Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


A cell-free protein-producing gel, Notas de estudo de Engenharia de Produção

A cell-free protein-producing gel

Tipologia: Notas de estudo

Antes de 2010

Compartilhado em 05/08/2009

igor-donini-9
igor-donini-9 🇧🇷

4.5

(4)

419 documentos

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
ARTICLES
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 29 MARCH 2009 | DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2419
A cell-free protein-producing gel
Nokyoung Park*, Soong Ho Um*, Hisakage Funabashi, Jianfeng Xuand Dan Luo
Proteins are important biomaterials and are generally produced in living cells. Here, we show a novel DNA hydrogel that is
capable of producing functional proteins without any living cells. This protein-producing gel (termed ‘the P-gel system’ or
‘P-gel’) consists of genes as part of the gel scaffolding. This is the first time that a hydrogel has been used to produce proteins.
The efficiency was about 300 times higher than current, solution-based systems. In terms of volumetric yield, the P-gel
produced up to 5 mg ml1of functional proteins. The mechanisms behind the high efficiency and yield include improved gene
stability, higher local concentrationand a faster enzyme turnover rate due to a closer proximity of genes. Wehave tested a total
of 16 different P-gels and have successfullyproduced all 16 proteins including membrane and toxic proteins, demonstrating that
the P-gel system can serve as a general protein production technology.
Hydrogels produced from biomolecules1–7 as well as synthetic
molecules8–16 have many applications in drug delivery,
tissue engineering and microfabrication. Recently, our
group reported an enzyme-catalysed DNA hydrogel17 of which the
scaffolding was composed entirely of branched DNA (refs 18–20).
Inspired by and on the basis of our DNA hydrogels, we constructed a
hydrogel using similar X-shaped DNA (X-DNA) as crosslinkers but
with actual genes as monomers. By deliberately incorporating the
genes as part of the gel scaffolding, we created a protein-producing
hydrogel (P-gel). This is the first time that a hydrogel has been
used to produce proteins.
To fabricate the P-gel, we ligated X-DNA and linear plasmids
(see Supplementary Fig. S1) within a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)
micromould (Fig. 1a,c). Subsequently, protein was expressed
simply by incubating the P-gel micropads with cell lysates for a
specific time period (Fig. 1b). We have successfully used several
different, commercially available cell-free systems, including lysates
made from E. coli, wheat germ and rabbit reticulocyte (see
Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that the P-gel format is
compatible with different systems. Here, we focused on Renilla
luciferase (Rluc) as the model protein and wheat germ lysates
from Roche as the model, cell-free system. In this system, the
reaction compartment is separated from the feeding buffer by
a membrane (see Supplementary Fig. S2)21. Here, we define
‘expression efficiency’ as the amount of protein produced per unit
of plasmid (gene) and ‘expression yield’ as the amount of protein
produced per unit of reaction volume. Unless stated otherwise, the
reaction volume was kept at 50 µl and the reaction time at 24 h.
Current cell-free protein expression systems developed over
the past 40 years have led to an increased volumetric yield in
the micrograms per millilitre range but seldom reaching the
milligrams per millilitre level22–33. Almost all cell-free systems are
solution phase systems (SPS), in which the gene templates are
dispersed in solution. Here, we used SPS as the ‘benchmark’
to evaluate the productivity (efficiency and yield) of P-gel. In
preliminary experiments, we produced Rluc protein with the
P-gel using the same conditions as those for the SPS. Our initial
results indicated that not only was functional Rluc produced from
the P-gel, but the productivity of this system was significantly
Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University,Ithaca, New York 14853-5701, USA. *These authors contributed equally to
this work. Present address: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA (S.H.U.); Arkansas Bioscience Institute, ArkansasState University, State University, Arkansas 72467,
USA (J.X.). e-mail: [email protected].
higher than that of the SPS. Encouraged by this outcome, we
investigated and later optimized the parameters governing protein
production that were specific to P-gels. These parameters included
the number of P-gel micropads, the concentration of Rluc plasmid
in the P-gel scaffolding and the molar ratio between the X-DNA
and the Rluc gene.
We first varied the number of P-gel micropads used in the
reaction but fixed the plasmid (gene) amount at 0.99 ng for each
micropad. We used 100, 200, 400 and 800 pads, which corresponded
to P-gel volumes of 2, 4, 8 and 16 µl, and plasmid amounts of 99.2,
198, 397 and 793 ng, respectively. Thus, through this design, we
changed both the gel volume and gene amount in each reaction
but fixed the P-gel gene concentration. As a control, the same
amount of plasmid was used in the SPS. The protein expression
results (Fig. 2a) demonstrate that, compared with the SPS control,
the P-gel exhibited higher efficiency and better yield under each
condition. In particular, the P-gel consisting of 400 micropads
(about 397 ng of genes) produced close to 100µg of luciferase in
a 50 µl reaction volume within 24 h, equivalent to an expression
efficiency of 250 µg of protein per microgram of plasmid and
an expression yield of 2.0 mg ml1. This represents a 93.5-fold
enhancement in both yield and efficiency over the SPS control. In
terms of amplification ability, for each copy of the gene under this
condition, the P-gel produced about 19,000 copies of the protein
molecules. Figure 2a also shows that protein production from the
P-gel is not linearly proportional to the number of P-gel micropads
in the reaction, suggesting that there are more factors involved other
than P-gel volume and gene amount.
To investigate the effect of the total gene amount, we fixed
the number of P-gel micropads at 400 (thus, maintaining a preset
gel volume at 8 µl) and varied the plasmid concentration of each
micropad from 0.99 to 99 ngµl1. As shown in Fig. 2b, the Rluc
expression reached a plateau with 400 ng of plasmids (equal to a
concentration of 50 ng µl1per micropad). As a comparison, SPS
became saturated when the plasmid amount increased to 4 µg (equal
to a concentration of 80 ng µl1, Supplementary Fig. S3).
To further explore the mechanism of the P-gel system, we varied
the X-DNA/gene ratio from 1,000:1 to 6,000:1 by changing the
X-DNA amount while keeping the number of micropads and the
432 NATUREMATERIALS |VOL 8 |MAY 2009 |www.nature.com/naturematerials
pf3
pf4
pf5

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe A cell-free protein-producing gel e outras Notas de estudo em PDF para Engenharia de Produção, somente na Docsity!

ARTICLES

PUBLISHED ONLINE: 29 MARCH 2009 | DOI: 10.1038/NMAT

A cell-free protein-producing gel

Nokyoung Park, Soong Ho Um

, Hisakage Funabashi, Jianfeng Xu

and Dan Luo

Proteins are important biomaterials and are generally produced in living cells. Here, we show a novel DNA hydrogel that is

capable of producing functional proteins without any living cells. This protein-producing gel (termed ‘the P-gel system’ or

‘P-gel’) consists of genes as part of the gel scaffolding. This is the first time that a hydrogel has been used to produce proteins.

The efficiency was about 300 times higher than current, solution-based systems. In terms of volumetric yield, the P-gel

produced up to 5 mg ml −^1 of functional proteins. The mechanisms behind the high efficiency and yield include improved gene

stability, higher local concentration and a faster enzyme turnover rate due to a closer proximity of genes. We have tested a total

of 16 different P-gels and have successfully produced all 16 proteins including membrane and toxic proteins, demonstrating that

the P-gel system can serve as a general protein production technology.

H

ydrogels produced from biomolecules1–7^ as well as synthetic

molecules8–16^ have many applications in drug delivery,

tissue engineering and microfabrication. Recently, our

group reported an enzyme-catalysed DNA hydrogel^17 of which the

scaffolding was composed entirely of branched DNA (refs 18–20).

Inspired by and on the basis of our DNA hydrogels, we constructed a

hydrogel using similar X-shaped DNA (X-DNA) as crosslinkers but

with actual genes as monomers. By deliberately incorporating the

genes as part of the gel scaffolding, we created a protein-producing

hydrogel (P-gel). This is the first time that a hydrogel has been

used to produce proteins.

To fabricate the P-gel, we ligated X-DNA and linear plasmids

(see Supplementary Fig. S1) within a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)

micromould (Fig. 1a,c). Subsequently, protein was expressed

simply by incubating the P-gel micropads with cell lysates for a

specific time period (Fig. 1b). We have successfully used several

different, commercially available cell-free systems, including lysates

made from E. coli , wheat germ and rabbit reticulocyte (see

Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that the P-gel format is

compatible with different systems. Here, we focused on Renilla

luciferase (Rluc) as the model protein and wheat germ lysates

from Roche as the model, cell-free system. In this system, the

reaction compartment is separated from the feeding buffer by

a membrane (see Supplementary Fig. S2)^21. Here, we define

‘expression efficiency’ as the amount of protein produced per unit

of plasmid (gene) and ‘expression yield’ as the amount of protein

produced per unit of reaction volume. Unless stated otherwise, the

reaction volume was kept at 50 μl and the reaction time at 24 h.

Current cell-free protein expression systems developed over

the past 40 years have led to an increased volumetric yield in

the micrograms per millilitre range but seldom reaching the

milligrams per millilitre level22–33. Almost all cell-free systems are

solution phase systems (SPS), in which the gene templates are

dispersed in solution. Here, we used SPS as the ‘benchmark’

to evaluate the productivity (efficiency and yield) of P-gel. In

preliminary experiments, we produced Rluc protein with the

P-gel using the same conditions as those for the SPS. Our initial

results indicated that not only was functional Rluc produced from

the P-gel, but the productivity of this system was significantly

Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-5701, USA. *These authors contributed equally to this work. †Present address: Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA (S.H.U.); Arkansas Bioscience Institute, Arkansas State University, State University, Arkansas 72467,

USA (J.X.). ‡e-mail: [email protected].

higher than that of the SPS. Encouraged by this outcome, we

investigated and later optimized the parameters governing protein

production that were specific to P-gels. These parameters included

the number of P-gel micropads, the concentration of Rluc plasmid

in the P-gel scaffolding and the molar ratio between the X-DNA

and the Rluc gene.

We first varied the number of P-gel micropads used in the

reaction but fixed the plasmid (gene) amount at 0.99 ng for each

micropad. We used 100, 200, 400 and 800 pads, which corresponded

to P-gel volumes of 2, 4, 8 and 16 μl, and plasmid amounts of 99.2,

198, 397 and 793 ng, respectively. Thus, through this design, we

changed both the gel volume and gene amount in each reaction

but fixed the P-gel gene concentration. As a control, the same

amount of plasmid was used in the SPS. The protein expression

results (Fig. 2a) demonstrate that, compared with the SPS control,

the P-gel exhibited higher efficiency and better yield under each

condition. In particular, the P-gel consisting of 400 micropads

(about 397 ng of genes) produced close to 100 μg of luciferase in

a 50 μl reaction volume within 24 h, equivalent to an expression

efficiency of 250 μg of protein per microgram of plasmid and

an expression yield of 2.0 mg ml−^1. This represents a 93.5-fold

enhancement in both yield and efficiency over the SPS control. In

terms of amplification ability, for each copy of the gene under this

condition, the P-gel produced about 19,000 copies of the protein

molecules. Figure 2a also shows that protein production from the

P-gel is not linearly proportional to the number of P-gel micropads

in the reaction, suggesting that there are more factors involved other

than P-gel volume and gene amount.

To investigate the effect of the total gene amount, we fixed

the number of P-gel micropads at 400 (thus, maintaining a preset

gel volume at 8 μl) and varied the plasmid concentration of each

micropad from 0.99 to 99 ng μl−^1. As shown in Fig. 2b, the Rluc

expression reached a plateau with 400 ng of plasmids (equal to a

concentration of 50 ng μl−^1 per micropad). As a comparison, SPS

became saturated when the plasmid amount increased to 4 μg (equal

to a concentration of 80 ng μl−^1 , Supplementary Fig. S3).

To further explore the mechanism of the P-gel system, we varied

the X-DNA/gene ratio from 1,000:1 to 6,000:1 by changing the

X-DNA amount while keeping the number of micropads and the

NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2419 (^) ARTICLES

Glass slide

APTES

P-gel precursor drop

PDMS mould P-gel pads

Cover with a PDMS mould

Peel off the mould

Step 1 Step 2

X-DNA Plasmid

In vitro transcription and translation

P-gel pads

mRNA

Protein

Transcription

Translation

P-gel

Ligation

1 mm × 1 mm × 20 μm

P-gel pads Lysate Polymerase Amino acids ATP and so on

a

b

c

Figure 1 | Fabrication of P-gel micropads. a , A schematic diagram illustrating the formation of P-gel micropads (side view). The P-gel precursor drop,

which contains X-DNA, genes and T4 DNA ligase, was confined within a PDMS mould with precisely defined dimensions: 1.0 mm × 1 .0mm × 20 μm

(20 nl) to control and adjust the exact gene amount within the P-gel scaffolding and also to obtain a higher surface-to-volume ratio of P-gel on an APTES-coated glass slide. Extra solution was able to flow out owing to the surface modification (Step 1). After gelation, the PDMS mould was peeled off

from the substrate (Step 2), and P-gel micropads were formed using the pre-designed dimensions. b , A schematic diagram of the gelation process through enzymatic crosslinking and cell-free expression with P-gel pads. c , A fluorescent image of the P-gel pads after staining with SYBR I. Each micropad was

separated by 100 μm spacers (scale bar: 500 μm).

gene concentration constant. Figure 2c indicates that the optimal

X-DNA/gene ratio was 2,000:1 for Rluc expression. When the

X-DNA/gene ratio reached higher than 4,000:1, the Rluc expression

decreased markedly. These results suggest that P-gel can tolerate

a wide range of crosslinker/gene ratios but that too high a ratio

of X-DNA/gene (>4,000:1) adversely affects P-gel expression,

probably owing to changes in the properties of the gel (for example,

extremely large amounts of X-DNA make the gels stiffer and

more similar to a solid rather than a gel). Under these optimized

conditions (plasmid density and ratio), P-gel also showed the

highest transcription level (see Supplementary Fig. S4), suggesting

that an increase in transcription efficiency may have a role in P-gel’s

enhanced protein production.

Next, we monitored protein expression as a function of reaction

time to gain insights into kinetic behaviour. Rluc expression

increased linearly with reaction time (Fig. 2d). This was also true for

SPS (Fig. 2d, inset), but there were two obvious differences between

these two systems. The first was that the time span of the linear

region for the P-gel was much longer. The P-gel continuously pro-

duced proteins for more than 36 h, whereas SPS reached a plateau

after only 12 h. The second difference was that the speed (slope)

of gene expression using the P-gel was much faster—about 73-fold

faster than that of the SPS in the first 12 h (Fig. 2d, inset). Thus, the

P-gel showed greatly improved kinetic behaviour over the SPS.

We also investigated the effect of X-DNA sequences on protein

production. Three different X-DNA sequences (see Supplementary

Table S2) were tested under the same conditions. The amounts

of protein produced from each P-gel were similar, suggesting

that the sequences of X-DNA did not affect the amount of

protein production.

From the above results, we have seen that P-gel can produce

a model protein (Rluc here) with a much higher efficiency and

yield compared with the SPS control. An important question is

whether or not P-gel can produce other proteins in a similar

fashion. To investigate the potential of the P-gel as a universal

protein production system, we tested a total of 16 P-gels with 16

different genes coding for reporter proteins, membrane proteins,

kinases and highly repetitive, toxic proteins (see Supplementary

Table S3). The molecular weights ranged from 16 to 110 kDa.

All 16 proteins were successfully produced from the P-gel system

with about 1–7 mg ml−^1 total protein yields (see Supplementary

Fig. S5). Notably, the total Rluc production (both active and

inactive forms) from P-gel was 134 times higher than that of

SPS. In addition to the total protein yield, we also measured the

amount of active proteins produced from P-gel when functional

assays were available (see Table 1 and Supplementary Table S3).

Compared with the SPS controls, P-gels produced far more

active proteins. Figure 3a,b shows visual comparisons of two

proteins, (Rluc and Aequorea coerulescens green fluorescent protein

(AcGFP)), produced from both P-gels and SPS. These images

visibly demonstrate that the P-gel has produced significantly more

functional proteins than SPS.

NATURE MATERIALS DOI: 10.1038/NMAT2419 (^) ARTICLES

Lane number

(kDa) 98 64

50

36

22

Rluc

P-gel SPS

AcGFP

Blank SPS P-gel

a b

1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 3 | Comparison of the proteins expressed from P-gel and SPS. a , Total protein comparison. SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis assays of two

expressed proteins: Rluc and AcGFP. Lane 1 corresponds to the pre-stained protein standards (SeeBlue Plus2, Invitrogen). The red arrows indicate the Rluc

(34 kDa, lane 2) and AcGFP (27 kDa, lane 4) expressed from P-gels. Lanes 3 and 5 are the lysates from SPS controls for Rluc and AcGFP, respectively. Lysate control (blank control) is in lane 6. The lanes were reorganized from the same gel without any image manipulation. b , Functional protein

comparison. Left: bioluminescence from Rluc; right: green fluorescence from AcGFP.

Lane number

1 2 3 4 5 6

3,

(bp)

2,

1,

500

Total surface area ( × 106 μm^2 )

0

Functional Rluc expression (mg ml

¬

)

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,

a

b

Figure 4 | Mechanism studies of P-gel expression. a , A northern blot

analysis of the Rluc mRNA from P-gel and the SPS control. Lane 1, 2 and 3:

standard mRNA at 25 ng, 2.5 ng and 0.25 ng, respectively. Lane 4, 5 and 6: mRNA extracted from the same volume of P-gel (16 ng mRNA), SPS (0.3 ng

mRNA) and blank (0 ng mRNA) lysates, respectively. The P-gel produced 53 times more mRNA than the SPS control. The mRNA amounts from P-gel

and SPS were calculated using ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) based on the mRNA standard. b , Rluc expression with a variation of surface-to-

volume ratio. Different PDMS micromoulds were microfabricated with the following dimensions: width and length at 200 μm and 400 μm, respectively, with depths of 10 μm, 30 μm or 70 μm. By manipulating the

appropriate number of P-gel micropads, the total volume as well as the gene amounts of P-gel was kept constant, while varying the overall surface

areas. Error bars represent standard deviations from three replicates.

to the gel scaffold, the expression level was 62 times higher

than SPS but was still about 66% of that of the P-gel system,

suggesting that physically crosslinking the gene within the gel

scaffold is another important step. We further explored the effect

of linear linking between X-DNA and plasmid in the format of

X-plasmid-X (that is, capping the plasmid with two X-DNAs

but, again, without crosslinking and thus without gel formation,

Supplementary Table S4). We observed a twofold enhancement,

suggesting that the X-DNA capping may have protected the

plasmid. Putting together these observations, our results (see

Table 2 and Supplementary Table S4) indicate that (1) conditions

that protect DNA (for example, adding free dsDNA, free X-DNA,

capping the gene with X-DNA or encapsulating the gene inside

a gel) will enhance the cell-free protein expression; and (2) more

importantly, physically crosslinking the genes into the DNA

hydrogel scaffold provides a novel format with extra enhancement

for cell-free protein production.

In addition to the gene protection, transcription efficiency

itself is another key factor for protein expression. Although the

kinetics of transcription are rather complicated in the P-gel system

owing to the coupled transcription and translation processes,

we can attribute the enhanced transcription efficiency to two

important parameters that are unique to the P-gels: (1) a higher

overall gene concentration due to the compressed volume of the

gel—a condition that cannot be realized in the solution phase

because of the extra volume of the solvent and the fixed solubility

of DNA, and (2) a faster enzyme turnover rate due to the

closer proximity of genes. Detailed calculations are discussed in

Supplementary Discussion S1.

After the above studies at the transcription level, we subsequently

examined the translation process. It is reasonable to assume that

transcription occurred mostly on or close to the surface of the

P-gel whereas translation occurred mainly outside (in the bulk

solution) the P-gel micropads for the following reasons: (1) the

P-gel micropads were extremely thin (only 20 μm) and relatively

large in surface (millimetres in length and width); (2) P-gels were

incubated with lysates after, not before, the gelling process, and thus

no encapsulation could occur; and (3) the translation machinery

is composed of protein complexes including ribosomes that are

very large in size, and thus would have difficulty diffusing within

the P-gel pores. To validate this surface-dominant hypothesis, we

fixed the volume of total P-gel micropads, but varied the total

surface area. Indeed, the P-gel expression of Rluc increased with

an increase of surface area (Fig. 4b), strongly suggesting that the

surface area, not the total volume, had an important role in the

P-gel system. Figure 2c also revealed that when the ratios of X-DNA

and plasmid varied from 1,000 to 4,000 (thus, changed the internal

pore sizes, see Supplementary Fig. S7), protein expression levels

were very similar, suggesting that pore sizes had no direct effects

on the P-gel expression.

ARTICLES NATURE MATERIALS^ DOI: 10.1038/NMAT

Table 2 | Effects of gene template conditions on protein production.

Condition Schematic diagram Rluc yield (mg ml −^1 , based on activity)

Fold increase

SPS (plasmid alone)

Lysate solution

Plasmids

SPS with dsDNA (plasmid + free dsDNA)

Lysate solution

dsDNA

SPS with X-DNA (plasmid + free X-DNA)

Lysate solution

X-DNA

Plasmid-entrapped gel (plasmid inside a gel)

Lysate solution

Plasmid-entrapped gel

P-gel (plasmid covalently crosslinked to gel matrix)

Lysate solution

P-gel

By simply crosslinking free genes with X-DNA, we have, for

the first time, produced a variety of different proteins with a high

efficiency and yield from a hydrogel. Some of these proteins are

important for complex materials synthesis but until now have been

impossible to produce from a living cell (for example, a ‘glue

protein’ from mollusc mussels). In addition, protein production

from the P-gel can be further enhanced through optimization

of reaction conditions (see Supplementary Discussion S2). More

importantly, compared with cell-based systems, non-physiological

perturbations, such as adding detergents or changing temperatures,

can be applied to improve P-gel protein production (for example,

expressing membrane proteins) without worrying about affecting

other bioprocesses or killing cells, as long as the cell-free systems

used will not be inactivated. We expect that other formats,

such as those that are column based or microfluidic-channel

based, will be easily adapted to the P-gel system for massive

parallel and/or totally automatic protein production. We further

predict that the tremendous protein production potential of

the P-gel system will make high-throughput protein engineering

and onsite protein production a reality in the near future. This

novel protein production system, less limited by biology but

more similar to a cell by virtue of the gel format, will have

an immediate and important impact on materials science and

engineering including catalyses, biomaterials, tissue engineering,

drug discovery and drug delivery.

Methods Synthesis of X-DNA and linear plasmids. All oligonucleotides were commercially synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology. The X-DNA sequences (see Supplementary Table S2) were designed and the X-DNAs were prepared and characterized following the same procedures as described in our previous publications18–20^. The Rluc gene was PCR-amplified from the pRL-Null vector (Promega) using two primers: ATG CCA TGG CTT CGA AAG TTT ATG ATC CAG and TAC CCC GGG TTA TTG TTC ATT TTT GAG AAC TCG C. After amplification, the Rluc gene was inserted into the Nco I and Sma I sites of the expression vector pIVEX1.3WG (Roche Applied Science) to generate pIVEX1.3RL (for wheat germ lysate). All other genes (except AcGFP) were cloned into the same cloning sites. The AcGFP gene was first cut out from the plasmid pAcGFP (Clontech) using Nco I and Stu I and then was subcloned into the pIVEX1.3WG vector at the Nco I and Sma I sites to generate pIVEX1.3AcGFP. All of the plasmids were linearized with Apa I before being used to construct the P-gels for expression. The size of the entire luciferase plasmid is 4,134 bp, and the size of the luciferase gene is 936 bp (or 1,331 bp with the T7 promoter, 5’ UTR and 3’ UTR).

Construction of P-gel micropads. X-DNA and linear plasmids were first mixed at a pre-determined molar ratio in the presence of T4 DNA ligase (Promega) to form the P-gel precursor. For an X-DNA/plasmid ratio of 2,000:1, we used 35. 0 μm of X-DNA and 17.5 nM of plasmid. P-gel micropads were then created by confining the precursor in a PDMS mould fabricated with precisely defined dimensions using standard photolithography and soft lithography processes (Fig. 1). Briefly, a