation of a situation or to manage their relationships with the people with whom they are communicating.  William Labov (Sociolinguistics) variation in language use serve to mark people belonging to different communities of speakers.

People do things with language – language as social action.  The objective of this approach is to understand how sentences/utterances are put together to perform coherent communicative actions.  People use language to communicate who they are and what they are doing. Verbal or nonverbal elements can signal what we are doing (e.g., joking, discussing, etc.) and how we feel about them. LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PRACTICE The third aspect of discourse has to do with the role of language in ‘social practice’.  Language is not simply a system for making meaning but is part of larger systems through which people construct social identities and social realities.  Different people use language in different ways which show who we are and also reflect our different ideas about the world, different beliefs and different values.  The use of language reflects worldviews, values, beliefs…  Michel Foucault argued that discourse is the main tool through which we construct knowledge and exert power over other people. Different kinds of discourses are associated with different kinds of people and different systems of knowledge, e.g., economic discourse, psychiatric discourse…  For the American discourse analyst James Paul Gee discourses are ways of being in the world, or forms of life that integrate words, acts, values, beliefs, attitudes, social identities.  This aspect of discourse leads us to explore how people use language to advance certain versions of reality and certain relationships of power, and also how our beliefs, values and social institutions are constructed through and supported by discourse. A central principle of this view of discourse is that discourse is always ‘ideological’, meaning that discourse always has ‘an agenda’, that it always ends up serving the interests of certain people over those of others. C1. DOING DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: FIRST STEPS There are basically three different ways of looking at discourse:

  • Discourse as language beyond the clause
  • Discourse as language in use
  • Discourse as social practice Each of the three different ways of looking at discourse can lead us to ask different kinds of questions about the texts and interactions that we encounter in our social lives. What makes this text or a conversation a text or conversation rather than just a random collection of sentences or utterances?