Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Discourse analysis capitolo 5, Dispense di Lingua Inglese

Riassunto del quinto capitolo del libro Discourse analysis

Tipologia: Dispense

2022/2023

Caricato il 12/11/2023

madalina-sandu
madalina-sandu 🇮🇹

17 documenti

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
A5. SPOKEN DISCOURSE
In many ways, speech is not so different from writing. When people speak they
also produce different kinds of genres (casual conversations, debates, lectures
and speeches of various kinds) and use different kinds of ‘social languages’.
They also promote particular versions of reality or ideologies.
But there are some ways in which speech is very different from writing:
1) Speech is more interactive: you speak to someone and receive feedbacks
which allows you to reformulate what you said. Conversations are always
co-constructed between or among the different parties having them.
2) Speech tends to be more transient and spontaneous than writing, we
can’t track back what we say, it is a fluid continuity of words as a result
of the interaction, and you can omit elements. When we write, we often
plan what we are going to write carefully, and we often read over, revise
and edit what we have written before showing it to other people. Because
writing has a certain ‘permanence’, people can also read what we have
written more carefully. On the other hand, casual conversation is just
made up as we go along, and our words disappear the moment we utter
them. This makes listening in some ways more challenging than reading.
3) Spoken discourse is less explicit than written discourse (writing: you
must specify a lot of things because who you address to doesn’t share
the same context as you). When we are speaking, we communicate with
our gaze, our gestures, our facial expressions and the tone of our voice.
When we are writing we do not have these tools and we often need to
depend more on the words themselves to express our meaning. Speech
also usually takes place in some kind of physical context which
participants share, and often the meaning of what we say is dependent
on this context.
People engaged in:
Telephone conversations (no visual feedback/gestures/facial expressions
to convey meaning) – skype calls (visual, share the context, facial
expressions which convey information about the speaker, multimodal
aspect)
Texting through FB or Messenger (mix between spoken and written
discourse, informal and everyday language)
Vocal messages
Spoken discourse is normally less explicit and more context dependent than
written discourse.
Interpreting what people mean
To interpret what people mean needs to go beyond the literal meanings of the
words.
Quite often in conversation people do not mean what they say and people do
not say what they mean.
pf2

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Discourse analysis capitolo 5 e più Dispense in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

A5. SPOKEN DISCOURSE

In many ways, speech is not so different from writing. When people speak they also produce different kinds of genres (casual conversations, debates, lectures and speeches of various kinds) and use different kinds of ‘social languages’. They also promote particular versions of reality or ideologies. But there are some ways in which speech is very different from writing:

  1. Speech is more interactive: you speak to someone and receive feedbacks which allows you to reformulate what you said. Conversations are always co-constructed between or among the different parties having them.
  2. Speech tends to be more transient and spontaneous than writing, we can’t track back what we say, it is a fluid continuity of words as a result of the interaction, and you can omit elements. When we write, we often plan what we are going to write carefully, and we often read over, revise and edit what we have written before showing it to other people. Because writing has a certain ‘permanence’, people can also read what we have written more carefully. On the other hand, casual conversation is just made up as we go along, and our words disappear the moment we utter them. This makes listening in some ways more challenging than reading.
  3. Spoken discourse is less explicit than written discourse (writing: you must specify a lot of things because who you address to doesn’t share the same context as you). When we are speaking, we communicate with our gaze, our gestures, our facial expressions and the tone of our voice. When we are writing we do not have these tools and we often need to depend more on the words themselves to express our meaning. Speech also usually takes place in some kind of physical context which participants share, and often the meaning of what we say is dependent on this context. People engaged in: Telephone conversations (no visual feedback/gestures/facial expressions to convey meaning) – skype calls (visual, share the context, facial expressions which convey information about the speaker, multimodal aspect) Texting through FB or Messenger (mix between spoken and written discourse, informal and everyday language) Vocal messages Spoken discourse is normally less explicit and more context dependent than written discourse. Interpreting what people mean To interpret what people mean needs to go beyond the literal meanings of the words. Quite often in conversation people do not mean what they say and people do not say what they mean.

Two analytical traditions help us make sense of conversations:

  • PRAGMATICS
  • CONVERSATION ANALYSIS (methods) PRAGMATICS Pragmatics (rooted in philosophy of language) is the study of how people use words to accomplish actions in their conversations, e.g., requesting, threatening, apologising. It helps us figure out what actions other people are trying to take with their words and respond appropriately. It has its roots in the work of three philosophers of language: Herbert Paul Grice, John Austin, John Searle. Pragmatics tends to approach the problem as a matter of logic, asking what conditions are necessary for a participant in a conversation to logically conclude that a given utterance has a certain meaning = pragmatic force. CONVERSATION ANALYSIS Conversation analysis (rooted in sociology – ethnomethodology) focuses on the methods ordinary members of a society use to interact with one another and interpret their experiences. It was developed by three sociologists: Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson and studies the procedural rules that people use to cooperatively manage conversations and figure out what other people mean. According to this approach, people make sense of what other people say not by figuring it our logically but paying attention to the local conditions of the conversation itself, especially the sequence of utterances.