Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas


Sistema Comunicação - trellis coded modulation, Provas de Engenharia Elétrica

Arquivos Diversos

Tipologia: Provas

Antes de 2010

Compartilhado em 09/11/2009

volnei-junior-12
volnei-junior-12 🇧🇷

4.7

(43)

293 documentos

1 / 38

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
1
Trellis-Coded Modulation [TCM]
Limitations of conventional block and convolutional codes on
bandlimited channels
Basic principles of trellis coding: state, trellis, and set partitioning
Coding gain with trellis codes
System mechanization: application of the Viterbi Algorithm for
decoding
Systems issues
Applications to wired and wireless channels
Advanced concepts: multi-dimensional trellis codes
Three aspects of TCM [or any code]
Design the code
Determine the performance of the code (coding gain)
Mechanize the encoder and decoder (Viterbi Algorithm
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe Sistema Comunicação - trellis coded modulation e outras Provas em PDF para Engenharia Elétrica, somente na Docsity!

Trellis-Coded Modulation [TCM]

  • Limitations of conventional block and convolutional codes on

bandlimited channels

  • Basic principles of trellis coding: state, trellis, and set partitioning
  • Coding gain with trellis codes
  • System mechanization: application of the Viterbi Algorithm for

decoding

  • Systems issues
  • Applications to wired and wireless channels
  • Advanced concepts: multi-dimensional trellis codes
  • Three aspects of TCM [or any code]
    • Design the code
    • Determine the performance of the code (coding gain)
    • Mechanize the encoder and decoder (Viterbi Algorithm

Classic Coding

  • Information theory tells us that for optimal communications we should design

long sequences of signals, with maximum separation among them; and at the

receiver we should perform decision making over such long signals rather than

individual bits or symbols.

  • If this process is done properly, then the message error probability will

decrease exponentially with sequence length, n

provided that the rate R is less than R 0 , which in turn is less than the Shannon

Capacity.

  • This is the idea behind coding. In conventional coding, the coding is separate

from modulation. Coding occurs at the digital level, before modulation and

generally involves adding bits to the input sequence. The resultant redundancy

requires added bandwidth.

  • At the receiver, hard decoding occurs after demodulation. The decoding

operation is based on hard decisions, since a digital bit (or symbol) stream fees

the decoder and is either in error or not. Decoding can also be done based on

the analog received samples, and this is called soft decoding. The theoretical

loss due to hard [vs soft] decoding leads to a ~2dB performance loss.

R R n Pe Ke

−( 0 − ) <

Trellis Coded Modulation

  • The key idea is that the operations of [baseband] modulation and coding are

combined.

  • The bandwidth is not expanded: same symbol rate, but redundancy is

introduced by using a constellation with more points than would be required

without coding.

  • Typically, the number of points is doubled
  • The symbol rate is unchanged
  • The power spectrum is unchanged
  • Since there are more possible points per symbol, it may appear that the error

probability would increase for a given S/N.

  • As in conventional coding, dependencies are introduced among different

symbols ---only certain sequences of successive constellation points are

allowed.

  • By properly making use of these constraints during reception, the error

probability actually decreases.

  • A measure of performance improvement is the coding gain , which is the

difference is S/N between a coded and uncoded system of the same

information rate that produces the same error probability.

History of Trellis-Coded Modulation

Rotationally Invariant TCM with M-PSK 1988

TCM with Built-In Time Diversity 1988 - 1990

TCM with Tomlinson Precoder 1990 - 1991

TCM with Unequal Error Protection 1990

Multilevel Coding with TCM 1992 - 1993

Concatenated Coding with TCM 1993 - present

Multidimensional TCM 1984 - 1985

Rotationally Invariant TCM 1983

Ungerboeck Invented TCM 1976

  • Satellite Communications - Wireless Communications Trials - Digital Subscriber Loops - HDTV - Broadcast Channels - Satellite Communications - HDTV - CATV - DBS - Digital Subscriber Loops
  • Voiceband Modems up to 14.4 Kbps
  • Voiceband Modems up to 33.4 Kbps

Trellis Coding---the basics

  • It can be shown for the Gaussian channel that there is an input discrete

alphabet that has capacity very close to the capacity with continuous

inputs

  • As shown on the next chart, an eight- level system can achieve a

capacity of 2 bits/symbol

  • This suggests that it is only necessary to double the signal

constellation to get good coding gains (increasing the signal alphabet

will not improve the coding gain)

  • Note that at about 19 dB we can achieve with a four-level

constellation

  • With coding, using an 8-level constellation we can theoretically

transmit 2 bits/symbol error free down to about 13dB

  • Hence using coded modulation we could gain as much as 19-13 = 6 dB
  • The bandwidth has not been expanded (same symbol rate)

10

Trellis Coding – The Basics

The Information Conveyed by a Real-Valued Discrete

time Channel with Additive Gaussian Noise

16-AM
8-AM
4-AM
2-AM

SNR (dB)

C (Bits/Symbol) (^10) -

0.5 log 2 (1+ββ/σσ^2 ) 10 -

Uncoded

Shannon Capacity

Trellis Coding ---QAM modulation

  • Given a channel with a bandwidth limitation, first determine the maximum symbol rate that can be transmitted.
  • Determine the size of the alphabet, , that is needed to produce the desired bit rate.
  • Double the size of the constellation and introduce a channel coder that produces one extra bit
  • The coder need not code all the incoming bits
  • There are many ways to map the coded bits into symbols. The choice of mapping will drastically affect the performance of the code.
  • Ungerboeck produced a good heuristic technique called mapping by set partitioning
    • The encoding philosophy is to first partition the larger constellation into smaller subsets
    • The Euclidean distance between sequences of signal points in different subsets is substantially increased (and may be on the order of the distance between points in the same subset)
    • Performance will be determined by the distance between sequences in different subsets.
  • Trellis coding produces a dramatic increase in the Euclidean (free) distance between sequences of signal points and the Viterbi Algorithm is used to detect the signal
  • Results also hold for 2-dimensional modulation

2^ L

2 L +^1

Trellis Coding Summary

  • Ungerboeck (1976) showed that for bandlimited channels substantial coding

gains could be achieved by convolutional coding of signal levels (rather than

coding of binary source levels)]

  • He joined modulation and coding to increase the Euclidean distance between

signal sequences

  • Called channel “trellis coding” because the sequence of states in the finite state

machine which encodes the signal levels follows a trajectory in a trellis of

possible trajectories

  • The larger Euclidean distance between signal sequences, the lower the error

rate, which for moderate to large SNR is

  • Codewords consist of modulated level sequences. Trellis coding uses dense

signal sets but restricts the sequences that can be used. This provides a gain in

minimun distance and the code imposes a time dependency on the allowed

signal sequences that allows the receiver to ride through “noise bursts” as it is

estimating the transmitted sequence.

  • Since the pulse shape and symbol rate are unchanged ---> no bandwidth

expansion

( / 2 ),where theaverage number ofsequencesat ,and ( ) x^2 /^2
Pe NfreeQ dfree Nfree dfree Q x e

13

Limitations of Conventional Coding Techniques for Bandlimited Channels

  • For the example uncoded 4-PSK and rate 2/3 coded 8-PSK system [same customer date rate] - if the uncoded system has a BER = 10 -5, the coded system will have an error rate at the demodulator output of worse than 10 -2. What sort of code is needed to make the 8-PSK system have a 10 -5^ decoded BER?
  • A t-error correcting code of block length n, with k information bits must satisfy the Hamming bound [see Weldon and Peterson]--- which provides a lower bound on the code block length
  • Suppose t=2 and k/n = R= 2/3 [as per our example] we find that n > 24.
  • With such a code we need a binary block length of 24 bits or eight 8-PSK symbols. Each of the symbols has an error rate of 10 -2. With Gray coding [ie, a symbol error --->one bit error], the code will correct two symbol errors.
  • An error will be made if 3 [or more] of the 8 symbols are in error, and the decoded BER
  • Thus relatively complex codes [n=24] are required and this code did not provide “gain.”
  • For a non-bandlimited channel the coded system has a DEMOD error rate of 10 -4^ and the BER is

∑^ ( )

=

− (^) ≥

t

i

n i

n k 0

2

8 2 3 5 3

− − ∗ ≈ ∗

8 -4 3 -

3 ∗(10^ ) ≈^10

So in a bandlimited channel can a simpler code can be used to achieve large coding gain?

14

Trellis Coded Modulation (Example continued)

  • Uncoded four phase d^2 = 2. Coded d^2 =?
  • Coded system uses 8-point constellation and the signal mapping shown below
  • Number of states = 2#SR’s^ = 4
  • Number of paths leaving node = 2# bits/symbol (user)
  • Tribit determines signal point
  • Each new dibit X 1 and X 2 causes a state transition, as well as generating an output

(shown are input dibit and output tribit)

∆∆ 0 = 2

3 ∆∆ 1 = 2 2

1

0 7

6

5

4 ∆ ∆ 0 = 2sin(ππ/8)

∆ ∆ 2 = 2

Four-point (uncoded) and eight-point (coded) signal constellations. Each has radius one, and thus an average signal power of unity

free

Encoder State Trellis

TCM does not protect parallel branches Receiver trellis strives to generate (i.e. “estimate”) the transmit path through the trellis

00

01

10

11

s 1 s 0 x 2 x 1 [ y 2 y 1 yo ]

00 10 01 11

00 10 01 11 01 11 00 10

01 11 00 10 n n + 1 time

[000] [100] [010] [110]

[010] [110] [000] [100] [001] [101] [011] [111]

[011] [111] [001] [101]

Trellis Encoding

  • The new state is a function of the current state and the input
  • Transitions are NOT possible between every state
  • Parallel branches, corresponding to the two paths associated with each

uncoded bit, represent points at at maximum separation in Euclidean distance

  • Branches emerging from and converging to a point have the next largest

separation

  • Each parallel pair represents a pair of points with a Euclidean Distance = 2
  • At each node the four arms entering have Euclidean distance
  • The minimum distance separation at the same node is

2

  1. 38 8

2 sin =

π

Basic Philosophy of TCM

  • Form an expanded constellation, with double the number of points
  • Partition that constellation into subsets. The points within each subset are far

apart in Euclidean distance, and are made to correspond to the uncoded bits.

  • The remaining bits determine the choice of the subset. Only certain sequences

of subsets are allowed. Typically, the allowed sequences correspond to a

simple convolutional code.

  • In order to keep the allowed sequences far apart, choose subsets that

correspond to branching in and out of each state to have maximum distance

separation.

  • At the receiver, we find the allowed sequence which is closest in Euclidean

distance to the received sequence of signals.

  • After the output sequence is decoded, the receiver decides between the

uncoded points based on the Euclidean distance to the nearest signal point ---

thus the distance between uncoded pairs and closest sequences should be ~ the

same.

Partitioning of 16-Point Constellation

The dmin between points in subsets is increased by at least a factor of 2 with each partitioning.

Note that this gain has to overcome the larger constellation power.

Partitioning of 16-Point Constellation

2

d 0

2 d 0

2 d 0

A B

a b c d