



Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Riassunto del secondo capitolo del libro Discourse analysis
Tipologia: Dispense
1 / 7
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!




According to the linguistic Halliday, meaning is the most important thing that makes a text a text. It has to make sense. A text, in his view, is everything that is meaningful in a particular situation. And the basis for meaning is choice. Whenever I choose one thing rather than another from a set of alternatives, I’m making meaning. Texts are not only written: can be oral and written. Can also involve other elements, linguistics, and verbal. Word, colour, and context TEXTS VS RANDOM COLLECTIONS OF SENTENCES
communicative purposes. (COMMON KNOWLEDGE = the knowledge you share with other people in society).
We sometimes need to apply our experience with past texts and with certain conventions that have grown up in our society in order to understand new texts we encounter. We have expectations about the way elements in a text ought to be organized. There are a number of different kinds of interpretative frameworks that we use to make sense of texts. One kind is: GENERIC FRAMEWORK is based on the expectations we have about the kinds of information that we expect to encounter in texts of different kinds and the order in which we expect the information to be presented, along with other types of lexical and grammatical features we expect to encounter. Part of what forms such generic frameworks is that different parts of a text are not just lexically and grammatically related, but they have also conceptually and procedurally related – they appear in a certain logical and predictable sequence. Texts following the ‘Problem-Solution’ pattern, for example, begin by presenting a problem and then go on to present one or more solutions to the problem. This important principle in discourse analysis has its origins largely in cognitive science and early research in artificial intelligence by people like Schank and Abelson (1977), who pointed out that many human activities are governed by conventional, sequentially ordered, multi-step procedures (which they called ‘scripts’), and Rumelhart, (1975), who pointed out that, in a similar way, texts like narratives also exhibit conventional structures based on predictable sequences of actions and information (which he called ‘schema’). William Labov argued that stories have a predictable pattern:
system comprising three levels of coding, or ‘strata’: the semantic (meanings), the lexicogrammatical (forms) and the phonological and orthographic (expressions).