



Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Riassunto del quarto capitolo del libro Discourse analysis
Tipologia: Dispense
1 / 7
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!




According to Bakhtin, all texts involve some degree of intertextuality. We cannot speak or write without borrowing the words and ideas of another people, and nearly everything we say or write is in some way a response to some previous utterance or text and an anticipation of some future one. When we appropriate the words and ideas of others in our texts and utterances, we almost always communicate how we think about those words (and people) in the way we represent them. We might:
Authors also construct versions of reality by creating a certain type of relationships between the producers of texts and those who read them through the resource of modality or through the use of particular styles or registers. Authors create versions of reality through which they construct their circumstances in which these processes are taking place and these relationships are being formed. Circumstances are expressed through circumstantial adjuncts that tell the readers when, where, how or why an action is taking place. To really understand how people actually interpret texts, or, for that matter, how ideologies end up finding their way into texts in the first place, it is necessary to go beyond texts themselves and analyse both discourse practices (the practices authors engage in when creating texts and the practices readers engage in when interpreting them) and social practices (the activities, norms and social relationships that make up readers’ social worlds. “Images are being monitored and recorded for the safety of our customers and colleagues and to detect crime. Sainsbury’s will prosecute shoplifters and use the civil recovery scheme to recover.” Connection with a particular place and a particular group of people conveys the ideological stance behind a text. Written in Spanish in a place in which illegal border crossing occurs. It’s not a friendly advice but a warning to those who have entered illegally the US that they will face consequences. Indexical meaning of texts: Something in the text links to a system of values/beliefs. An index is a kind of sign that points to some aspects of the context. Some words are always depending on the context for their meaning. E.g. this bus, you, this. Deictic expressions are those words or phrases that refer to something that exists in the context in which a text occurs. Indexical meaning is created not only through connections with the physical world but also through the connections that are made with the broader social and cultural context of texts. INDEXICAL ORDER One of the most important uses of indexicality is that it allows people to invoke certain cultural models or stereotypes very efficiently without having to spell them out.
takes the position of the speaker or writer and the other takes the position of the listener or reader. Processes involving thinking and feeling usually link participants to ideas or emotions. Participants can also be linked in various ways that show their relationship with each other: they might be portrayed as equal or equivalent with linking verbs (like ‘to be’ or ‘to seem’); one participant might be portrayed as possessing another (with words like ‘to have’ or ‘to contain’); and participants might be linked to each other in other kinds of relationship like cause and effect (with words like ‘to cause’, ‘to lead to’, or ‘to result in’). Finally, processes themselves can sometimes be transformed into participants and linked to other participants or other processes. Turning a process into a participant is know as nominalization and is often a characteristic of technical or academic texts.