Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


how to do a critical discourse analysis , Appunti di Lingua Inglese

Guida per analisi critica del discorso

Tipologia: Appunti

2016/2017
In offerta
30 Punti
Discount

Offerta a tempo limitato


Caricato il 07/01/2017

vale1091
vale1091 🇮🇹

4.7

(9)

4 documenti

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
HOW TO DO CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
CDA seeks to reveal buried ideology. The book presents a set of tools and show how they can be used to
analyse a wide range of media texts. It will also introduce a set of methods to analyse visual communication.
CDA has its origins in Critical Linguistics. It shows how language and grammar can be used as ideological
instruments.
The question of the power is at the core of CDA. The aim in CDA has been to reveal what kinds of social
relations of power are presented in text both explicitly and implicitly
According to Van Dijk , CDA studies implicit and indirect meanings in texts.
ANALYSING SEMIOTIC CHOICES (cap. 2)
WORD CONNOTATIONS: words that have a particular connotation. i.e. the words “family home” suggest
something safe, stable and common to all of us.
OVERLEXICALISATION: repetition of words that we can consider synonymous terms. It gives a sense of
over-persuasion. So, we can find overlexicalisation when there is an abundance of particular words
(excessive description) and their synonyms.
SUPPRESSION OR LEXICAL ABSENCE: words that we might expect but that are absent.
STRUCTURAL OPPOSITIONS: opposition of words: young-old, good-bad. Often only one of these may
be mentioned. It is not necessary that the text state who is good and bad or why this is, but the structural
oppositions indicate how the participants should be evaluated. Ex. (our boys, heroes for British commandos
– evil terrorists, fanatics for the Taliban)
LEXICAL CHOICES : we choose specific words rather than other words (mum instead of mother to be
more nostalgic)
VISUAL SEMIOTIC CHOICES.
ATTRIBUTES: we are concerned with the ideas and values communicated by objects of an image and how
they are represented. (ex. the computer in an image with a woman in her office suggests work where the
woman is tied to the desk- instead, a PC computer suggests mobility and independence)
SETTINGS: settings are used to communicate general ideas, to connote discourses and their values,
actions and identities. (ex. In the Cosmopolitan image – woman in her office- the woman is not really using
her computer. There is no evidence of any activity. The emptiness of the setting suggests the luxury of the
space. The setting serves to symbolize work rather than documenting it).
SALIENCE: when we use some elements to underline some aspects: we can achieve salience through
symbols that are potent cultural symbols, colour, focus, foregroundings (foregrounding creates importance),
overlapping (this is like foregrounding since it has the effect of placing elements in front of others)
PRESENTING SPEECH AND SPEAKERS (cap. 3)
QUOTING VERBS: describe the way in which people say something
Neutral : “say, tell, ask, enquire, reply, answer”
Metapropositional verbs: underline the interpretation:” declare, urge, grumbled, explain, agree,
announce, complain, claim, accuse, order, grumble”
Metalinguistic verbs: the kind of language used by a speaker: “narrate, recount”
1
pf3
pf4
Discount

In offerta

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica how to do a critical discourse analysis e più Appunti in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

HOW TO DO CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

CDA seeks to reveal buried ideology. The book presents a set of tools and show how they can be used to analyse a wide range of media texts. It will also introduce a set of methods to analyse visual communication. CDA has its origins in Critical Linguistics. It shows how language and grammar can be used as ideological instruments. The question of the power is at the core of CDA. The aim in CDA has been to reveal what kinds of social relations of power are presented in text both explicitly and implicitly According to Van Dijk , CDA studies implicit and indirect meanings in texts.

ANALYSING SEMIOTIC CHOICES (cap. 2) WORD CONNOTATIONS : words that have a particular connotation. i.e. the words “family home” suggest something safe, stable and common to all of us.

OVERLEXICALISATION: repetition of words that we can consider synonymous terms. It gives a sense of over-persuasion. So, we can find overlexicalisation when there is an abundance of particular words (excessive description) and their synonyms.

SUPPRESSION OR LEXICAL ABSENCE : words that we might expect but that are absent.

STRUCTURAL OPPOSITIONS : opposition of words: young-old, good-bad. Often only one of these may be mentioned. It is not necessary that the text state who is good and bad or why this is, but the structural oppositions indicate how the participants should be evaluated. Ex. (our boys, heroes for British commandos

  • evil terrorists, fanatics for the Taliban)

LEXICAL CHOICES : we choose specific words rather than other words (mum instead of mother to be more nostalgic)

VISUAL SEMIOTIC CHOICES. ATTRIBUTES : we are concerned with the ideas and values communicated by objects of an image and how they are represented. (ex. the computer in an image with a woman in her office suggests work where the woman is tied to the desk- instead, a PC computer suggests mobility and independence)

SETTINGS : settings are used to communicate general ideas , to connote discourses and their values, actions and identities. (ex. In the Cosmopolitan image – woman in her office- the woman is not really using her computer. There is no evidence of any activity. The emptiness of the setting suggests the luxury of the space. The setting serves to symbolize work rather than documenting it).

SALIENCE : when we use some elements to underline some aspects: we can achieve salience through symbols that are potent cultural symbols, colour, focus, foregroundings (foregrounding creates importance), overlapping (this is like foregrounding since it has the effect of placing elements in front of others)

PRESENTING SPEECH AND SPEAKERS (cap. 3) QUOTING VERBS : describe the way in which people say something

  • Neutral : “say, tell, ask, enquire, reply, answer”
  • Metapropositional verbs: underline the interpretation:” declare, urge, grumbled, explain, agree, announce, complain, claim, accuse, order, grumble”
  • Metalinguistic verbs: the kind of language used by a speaker: “narrate, recount”
  • Descriptive verbs: “cry, intone, shout, murmur, whisper, laugh” mark the manner and attitude of a speaker in relation to what is being said.
  • (^) Transcript verbs: underline the development of the discourse: “repeat, add, pause”.

Representing people.CLASSIFICATION OF SOCIAL ACTORS(cap.4) PERSONALISATION AND IMPERSONALISATION : Ex. “the university requires…”= impersonalisation, it is not a particular person but a whole institution.

INDIVIDUALISATION VS COLLECTIVISATION : participants can be described as individuals (ex. “two soldiers, John Smith and Jim Jones”=by being named, these soldiers are individualized- more empathy) or as part of a collectivity(ex. “militants were killed..”=militants are simply a generic group)

SPECIFICATION AND GENERICISATION : participants can be represented as specific individuals (ex: A man, Mazar Hussein…”) or as a generic type ( a Muslim man…)

NOMINATION OR FUNCTIONALISATION : participants can be nominated in terms of who they are (ex. George Bush) or functionalized by being depicted in terms of what they do (ex. the American president )

HONORIFICS: The way people are represented through what they do can also be achieved through the use of functional honorifics (ex. minister of foreigner affairs, Lord, Judge)

OBJECTIVISATION : participants are represented through a feature: (Ex. “Beauty” for a woman)

ANONYMISATION: participants can be anonymized (ex.” Some people believe…, a source said….”)

AGGREGATION : participants are quantified and treated as statistics (ex. “Many thousands of immigrants.”)

PRONOUN VS NOUN: THE “US” AND “THEM” DIVISION: pronouns like “us” “we” “them” are used to align us alongside or against particular ideas

SUPPRESSION : when the agent of the action is absent

TRANSITIVITY AND VERB PROCESSES(cap. 5) TRANSITIVITY: when an action is active or passive (ex: “three soldiers attacked a civilian yesterday” the actor element is the “three soldiers” who carry out the process of attacking, the goal is the” civilian” who has been attacked and the circumstance is “yesterday”. So in a transitivity analysis we have first to identidy the participants in a clause and then the process type. Halliday distinguishes six process types.

  • MATERIAL PROCESSES : describe processes of doing: (ex. “army attacked”, “he walked away”)
  • MENTAL PROCESSES : describe processes of sensing: and can be divided into 3 classes: 1. Cognition (verbs of thinking, understanding, knowing), 2. Affection(verbs of liking, disliking, fearing), 3. Perception (verbs of seeing, hearing or perceiving)
  • BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES : denote psychological or physical behavior (ex. watch, taste, stare, dream, breathe, smile, laugh)
  • VERBAL PROCESSES: when we use “to say “ or its synonyms
  • RELATIONAL PROCESSES: encode meanings about states of being, where things are stated to exist in relation to other things, underline the relationship: (ex. Be, become, mean, define, symbolize, represent, stand for, refer to, mark, exemplify, have)
  • Episteme modality : express the level of certainty. Epistemic modals show how certain you are something will happen (I will probably have a beer tonight)
  • (^) Deontic modality : express obligation. Deontic modals are about how we compel and instruct others (“students must do the essay”)
  • Dynamic modality : this is related to possibility and ability (“tomorrow I will go to the dentist”, “I can do this essay”) Modals are used to communicate the power of the agent (“ you will come with me”)= the speaker has the power to state what will happen

HEDGING: when we create a strategic ambiguity to avoid taking a position.(“ Some people said that multiculturalism is outmoded..”). these structures aloow the author to “dress up”(travestire) the sentence= “I think multiculturalism is outmoded..”)