



Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Encontra documentos específicos para os exames da tua universidade
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Simulado para testar seu conhecimento na língua inglêsa.
Tipologia: Exercícios
1 / 7
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!




As questões de 1 a 5 referem-se ao texto abaixo.
Why Urban, Educated Parents Are Turning to DIY Education
They raise chickens. They grow vegetables. They knit. Now a new generation of urban parents is even teaching their own kids.
Jan 30, 2012 | Linda Perlstein
In the beginning, your kids need you – a lot. They’re attached to your hip, all the time. It might be a month. It might be five years. Then suddenly you are __________ (I) to send them off to school for seven hours a day, where they’ll have to cope with life in ways they never had to before. You no longer control what they learn, or how, or with whom. Unless you decide, like an emerging population of parents in cities across the country, to forgo that age-old rite of passage entirely. When Tera and Eric Schreiber’s oldest child was about to start kindergarten, the couple toured the __________ (II) public elementary school a block away from their home in an affluent Seattle neighborhood near the University of Washington. It was “a great neighborhood school,” Tera says. They also applied to a private school, and Daisy was accepted. But in the end they chose a third path: no school at all. Eric, 38, is a manager at Microsoft. Tera, 39, had already traded a career as a lawyer for one as a nonprofit executive, which allowed her more time with her kids. But “more” turned into “all” when she decided that instead of
working, she would homeschool her daughters: Daisy, now 9; Ginger, 7; and Violet, 4. We think of homeschoolers as evangelicals or off- the-gridders who spend a lot of time at kitchen tables in the countryside. And it’s true that most __________ (III) parents do so for moral or religious reasons. But education observers believe that is changing. You only have to go to a downtown Starbucks or art museum in the middle of a weekday to see that a once-unconventional choice “has become newly fashionable,” says Mitchell Stevens, a Stanford professor who wrote Kingdom of Children, a history of homeschooling. There are an estimated 300, homeschooled children in America’s cities, many of them children of secular , highly educated professionals who always figured they’d send their kids to school – until they came to think, Hey, maybe we could do better. When Laurie Block Spigel, a homeschooling consultant, pulled her kids out of school in New York in the mid-1990s, “I had some of my closest friends and relatives telling me I was ruining my children’s lives.” Now, she says, “the parents that I meet aren’t afraid to talk about it. They’re doing this proudly.” Many of these parents feel that city schools – or any schools – don’t provide the kind of education they want for their kids. Just as much, though, their choice to homeschool is a more extreme example of a larger modern parenting ethos: that children are individuals, each deserving a uniquely curated __________ (IV). That peer influence can be noxious. (Bullying is no longer seen as a harmless rite of passage.) That DIY – be it gardening, knitting, or raising chickens – is something educated urbanites should embrace. That we might create a sense of security in our kids by practicing “attachment parenting,” an increasingly popular approach that involves round-the- clock physical contact with children and immediate responses to all their cues. Even many attachment adherents, though, may have trouble envisioning spending almost all their time with their kids – for 18 years! For Tera Schreiber, it was a natural transition. When you have kept your kids so close, literally – she __________ (V) her youngest till Violet was 4
Baltimore homeschooler, “Once we had a child and I realized how fun it was to see her discover stuff about the world, I thought, why would I want to let a teacher have all that fun?” (…) For many of the homeschoolers I met, family is more: the very focus of their lives. And they wouldn’t want it any other way. One comfort Tera and Eric Schreiber held on to when they started homeschooling was that if it wasn’t working out, they could enroll the girls in school, literally the next day. That developed into an annual reassessment. By now their rhythms are deeply their own; they are embedded in a community they love. And at the college up the road there are plenty of calculus tutors, should they need them one day.
Adapted from http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/
d) é bastante comum encontrar pais que optaram pela educação fora da escola ensinando seus filhos em locadoras de filmes e museus. e) o bullying está entre as principais causas que têm levado muitos norte-americanos a tirarem seus filhos da escola e educarem-nos em casa.
As questões 6 e 7 referem-se ao texto abaixo.
If a forbidden doughnut is tempting you to break your diet, tell yourself you'll have a bite later — just don't specify when. That strategy makes it less likely you'll go on a doughnut-eating spree , according to new research presented last week at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. Unlike simply delaying gratification ("I'll wait until dessert"), promising yourself a temptation at a nebulous later date can actually decrease the amount of your ultimate consumption of that temptation.
Adapted from http://todayhealth.today.msnbc.msn.com/
Statistics is an imperialist discipline that can be applied to almost any area of science or life, and this litany of applications is intended to be the unifying thread that sews the book into a coherent whole. It does so, but at the cost of giving it a list-like, formulaic feel. More successful are McGrayne’s vivifying sketches of the statisticians who devoted themselves to Bayesian polemics and counterpolemics. As McGrayne amply shows, orthodox Bayesians have long been opposed, sometimes vehemently, by so-called frequentists, who have objected to their tolerance for subjectivity. The nub of the differences between them is that for Bayesians the prior can be a subjective expression of the degree of belief in a hypothesis, even one about a unique event or one that has as yet never occurred. For frequentists the prior must have a more objective foundation; ideally that is the relative frequency of events in repeatable, well-defined experiments. McGrayne’s statisticians exhibit many differences, and she cites the quip that you can nevertheless always tell them apart by their posteriors, a good word on which to end.
(Fonte omitida propositalmente)
c) engenhosa, aferir e destinada. d) inteligente, acessar e proposta. e) habilidosa, analisar e escolhida.
As questões 14 e 15 referem-se ao texto abaixo.
Adapted from http://bose.res.in/Advertisement_BoseTest2012.jpg
A questão 17 refere-se à sentença a seguir.
What we are seeing increasingly is a society of private affluence and public squalor.
As questões de 18 a 20 devem ser respondidas baseadas no seguinte texto.
Looking for love? Formula isn't online, report says
By Rita Rubin
If you’re bemoaning the lack of a Valentine, chances are you’ve turned to what seem like a gazillion dating websites for help. Buyer beware, though, caution a team of psychologists who’ve just published a lengthy report about online dating, now a billion-dollar industry. “There are sites that will tell you, ‘based on decades of scientific research and basic math, we can find your compatible mate for you,’” says lead author Eli Finkel, an associate professor of social psychology at
Northwestern University. “That’s a pretty tantalizing offer.” The problem, Finkel says, is that these websites have no scientific evidence to back up their claims that they can find your soulmate. Well of course they don’t. Science and romance go together like Demi and Ashton, right? Actually, Finkel says, scientists have been studying relationships for 80 years or so. And one thing is clear: It’s impossible to determine that two people have what it takes to maintain a long-term relationship before they’ve even met. Research has shown that three types of information are needed to predict whether a couple will fall in love and stay in love, Finkel says. One is demographics. It helps if a potential mate is age – and geographically appropriate. A second, says Finkel: “What are the actual dynamics between two people who have met?” And last, “What are the life circumstances that affect the couple?” Finkel says. “There’s no way they could possibly know that a hurricane or a cancer diagnosis or a sexy coworker is around the corner.” Probably the best-known matchmaking website is eHarmony.com, which charges $59.95 for a month’s subscription. eHarmony asks clients approximately 250 questions about 29 “dimensions of compatibility,” ranging from conflict resolution to kindness to ambition. eHarmony’s “matching algorithm” is proprietary, so the company did not share it with Finkel and his coauthors. In a statement, spokeswoman Becky Teraoka said the proof of eHarmony’s success is in the numbers. On average, she said, 542 people marry in the U.S. each day as a result of being matched on eHarmony, according to a 2009 study conducted for the website by Harris Interactive. “eHarmony’s matching system is based on years of empirical and clinical research on married couples,” Teraoka said. “As part of this work, we have studied what aspects of personality, values and interest, and how pairs match on them, are most predictive of relationship satisfaction.” Finkel isn’t convinced. Speed-dating, which he’s also studied, can tell prospective mates more about __________ than profiles from a website, he says. “The human mind was built to size people up pretty quickly. The human mind was not built to browse a profile and figure out whether somebody is compatible.” If you’re looking for love online, Finkel says, your best bet is to save your money and stick with the less- expensive websites in which you browse profiles, as opposed to those that try to make matches for you. But, warns Finkel, who met his wife the old- fashioned way through a fix-up arranged by their grandmothers, “get offline fairly quickly, because you’re
Answers 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 D B A E A C D C B E 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 D E C A D B A B A E
Créditos Realização: Prof. Jefferson Celestino Organização: Júlio Sousa Email: [email protected]