


Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Guida per analisi critica del discorso
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 4
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!



In offerta
CDA seeks to reveal buried ideology. The book presents a set of tools and show how they can be used to analyse a wide range of media texts. It will also introduce a set of methods to analyse visual communication. CDA has its origins in Critical Linguistics. It shows how language and grammar can be used as ideological instruments. The question of the power is at the core of CDA. The aim in CDA has been to reveal what kinds of social relations of power are presented in text both explicitly and implicitly According to Van Dijk , CDA studies implicit and indirect meanings in texts.
ANALYSING SEMIOTIC CHOICES (cap. 2) WORD CONNOTATIONS : words that have a particular connotation. i.e. the words “family home” suggest something safe, stable and common to all of us.
OVERLEXICALISATION: repetition of words that we can consider synonymous terms. It gives a sense of over-persuasion. So, we can find overlexicalisation when there is an abundance of particular words (excessive description) and their synonyms.
SUPPRESSION OR LEXICAL ABSENCE : words that we might expect but that are absent.
STRUCTURAL OPPOSITIONS : opposition of words: young-old, good-bad. Often only one of these may be mentioned. It is not necessary that the text state who is good and bad or why this is, but the structural oppositions indicate how the participants should be evaluated. Ex. (our boys, heroes for British commandos
LEXICAL CHOICES : we choose specific words rather than other words (mum instead of mother to be more nostalgic)
VISUAL SEMIOTIC CHOICES. ATTRIBUTES : we are concerned with the ideas and values communicated by objects of an image and how they are represented. (ex. the computer in an image with a woman in her office suggests work where the woman is tied to the desk- instead, a PC computer suggests mobility and independence)
SETTINGS : settings are used to communicate general ideas , to connote discourses and their values, actions and identities. (ex. In the Cosmopolitan image – woman in her office- the woman is not really using her computer. There is no evidence of any activity. The emptiness of the setting suggests the luxury of the space. The setting serves to symbolize work rather than documenting it).
SALIENCE : when we use some elements to underline some aspects: we can achieve salience through symbols that are potent cultural symbols, colour, focus, foregroundings (foregrounding creates importance), overlapping (this is like foregrounding since it has the effect of placing elements in front of others)
PRESENTING SPEECH AND SPEAKERS (cap. 3) QUOTING VERBS : describe the way in which people say something
Representing people.CLASSIFICATION OF SOCIAL ACTORS(cap.4) PERSONALISATION AND IMPERSONALISATION : Ex. “the university requires…”= impersonalisation, it is not a particular person but a whole institution.
INDIVIDUALISATION VS COLLECTIVISATION : participants can be described as individuals (ex. “two soldiers, John Smith and Jim Jones”=by being named, these soldiers are individualized- more empathy) or as part of a collectivity(ex. “militants were killed..”=militants are simply a generic group)
SPECIFICATION AND GENERICISATION : participants can be represented as specific individuals (ex: A man, Mazar Hussein…”) or as a generic type ( a Muslim man…)
NOMINATION OR FUNCTIONALISATION : participants can be nominated in terms of who they are (ex. George Bush) or functionalized by being depicted in terms of what they do (ex. the American president )
HONORIFICS: The way people are represented through what they do can also be achieved through the use of functional honorifics (ex. minister of foreigner affairs, Lord, Judge)
OBJECTIVISATION : participants are represented through a feature: (Ex. “Beauty” for a woman)
ANONYMISATION: participants can be anonymized (ex.” Some people believe…, a source said….”)
AGGREGATION : participants are quantified and treated as statistics (ex. “Many thousands of immigrants.”)
PRONOUN VS NOUN: THE “US” AND “THEM” DIVISION: pronouns like “us” “we” “them” are used to align us alongside or against particular ideas
SUPPRESSION : when the agent of the action is absent
TRANSITIVITY AND VERB PROCESSES(cap. 5) TRANSITIVITY: when an action is active or passive (ex: “three soldiers attacked a civilian yesterday” the actor element is the “three soldiers” who carry out the process of attacking, the goal is the” civilian” who has been attacked and the circumstance is “yesterday”. So in a transitivity analysis we have first to identidy the participants in a clause and then the process type. Halliday distinguishes six process types.
HEDGING: when we create a strategic ambiguity to avoid taking a position.(“ Some people said that multiculturalism is outmoded..”). these structures aloow the author to “dress up”(travestire) the sentence= “I think multiculturalism is outmoded..”)