Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Discourse analysis capitolo 4, Dispense di Lingua Inglese

Riassunto del quarto capitolo del libro Discourse analysis

Tipologia: Dispense

2022/2023

Caricato il 12/11/2023

madalina-sandu
madalina-sandu 🇮🇹

17 documenti

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
A4. DISCOURSE AND IDEOLOGY
-Texts promote certain points of view or ideologies; at the same time,
they construct them and reinforce them. We can be attracted, it is a
promotional aspect
1) Authors (any person) create versions of reality based on their choice
and combination of words, it’s not reality but how they/we perceive
reality, their own version through the words they choose.
The choice of words creates a version of reality, everyone tells a different
story. (Reading news on different newspapers)
2) Authors construct certain relationships between themselves and their
readers.
3) Authors represent the words of other people and position themselves
in relation to those words (and those people): summarise what people
say
4) Author index and invoke larger concepts, systems of social
organization or relationships of power and, by doing so, reinforce
these concepts, systems, and relationships.
Our words are never neutral: words always represent the world in a
certain way and create certain relationship with the people with whom
we are communicating.
TEXTS PROMOTE A PARTICULAR IDEOLOGY
An ideology is a specific set of beliefs and assumptions people have about
such things as what is good and bad, what is right and wrong, what is
normal and abnormal.
Ideologies provide us with MODELS: of behaviour that we follow, apply
(cultural models) to fit in a society. Ideologies help to create a shared
worldview and sense of purpose among people in a particular group. On the
other hand, ideologies also limit the way we look at reality and tend to
marginalize or exclude altogether people, things and ideas that do not fit
into these models.
LIMITS: or limitations that a model can create.
All texts, somehow, involve these systems of inclusion and exclusion.
(fill out a form: indicate married/single; this question reinforce the idea that
your marital status is an important aspect of your identity)
MARGINALIZATION: who doesn’t share the same models, or your cultural
models is marginalized and considered wrong. So, ideologies can create
exclusion for those who doesn’t share them.
The linguistic Michael Halliday pointed out that whenever we use language we
are always doing three things at once:
1. We represent the world – IDEATIONAL FUNCTION of language.
2. We create, ratify, negotiate our relationships with whom we are
communicating – INTERPERSONAL FUNCTION of language.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Discourse analysis capitolo 4 e più Dispense in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

A4. DISCOURSE AND IDEOLOGY

  • Texts promote certain points of view or ideologies; at the same time, they construct them and reinforce them. We can be attracted, it is a promotional aspect
    1. Authors (any person) create versions of reality based on their choice and combination of words, it’s not reality but how they/we perceive reality, their own version through the words they choose. The choice of words creates a version of reality, everyone tells a different story. (Reading news on different newspapers)
    2. Authors construct certain relationships between themselves and their readers.
    3. Authors represent the words of other people and position themselves in relation to those words (and those people): summarise what people say
    4. Author index and invoke larger concepts, systems of social organization or relationships of power and, by doing so, reinforce these concepts, systems, and relationships. Our words are never neutral: words always represent the world in a certain way and create certain relationship with the people with whom we are communicating. TEXTS PROMOTE A PARTICULAR IDEOLOGY An ideology is a specific set of beliefs and assumptions people have about such things as what is good and bad, what is right and wrong, what is normal and abnormal. Ideologies provide us with MODELS: of behaviour that we follow, apply (cultural models) to fit in a society. Ideologies help to create a shared worldview and sense of purpose among people in a particular group. On the other hand, ideologies also limit the way we look at reality and tend to marginalize or exclude altogether people, things and ideas that do not fit into these models. LIMITS: or limitations that a model can create. All texts, somehow, involve these systems of inclusion and exclusion. (fill out a form: indicate married/single; this question reinforce the idea that your marital status is an important aspect of your identity) MARGINALIZATION: who doesn’t share the same models, or your cultural models is marginalized and considered wrong. So, ideologies can create exclusion for those who doesn’t share them. The linguistic Michael Halliday pointed out that whenever we use language we are always doing three things at once:
  1. We represent the world – IDEATIONAL FUNCTION of language.
  2. We create, ratify, negotiate our relationships with whom we are communicating – INTERPERSONAL FUNCTION of language.
  1. We join sentences and ideas together in particular ways to create cohesive and coherent texts – TEXTUAL FUNCTION of language. According to Halliday, we represent the world through language by choosing words that represent people, things or concepts (participants) and words about these participants are doing to, with or for one another (processes). All texts contain participants and processes. James Paul Gee calls them ‘whos doing whats’. DO WE REPRESENT OR CONSTRUCT REALITY THROUGH OUR WORDS/CHOICES? CHOICE is fundamental for ideology; it conveys a different aspect and viewpoint. SOCIAL FUNCTION OF LANGUAGE is implied; it creates relationships. Language is not isolated but it is use in society. Processes always construct a certain type of relationship between participants. Halliday calls this relationship TRANSITIVITY. In terms of ideology, it is important to consider which participants are portrayed as performing actions and which are portrayed as having action performed to or for them. “You may now kiss the bride” The process is the kiss, and the participants are “you and the bride” The actor in processes is called agent and his/her ability to ‘take charge’ of the process is called agency. “You may now kiss each other” Halliday identifies different kind of processes, which involved any kind of physical and material actions. PROCESSES AND PARTICIPANTS: processes link participants in different ways
  1. Processes involving some kind of physical action link participants in ways in which someone is portrayed as doing something to or for the other – ACTION PROCESSES
  2. Processes involving saying or writing often link participants so as one participant takes the position of the speaker/writer and the other takes the position of listener/reader – VERBAL PROCESSES
  3. Processes involving thinking of feeling link participants to ideas or emotions in various ways – MENTAL PROCESSES

According to Bakhtin, all texts involve some degree of intertextuality. We cannot speak or write without borrowing the words and ideas of another people, and nearly everything we say or write is in some way a response to some previous utterance or text and an anticipation of some future one. When we appropriate the words and ideas of others in our texts and utterances, we almost always communicate how we think about those words (and people) in the way we represent them. We might:

  1. Quote them – effect to validate the words of the other person by implying that what they say is so important and profound that needs to be repeated word for word – at the same time quotes create distance.
  2. Paraphrase them – sometimes a mix of quote and paraphrase is used, only quoting single words.
  3. Use indirect reference – words and ideas of other people are not directly asserted by indirectly presumed in texts. Presuppositions are implicit assumptions about background beliefs that are presented as taken-for- granted facts. Intertextuality does not just involve mixing other people’s words with ours. It can also involve mixing genres and social languages. DIFFERENT FORMS OF DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION
  4. DIRECT QUOTATION: according to the Surgeon General ‘smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States’.
  5. PARAPHRASE: the Surgeon General has determined that cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health.
  6. SELECTIVE QUOTATION: the Surgeon General has long warned that smoking is ‘dangerous’.
  7. ASSERTION: smoking kills.
  8. PRESUPPOSITION: the purpose of the legislation is to reduce the harms caused by tobacco. B4. CONSTRUCTING REALITY – Participants and Processes Authors of texts promote ideology by constructing versions of reality in which certain types of participants, and those who are included are linked to each other in certain relationships, often based on the actions (processes) they are portrayed as engaging in. These actions are called processes and different kinds of processes link participant in different ways. Processes themselves can sometimes be transformed into participants and linked to other participants or other processes. Turning a process into a participant is known as nominalization and is often a characteristic of technical or academic texts.

Authors also construct versions of reality by creating a certain type of relationships between the producers of texts and those who read them through the resource of modality or through the use of particular styles or registers. Authors create versions of reality through which they construct their circumstances in which these processes are taking place and these relationships are being formed. Circumstances are expressed through circumstantial adjuncts that tell the readers when, where, how or why an action is taking place. To really understand how people actually interpret texts, or, for that matter, how ideologies end up finding their way into texts in the first place, it is necessary to go beyond texts themselves and analyse both discourse practices (the practices authors engage in when creating texts and the practices readers engage in when interpreting them) and social practices (the activities, norms and social relationships that make up readers’ social worlds. “Images are being monitored and recorded for the safety of our customers and colleagues and to detect crime. Sainsbury’s will prosecute shoplifters and use the civil recovery scheme to recover.” Connection with a particular place and a particular group of people conveys the ideological stance behind a text. Written in Spanish in a place in which illegal border crossing occurs. It’s not a friendly advice but a warning to those who have entered illegally the US that they will face consequences. Indexical meaning of texts: Something in the text links to a system of values/beliefs. An index is a kind of sign that points to some aspects of the context. Some words are always depending on the context for their meaning. E.g. this bus, you, this. Deictic expressions are those words or phrases that refer to something that exists in the context in which a text occurs. Indexical meaning is created not only through connections with the physical world but also through the connections that are made with the broader social and cultural context of texts. INDEXICAL ORDER One of the most important uses of indexicality is that it allows people to invoke certain cultural models or stereotypes very efficiently without having to spell them out.

takes the position of the speaker or writer and the other takes the position of the listener or reader. Processes involving thinking and feeling usually link participants to ideas or emotions. Participants can also be linked in various ways that show their relationship with each other: they might be portrayed as equal or equivalent with linking verbs (like ‘to be’ or ‘to seem’); one participant might be portrayed as possessing another (with words like ‘to have’ or ‘to contain’); and participants might be linked to each other in other kinds of relationship like cause and effect (with words like ‘to cause’, ‘to lead to’, or ‘to result in’). Finally, processes themselves can sometimes be transformed into participants and linked to other participants or other processes. Turning a process into a participant is know as nominalization and is often a characteristic of technical or academic texts.