Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


Efficient Preparation of Cyclic Poly, Notas de estudo de Engenharia Elétrica

Efficient Preparation of Cyclic Poly

Tipologia: Notas de estudo

Antes de 2010

Compartilhado em 11/01/2010

igor-donini-9
igor-donini-9 🇧🇷

4.5

(4)

419 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
Efficient Preparation of Cyclic Poly(methyl
acrylate)-block-poly(styrene) by Combination of
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization and Click
Cyclization
Dawanne M. Eugene and Scott M. Grayson*
Department of Chemistry, Tulane UniVersity,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70118
ReceiVed April 28, 2008
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed June 7, 2008
Introduction. Diblock copolymers demonstrate a unique
ability to self-assemble into complex nanoscale morphologies
resulting from the phase segregation of contrasting blocks.
Extensive research has been devoted to studying how linear
diblocks segregate in bulk to yield a diverse range of nanoscale
symmetries,
1,2
including lamellae, hexagonally packed cylinders,
bicontinuous gyroids, and body-centered-cubic arrays of spheres.
Diblock copolymers also demonstrate the ability to self-assemble
in solution to yield micellar aggregates which can be used to
encapsulate guests and can be stabilized via cross-links to afford
more robust nanoscale carriers.
3
With the development of
synthetic techniques to prepare more architecturally complex
block copolymers including star block polymers,
4
ABC triblocks,
5–7
ABCD tetrablocks,
8,9
and miktoarm stars,
10–12
the relationship
between the block copolymer architecture and the resultant self-
assembly is being explored. In the case of triblock copolymers
the addition of the third block leads to a vastly increased set of
complex morphologies.
13
Cyclic block copolymers belong to a
unique polymer topological that is expected to exhibit charac-
teristic changes in both solution and bulk properties.
14,15
However, exploration of these materials has been very lim-
ited,
16,17
largely because of the technical difficulties in preparing
and purifying well-defined cyclic block copolymers. Recently,
cyclic block copolymers have been prepared using the 60Co
γ-ray-induced polymerization from cyclic dithioester initiators,
though this technique has not seen widespread use.
18
The most
common synthetic route has been the end-group coupling of
telechelic ABA triblock copolymers prepared using anionic
polymerization, including poly(dimethylsiloxane)-block-poly-
(styrene)-block-poly(dimethylsiloxane),
16,19,20
poly(2-vinylpy-
ridine)-block-poly(styrene)-block-poly(2-vinylpyridine),
16
poly-
(styrene)-block-poly(butadiene)-block-poly(styrene),
17,21
and poly-
(styrene)-block-poly(isoprene)-block-poly(styrene),
22
which were
cyclized with difunctional coupling agents such as dichlorodim-
ethylsilane or di(bromomethyl)benzene. While anionic polym-
erization techniques can yield very narrow polydispersity (PDI)
linear precursors, the nonspecific coupling chemistry between
two bifunctional reagents results in significant quantities of linear
oligomers from multiple intermolecular coupling events, in
addition to unreacted linear precursors. The anionic preparation
of block copolymers with complementary amine and carboxylic
acid end groups
23
provides a more specific functional group
coupling via their dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) coupling
to form an amide linkage, but the low efficiency of the DCC
coupling requires extensive purification. Among the reported
anionic techniques for preparing cyclic diblocks, the isolation
of reasonably pure cyclics requires tedious and repetitive
fractionation to remove acyclic impurities. For physical studies
of block copolymer self-assembly as well as exploration of these
materials for biomedical applications, narrow polydispersity and
high cyclic purity are critical for providing meaningful and
reproducible data. Therefore, a more efficient route toward well-
defined cyclic block copolymers with diverse side chain
functional groups would be invaluable.
Herein, an alternative cyclization approach is investigated that
promises to provide access to a diverse range of high-purity
cyclic block copolymers. Laurent and Grayson
24
recently
demonstrated that the functional group tolerance, facile end-
group modification, and well-controlled polymerizations offered
by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)
25
can be paired
with the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition “click” coupling
26–28
to yield high-purity cyclic polystyrene without excess quantities
of solvent or time-consuming fractionation methods to purify
the product. Because of the functional group tolerance of both
ATRP and the click reaction, this procedure can provide an
efficient route to prepare a broad range of homopolymers. In
addition, because ATRP has demonstrated high efficiency in
reinitiating macroinitiators,
29,30
this procedure should be equally
well-suited to preparing diverse cyclic block copolymers. The
application of this technique toward the preparation of well-
defined cyclic block copolymers of methyl acrylate and styrene
(Scheme 1) is reported below.
Results and Discussion. Using a previously reported alkyne
initiator,
31
1, methyl acrylate (MA) was polymerized in bulk
using Cu(I)Br catalyst with N,N,N,N′′,N′′-pentamethyldiethyl-
enetriamine (PMDETA) ligand at 50 °C after a series of freeze-
pump-thaw cycles to remove oxygen from the reaction
environment. The resulting trimethylsilyl (TMS)-alkyne-
terminated poly(methyl acrylate) (TMS-CtC-PMA-Br) ho-
mopolymers 2a,cwere purified by washing their methylene
chloride solution with water, passing the organic layer through
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Scheme 1
.
Polymerization and Cyclization of Poly(methyl
acrylate (MA))-b-poly(styrene (S)): (a) n26, m38; (b) n
26, m56; (c) n30, m23
a
a
The degree of polymerization for PMA and PS blocks was
calculated from the average of the number-average molecular weight
(Mn) values measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and
matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(MALDI-TOF MS).
5082 Macromolecules 2008,41, 5082-5084
10.1021/ma800962z CCC: $40.75 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/25/2008
pf3

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe Efficient Preparation of Cyclic Poly e outras Notas de estudo em PDF para Engenharia Elétrica, somente na Docsity!

Efficient Preparation of Cyclic Poly(methyl

acrylate)- block -poly(styrene) by Combination of

Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization and Click

Cyclization

Dawanne M. Eugene and Scott M. Grayson*

Department of Chemistry, Tulane Uni V ersity, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118

Recei V ed April 28, 2008 Re V ised Manuscript Recei V ed June 7, 2008

Introduction. Diblock copolymers demonstrate a unique ability to self-assemble into complex nanoscale morphologies resulting from the phase segregation of contrasting blocks. Extensive research has been devoted to studying how linear diblocks segregate in bulk to yield a diverse range of nanoscale symmetries,1,2^ including lamellae, hexagonally packed cylinders, bicontinuous gyroids, and body-centered-cubic arrays of spheres. Diblock copolymers also demonstrate the ability to self-assemble in solution to yield micellar aggregates which can be used to encapsulate guests and can be stabilized via cross-links to afford more robust nanoscale carriers.^3 With the development of synthetic techniques to prepare more architecturally complex block copolymers including star block polymers,^4 ABC triblocks,5– ABCD tetrablocks,8,9^ and miktoarm stars,10–12^ the relationship between the block copolymer architecture and the resultant self- assembly is being explored. In the case of triblock copolymers the addition of the third block leads to a vastly increased set of complex morphologies.^13 Cyclic block copolymers belong to a unique polymer topological that is expected to exhibit charac- teristic changes in both solution and bulk properties.14, However, exploration of these materials has been very lim- ited,16,17^ largely because of the technical difficulties in preparing and purifying well-defined cyclic block copolymers. Recently, cyclic block copolymers have been prepared using the 60 Co γ-ray-induced polymerization from cyclic dithioester initiators, though this technique has not seen widespread use.^18 The most common synthetic route has been the end-group coupling of telechelic ABA triblock copolymers prepared using anionic polymerization, including poly(dimethylsiloxane)- block -poly- (styrene)- block -poly(dimethylsiloxane),16,19,20^ poly(2-vinylpy- ridine)- block -poly(styrene)- block -poly(2-vinylpyridine),^16 poly- (styrene)- block -poly(butadiene)- block -poly(styrene),17,21^ and poly- (styrene)- block -poly(isoprene)- block -poly(styrene),^22 which were cyclized with difunctional coupling agents such as dichlorodim- ethylsilane or di(bromomethyl)benzene. While anionic polym- erization techniques can yield very narrow polydispersity (PDI) linear precursors, the nonspecific coupling chemistry between two bifunctional reagents results in significant quantities of linear oligomers from multiple intermolecular coupling events, in addition to unreacted linear precursors. The anionic preparation of block copolymers with complementary amine and carboxylic acid end groups^23 provides a more specific functional group coupling via their dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) coupling to form an amide linkage, but the low efficiency of the DCC coupling requires extensive purification. Among the reported anionic techniques for preparing cyclic diblocks, the isolation of reasonably pure cyclics requires tedious and repetitive fractionation to remove acyclic impurities. For physical studies

of block copolymer self-assembly as well as exploration of these materials for biomedical applications, narrow polydispersity and high cyclic purity are critical for providing meaningful and reproducible data. Therefore, a more efficient route toward well- defined cyclic block copolymers with diverse side chain functional groups would be invaluable. Herein, an alternative cyclization approach is investigated that promises to provide access to a diverse range of high-purity cyclic block copolymers. Laurent and Grayson^24 recently demonstrated that the functional group tolerance, facile end- group modification, and well-controlled polymerizations offered by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)^25 can be paired with the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition “click” coupling26– to yield high-purity cyclic polystyrene without excess quantities of solvent or time-consuming fractionation methods to purify the product. Because of the functional group tolerance of both ATRP and the click reaction, this procedure can provide an efficient route to prepare a broad range of homopolymers. In addition, because ATRP has demonstrated high efficiency in reinitiating macroinitiators,29,30^ this procedure should be equally well-suited to preparing diverse cyclic block copolymers. The application of this technique toward the preparation of well- defined cyclic block copolymers of methyl acrylate and styrene (Scheme 1) is reported below. Results and Discussion. Using a previously reported alkyne initiator,^31 1 , methyl acrylate (MA) was polymerized in bulk using Cu(I)Br catalyst with N,N , N ′, N ′′, N ′′-pentamethyldiethyl- enetriamine (PMDETA) ligand at 50 °C after a series of freeze- pump-thaw cycles to remove oxygen from the reaction environment. The resulting trimethylsilyl (TMS)-alkyne- terminated poly(methyl acrylate) (TMS-CtC-PMA-Br) ho- mopolymers 2a , c were purified by washing their methylene

  • Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. chloride solution with water, passing the organic layer through

Scheme 1. Polymerization and Cyclization of Poly(methyl acrylate (MA))- b -poly(styrene (S)): (a) n26, m38; (b) n26, m56; (c) n30, m23 a

a (^) The degree of polymerization for PMA and PS blocks was calculated from the average of the number-average molecular weight ( M n ) values measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

5082 Macromolecules 2008 , 41 , 5082- 5084

10.1021/ma800962z CCC: $40.75  2008 American Chemical Society Published on Web 06/25/

a silica plug to remove the copper salts, and removing unreacted monomer in V acuo. The isolated PMA samples were character- ized by matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Figure 1a), gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (Figure 1b), and 1 H NMR spectroscopy and could be prepared reproducibly with number-average molecular weights ( M n ) ranging between 2000 and 3000 with very narrow polydispersities (PDI < 1.06) (Table 1). The M n of the PMA samples was determined via 1 H NMR spectroscopy by integrating the methyl protons (3.5 ppm) of the acrylate

methyl ester with respect to the nine methyl protons (0.1 ppm) of the TMS-protecting group on the initiator. Polystyrene (PS) blocks were prepared from the PMA homopolymers by reintroduction of Cu(I)Br catalyst in a degassed solution of styrene and the TMS-CtC-PMA-Br macroinitiators in anisole at 90 °C. The PMA- block -PS copoly- mers, 3a - c , were purified and isolated by extraction, filtration through a plug of silica gel, and precipitation into methanol. Block copolymers 3a,b were both prepared from PMA ho- mopolymer 2a , whereas block copolymer 3c was prepared from 2c. The resultant TMS-CtC-PMA- b -PS-Br copolymers were characterized by MALDI-TOF MS (Figure 1a), GPC (Figure 1b), and 1 H NMR spectroscopy with M n ranging between 5000 and 9000 with a narrow polydispersity (PDI < 1.12) (Table 1). The technical simplicity and high efficiency of click chemistry have led to its widespread use for macromolecular couplings,32, and it was employed for these reasons to effect cyclization. Because the benzyl bromide end group of TMS-CtC-PMA- b -PS-Br is very susceptible to nucleophilic displacement, it can be transformed to the azide TMS-CtC-PMA- b -PS-N 3 ( 4a - c ) in nearly quantitative yields using sodium azide as a nucleophile.34,35^ To provide the complementary functional groups to enable the Huisgen cycloaddition, the initiator can be deprotected using tetrabutylammonium fluoride to yield the terminal alkyne, H-CtC-PMA- b -PS-N 3 ( 5a - c ). Both of these end-group transformations can be monitored using 1 H NMR spectroscopy by visualizing the loss of the benzylic bromide resonance at 5.0 ppm and the loss of the methyl resonances of the TMS group at 0.1 ppm. The M n of the block copolymers was determined via 1 H NMR spectroscopy by integrating the methyl protons (3.5 ppm) of the methyl ester on the acrylate repeat units, the aromatic protons (6.2-7.2 ppm) of the styrene repeat units with respect to the nine methyl protons

Figure 1. Characterization data for the block copolymerization: trimethylsilyl (TMS)-alkyne-terminated poly(methyl acrylate) homopolymer, TMS-CtC-PMA-Br ( 2a ), and the poly(methyl acrylate)- block -poly(styrene) copolymer, TMS-CtC-PMA- b -PS-Br ( 3a ) as observed by matrix- assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (a) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (b).

Table 1. Number-Average Molecular Weight ( M n ) and Polydispersity Index (PDI ) M w / M n ) Data for Block Copolymers As Calculated by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC), Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) Mass Spectroscopy, and 1 H NMR Spectroscopy of Polymers 2 - 6 a M n PDI polymer GPC NMR MALDI GPC MALDI 2a 2700 2800 2380 1.01 1. 3a 6110 5600 5970 1.09 1. 4a 5740 5800 6160 1.08 1. 5a 5660 5800 5920 1.10 1. 6a 4150 6400 5890 1.13 1.

2a 2700 2800 2380 1.01 1. 3b 8300 8500 8270 1.11 1. 4b 7980 9100 8420 1.09 1. 5b 8140 8900 8220 1.11 1. 6b 6140 9000 8120 1.14 1.

2c 2820 2600 2880 1.06 1. 3c 5130 5600 5400 1.11 1. 4c 5510 5100 5840 1.08 1. 5c 5700 5400 5650 1.28 1. 6c 4600 5400 5640 1.39 1. a (^) The structures of polymers 2 - 6 are defined in Scheme 1.

Figure 2. Characterization data for the click cyclization: linear azide-terminated poly(methyl acrylate)- b -poly(styrene), l -H-CtC-PMA- b -PS-N 3 ( 5a ), and cyclic poly(methyl acrylate)- b -poly(styrene), c -PMA- b -PS ( 6a ), via matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (a) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (b).

Macromolecules, Vol. 41, No. 14, 2008 Communications to the Editor 5083